Minimising the effects of duplicate content
-
Hello,
We realised that one of our clients, copied a large part of content from our website to his. The normal reaction would be to send a cease and desist letter. Nevertheless this would probably mean loosing a good client.
The client dumped the text of several articles (for example:
http://www.velascolawyers.com/en/property-law/136-the-ley-de-costas-coastal-law.html )Into the same page:
http://www.freundlinger-partners.com/en/home/faqs-property-law/I convinced the client to place our authorship tags on this page, but I am wondering if this is enough.
What do you think?
Cheers
Luca -
I concur with the Dr. of Cleverness.
-
Yikes. I think that would be a good one to counsel them to re-write, otherwise I do not know of a way to divide up the canonicalization tag.
-
Hello,
These are all valid points. Educating a client is always better than confrontation. Just a last question. The clients copied several articles coming from 25 different pages from my site into a single page. I suppose I have just to chose a single article (for example the article appearing first) and tell the client to place a canonical link pointing to it. I suppose there is no way to tell google that the content of the client's page is coming from several pages of my site.
Cheers
Luca -
The big point here to make as Hashtag mentioned (nice name BTW) is to explain to the client how it harms them. I have one site were we have literally thousands of local businesses that work with us and they will do things like this - mostly because they do not know any better. It is often due to a marketing assistant or outsourced firm that does not know what they are doing.
You actually have an opportunity here to show off your expertise and help your client and get this fixed (whether it is with a canonical or a rewrite). Staying focused on how this practice 1) hurts them and then 2) how you can help them fix it, makes you a winner and makes it an easier conversation than what you think it might be.
If you think about it, for this type of situation, this is the best possible scenario. It is a gift! You can most likely fix this as a you have a good relationship with the client, and even be able to improve your relationship with them (and make more money). If this were some random scraper, there would be nothing you could do besides filing a complaint.
Good luck!
-
Lvet,
Good morning! Well, there are a few things to keep in mind here. Matt Cutts has said a lot in regards to duplicate content, and people taking content. If someone posts an article & then it is copied and then posted somewhere else Google looks at a lot of factors to determine who will get credit for the article; who posted first, who has more authority and trustworthiness etc.
In this case, not only does your website appear to have more authority, but you also posted first, so on a surface look, it would appear like this is going to hurt them more than going to hurt you. Adding the rel-cannonical tag is basically telling search engines that you know this is the same content as somewhere else, and that you only want one version to be indexed. Search engines have also said that they pay attention to them, but are not obligated to follow it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LsB19wTt0Q Matt Cutts video on the duplicate content and how to make sure you get credit.
My advice, encourage them to rewrite your their content because it will help them bring business and rank better with Google! You kill 2 birds with one stone. You get your page back, and they get their own content!
Hope this helps!
-
A cross-domain canonical tag would probably be a good idea.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Recurring events and duplicate content
Does anyone have tips on how to work in an event system to avoid duplicate content in regards to recurring events? How do I best utilize on-page optimization?
Technical SEO | | megan.helmer0 -
Effects of forwarding content to another site?
Our e-commerce store is moving away from a set of products. Instead of just redirecting these to an another section of our site, we were considering redirecting them to another site that sells the product. I don't mind losing that traffic, but I don't want it to inadvertently hurt our other product lines. Any thoughts on the impact of 301 redirecting a certain section of traffic to another domain? Anything I should we on the lookout for or consider?
Technical SEO | | CPollock0 -
Does having no content on a mobile page have effect on the ranking.
We are about to go live with a mobile version of our webshop, mobile users will be shown an alternative version of the desktop page. At the moment we have little to no content on the mobile pages; how will this effect our ranking? (desktop and mobile page have the same URL and meta, only the "body" is different)
Technical SEO | | G.School0 -
Quickview popup duplicate content
Hi We have an eccomerce site. We just added to the product list view a quickview tab - when you roll mouse over it a popup window with the product image and short description shows up - is this a problem of duplicate content( its the same content that's on the product pages except there we also have a long detailed description) - t is done with javascript. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | henya0 -
Duplicate Content in Dot Net Nuke
Our site is built on Dot Net Nuke. SEOmoz shows a very large amount of duplicate content because at the beginning each page got an extension in the following format: www.domain.com/tabid/110/Default.aspx The site additionally exists without the tabid... part. Our web developer says an easy fix with a canonical tag or 301 redirect is not possible. Does anyone have DNN experience and can point us in the right direction? Thanks, Ricarda
Technical SEO | | jsillay0 -
Rel=canonical overkill on duplicate content?
Our site has many different health centers - many of which contain duplicate content since there is topic crossover between health centers. I am using rel canonical to deal with this. My question is this: Is there a tipping point for duplicate content where Google might begin to penalize a site even if it has the rel canonical tags in place on cloned content? As an extreme example, a site could have 10 pieces of original content, but could then clone and organize this content in 5 different directories across the site each with a new url. This would ultimately result in the site having more "cloned" content than original content. Is this at all problematic even if the rel canonical is in place on all cloned content? Thanks in advance for any replies. Eric
Technical SEO | | Eric_Lifescript0 -
Duplicate page content issue needs resolution.
After my last "crawl" report, I received a warning about "duplicate page content". One page was: http://anycompany.com and the other was: http://anycompany.com/home.html How do I correct this so these pages aren't competing with each other or is this a problem?
Technical SEO | | JamesSagerser0 -
Root domain not resolving to www. Duplicate content?
Hi, I'm working with a domain that stays on the root domain if the www is not included. But if the www is included, it stays with the www. LIke this: example.com
Technical SEO | | HardyIntl
or
www.example.com Of course, they are identical and both go to the same IP. Do search engines consider that to be duplicate content? thanks,
michael0