Link Detox or I can use Open Site Explorer for tracking down bad links?
-
Here's the thing. I need to find bad external links pointing to my site. Is Link Detox the only option or I can actually use Open Site Explorer for that. If OSE is an option, please give me an idea how I need to go about it. Thanks.
-
Recognize that there are three major types of "bad" backlinks that you need to look for:
- sitewides
- over-optimized anchor text
- links from really stinky places
Link Detox is great--I use it all the time to diagnose penalty issues. BUT it only really helps with links from spammy domains--it won't help you spot over-optimized anchor text. I use OSE's anchor text tab to do that.
To spot sitewides, you'll probably want to download the entire backlink profile from OSE into a spreadsheet, then sort by domain, and look for massive blocks of links from the same domain.
-
Also a fan of Link Detox as I just used it and agree it found links OSE did not. After determining the links I wanted to target for removal, I used RMOOV for an email campaign and Disavow list. RMOOV is a really slick tool to contact webmasters and create a record in the form of a Google Docs spreadsheet of your efforts. This could be sent to the Google Web Spam team for support in a reconsideration request. Both tools make this process much simpler than some of the manual methods I've seen described here. Now I'm waiting to be forgiven!
-
I'll second what Tom said. I used Link Detox's $50 for two audits plan a few times and it worked great. I even screwed up the first run by having some settings wrong, emailed their Help Desk, and they re-credited me the botched run.
If you already have collected a list of backlinks from other sources (Moz, Google or Bing Webmaster Tools, Ahref, Majestic, etc) you can also append that list to your audit. Link Detox finds most links anyways, but appending your own list makes it VERY complete.
They even have a feature where later you can append your Disavow file and the Link Detox system marks any matches so you don't have to keep reviewing those bad links. I keep hoping that MOZ and other analysis programs will add a feature where we can append our Disavow file so our link-based statistics will match what Google sees when they factor in the Disavow file.
-
Hi Vince
You can certainly use OSE, but it will be more of a manual process on your end. You'd need to go into the links in the OSE report for yourself, possibly starting with those with low PA/DA scores or exact match anchor text, and then making your own judgement on whether the link is bad or not.
With Link Detox, it runs through your backlink profile (it's a bit more thorough than OSE as well I've found) and then classifies the links for you, in terms of "health". You should always check a few of the results yourself to see if you agree, but it's usually pretty accurate in its diagnosis.
With OSE, you don't get that automatic diagnosis, so Link Detox is pretty unique in that case. If you haven't spotted it, you can pay a one off fee of €50 to run 2 audits - just follow this link. There's no contract with this plan so you can test it and see if you like it. Usually much more cost efficient for individual sites.
Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why does the MOZ bar not work on SERPs with site links?
Maybe a dumb question (am a beginner), but MOZ bar shows no information on SERP results with site links? I'm sure there's a reason? What is it?
Getting Started | | RionHaber0 -
Can someone tell me where the page is that had links to the 3 SEO study guides on here?
Can someone tell me where the page is that had links to the 3 SEO study guides on here?
Getting Started | | Connect4Web0 -
I would like to know why there are no links found, but there are about 300 links detected with other tools?
Our site gets, when scanned with MOZ tools no links detected. <a href="https://produktion.semodu.com">semodu.com</a> Does someone know why?
Getting Started | | SEMODU0 -
Where can I find the list of all the question I've asked here?
In my profile I see only the comments, I'd like to keep track also of my questions
Getting Started | | 2mlab0 -
I am having trouble using tools. Please help.
Hi, I have been using Moz tools like keyword, site explorere. And the results have all these big words in the column that confuse me. In other words, I don't know how to translate the results and understand what the results mean. Is there an easy guide on how to use the tools. Also, once I understand the results, Is there a way to come up with rough estimate on what it takes to rank my site for certain keywords. Is there a step by step or easy guide to become productive after using those tools? I have been through introductory videos and read some material like beginning SEO etc. But having hard time using the tool? Is it just me and every one is blazing with Moz tool?
Getting Started | | zsyed0 -
I can't add Google+
I just signed up for the beta analytics, when trying to add our CEO Google plus it asks to create a new G+ profile? Why can't I add her Google + without creating a new one?
Getting Started | | KatherineKotaw0 -
Mozbar highlight links in firefox
I use Mozbar to check for nofollow links on any website. Recently I changed from Chrome to Firefox and it appears that the link highlight function is behaving different on the latter.
Getting Started | | Trbl
On a page with nofollow in the robot.txt links are highlighted both when selecting nofollowed (pink) and followed (green) links. In Chrome it used to highlight only the nofollow links (as is correct in this case) Did anyone notice this behaviour too? Seems like a bug.0