What do Pro Subscribers Get that Free Users Don't?
-
I've been playing with my new account here on Moz, and I'm trying to figure out what Pro subscribers get that Free users don't get. Is there a page somewhere that lists the differences? I Googled, but couldn't find one.
-
Thanks Sam. And thanks for replying to me so fast on a Sunday!
-
Hey Charles,
There is no comparison page that will show you the difference between paid and free accounts. The easiest way to see them right now is to log out of your Moz account and head over to OSE, Followerwonk and download the Mozbar. High level though, OSE will not provide social metrics, limits the filtering options available and limits the results shown on some of the tabs. Followerwonk shuts off exports and limits certain data sets and the Mozbar deactivates the ability to link to and analyze pages from our paid tools among other things.
Discounts to Mozcon and the video bundles are usually around a couple of hundred dollars. You can find the videos from last years' Mozcon here. I'll be sure to pass this along as feedback to our Product and Marketing teams to see if we can get a more thorough comparison page put together. Thanks!
Sam
-
Thanks Sam! Is there any page somewhere that shows the difference between what community users get vs. Pro subscribers? e.g. what are the data/functionality differences in OSE, Followerwonk, and the Mozbar? How much is the discount to Mozcon? Where are the videos located?
The help hub looks great. Going to check that out.
-
Hey Charles,
As a Moz Pro subscriber, you actually get access to a lot of things community users don't. For one, the ability to post in the Community if you have general or more SEO related questions. You also get full access to our free tools (OSE, Followerwonk, Mozbar) which give you more functionality and data. Lastly, you get access to all of our paid tools. This includes (Rank Tracker, On-Page Grader, Fresh Web Explorer, etc) as well as Moz Analytics. I recommend heading over to our Help Hub for a full walkthrough of the app and tools.
Ah, some other great perks include discounts to tickets for Mozcon and the videos. Hope this helps clear things up!
Best,
Sam
Moz Helpster
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What to believe Google's Comp or Moz's Opportunity/Potential graph
Hi! I'm newbie and I really don't know which info is best to dial in with the keywords. Google tells me that my keyword is in high competition, but Moz suggests that I have very high opportunity and potential with low difficulty with the same keyword... Maybe I need some sleep and come back later :-). Many thanks!
Getting Started | | PapaMilicia0 -
My campaign hasn't updated since wk of Sept 18-24
Even though it shows it should run weekly the campaign appears to be stuck. Also, it seems like campaign frequency should be a variable under campaign settings, but isn't. Is there a way to manually run the campaign to add the data?
Getting Started | | dwerkema0 -
I don't believe moz is seeing everything that is on my webpage
I used the page key word grader and got an "F" Moz said that my keyword employee handbook was not in my title nor was it found in the body of my page. But when I look at the page and double check everything it is there all over the place. I am not blaming moz this is a wiz site and while I am a beginner and very well could be wrong could anyone just take a look and tell me if I am nuts or what. The web page is http://www.cestoday.com/#!employee-handbook/co0h I now have the font so big I will have to fix that. Thank you
Getting Started | | redsman9440 -
'not a valid url' error in campaign set up
I get the error not a valid url when I'm trying to set up a campaign. I know it's a valid url. I have tried with www, non-www, http://, https:// when I do the https it lets me start, but then I get an error that https is forwarding to http and I need to use that. When I then put in the http, I get the original error. thanks in advance for your help.
Getting Started | | HighVoltage0 -
I am managing an existing ecommerce website and just subscribed to the MOZ tools - what is the best rout to learning how bets leverage all the tools to optimize my site?
I am managing an existing ecommerce website and just subscribed to the MOZ tools - what is the best rout to learning how bets leverage all the tools to optimize my site?
Getting Started | | DiveNSail0 -
Dashboard doesn't show new data for the passed week
Did Roger leave us to search for eastereggs 😉 ? My dashboard still shows data from the initial crawl (2- 8 april), and hasn't updated since. Have I switched something off ? The next run should contain 9 - 15 april, and that period closed yesterday so I wonder what's going on ...
Getting Started | | StephDep0 -
Moz's official stance on Subdomain vs Subfolder - does it need updating?
Hi, I am drawing your attention to Moz's Domain basics here: http://moz.com/learn/seo/domain It reads: "Since search engines keep different metrics for domains than they do subdomains, it is recommended that webmasters place link-worthy content like blogs in subfolders rather than subdomains. (i.e. www.example.com/blog/ rather than blog.example.com) The notable exceptions to this are language-specific websites. (i.e., en.example.com for the English version of the website)." I am wondering if this is still Moz's current recommendation on the subfolders vs subdomains debate, given that the above (sort of) implies that SE's may not combine ranking factors to the domain as a whole if subdomains are used - which (sort of) contradicts Matt Cutts last video on the matter ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MswMYk05tk ) which implies that this is not the case and there is so little difference that their recommendation is to use whatever is easiest. It would also seem to me that if you were looking through the eyes of Google, it would be silly to treat them differently if there were no difference at all other than subdomain vs subfolder as one of the main reasons a user would use a sud-domain is a technical on for which it would not make sense for Google to treat differently in terms of its algorithm. I notice that in terms of Moz, while most of the site uses subfolders, you do have http://devblog.moz.com/ - and I was wondering if this is due to a technical reason or conscious decision, as it would seem to me that the content within this section is indeed linkworthy (as it has external links pointing to it from external sources), therefore it would seem to not be following the initial advice that is posted in Moz's basics on domains. Therefore I am assuming it is due to a technical reason - or that Moz's adive is out of date with current Moz thinking, and is indeed in line with Matt C in that it doesn't matter. Cheers
Getting Started | | James773
