Aren't domain.com/page and domain.com/page/ the same thing?
-
Hi All,
A recent Moz scan has turned up quite a few duplicate content notifications, all of which have the same issue. For instance: domain.com/page and domain.com/page/ are listed as duplicates, but I was under the impression that these pages would, in fact, be the same page.
Is this even something to bother fixing or a fluke scan? If I should fix it does anyone know of an .htaccess modification that might be used?
Thanks!
-
Wow, thanks guys! This is indeed an enterprise level site, so especially thanks to CleverPhD for the breakdown on trailing slash v. no trailing slash. Redirecting as we speak.
-
You bet Jesse - thank you. I do work at the enterprise level and so it would make sense that this would become a bigger issue on larger sites. I would still say it could become an issue on smaller sites as people do tend to add the slash at the end and so you end up with a duplicate issue.
Full disclosure, I run sites due to legacy issues do not end with the slash. They run just fine. The key is to be consistent.
P
-
Interesting Clever, thanks for posting that. To be honest your points all make perfect sense. I've just never had that situation come up. To Frank's point, organization with or without slash doesn't matter much for smaller sites but as you said I can see how using the slash could make your analytics tracking much easier.
Perhaps it depends on the size of the site, but either way I hadn't thought of it in that detailed-a-manner and am glad you posted it.
Thanks as always !
-
As others have already mentioned, it is typically considered a separate page. Whether you choose with the slash or without is your preference. If a site is small I will typically opt for with/without the slash, but if a site is large and there are many different pages and the structure gets quite large I default to using the slash.
Not sure if the site you are mentioning is Wordpress based or not, if so there there are plugins that can help with this issue as well.
-
They are different and you need to setup 301s to correct, also check all your menus etc to make sure that you use them consistently - this includes in emails etc - consistency is the key.
You can go with slashes or no slashes, as long as you are consistent, I have run sites both ways.
I will disagree with Jesse one thing - I would strongly recommend using the ending slash. I have several reasons why.
-
The url ending in a slash traditionally represents a folder with pages/documents/images inside that folder. Used to be that we would use a URL like /folder/index.htm with index.htm being the default page. It used to be that if you did not designate any file as an index file, assuming the permissions on the folder were set correctly, you would see all the content in that folder. Later, you could designate a default index file and so when you left it blank by ending in a slash it would show the content of the default page without needing the index.htm to be included. Now this issue can cause duplicate content problems (but that is another story).
-
Knowing all that above, many of your web analytic and other reporting software would create reports using a given folder Google Analytics is a good one. If you use the conent drilldown tool, it automatically organizes your reports by looking at the slashes and then grouping pageviews and visits according to the folder structure.
3) Separately, you had development code that used the folder system in the url as a way to parse what the user wants and then deliver a page. This is why you can now have a url like /article/file and you do not need a .htm or .php or .html at the end as the server knows what to do with it without seeing the final extensions.
What happens then is that you end up with URLs like this
/toys/age6-8
/toys/age6-8/redball
/toys/age6-8/blueball
/toys/age9-10
/toys/age9-10/remote-car
/toys/age9-10/remote-control-train
You can see this is a toy store and they are grouping toys by age. Balls are better for younger children vs remote vehicles for older children. In your GA reporting, if you assume that a slash indicates a new folder
/toys/age6-8 would not be included in the report with the products as it would be seen as a page within the /toys/ folder. Same thing with /toys/age9-10
You have your most important page not grouped with all the products it contains.
This is one of the reasons that I prefer ending with the slash. Can you do it the other way, sure, but it just adds more hassle. The folder ending in a slash is a convention that most people follow and frankly, you will find that users also tend to end in a slash when they put in a url. You end up with links to your site where they have a slash and one is needed.
Old habits are hard to break and so this is why I recommend going with the ending slash.
-
-
As for the htaccess fix, a simple 301 redirect from one to the other will do it. I recommend going with the no-slash format.
-
Technically they are different URLs.
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/to-slash-or-not-to-slash.html
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why am I getting all these duplicate pages?
This is going for basically all my pages, but my website has 3 'duplicates' as the rest just have 2 (no index) Why are these 3 variations counting as duplicate pages? http://www.homepage.com http://homepage.com http://www.hompage.com/index.php
Moz Pro | | W2GITeam0 -
Can't figure out why some of my pages are duplicate content
Within the crawl diagnostics area I'm getting duplicate page content issues on several pages. I don't know why, would anyone be able to tell me how these links are duplicate so I can fix them? http://www.sagenews.ca/Column.asp?id=3010 http://www.sagenews.ca/Column.asp?id=2808 http://www.sagenews.ca/Column.asp?id=2998 http://www.sagenews.ca/Column.asp?id=2837 http://www.sagenews.ca/Column.asp?id=2981
Moz Pro | | INMCA0 -
What's the future of SERP Tracking? And... Is SEOMoz's SERP Rank Tracking in compliance with Google Adwords API Terms of Service?
My question is: Is SEOMoz's SERP Rank Tracking in compliance with Google Adwords API Terms of Service? Background: The reason I ask is because Raven Tools is now removing their SERP Reporting tool because it uses scraped Google position data. So, it looks like SEO's will either have to find a new rank tracking tool or find new ways to traffic the effects that rankings have on a website traffic volumes. For instance, there is a way to get the position a search results was in Google when it was clicked. We could create a secondary profile in Google Analytics for each client and use a custom filter to record the position that the keywords was in when the search result was clicked ( http://www.seomoz.org/blog/show-keyword-position-using-filters-and-advanced-segments ) Or perhaps we'll have to use Google Webmaster Tools' SEO Report to get data somehow ( http://support.google.com/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1308626 ) What are your thoughts on this? As you know, ranking data is still a great way to show clients if they are gaining or losing visibility in the search engines. It helps SEO's to report how effective their efforts have been. Because other ranking software companies uses Adwords API data to show the keyword search volume and advertiser competition of a keyword, they can not or eventually will not be able to use scraped ranking data any more. But, if another rank tracking tool out there doesn't need to be in compliance with the Adwords API TOS because they don't use that API to show search volume and advertiser competition, they can still technically provide their ranking data and not be violating any TOS, right? I'm just trying to understand the best way to continue reporting impact of organic keyword rankings on a website. Does the SEOMoz SERP Tracker comply with Adwords API? Is there another rank tracking tool out there that already is using Average Position data from the GWT SEO Report tool? Should we all just stop reporting rankings to clients altogether? Scott
Moz Pro | | OrionGroup2 -
Duplicate content pages
Crawl Diagnostics Summary shows around 15,000 duplicate content errors for one of my projects, It shows the list of pages with how many duplicate pages are there for each page. But i dont have a way of seeing what are the duplicate page URLs for a specific page without clicking on each page link and checking them manually which is gonna take forever to sort. When i export the list as CSV, duplicate_page_content column doest show any data. Can anyone please advice on this please. Thanks <colgroup><col width="1096"></colgroup>
Moz Pro | | nam2
| duplicate_page_content |1 -
Too many on-page links
one of my SEOmoz pro campaigns has given me the warning: Too many on-page links and the page in question is my html sitemap. How do i resolve this because I obviously need my sitemap. How do i get around this?
Moz Pro | | CompleteOffice1 -
Juicy Link Finder doesn't support Hebrew utf8 input?!
Looks like the Juicy Link Finder isnt working good with hebrew characters, after typing the keyword in and refreshing the page first the keyword appers in ???????? (question marks) and second the finder works for ages w/o getting any results. thanks
Moz Pro | | maddogx0 -
Duplicate page content reports duplicates, but pages don't show duplication
My duplicate page reports shows 376 pages with duplicate content. After reviewing the pages the report claims have duplicate content, i can't find duplications. could this be an error, or is there some source code that doesn't display that could be causing this issue?
Moz Pro | | noonzie0