Discrepancy between number of links from web master tools and open site explorer.
-
Hi
I am looking at number of link to www.bagnodesignglasgow.com on open site explorer shows as total links 24 but on WMT it says 937 ?
Why are these two numbers so different ?
Thanks
-
Thank you all for your answers.
I'm confident your amazing team will make some interesting progress in regards with the above issue.
-
Hi Vivo - this is great feedback and definitely an issue we're aware of and actively working on. A few things to keep in mind re: Google vs. Moz:
-
Moz tends to crawl the most important pages on most of the visited web. Google will crawl even the deep, dark, duplicate, spammy corners of the web. We've gotten the feedback many times that SEOs want to see these dark corners, too, and our big data team has been working on an infrastructure to allow us to scale closer to Google size (we'll probably get to 60-80% their size/freshness, but never quite 100%).
-
Moz's index can be older - we update every 15-30 days with pages found and crawled in the prior 60 days. Thus, if you've gotten lots of new links, I'd suggest checking out the "just discovered links" tab in OSE (which often shows way more new/fresh links), and Fresh Web Explorer (https://freshwebexplorer.moz.com/) which will surface almost anything connected to an RSS feed.
-
Two of our competitors - MajesticSEO and Ahrefs often have good crawl/link data as well, and when I need to see every link about a site, I, too, use multiple sources.
Thanks for letting us know, and rest assured, we're working tirelessly to improve both size and freshness (my personal estimate would be you'll start to see those results in 5-6 months).
-
-
Be sure to scroll down in the link that Cyrus gives, to the third set of metrics.
-
Thanks for you comment. I understand your frustration, especially if you found the marketing message to be confusing. As Keri mentioned, your comments have been shared with the team.
The differences between the size of link indexes has been covered extensively in other places, so I won't rehash it here. One thing I should point out: 24 links only represents the number of links to this specific page/URL. Open Site Explorer shows a total of 156 links pointing to the root domain bannodesignglasgow.com
http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/comparisons?page=1&site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bagnodesignglasgow.com
I've added a screenshot below. This represents about 15% of the links listed for your site in GWT, which is on the low end in our experience. Typically it's pretty common for OSE to report between 20-40% of links found in GWT. The good news is OSE tends to index the links that "count" and are more likely to influence rankings. And as Keri mentioned, no index will be able to capture all of the links Google sees. We are working to greatly expand the size of our index, and we should be able to ship some progress on this in the next few months.
Regardless, thanks again.
-
Hi Vivoweb,
Thanks for pointing this out. I've taken this back to the company and we'll be sure that we're clear on this point.
-
I agree but lets see to get 100% (and not even Google has 100% of your links, I use three sources for monitoring links, Google Alerts / Webmaster Tools, TalkWalker / Moz / Opensiteexplorer). But lets say you want Moz to go from 3% to 100%.
This would required extra resources on Moz end so we would end up paying higher monthly fee.
We currently pay $99 a month. Lets hope my maths is good. So $99 for 3% or $33 for 1%, to get that to 100% that is $33 * 100 that would be $3,300 a month. I can show the benefits to my MD who pays the invoice each month of the benefits for $99. Convincing him to pay $3,300 I couldn't justify that.
Also it would depend where all your links are. If they are from highly reputation sites like Mashable, BBC, et al then you are more likely to have a higher % than if your links are all from domains which are less well know and less likely to be found by the Moz crawlers.
Regarding Moz telling you in advance about the % - I will leave that to a Moz employee to explain but I guess the % would be different for everyone so would be quite hard to explain.
-
Hi Andy
Thanks for your reply.
But in my experience 24 vs 937 thats only 2.56% of links, the issue is that I cannot use GWT to check any of the competitors links profiles and if Moz is going to show my around 3% then that's not really good enough is it?
The following is from the website:
"We show you all of your data in a comparative view with your competitors. Scope out their link profiles, traffic, social activity, mentions of their brand online, trending content pieces, and more."
There has to be a fine print or something clearly mention to customers before making the purchase and inform them about this discrepancy.
Don't get me wrong I will still use Moz for all the other porpuses and I think it's a great value for money but I don't think it's right for people not to know the above.
-
This question has all ready been asked previously and you can find the answer here:
http://moz.com/community/q/google-webmaster-tools-and-open-site-explorer-s-links-not-matching-up
But to sum it up. Google has far more servers than Moz, even though Moz is a great company there is a big difference in the size of the companies so Google has far more reach to crawl even more websites.
Google isn't perfect and will also miss links so its good to use multiple sources for seeing link data.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to find lost internal links
I've been seeing a large decline in internal followed links over the past couple of months and am trying to figure out the cause. My developer says there have been no changes to the site that would cause this. Is there a way to find what internal links have been lost?
Link Explorer | | rgibson1002 -
Difference on full and partial URLs in Open Site Explorer?
Hi, I am pretty new to SEO and it might show. Here is my question, regarding the difference on "full and partial" urls in Open Site Explorer (OSP). That is, the difference on http://www.mywebsite.com and http://mywebsite.com. I get very similar results for the two variations, but not exactly the same. That suggest to me that OSP most of the time find the same links regardless of whether the url put into the search field is full or partial. But not all the time. Can anyone clarify? Thx in advance
Link Explorer | | plovski0 -
Crawling and Links - Showing Links
Hello I have a campaign in Moz that shows a new site as having no domain authority and no links. The site does have links to it, but they don't show up on OSE. Does Moz count links in the comments section of blogs (or is this counted as social, when the commenting system is one that requires facebook login?) I know blog comments are not great for SEO, I just use them when the post/link is 100% genuinely relevant. The site does have actual links on websites not just comment links, so it isn't showing any type of link. What is the best way to see the links the site has? Thanks!
Link Explorer | | wearehappymedia1 -
.Org are not appearing on the open site explorer
I am new to backlinking and I am learning as part of my role. My question is do .orgs not appear on the open site explorer? This is one for a local website. http://www.pinckneyschools.org/index.php/partners Thanks, Roger Castillo http://www.pinckneyschools.org/index.php/partners
Link Explorer | | LowrySolutions0 -
See Lost Links?
My Moz analytics campaign says i have lost some links since the last crawl on one of my sites, Is there an easy way in moz to see which links these are i lost and where from? James
Link Explorer | | Antony_Towle0 -
How can I get a Moz crawl report of 404 errors on my site
I have a Moz subscription and I see dead links on my website that link externally. Is there a Moz crawl report which will show me these 404 errors and which pages on my site those 404 links are on?
Link Explorer | | Marbanasin0 -
Open Site Explorer only showing 10 internal links, and 270 external links
Hi, I run the website www.abackpackerstale.com ,and for some reasons opensite explorer is only showing 10 internal links, and a 200 and something external links. How can I fix this as I am sure it is hurting my DA authority, and overall site score. Thanks! Stephen
Link Explorer | | backpackerstephen0 -
Open Site Explorer not reporting all 301 redirected links
Our site had over 2,000 root domains linking to it as reported in MOZ Open Site Explorer (and Google Webmaster Tools). We then changed the domain and made sure that 301 redirects were set up for all pages across the site. That was about 1 month ago. Open Site Explorer is now reporting less than 300 linking root domains. For the links that it is reporting the majority of these are being 301 redirected to the new URLs (some of them we changed the links directly). However the majority of the links that are being 301 redirected are not being reported. It is reporting most of the links coming from the old to the new domain. Google Webmaster Tools is reporting over 1,000 linking root domains to the new domain (it has a max of 1,000). We did notice that MOZ took some time to update the domain authority of the new domain. It was 1 for along time and it has now jumped up to 46 ( it was previously at 74). Maybe this is a time delay thing and eventually Open Site Explorer will report all of the 301 redirected links? It is a bit frustrating at the moment as we can't fully analyse the links to the site to try to focus on the high domain linking sites to get them to change the link directly. Also, If all links are being 301 redirected to the new domain should the authority not be close to where it was previously after one month? Our search traffic has dropped considerably since the launch of the new site and hasn't returned yet, so just wondering if the 301 redirected links pass on as much value as thre original direct links. Thanks, Damien
Link Explorer | | james.harris0