Are keyword focused pages actually hurting me?
-
Is the practice of having keyword focused pages a thing of the past? Here is what I am seeing. My biggest competitor ranks #1 or #2 in most of my relevant keyword phrases (about 20 that I consider most important). They DO NOT have keyword focused pages. They have a PA of 42.5 and a DA of 33.8. They have 72 root domains that link to them. Their home page is fairly lite for content. Only 1 paragraph of text really... and a few reviews local to their page (not TA or anything). Socially, we we have the same FB following... but I also have blog, G+, twitter, pinterest, flickr, instagram, youtube, and linkedin.
My keyword pages will rank #8 or #9. My home page hardly ever ranks. My home page has a PA of 40.3 and a DA of 29.1. I have 60 root domains that link to me.
BUT... my keyword pages fall much lower. For instance, one has a PA of 16.1 and only 1 root domain link.
So, my question is... are my keyword pages actually hurting me? Meaning... is google seeing my keyword page as more relevant content wise (because they are perfect for keyword placement, % of keyword to text, etc), but they rank them lower because of PA and back-links?
Should I take down my keyword focused pages (one at a time maybe???) and work on building my home page?
-
Hi,
About your keyword pages, they don't have to sit on a main page of your website. For example you could include a link with something like "find out more information on XXX" then the link redirects them to the keyword page. This way you get to keep all the SEO benefits, but remove them from immediate viewing on your website.
Hope this helps a little
I too am trying to discover more about links so thanks for your post.
Jason
-
What I don't know is how to do good link building and some of the nitty gritty details about what ranks and what doesn't.
I would suggest the link building category on the blog here. There is nearly 10 years of link development information in there, clearly with the newer information being more relevant than older.
Should I do them all at once, or one at a time?
I really can't say if you should take them down without seeing them, unfortunately.
Will I forever be penalized by google for directory submissions?
You are very unlikely to be penalised "forever" for anything as long as the offending links are removed. If you receive a penalty (which you are not guaranteed to do if you use directories for link development, but it's a risk), how soon you recover depends on what type of penalty you received. If you received a manual penalty, i.e. someone from Google's webspam team looked at your links and decided to penalise the site, you will first receive a notice in Webmaster Tools telling you that you have been penalised and why. You should then remove or disavow the bad links (try to actually remove them before using the disavow tool) and file a reconsideration request. If the site / links now meet Google's standards, they will revoke the penalty (although it can take multiple iterations of filing for reconsideration and having those requests rejected before you are successful).
If you have been penalised due to the Penguin algorithm (i.e. your links trip a trigger in that algorithm and cause you to receive an automatic penalty that has not been overseen by a real person), you will have to wait for a "refresh" of Penguin to see that penalty removed. These refreshes seem to happen ever few months or so, but there is no set period or refreshes.
In short, if you remove your bad links, you will not be penalised in the future after those links are gone.
I would take down the links that were placed in directories for link building purposes alone and leave those that have been built for a combination of reasons, including for the purpose of people finding them and clicking on them. Do review the other sites the directories link to as well though - if you find that the directories linking to you also link to spam sites, remove your links. You are judged not only on the quality of your links, but on the quality of the sites that sites linking to you ALSO link to, if that makes sense.
I am working on getting my husband to write "fishing reports" (We are an deep sea fishing company) and have them published on the top florida fishing websites. Will this help?
It might, but this is not really enough information to know whether this is a good tactic or not. If the reports are placed on high-quality websites (which top fishing websites should be) and links are placed back to your site, this could very well be beneficial.
-
Jane, thank you for taking this time to respond to me. My head is just spinning! I am so new to SEO. I know how to build a good site. I know how to do good social media. I can follow the google webmaster guide just as well as anyone else. What I don't know is how to do good link building and some of the nitty gritty details about what ranks and what doesn't.
My keyword pages look nice, but they are written specifically to attract that keyword page. I'm afraid to take them down. How long would it possibly take me to recover taking them down? Should I do them all at once, or one at a time?
Will I forever be penalized by google for directory submissions? Some are really good... like city search or mapquest. But, some are for the sole purpose of link building. Should I take them down?
I am working on getting my husband to write "fishing reports" (We are an deep sea fishing company) and have them published on the top florida fishing websites. Will this help?
-
Hi there,
Not Samuel, but I'll pitch in too.
A few years ago, he paid some company to create these keyword-focused pages. I HATE them! But, they have always ranked. Are you suggesting that I delete these pages? (Please say yes lol)
It's hard to say without seeing the pages. At best, the pages might be fine - this is a page that targets some specific keywords that is perfectly okay: https://www.endsleigh.co.uk/personal/gadget/phone-insurance/
So is this: http://www.johnlewis.com/home-garden/tableware/salt-pepper/c80000896
However, on the other end of the spectrum you have low quality, made-for-SEO pages that include "doorway pages". The grey area between pages targeting certain phrases legitimately and doorway pages is large. Would you class these pages as being somewhere on that spectrum, and if so, where?
2. What do you mean by publish? Are you talking Press Releases? We have a blog that we publish to WP and then syndicate to FB, Twitter, G+, Pinterest, and LinkedIn.
Samuel was likely talking about publishing high quality content across your web "properties", focusing mainly on your own website but also keeping your social media accounts up to date with good stuff as well.
I've requested to be added to 50-60 directories (yelp, city search, etc.). I have links on all the major social media sites. I add weblinks on the content I put out on youtube and Pinterest. Our blog has been shared quite a bit. My SEO says he's done press releases, but I don't know if he used anchor-text or not.
There are some red flags here. Directory submission for SEO purposes is a very outdated tactic. Using directories for exposure is fine, and if you would have submitted to all of those directories for visibility purposes as opposed to SEO, fine (I doubt this though, given the high number). Google takes a dim view of directory links, usually because they're either from low quality websites, they were paid for, the directories link out to a bunch of spam indiscriminately or all of the above. Directories should only be used if you are using them for other purposes besides SEO, e.g. a directory about florists in London area, and you are a florist in the London area who might get business from the listing.
Social media links are fine, but they are usually nofollowed by the social media site, meaning that you do not receive SEO value from them. A large, active social media following where people often share your content is a good signal as far as search engines go (a real brand usually has this sort of activity whilst a spam site does not), but we are yet to really have it proven that any of that activity counts as a certain "ranking factor".
You absolutely need a list of the links your SEO has created. Try to have him send you a spreadsheet report of all the links he has made once a week or once a month (month is usually easier; week would be perfect. As an SEO, it was easier for me to do it once a month though). You need to know of all the ways in which your site is being represented on the web, even or especially from press releases. Like directories, PRs were roundly abused by SEOs in years gone by, meaning that Google is fairly unforgiving about either not crediting links from PRs as having much value, or considering a backlink profile built largely on PRs low-quality. This is from less than a year ago about press releases and SEO: http://searchengineland.com/google-links-in-a-press-release-should-be-nofollowed-like-advertisements-168339
-
Thank you for taking the time to respond to me.
1. I have a really good website experience. A lot of my customers tell me what a great website I have, how well laid out it is, they love the content... that was what drove them to call me. My husband and I run this business together. (I used to work full time and he was getting it started). A few years ago, he paid some company to create these keyword-focused pages. I HATE them! But, they have always ranked. Are you suggesting that I delete these pages? (Please say yes lol)
2. What do you mean by publish? Are you talking Press Releases? We have a blog that we publish to WP and then syndicate to FB, Twitter, G+, Pinterest, and LinkedIn.
3. I have a really good social media following... best out of all of my competitors (in my opinion). We have the most page likes, the most user engagement. We are the only of our local market to have all of the social media outlets covered. (Most don't even have FB). We are ranked #1 on TA (have been for well over a year, maybe 2-3) and have earned the 2014 Certificate of Excellence. The TA links about my business actually outrank my website many times.
4. Understood
5. Yes, that's the goal!!!
Okay... talking about link profile. I'm not really sure to be honest. This is my weak link (pun intended haha). I'm just not sure what to do. I've requested to be added to 50-60 directories (yelp, city search, etc.). I have links on all the major social media sites. I add weblinks on the content I put out on youtube and Pinterest. Our blog has been shared quite a bit. My SEO says he's done press releases, but I don't know if he used anchor-text or not. I have never used anchor text, just used http://www.mydomain.com as my links.
(Also, I get most of my traffic through Google PPC and my campaigns are really well crafted (high conversion rate and CTR) and we get most of our traffic and business. I'm looking to rely less on PPC and more on organic search).
-
There is so much I can say, but I'll try to be brief.
1. Focusing so much on keywords is SEO from five and ten years ago. Don't worry about keyword percentage in the text -- write text for humans, not search engines. Just sprinkle the keyword a few times naturally. If I were to read your page, I should not be able to tell what keyword you're targeting. Moreover, focus on the user intent behind the search query. What exactly is the person looking for when he or she types that query? Make your page the best resource for whatever that happens to be.
2. What's your link profile? Are you building links with exact-match anchor text? If so, that's a big no-no today. The other site may have more earned links (sites are linking to him or her without him or her having to do much of anything directly).
Here's the general process that I would recommend for anyone:
1. Build a great website with a great user experience that is the best resource for your industry or sector.
2. Publish the best content on your given topic.
3. Use social media and PR to promote the website as a whole and the content individually.
4. Repeat indefinitely.
5. See rankings, traffic, natural links, sales, and more increase naturally over time.
Without even knowing you or the competitor, I'm 99% sure that he is doing this process better than you at the moment.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why does Google's search results display my home page instead of my target page?
Why does Google's search results display my home page instead of my target page?
Technical SEO | | h.hedayati6712365410 -
"One Page With Two Links To Same Page; We Counted The First Link" Is this true?
I read this to day http://searchengineland.com/googles-matt-cutts-one-page-two-links-page-counted-first-link-192718 I thought to myself, yep, thats what I been reading in Moz for years ( pitty Matt could not confirm that still the case for 2014) But reading though the comments Michael Martinez of http://www.seo-theory.com/ pointed out that Mat says "...the last time I checked, was 2009, and back then -- uh, we might, for example, only have selected one of the links from a given page."
Technical SEO | | PaddyDisplays
Which would imply that is does not not mean it always the first link. Michael goes on to say "Back in 2008 when Rand WRONGLY claimed that Google was only counting the first link (I shared results of a test where it passed anchor text from TWO links on the same page)" then goes on to say " In practice the search engine sometimes skipped over links and took anchor text from a second or third link down the page." For me this is significant. I know people that have had "SEO experts" recommend that they should have a blog attached to there e-commence site and post blog posts (with no real interest for readers) with anchor text links to you landing pages. I thought that posting blog post just for anchor text link was a waste of time if you are already linking to the landing page with in a main navigation as google would see that link first. But if Michael is correct then these type of blog posts anchor text link blog posts would have value But who is' right Rand or Michael?0 -
How to make my good sub-page rank ahead of my generic home page?
I have an ecommerce site for the clothes drying racks my family business makes, and it sells a few other laundry items also. It's about 5 years old. We used to rank on the first page for basic phrases like "clothes drying rack" and "umbrella clothesline". About 1.5 years ago we fell hard in the rankings. Since then "umbrella clothesline" has moved back to the first page, but "clothes drying rack" is stuck on the 3rd page and always with the result being the generic homepage instead of the good sub-page (which used to rank on the first page) that really shows-n-tells about our drying rack. Here are the three pages I am talking about. Home page = http://www.bestdryingrack.com/ Drying rack page = http://www.bestdryingrack.com/clothes-drying-rack-main.html and umbrella clothesline page = http://www.bestdryingrack.com/umbrella-clotheslines.html Any ideas on how to get the drying rack page to start ranking well again? (hopefully better than the generic homepage ranks) A little technical background: the Moz campaign on this site says that the home page has a PA = 42 with 190 LRD's and 344 external links. Both the umbrella clothesline page and the clothes drying rack page have almost equal statistics of PA = 35 with 20 LRD's and 23 external links. My anchor text distribution is maybe unbalanced. The drying rack page has 15 external links with the anchor of "Clothes Drying Rack". But the umbrella clothesline page has 14 external links with the anchor of "outdoor umbrella clothesline" and it ranks on the first page for that search. I can't figure out how to get OSE to tell me anchor text stats for just the homepage and not the whole site since www.bestdryingrack.com/index.html 301's to the plain www.bestdryingrack.com (if you know how, please share) What's wrong with my poor neglected clothes drying rack page? The only way I can get it to show up on the first page is to do a real specific search like "round wooden clothes drying rack" Your help could save a faltering family business. Thank you!
Technical SEO | | GregB1230 -
Why do they rank the home page?
We are trying to rank for the key word Motorcycle Parts. We have moved up to page 2 over the past couple months; however, google is ranking our home page not our http://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/s/49/61/Motorcycle-Parts page that is for motorcycle parts. We are working on internal linking to help point the right signals too. Any other thoughts? ( we have new content written to put in as well we just have to wait for an issue to be fixed before we can put it in)
Technical SEO | | DoRM0 -
What is the best way to find missing alt tags on my site (site wide - not page by page)?
I am looking to find all the missing alt tags on my site at once. I have a FF extension that use to do it page by page, but my site is huge and that will take forever. Thanks!!
Technical SEO | | franchisesolutions1 -
Should I delete a page or remove links on a penalized page?
Hello All, If I have a internal page that has low quality links point to it or a penality. Can I just remove the page, and start over versus trying to remove the links? Over time wouldn't this page disapear along with the penalty on that page? Kinda like pruning a tree? Cutting off the junk limbs so other could grow stronger, or to start new fresh ones. Example: www.domain.com Penalized Internal Page: (Say this page is penalized due to keyword stuffing, and has low quality links pointing to it like blog comments, or profiles) www.domain.com/penalized-internal-page.com Would it be effective to just delete this page (www.domain.com/penalized-internal-page.com) and start over with a new page. New Internal Page: www.domain.com/new-internal-page.com I would of course lose any good links point to that page, but it might be easier then trying to remove old back links. Thoughts? Thanks! Pete
Technical SEO | | Juratovic0 -
Handling 301s: Multiple pages to a single page (consolidation)
Been scouring the interwebs and haven't found much information on redirecting two serparate pages to a single new page. Here is what it boils down to: Let's say a website has two pages, both with good page authority of products that are becoming fazed out. The products, Widget A and Widget B, are still popular search terms, but they are being combined into ONE product, Widget C. While Widget A and Widget B STILL have plenty to do with Widget C, Widget C is now the new page, the main focus page, and the page you want everyone to see and Google to recognize. Now, do I 301 Widget A and Widget B pages to Widget C, ALTHOUGH Widgets A and B previously had nothing to do with one another? (Remember, we want to try and keep some of that authority the two page have had.) OR do we keep Widget A and Widget B pages "alive", take them off the main navigation, and then put a "disclaimer" on the pages announcing they are now part of Widget C and link to Widget C? OR Should Widgets A and B page be canonicalized to Widget C? Again, keep in mind, widgets A and B previously were not similar, but NOW they are and result in Widget C. (If you are confused, we can provide a REAL work example of what we are talkinga about, but decided to not be specific to our industry for this.) Appreciate any and all thoughts on this.
Technical SEO | | JU19850 -
Too many on page links
Hello I have about 800 warnings with this. Example of one url with this problem is: http://www.theprinterdepo.com/clearance?dir=asc&order=price I was checking and I think all links are important. But I suppose that if I put a nofollow on the links on the left which are only for navigation purposes I can get rid of these warnings. Any other idea?
Technical SEO | | levalencia10