Help with Roger finding phantom links
-
It Monday and Roger has done another crawl and now I have a couple of issues:
- I have two pages showing 404->302 or 500 because these links do not exist. I have to fix the 500 but the 404 is trapped correctly.
http://www.oznappies.com/nappies.faq & http://www.oznappies.com/store/value-packs/\
The issue is when I do a site scan there is no anchor text that contains these links. So, what I would like to find out is where is Roger finding them. I cannot see any where in the Crawl Report that tells me where the origin of these links is.
- I also created a blog on Tumblr and now every tag and rss feed entry is producing a duplicate content error in the crawl stats. I cannot see anywhere in Tumblr to fix this issue.
Any Ideas?
-
Thanks again Ryan, you have been very helpful answering al lot of my questions.
-
Someone else asked the same question regarding tag pages yesterday. I would suggest asking a separate Q&A on that topic.
Tag pages & forum category pages are both often used as containers. They don't have any content except links to articles. I would ask for feedback as to the best practice. I suspect noindex, following those pages would be best, but I don't have the experience to feel comfortable offering that advice.
-
I have been looking at the data that Roger is reporting for the duplicate content and in ALL cases there is either a 301 or a NoIndex. So now I do not know why Roger is reporting them as a duplicate, robots should not see the second entry.
-
I did not think of looking at the csv report. I see it now thanks Ryan. There should be a soft 404 handler in place to process the bad urls, I will have to see why it is not working.
With tumblr, I was looking for an easy way to add a blog to the site.
The RSS is coming from tumblr as is all the content.
When we specify Tags in tumblr it creates urls e.g. mypage.com/article/tag1 mypage.com/article/tag2 mypage.com/article/tag3 which all contain the content of mypage.com/article with out a canonical to the original. It is a really strange non-seo friendly approach, and so I wondered if anyone had similar problems.
-
The crawl report offers a "referrer" field. That field offers where Roger found the offending link. In my experience that field has always been accurate.
When I try to access www.oznappies.com/faq I receive a 302 redirect and a 500 error. I would recommend adjusting non-existant pages to a soft 404 page. Still provide a 404 response to browsers, but offer users a friendly way to find information (i.e. links / search) and stay on your site.
A great example of a soft 404 page is http://www.orangecoat.com/a-404-page.html
For the Tumblr issue, I am not clear on the problem. Are you writing content and publishing on both the oznappies.com site and your tumblr site? Then this content is being published again on your site via a RSS import?
-
I removed the links and just left the text so these will cut and paste now. It confuses me where Roger found the links.
Thanks for running the Xenu scan. I have tried other site scanner and come up blank.
-
That second link is anchored to the wrong place.
Regardless I also cannot find the .faq page. I just ran Xenu over it to see what it could find, but no broken links showed up.
Afraid I don't use Tumblr either, so eh, pretty useless post. Sorry.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Site Explorer shows links as followable but they have nofollow tags
Hello, I am looking at site explorer and sites linking to my site moneyfact.co.uk. I've got thousands of links showing as 'followable' but when i check them they have rel="nofollow" tags. e.g: http://www.dianomioffers.co.uk/partner/moneyfacts.co.uk/brochures.epl?partner=93&partner_id=93&partner_variant_id=33 Why would they show as followable when the links are nofollowed? Thanks Steve
Moz Pro | | SteveBrumpton0 -
Find ClickBank Affiliates
Hey everyone, just a quick question. I am interested in using the Open Site Explorer tool to find ClickBank affiliates (advertisers not merchants) for current ClickBank products. Is there a way to do this? What I have been doing: 1.) Run an inbound link search for current products 2.) Manually go through all the back links and pull links that could be from affiliate sites (and delete those that look like links from directories). Thoughts? Thanks!
Moz Pro | | goproworkouts0 -
Does SEOmoz have a tool to find mirror sites?
I heard from a company that is trying to get my clients SEO business that they discovered multiple sites mirroring our site's content. Does SEOmoz have a tool to find these websites? Or does Google?
Moz Pro | | thomas.wittine0 -
Is there a tool that tracks and records your links to your site
What I mean by this is we have a linkbuilder working for us and I'm looking for to record there progress with link building I've seen somthing in Majestic but is there one in SEOMOZ All teh best Steve
Moz Pro | | ibexinternet0 -
Canonical link on canonical url
This might seem a bit of an odd one, but we seem to be going around in circles on this when using the on page optimizer tool. We have an ecommerce site (magento) which by default is putting a canonical link in the header on every product page. For example; www.example.com/product1.html has the But when we run the on page optimiser tool, we're losing points on the critical section for not having canonical set correctly. If we remove the tag, we get the tick and the a grade, but then further down the report we lose a tick for not using canonical links. What are we missing here?
Moz Pro | | andyjsi0 -
Linking Building: Do I have to beat Linking Root Domains or Total Links?
Hello, When skoping for how to beat competitors, do I need to aim to beat the linking root domains number or the total links? Or do I need to think about both? Thanks!
Moz Pro | | BobGW0 -
Quantity of Internal Followed Links
We compared our and competitor pages. And we have got next statistics: Internal Followed Links: 184 4,496 We are thinking about changing our shopping cart links format from /product_info.php?products_id=3547 to /product_name.html This should increase "number of our pages" and "number of links" from them.
Moz Pro | | ctam
But in case a description of products from the same category often is very similar. We worry about duplicating page content. Could you give any advice in that situation? Do Internal Links play a big role in page rank? Thanks. PS: at attached image you can find full page metrics from open site explorer. Our metrics are at left, competitors - right. BtTap.jpg0 -
Trying to understand how a website is getting higher than me with less links
Hi i am new to seo and trying to teach myself the best way to improve a site and the best way to use the tools on seomoz. The problem i have is. i am working on a page at the moment on a site. the page is called weight loss hypnotherapy http://www.clairehegarty.co.uk/weight-loss-hypnotherapy and i have around 130 links going to the page where as a site which is much higher than me in google has only around 5 links. I cannot understand with being new to seo how this can happen, can anyone please explain what i need to do to improve my ranking please. here is the site i am talking about that is higher than me www.weightlosshypnotherapy.co.uk/ any help would be great can anyone also give me a good example of a page before it has been optimised and a page after it has had this done.
Moz Pro | | ClaireH-1848860