Aren't domain.com/page and domain.com/page/ the same thing?
-
Hi All,
A recent Moz scan has turned up quite a few duplicate content notifications, all of which have the same issue. For instance: domain.com/page and domain.com/page/ are listed as duplicates, but I was under the impression that these pages would, in fact, be the same page.
Is this even something to bother fixing or a fluke scan? If I should fix it does anyone know of an .htaccess modification that might be used?
Thanks!
-
Wow, thanks guys! This is indeed an enterprise level site, so especially thanks to CleverPhD for the breakdown on trailing slash v. no trailing slash. Redirecting as we speak.
-
You bet Jesse - thank you. I do work at the enterprise level and so it would make sense that this would become a bigger issue on larger sites. I would still say it could become an issue on smaller sites as people do tend to add the slash at the end and so you end up with a duplicate issue.
Full disclosure, I run sites due to legacy issues do not end with the slash. They run just fine. The key is to be consistent.
P
-
Interesting Clever, thanks for posting that. To be honest your points all make perfect sense. I've just never had that situation come up. To Frank's point, organization with or without slash doesn't matter much for smaller sites but as you said I can see how using the slash could make your analytics tracking much easier.
Perhaps it depends on the size of the site, but either way I hadn't thought of it in that detailed-a-manner and am glad you posted it.
Thanks as always !
-
As others have already mentioned, it is typically considered a separate page. Whether you choose with the slash or without is your preference. If a site is small I will typically opt for with/without the slash, but if a site is large and there are many different pages and the structure gets quite large I default to using the slash.
Not sure if the site you are mentioning is Wordpress based or not, if so there there are plugins that can help with this issue as well.
-
They are different and you need to setup 301s to correct, also check all your menus etc to make sure that you use them consistently - this includes in emails etc - consistency is the key.
You can go with slashes or no slashes, as long as you are consistent, I have run sites both ways.
I will disagree with Jesse one thing - I would strongly recommend using the ending slash. I have several reasons why.
-
The url ending in a slash traditionally represents a folder with pages/documents/images inside that folder. Used to be that we would use a URL like /folder/index.htm with index.htm being the default page. It used to be that if you did not designate any file as an index file, assuming the permissions on the folder were set correctly, you would see all the content in that folder. Later, you could designate a default index file and so when you left it blank by ending in a slash it would show the content of the default page without needing the index.htm to be included. Now this issue can cause duplicate content problems (but that is another story).
-
Knowing all that above, many of your web analytic and other reporting software would create reports using a given folder Google Analytics is a good one. If you use the conent drilldown tool, it automatically organizes your reports by looking at the slashes and then grouping pageviews and visits according to the folder structure.
3) Separately, you had development code that used the folder system in the url as a way to parse what the user wants and then deliver a page. This is why you can now have a url like /article/file and you do not need a .htm or .php or .html at the end as the server knows what to do with it without seeing the final extensions.
What happens then is that you end up with URLs like this
/toys/age6-8
/toys/age6-8/redball
/toys/age6-8/blueball
/toys/age9-10
/toys/age9-10/remote-car
/toys/age9-10/remote-control-train
You can see this is a toy store and they are grouping toys by age. Balls are better for younger children vs remote vehicles for older children. In your GA reporting, if you assume that a slash indicates a new folder
/toys/age6-8 would not be included in the report with the products as it would be seen as a page within the /toys/ folder. Same thing with /toys/age9-10
You have your most important page not grouped with all the products it contains.
This is one of the reasons that I prefer ending with the slash. Can you do it the other way, sure, but it just adds more hassle. The folder ending in a slash is a convention that most people follow and frankly, you will find that users also tend to end in a slash when they put in a url. You end up with links to your site where they have a slash and one is needed.
Old habits are hard to break and so this is why I recommend going with the ending slash.
-
-
As for the htaccess fix, a simple 301 redirect from one to the other will do it. I recommend going with the no-slash format.
-
Technically they are different URLs.
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/to-slash-or-not-to-slash.html
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is one page with long content better than multiple pages with shorter content?
(Note, the site links are from a sandbox site and has very low DA or PA) If you look at this page, you will see at the bottom a lengthy article detailing all of the properties of the product categories in the links above. http://www.aspensecurityfasteners.com/Screws-s/432.htm My question is, is there more SEO value in having the one long article in the general product category page, or in breaking up the content and moving the sub-topics as content to the more specific sub-category pages? e.g. http://www.aspensecurityfasteners.com/Screws-Button-Head-Socket-s/1579.htm
Moz Pro | | AspenFasteners
http://www.aspensecurityfasteners.com/Screws-Cap-Screws-s/331.htm
http://www.aspensecurityfasteners.com/Screws-Captive-Panel-Scre-s/1559.htm0 -
What to look for with Domain Authority?
Hi, Our site has fluctuated between 20 and 22 DA for six months, but today it jumped to 27. Is that a sign we are doing something right or is 5 points within the DA's fluctuations pretty standard? Thanks, Ruben
Moz Pro | | KempRugeLawGroup0 -
Page Ranking by URL / Keyword
Needing to know how to find out the page rank of a URL that is NOT within the top 50 or top 100. Need to know that specific page's rank, not what our overall site's ranking for the keyword is. Can't seem to find any tool that goes beyond the top 100. Any ideas?
Moz Pro | | leankit0 -
Why did I not get on page analysis
I signed up last Friday for a 30 day trial and was hoping to get the on page analysis so I could get cracking on it. Moz said the crawl was done but I have no info for on page analysis which I find really useful when I have used this before. Any ideas and are any of the MOZ moderators able to get the system to perform one so I can make changes tonight for the MOZ crawl again tomorrow? Thanks Paul
Moz Pro | | ptrobson0 -
Why my site page don't appeare in the ranking ?
why my site page don't appear in the ranking, which type of domain tracking should i choose to track all my site pages ( my site is a .blogspot.com ) ? when i check it i found that they appear in the first 30 results although seomoz saying they are not in the first 50 result !
Moz Pro | | AmrKamal0 -
On-Page Report Card Questions
First post here, a couple questions as I work through some of the SEOMOZ tool reporting, specifically the On-page Report Card. I've just received the report results yesterday, so working through the data now. There are two issues categorized as critical by the tool: (1) The grader is stating I don't have any instances of the target keyword in my page title, yet it's there. (The page title is too long, but I'm in the process of hacking the blog software to fix this, it's auto-generated by the CMS.) (2) It's also saying under "Broad Keyword Usage in Document" that I have zero instances of the keyword in the body text, and while I certainly don't have enough, there is at least one instance at the bottom of the blog post. All the text is contained with tags. (3) Related to #2, what's the difference between "Appropriate Keyword Usage in Document" under "High Importance Factors" and "Broad Keyword Usage in Document" under "Critical Factors"
Moz Pro | | webranger0 -
Why doesn't Open Site Explorer recognize the link from my twitter profile?
When I run a report on my competition I'm seeing their link show up in OSE's report under the "Linking Domains" tab, but when I put my site in there, it doesn't recognize my link from my twitter profile. Any ideas?
Moz Pro | | shawn811 -
Duplicate page content reports duplicates, but pages don't show duplication
My duplicate page reports shows 376 pages with duplicate content. After reviewing the pages the report claims have duplicate content, i can't find duplications. could this be an error, or is there some source code that doesn't display that could be causing this issue?
Moz Pro | | noonzie0