Should the Title Tag and the H1 Tag not be the same or not anymore and can that be classed as over optimization?
-
Hi All,
I am just evaluating my title tags, H1,H2's etc and wondered in light of the google algorithm changes over the last 12 months , we should look at more diversity as opposed to things possibly looking over optimized...
Originally (18 months ago) my Title tags considered of 2/3 keyword phrases , then I reduced this to my keyword phrase | Brand Name but a majority of my H1's and H2's had the same keyword phrases. Historically this has served us very well and rankings for good but over the last 12 months, we were hit by panda, hummingbird etc...and which we are trying to recover from and from what I have read, the rules have changed with regards to good seo./ over optimized SEO. We have been writting unique content , making more of our links branded etc to sort things out from that perspective but on the page stuff is just as important so I would like to get this right.
-
I am now thinking , that I may be getting penalized if my H1 and title's , H2 are the same ? and that they should be obviously related but different.
-
H2's again , need to be related but not the same as either of the above.
Is that how things should be these days ? from what I have read about this, most of the articles are not that recent so I don't what to do what is now redundant advice
Any advice greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Pete
-
-
Many thanks All. I will take your advice on board
thsnks
pete
-
Everyone talks about over-optimization of on-page content. If you are seeing a penalty, I highly doubt it is from something as simple as over-optimized H tags, unless you are just literally repeating the same things over and over across multiple pages.
Having the page title being the same as your H1 is fine, as long as it is well written, and highlighting what you are trying to rank for. We have even used our opening sentences as meta descriptions before. If the content is good, then you can use it wherever you like. Don't get so caught up in the finite details, that you overlook what is really causing your site not to rank / drop in rank. The rules of SEO have not really changed that much, except in the way that now Google looks much more closly at external factors to determine the rank and authority of a site. Read over what you have for your content. If it sounds spammy and unnatural, it probably is.
Without having a link, its hard to see what you have going on, or where your site could be improved. Based off of your description, this is the best answer I have.
-
My CMS is set up such that the title of a page is automatically used for the h1 and the title tag. I usually don't edit this as it is useful to the user--the title of the page summarizes what the content is about. This information is useful in the serps, where you see it in the title tag, and on the page, where you see it in the h1. (You do also see the title tag once you are on the page, but it is kind of in the background, so not really redundant.) I would never use the same content in the h2 as in the h1 just because it would not create a good user experience-- having subsections with the exact same name as the title doesn't help the reader and could be confusing. If your pages are set up around keywords rather than users, then that is probably your problem. As Cole mentioned, consider what is best for the user.
-
I'm open to correction from other Mozzers but I don't think you've been hit with a penalty because of your keyword optimization.
I would consider one thing - what is best for the user?
It may look like this (targeting Website Design):
Title Tag Keyword Phrase | Brand Name - For example: Website Designer - Seattle, Washington
H1 Keyword Phrase in a question form - Website Design Made Easy (followed by content)
H2 Keyword Phrase asking where it originated, etc. - Website Design Services and Pricing (followed by content)
Basically, provide relevant content. I wouldn't worry too much here; just slightly alter it so it's not exact match all the way down the page.
As far as a penalty, you may have been recently hit with the new panda update or the penguin update.
I hope this helps. Thanks, Cole.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Url title and then category vice versa
We have recently developed a site with the structure of domain.com/page-title/about/category Instead of the traditional domain.com/category/page-title We want to optimize more on each single article rather than the category its in. However now we get the info from a seo company that this is rather a bad idea and it hurts the SEO performance because google doesnt understand the structure. The archive page of each category is domain.com/category/overview Whats your input on this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Preen0 -
Canonical Tag help
Hello everyone, We have implemented canonical tag on our website: http://www.indialetsplay.com/ For e.g. on http://www.indialetsplay.com/cycling-rollers?limit=42 we added canonical as http://www.indialetsplay.com/cycling-rollers?limit=all (as it showcase all products) Our default page is http://www.indialetsplay.com/cycling-rollers Is canonical tag implementation right? Or we need to add any other URL. Please suggest
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Obbserv0 -
Https://www.mywebsite.com/blog/tag/wolf/ setting tag pages as blog corner stone article?
We do not have enough content rich page to target all of our keywords. Because of that My SEO guy wants to set some corner stone blog articles in order to rank them for certain key words on Google. He is asking me to use the following rule in our article writing(We have blog on our website):
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AlirezaHamidian
For example in our articles when we use keyword "wolf", link them to the blog page:
https://www.mywebsite.com/blog/tag/wolf/
It seems like a good idea because in the tag page there are lots of material with the Keyword "wolf" . But the problem is when I search for keyword "wolf" for example on the Google, some other blog pages are ranked higher than this tag page. But he tells me in long run it is a better strategy. Any idea on this?0 -
Canonical Tags being indexed on paginated results?
On a website I'm working on which has a search feature with paginated results, all of the pages of the search results are set with a canonical tag back to the first page of the search results, however Google is indexing certain random pages within the result set. I can literally do a search in Google and find a deep page in the results, click on it and view source on that page and see that it has a canonical tag leading back to the first page of the set. Has anyone experienced this before? Why would Google not honor a canonical tag if it is set correctly? I've seen several SEO techniques for dealing with pagination, is there another solution that you all recommend?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | IrvCo_Interactive0 -
Canonical tags required when redirecting?
Hello, My client bought a new domain and he wants it to be the main domain of his company. His current domain though has been online for 10 years and ranks pretty well on a few keywords. I feel it is necessary to redirect the old domain to the new one to take advantage of its ranking and avoid any broken links. The sites are exactly the same. Same sections and same content. Is it necessary to place canonical tags on one of the sites to avoid duplicate content/sites? Any thoughts? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Eblan0 -
How to optimize on-page for a large service area?
Hello Everyone, I'm in the process of setting up a website for a plumbing company that services a relatively large area in Michigan. They have physical locations spread out across the area, but they want to optimize for other areas as well. Naturally, I set up pages on the site with unique content relating to the town/area. I understand that these may not rank locally, but we can at lest shoot for organic rankings in this area. My question here more relates to how to link these pages in the site. Should I have a bunch of footer links with something like city, state, zip as the anchor text. Or should I create an "Areas Served" page, and link out from there? I don't want to appear spammy, beaus this isn't what i'm trying to do, I just want to make sure this is done right. Thanks Zach
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seolinktools0 -
Should we use the rel-canonical tag?
We have a secure version of our site, as we often gather sensitive business information from our clients. Our https pages have been indexed as well as our http version. Could it still be a problem to have an http and an https version of our site indexed by Google? Is this seen as being a duplicate site? If so can this be resolved with a rel=canonical tag pointing to the http version? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | annieplaskett1 -
Help with canonical tag
hello- i got this recommendation <dl> <dt>Recommendation</dt> <dd>Add a canonical URL tag referencing this URL to the header of the page</dd> <dd>from my "report card" and i see also that i have a lot of issues with duplicate content but i really dont have any duplicate content on my site.</dd> <dd>the crawl has apparently marked every post in my blog as duplicate page content.</dd> <dd>and the "use canonical tag" suggestion keeps appearing as a fix to my problems.</dd> <dd>could you please help me with ------How do i create a canonical tag?</dd> <dd>is it just rel=canonical?</dd> <dd>and where do i put it?</dd> <dd>i should put it on every page right?</dd> <dd>or with CSS my webmaster could probably do it very quickly right?</dd> <dd>i get the basic concept behind rel=canonical but i cant say i fully understand it -</dd> <dd>i need some help with regard to how and where this tag should be placed.</dd> <dd>thanks,</dd> <dd>erik
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ezpro9
</dd> <dd>.</dd> </dl>0