Fixing my sites problem with duplicate page content
-
My site has a problem with duplicate page content. SEO MOZ is telling me 725 pages worth. I have looked a lot into the 301 Re direct and the Rel=canonical Tag and I have a few questions:
First of all, I'm not sure which on I should use in this case. I have read that the 301 Redirect is the most popular path to take. If I take this path do I need to go in and change the URL of each of these pages or does it automatically change with in the redirect when I plug in the old URL and the new one? Also, do I need to just go to each page that SEO MOZ is telling me is a duplicate and make a redirect of that page?
One thing that I am very confused about is the fact that some of these duplicates listed out are actually different pages on my site. So does this just mean the URL's are too similar to each other, and there fore need the redirect to fix them? Then on the other hand I have a log in page that says it has 50 duplicates. Would this be a case in which I would use the Canonical Tag and would put it into each duplicate so that the SE knew to go to the original file?
Sorry for all of the questions in this. Thank you for any responses.
-
That code should automatically 301 redirect all urls with www in them to non www versions - you can check if this is working properly with this tool (for the moment I do not see the redirect working though).
So for any duplicates you are seeing because of that specific issue this will fix them.
You should then wait for the next moz crawl to happen and should see less duplicates (since these ones will be removed) - this will show you what duplicate issues are still apparent (as mentioned there are a number of reasons that duplicate content can occur) and then you can focus on what kind of duplicates they are and what fix(es) may be needed to address them.
It is best to fix one thing at a time and not pile a whole bunch of changes you are not sure about on top of each other - it keeps it easier to bug track if something goes wrong!
-
The link was very helpful. With the code that it shows you to use and my site having more than one duplicate would I need to add on to it for the "examples"?
So: (my writing is all in caps in this code)
#Force non-www:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.KILLBILLET.com [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://KILLBILLET.com/$1 [L,R=301]is this really all I need? I do not need to enter in all of the URLs that lead to this homepage? Or am I thinking far too simply with this?
I greatly appreciate how much help you have given me. I will be looking into all the other things and if they are beyond me then I will get further help. -
HI,
So this is a different site and I don't think a rel canonical in the index.php is what you want, especially for a www/non www duplicate issue which is best solved with an htaccess 301 redirect. I am not familiar with that forum software but I would be very careful about putting canonical tags in if you are unsure what a particular file is or where it will be displayed - you might end up with the same tag for the entire site which would not be good at all!
Its best to try to take it one thing at a time, do a correction you are sure will fix one of your duplicate issues and then maybe wait for the next moz crawl which will have less issues and make it easier to focus on the remaining ones and investigate on the best way to solve them.
For the www or non www redirects you would usually put a couple of lines in your .htaccess file in your root directory, you can check out this link for the exact code and how to do it through cpanel. I would suggest taking a backup of the existing file in case you need to restore it quickly (typos can take a site down easily). If you have a developer who is familiar with this kind of thing it might be worth asking them to assist.
-
Thank you very much for the informative post and video. I have watched the video especially several times.
I have yet another question. One of my duplicate pages is the home page. This is a www no-www problem it looks like:
http://www.killbillet.com/forum.php?s=9b0841ea53f918d77f12ba32487df7cahttp://www.killbillet.comHowever, when I go to the /cpanel of my site and try to put in a rel=canonical in the index.php file i find this:
/* Tell forum.php to redirect
to the default url as defined
in the navigation manager */
define('VB_REDIRECT', true);Doesn't this already mean it is supposed to be redirected and shouldn't have a duplicate?
On top of that I am unsure of how to find each duplicate page. Yes, I understand that index.php is my homepage but if I find index.php in the includes is this the duplicate of the homepage even though the file size is different? And is this where the canonical is meant to go?
-
HI,
For the category pages that is more an issue of thin content - there is so little unique content on the pages that they are being flagged as duplicate. I would think your best bet in this case would be to get some more text in there describing the advantages/qualities etc of the relevant manufacturer - make the pages more unique in other words.
For the cart page, that is indeed a duplicate content issue due to url parameters. Is that a custom coded site or a CMS? I dont know what if anything those parameters do in real life (the refurl is for internal tracking?) but in this case a 301 is not what you want. A canonical to 'cart.php' is a possibilty, or maybe just meta tag NOINDEX the entire cart page if it has no seo value anyway.
There are quite a few variables to take into consideration, I would recommend reading up a bit on it, particularly this post on thin/duplicate content and this video on common ecommerce seo pitfalls (it is a great video, watch it all!).
-
Hi there! Thank you for your response!
Here is an example of pages that are very similar (But ARE different pages) but the URLS are different: (20 duplicates)
http://www.maxamps.com/categories.php?cat=90
http://www.maxamps.com/categories.php?cat=86
Here is an example of the login page which has 50 duplicates but all lead to the same place; the login page:
http://www.maxamps.com/cart.php?mode=login&refurl=%2Fproducts.php%3Fcat%3D408
http://www.maxamps.com/cart.php?mode=login&refurl=%2Fproducts.php%3Fcat%3D259
http://www.maxamps.com/cart.php?mode=login&refurl=%2Fproducts.php%3Fcat%3D252
I assume this would be because of costumer ID numbers possibly? However, it is before signing in.
I obviously have pages that are very similar with their products and this must be the issue. However, as you said, I don't want to lose all of the other content by redirecting everything to this one page. The canonical does not seem correct either because they are not the same page over and over so I am really lost as to how I fix this, especially because I did think that this was mostly a URL issue.
-
Hi,
What you should do depends on what the issue is. 301's are useful if your duplicate issues are due to both www and non www urls being available to the search engines. The canonical tag is useful if you have url parameters that are causing duplicate content or if you have a multi capitalisation issue with your urls. There are other possibilities for the root cause, so first thing to do is properly identify what is causing the duplicate content issue for each case (there might be various reasons). What kind of duplicates they are will then guide you as to the best way to approach the solution. You can check out this moz guide for a good rundown on potential issues and solutions.
Without knowing your site it is tough to tell the exact issue, but:
Duplicate content is related to the page content itself, not the url - so if you are seeing different pages all flagged as duplicate it likely means the actual content on them is very similar. If you 301 redirect these pages then only the final page the 301 redirects to will still be available to users and search engines - so be sure this is what you intend to do. If for example these are pages for different (but similar) products then you would likely not want to do this.
The login page - depending on the issue (perhaps url parameters?) this is likely a good candidate for a rel canonical - in this case you put the canonical tag in each page version - most CMS's will do this automatically for all versions of the page if you set it up properly.
Hope that helps a bit!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Migrating login page from website: SEO impact
Our current login page looks like www.website.com/log-in/. We are planning to migrate it to a sub directory login.website.com. For years, our login page is the top landing with highest visits after homepage. If we migrate this now, are we going to loose traffic and drop in rankings? Thanks
Web Design | | vtmoz0 -
Does an age verification home page hurt SEO?
There's a microbrewery in our area that just launched its first website. It has the "verify your age" homepage (which is not really their homepage, but I don't know what it's called) before you can enter. It looks like this: http://angrychairbrewing.com/ Anyway, does this hurt them at all from a rankings standpoint? Also, assuming bots/spiders/ROGER can crawl sites like this, (which I think they would have to be able to do) how do they get around this verification? Thanks, Ruben
Web Design | | KempRugeLawGroup0 -
Thoughts on our Agency Site
Hi all, We'd all welcome opinions on our digital agency site http://www.newbrandvision.com/. We are in the planning stage of launching a new site; and we'd welcome any UX or SEO thoughts. It's a strange one but our agency has been around since 2002, and we operate in the heart of London; however we don't rank anywhere near the first page for "digital agency in London" or any long-tail /semantics around this. We feel that it's pretty clear from search and when landing on the site what we are; but would welcome any general thoughts as to why we aren't ranked that highly. Much appreciated!
Web Design | | Tangent0 -
SEO page length 4500+ words
I have read varying discussions on this... some say it is good or rather it does not really matter (as long as not stuffed with keywords) and some say more than 1000+ words is bad! I have a travel site and I want to add an historical page about the zone. It is very interesting (very organic, not written for SEO purposes as such). It adds flavor and details to a site that is really all about sales. Does anyone have an opinion whether this is detrimental to SEO or not?
Web Design | | Llanero0 -
Migrating a site to Wordpress
I've recently been converting our old website to a wordpress based website and been working on the new version of the site on a subdomain. Now at the stage when I am getting ready to let the site go live and just wondering exactly how to do this so I have minimal downtime? Looking in the wordpress control panel there is the setting to enter the address of the site if you want it to be different from the directory it has been installed within - is this a good idea (i.e. is it stable if I do this? good for seo, bad for seo or makes no difference?)? or should I manually install everything in the root myself (if I do this is there a way to direct people to the temp version of the site on the subdomain? Any tips, do and don't s would be appreciated as I want to do this right!
Web Design | | Jon-C0 -
Order of my products on page?
Hi, I read somewhere that Google reads a page in a certain way. All my product pages are listed (or most of them) in Alphabetical order. Now say I am targeting brands named Cruyff and Money Clothing, should I put all the Cruyff and Money products above everything else? See here for example... http://www.designerboutique-online.com/jackets/ They are in Alph order, except the sales items at the bottom. So would it be beneficial to do this? To put my targeted brands at the top of the page? And if not, is there anything I should be doing with the layout of the products to improve/help with SEO? Thanks Will
Web Design | | WillBlackburn0 -
What Is Our Site Missing Causing Our Former Dominance To Slip?
So we have operated one of our retail sites, BonitaJ.com for many years now. Through a lot of work, link building and optimizing around 2009, we were in a prominent spot on the 1st page in google for just about every main term we were targeting. Towards the end of 2009, nearing December or so, we started slipping here and there, and began being displaced for our main terms by newer sites that according to several factors, don't have near the strength our site holds. And by strength, I simply mean, based on link volume, mozbar stats and many other factors, it seems we should rank well above most, but still find ourselves just hanging to 8-10 positions on page one, and in many cases somewhere on page two for terms it seems like we should be in the top 5 positions for. I believe some of our slippage is due to google's devaluing of many of our incoming links. We achieved our early ranking dominence off a lot of directory links and things like that over time, but ever since 2009 when links began getting devalued we immediately broke into getting quality blog links via LEGIT blog relationships where we'd offer up contests, bloggers would review our products and so on, and these relationships continue through today. We also do a lot of guest blog writing, article postings on various networks, as well as press releases, all with the goal of keeping our link profile happy and healthy. So we still have work to do there, but we're on the right track. So my thought is that to get back over the hump, we simply need to continue with the legit link building methods, but I'm also thinking that maybe we need to improve some things navigationally. Things I was hoping people would chime in on are.... 1. If we're mainly trying to target bridal/wedding related jewelry terms, should we ditch the "Jewelry Sets, Pearl Jewelry & Swarovski Crystal Jewerly" terms from our main navbar. They are featured inside each of the categories, and in the end, we don't rank or pull traffic for them anyway. Would ditching them from the main nav, help pass more juice from home page and other pages to the pages that better target our niche? 2. A while back, we ditched including actual product on each of the main category pages. I'm leaning towards breaking the main category pages up into sections, for instance once on the "Bridal Jewelry" page, it would list each of the sub-cats, with a 5-10 product sampling of the most popular items, with a link that says "view all necklaces" at the end of each sub-section. Do you think that more wise than just trying to direct them into the sub-cats with no actual product offering? 3. Anything else you see glaringly wrong with what we're trying to do? This site is just on the edge of blowing up from a ranking perspective if I can just get some confirmation on some things that I know I should do, but I'm wary due to fear of screwing things up. If I can get some solid feedback, the rest is history.
Web Design | | AarcMediaGroup0