Question concerning a 302 Redirect
-
Hi!
I've already done some research on redirects, but I still have a question concerning a 302 redirect implemented at the homepage of a website.
The Website www.domainA.com has a 302 redirect to www.domainA.com/content/.... Also all subsequent pages have the /content/ directory in their URLs: e.g domainA.com/content/products
-
First thing I was wondering about, was the use of a redirect to a new site using an additional directory /content/... Why would anyone do this? Would it be enough to replace the 302 with a 301 redirect, or would you recommend to change the entire structure and eliminate this /content/ directory? The most logical structure would be www.domainA.com/products/.., and not www.domainA.com/content/products, right?
-
Second thing: Given that 302 means temporary redirect, what are the actual implications when redirecting from domainA.com to domainA.com/content? I've heard that 302 redirects don't pass linkjuice and are detrimental for the site's rankings... What are the actual implications concerning the example above (302 redirect from domainA.com to domainA.com/content ?
Would be great to get some advice about the first problem and maybe some insights about the second one concerning 302s in general.
Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
Chris
-
-
That's fine, I think in that case, they didn't really know why they did it, so it will certainly help them to know, that there's better options around.
Thanks again for your insights and time, you helped me a lot with that one!
Cheers,
Chris
-
I am in agreement with you Christoph.
I do not see any value in adding a "content" directory. From a user stand point, it is not helpful.
The only reason to have a /content directory is if there is a need for it on the server. Sometimes there is shared hosting involved or other considerations that I am not aware of, so I prefer not to criticize others for their choices without knowing all the facts that their decision was based upon.
-
Hi Ryan,
thanks for your reply and your view on this. I think I've already read the article by Matt Cutts, but as I've been working in SEA so far, the technical aspects of SEO are still the area where I have to catch up the most. But you've definitely helped me with that one
Coming back once again to the actual website, that I mentioned. Concerning the /content/ directory, you said that it would depend on the perspective. What I meant with "The most logical structure would be www.domainA.com/products/.., and not www.domainA.com/content/products, right?" was that the /content/ directory may be detrimental for the ranking of sub-pages, as subsequent pages, which are lower in the hierarchy like domainA.com/content/products/shoes would be one level deeper than if it was domainA/products/shoes. In the former case, the sub-page "Shoes" would be one click further away than in the latter. So for the sub-page "shoes" it would be "better" to be located one level up, right?
In the specific case, the homepage is permanently redirected from domainA.com to domainA.com/content/, but they did it with a 302 redirect.
So in this case it would be better to use a 301 or change the URL structure, so that no redirect is necesary (e.g: domainA.com/products/shoes). Would that be suitable options according to you?
-
There are many great pages written on this topic. An older but relevant article from Matt Cutts: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-advice-discussing-302-redirects/
In short, a 302 would only ever be used if the move was temporary. You are correct in that they do not pass a link's value. I would only use a 302 to resolve a temporary problem.
A 301 passes 90%+ of the link's value, but there is some loss. That is why you would prefer not to use it, especially if the move was temporary. Using multiple 301s in a chain can be especially bad for this reason.
First thing I was wondering about, was the use of a redirect to a new site using an additional directory /content/... Why would anyone do this?
There are some very good reasons. It sounds like they originally had the site located in the root directory of their web server, and did a re-organization of their file structure. Their site is now contained in the content directory. Perhaps they set up a new CMS which required this change.
The most logical structure would be www.domainA.com/products/.., and not www.domainA.com/content/products, right?
It depends on your perspective. For example, if you have a WordPress blog site or other CMS paired with forum software, then the wordpress site is often set up at the root domain. The forum software would be in a directory such as /forums or perhaps /content. If it was my site then the products would be located off the root directory as you suggest, but others could certainly offer it within the /content directory.
what are the actual implications when redirecting from domainA.com to domainA.com/content?
It depends. A well established site will often have a lot of link value for their home page. That value would be lost with the 302. There is nothing specifically detrimental per se. It is more of missed opportunities.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate content question
Hey Mozzers! I received a duplicate content notice from my Cycle7 Communications campaign today. I understand the concept of duplicate content, but none of the suggested fixes quite seems to fit. I have four pages with HubSpot forms embedded in them. (Only two of these pages have showed up so far in my campaign.) Each page contains a title (Content Marketing Consultation, Copywriting Consultation, etc), plus an embedded HubSpot form. The forms are all outwardly identical, but I use a separate form for each service that I offer. I’m not sure how to respond to this crawl issue: Using a 301 redirect doesn’t seem right, because each page/form combo is independent and serves a separate purpose. Using a rel=canonical link doesn’t seem right for the same reason that a 301 redirect doesn’t seem right. Using the Google Search Console URL Parameters tool is clearly contraindicated by Google’s documentation (I don’t have enough pages on my site). Is a meta robots noindex the best way to deal with duplicate content in this case? Thanks in advance for your help. AK
Technical SEO | | AndyKubrin0 -
301 Redirects a Year Later
I inherited the digital maintenance of a website that was relaunched a year ago. In looking at Google Analytics, organic search a year later is still down 33%. I fear they did not install 301 Redirects but can't really get a specific answer from them. Is it possible to install them a year later to help with Google indexing and get back some of the organic traffic?
Technical SEO | | stansamples0 -
I have a question about the impact of a root domain redirect on site-wide redirects and slugs.
I have a question about the impact (if any) of site-wide redirects for DNS/hosting change purposes. I am preparing to redirect the domain for a site I manage from https://siteImanage.com to https://www.siteImanage.com. Traffic to the site currently redirects in reverse, from https://www.siteImanage.com to https://siteImanage.com. Based on my research, I understand that making this change should not affect the site’s excellent SEO as long as my canonical tags are updated and a 301 redirect is in place. But I wanted to make sure there wasn’t a potential consequence of this switch I’m not considering. Because this redirect lives at the root of all the site’s slugs and existing redirects, will it technically produce a redirect chain or a redirect loop? If it does, is that problematic? Thanks for your input!
Technical SEO | | mollykathariner_ms0 -
Redirecting Canonical Hostnames
Hi, I want to rewrite all the url pages of "site.com" to "www.site.com". I read the moz redirection article and i concluded that this would be the best approach. RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.seomoz.org [NC]
Technical SEO | | bigrat95
RewriteRule (.*) http://www.seomoz.org/$1 [L,R=301]. But i recieved this error: Internal Server Error The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request. Please contact the server administrator, webmaster@localhost and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error. More information about this error may be available in the server error log. I tried this rewrite too... RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www. [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [L,R=301] It worked but it just rewriting my domain** "site.com"** and not all the subs "site.com/fr/example.php" to "www.site.com" Why it doesn't work properly, it seem to be easy... Could it be a hosting problem? Is there another way to do it? <address> </address> <address> </address> <address> </address> <address> </address>0 -
An Easy Question - Backlinks
Hi guys, I know this is an easy question and I'm already quite sure of the answer for it but it would be good to get some other views. This website - http://www.collapso.net/ have 261,923 backlinks to our website according to Ahrefs. They have 1000's of pages like this - http://www.collapso.net/countiesnew/Cork.html which link to our site. 43.95% of the backlinks to our site are from these guys but we've been fortunate enough to never receive any warnings via WMT or ever experienced drop offs in traffic. My question is - Do we have this site remove all the links to our site or leave them alone? Given there's such a large quantity of links, I'm not exactly sure what the impact would be on us. My instinct says get rid of them. Although part of me questions what such a massive drop in our link profile would look like to Google.
Technical SEO | | MarkScully0 -
301 Redirecting weird URLs with % in them
I've been working on redirecting links reported as 404 in Google webmaster tools. I've stumbled upon 41 URLs that Google is reporting as 404 that include a '%' in the URL, but I don't know how to redirect. Here is an example: URL: bond_information.htm%20Surety%20Bond%20Information,%20with%20FAQ Attempted redirect: redirect 301 /bond_information.htm%20Surety%20Bond%20Information,%20with%20FAQ http://www.mysite.com/ Unfortunately, after implementing the redirect, http://www.mysite.com/bond_information.htm%20Surety%20Bond%20Information,%20with%20FAQ still resolves a 404 error. Anyone successfully fix these errors using Apache .htaccess?
Technical SEO | | TheDude0 -
Can I do a redirect to a new domain name only a couple of weeks after having redirected to another domain?
I have a client with two website with very similar content. Both had a lot of inbound links and performed fairly well in SERPS. We recently combined both sites and have redirected one of the domains to the other. The traffic dipped slightly initially, but is recovering nicely. Now the client registered a new domain name he would like to use for the site. Should I wait a few weeks for everything to settle down after the first redirect/consolidation of sites before doing a new redirect to a new domain name, or should I not worry about having any issues with doing it right away?
Technical SEO | | Drewco0