CSS Float Top Left Image not displaying
-
Using CSS/HTML in Dreamweaver CC, I am trying to display a SEO friendly matrix of six images wide by three deep on the Home Page, but cannot get the first (top left) image to display consistently.
The page appears correctly in Dreamweaver Design View, but not in the Live View. Equally it works fine in Safari, but not in Firefox nor I.E.
I seem to have tried every CSS variation to resolve this issue, without success. Can someone stear me in the right direction, please?
The relevant HTML Code ...
Celotex PL4050 - 62.5mm insulated wallboard from £11.96 per m² / £34.45 per board
SuperFoil SF19 40mm Multi-foil Roll from £5.23 per m² / £98.00 per 18.75 m² Roll
Celotex GA4000 General application Rigid PIR from £8.56 per m² / £24.66 per board
Rockwool Full-fill 75mm Cavity Wall Slabs from £3.51 per m² / £1.92 per slab
Knauf Earthwool 270mm Loft Roll 44 Combi-Cut from £3.80 per m² / £22.51 per 9.93 m² Roll
Kingspan Kooltherm K8 75mm Cavity Wall Boards from £16.26 per m² / £8.79 per board
Knauf Earthwool 170mm Combi-cut Loft Roll 44 from £3.16 per m² / £25.34 per 8 m² Roll
Kingspan Kooltherm K7 Rigid Phenolic Foam - 75mm £13.91 per m² / £40.05 per board
...
The associated CSS code ...
#popular {
width: 1050px;
height: 800px;
overflow: hidden;
width: auto;
height: auto;
}
#product1 {
background-image: url(../007-graphics/popular/01-prod.png);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
width: 150px;
height: 265px;
margin-left: 24px;
float: left;
overflow: auto;
clear: left;
}
#product2 {
background-image: url(../007-graphics/popular/02-prod.png);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
width: 150px;
height: 265px;
margin-left: 10px;
float: left;
opacity: 0.85;
}
#product3 {
background-image: url(../007-graphics/popular/03-prod.png);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
width: 150px;
height: 265px;
margin-left: 10px;
float: left;
max-height: 275px;
opacity: 0.85;
}
#product4 {
background-image: url(../007-graphics/popular/04-prod.png);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
width: 150px;
height: 265px;
margin-left: 10px;
float: left;
max-height: 275px;
}
#product5 {
background-image: url(../007-graphics/popular/05-prod.png);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
width: 150px;
height: 265px;
margin-left: 10px;
float: left;
max-height: 275px;
opacity: 0.85;
}
#product6 {
background-image: url(../007-graphics/popular/06-prod.png);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
width: 150px;
height: 265px;
margin-left: 10px;
float: left;
max-height: 275px;
opacity: 0.85;
}
#product7 {
clear: both;
background-image: url(../007-graphics/popular/07-prod.png);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
width: 150px;
height: 265px;
margin-left: 24px;
float: left;
max-height: 275px;
opacity: 0.85;
}
#product8 {
background-image: url(../007-graphics/popular/08-prod.png);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
width: 150px;
height: 265px;
margin-left: 10px;
float: left;
max-height: 275px;
}
#product9 {
background-image: url(../007-graphics/popular/09-prod.png);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
width: 150px;
height: 265px;
margin-left: 10px;
float: left;
max-height: 275px;
opacity: 0.85;
} ...The complete code is located at - www.just-insulation.com/index.html
-
G'day Jesse,
I have added the following code to my .htaccess file ...
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^[A-Z]{3,9}\ /.index.html\ HTTP/
RewriteRule ^(.)index.html$ http://www.just-insulation.com/$1 [R=301,L]All attempts to add a similar code to redirect in the other direction results in the home page not loading, or the creation of an infinite loop.
Open Site Explorer still returns ...
www.just-insulation.com a PA of 32 and
www.just-insulation.com/index.html a PA of 15The thought of all this lost link juice is making me really thirsty.
-
Yes exactly. Assuming you're on an Apache server, of course.
Just to clarify, I ran both URLs through Open Site Explorer and sure enough two different Page Authorities returned:
www.just-insulation.com has a PA of 32
www.just-insulation.com/index.html has a PA of 15
Showing that in fact your link juice is splitting there when ideally you will want it combined.
-
Should I understand that you are proposing that I use the .htaccess file to create a server side redirect?
-
No problem.
While it is good you have the canonical tag present, you should still redirect one to the other. The canonical tag will prevent any duplicate content issues with your site so at least you don't have to worry about that. But not redirecting can still have some unwanted effects on your page.
Basically it can split your PR/PA between two URLs. If somebody links to yourdomain.com and another somebody links to yourdomain.com/index.html these two links are now receiving juice separately. The canonical tag does not carry link juice. That is why you want to 301 the index.html page to your root domain. Your hosting provider should be able to do this easily for you, or go ahead and google it if you have your own server. (the process changes based on whether you're hosting via Apache servers or IIS servers.)
I would still focus on getting that redirected. It'll save you headaches in the future.
Good luck!
-
Thanks again for your input, Jesse.
Your 301 Redirect has me worried. We presently have the canonical statement on our home page ... - and thought that this was the correct way to prioritise http://www.just-insulation.com over http://www.just-insulation.com/index.com . Also, the weekly Moz Campaign Crawl Diagnostics is not showing any errors. Can you elaborate on the best method to resolve this issue?
I continue to search for an appropriate SEO friendly Add-in that will allow me to frequently change the front page images / hyperlinks / descriptions / etcetera. However, I certainly do take your advice on board.
Many thanks.
-
Bravo, sir! May I make one more SEO related quick-suggestion:
Make sure you redirect your page with a 301 to avoid duplicate content. Right now you have two addresses (www.domain.com and www.domain.com/index.html) displaying the same content. These will both be indexed and should be redirected.
Also from a usability standpoint I feel like the images should be clickable... But there are a ton of these little nit-picky changes I'll leave to you
You might be kind of shooting yourself in the foot with the whole image name thing. You don't have alt tags or image names and that can affect your on-site optimization. However you won't rank for every product on one page anyway so in your case it might not matter terribly. Still I'd raise an eyebrow if it were my page..
Anyway good luck!
-
Greetings Jesse,
Thanks for the feedback. It seems that once I removed the drop shadows from the images, the situation resolved itself. Clearly there was a sizing issue with one or more of the images that was throwing the CSS float out of kilter.
The reason that I named the images prod-1, prod-2, prod-3, was to semi-automate future image changes. As these are background images, populated through CSS, rather then HTML, I understood that they had no influence on SEO.
Sorry about your headache, and 'Yes', you were quite right that the 'Happy Monkey' font was totally over the top! That came about because of my mistake in the CSS Links, and has since been resolved.
I have been trying to identify a jQuery Gallery or Lightbox to use instead of CSS, but without luck so far.
Again, my thanks for your critique.
-
Hi there Maximise,
Thank you for the advice. The problem is now solved thanks to the responses to my post.
It seems, that (following Jesse's critique) when I removed the drop shadows from the images, the situation resolved itself. I can only imagine that the Drop Shadows were effecting the image size, and this impacted upon the CSS Float mechanism.
Anyway, thanks again.
-
Thanks!
It relates to elements that are floated. Options are left, right, both or none. So if you have "clear:left" then this element can not have any floated elements to it's left and would therefore be bumped to the next line.
-
Ha! Yeah that'll do it. Nicely done Maximise.
As a side, what does the clear: operator do in CSS?
-
The product 1 image doesn't seem to exist. Are you sure you don't have it cached in some browsers? Follow this link and press F5 to see if it loads - it doesn't for me.
http://www.just-insulation.com/007-graphics/popular/01-prod.png
-
Couple things here --
First off I'm not sure you'll get the best coding advice here on the moz forums.. Although I know there are some people here who are good at it for sure. You may be better off with these types of questions at stackoverflow.com (just a thought)
Moz will give you awesome marketing/optimization tips though. For example, I might say to you "hey why are your images titled '09-prod.png' that isn't doing anything for your optimization..." Or I might say "oof. No offense but that site kinda gives me a headache. See if you can make it less busy and scale that drop shadow down... Is that comic sans?? no."
But also to answer your question, my best bet would be that your first product definition in the CSS has a "clear:left" operator assigned to it. That is most likely why it is not displaying. Try removing that.
Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google image search filter tabs and how to rank on them
I have noticed Google image search has included suggestion tabs (e.g,. design, nature... when searching background) on the top of the image search.
Technical SEO | | Mike555
Are there specific meta tags I can add into my images so that my images will show up on each tab?
Do those filters just show content based on image keywords or something else? IRme7gQ0 -
Is Base64 encoding images in general better for SEO or worse?
We've made a lot of changes to our website (https://refreshcartridges.co.uk/) over the years, with our website developer putting a heavy emphasis on improving page loading times in general. One of the those changes has been to base64 encode or in-line the majority of images on our site which has reduced our loading times down to under a second for most of our pages for our visitors which are mainly based in the UK. My question is whether in-lining the images, thus removing the images filenames for index association results in this technique being a net-good or net-bad for our sites SEO in general, particularly on our frontpage.
Technical SEO | | ChrisHolgate0 -
Image Search / sudden drop in traffic
One of our sites in Germany had a very sudden drop in traffic (starting Oct. 7th). The site gets most of it's organic traffic from Image Search. Checking in Search Console revealed that search volume for keywords increased in that period our average position is stable our click rate dropped dramatically (we double checked - searching the keyword in "anonymous mode" still showed our results for main keywords in top image positions (first 2 rows)). As an example (see attached screencopy) - keyword had clickrate of 1% (average) - dan dropped to 0.06% while the position remained stable. Germany is still using the "old" version of image search (unlike the rest of the world) - which gives the site preview rather than just the image slider when you click on a result in image search. Our first thought that this was changed - but it seems that it didn't change. Ideas what might cause this dramatic drop in click%? There have been no major technical modifications on the site for the last 2 months. thanks, Dirk GjlV8CW.jpg
Technical SEO | | DirkC0 -
Using images from one domain on another?
I run a travel photography business where I sell fine art prints. I've been toying with the idea of creating a few new websites about some of the places I've traveled to. This is for a few reasons. First, because I love talking about my travels. But second, because I feel like it might be a good way to bring in more print sales from those places. The question I have, if I were to use the images from my main photography sales domain on a different domain, how does this affect SEO? These images filenames for the photographs are already optimized well for searching. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | shannmg10 -
How would I make an image sitemap for a site with 50k images?
Is it worth creating an image sitemap? I read an image sitemap can only have 1k entries would I need to make 50 different ones?
Technical SEO | | EcommerceSite0 -
Have done everything for my site but not yet ranking in top 10 of critical keywords
I have conducted some highly technical SEO such as Link building, Social Media Promotion, On-page technical SEO, High quality Content, Superb Site architecture, responsive theme for good user experience, keyword analysis, title tags, description tags,etc. But currently not yet ranking even in top 5 of my critical keyword "Bulk sms kenya" or "bulk sms in kenya", my site is at http://goo.gl/X9vaLT am based in Nairobi, Kenya. Any advise, tips etc? As especially the keyword is not that highly competitive with a Difficulty Score of only 24%, what might I be missing?
Technical SEO | | ConnectMedia0 -
Image Impression Drop
On August 8th we started to see our Image Impressions in Google Webmaster Tools start to plummet. Has anyone else run into this issue? I have not been able to find any news on Google Algos which my have caused this. Any other ideas what could have caused this? jxPmLwO
Technical SEO | | joebuilder0 -
CSS Hiding Text - Does this matter to search engine crawlers
Hello, I'm working on a site and a developer is using CSS to mask crawlable links below. Then, java, advanced search links go on top of this. So, if you disable Java, but have CSS enabled, you don't have a lefthand nav. With both CSS and Java disabled you have a fully crawlable website. Is this a red flag? I understand a user without java would have a problem since most people don't disable CSS. But, is this a problem for search crawlers? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | Blenny0