Are these good backlinks?
-
I am trying to understand how to build good backlinks. I've read or been told that anchor text is bad (understood), websites with unrelated subjects is bad (understood), paid-for links are bad (?), "submitted" and article to get the link is bad (?), or it is a link/farm directory are bad (?). This is actually really confusing to me! Please bear with my silly questions, I am an engineer with an MBA, stay-at-home/homeschooling mom that helps run my husbands business. My brain gets full fast! Ha!
I thought maybe if I post some of the links we have built, someone could look at them and tell me if they are good or bad. This way I can go forward understanding better.
Articles... I thought that writing articles was a GOOD thing! Now I see that submitting articles isn't? So what about these two articles where my husband, as an expert in his field, wrote an article for a popular mag/blog.
http://coastalanglermag.com/red-snapper-season/ (they did the hyperlink wrong and I am trying to get the publisher to fix it)
http://www.bdoutdoors.com/article/shark-encounter-capt.-gregg-rapp/ (this is a pretty funny story if you read it)
Blog stories... what about when someone copies your blog post as a story on their website? Or someone scrapes your content?
http://jeremyrymill.tumblr.com/
http://www.bdoutdoors.com/article/heart-pressure/
http://www.sportfishermen.com/board/showthread.php?t=2627767&p=3294972 (we post fishing reports and they get copied)
Un-related Directories...
http://www.mobileresources.net/mobi/Glowing_Deep_Sea_Fish/ (I didn't create this!!! I guess they just crawl and link?)
Related "farm" Directories
http://www.sportsmansresource.com/ffishtarpon.htm
Other directories/citations such as yellow pages, city search, etc. These are okay right?
Local hotels and what not... concierge's link to me, I don't even ask them to
http://laquintacocoabeach.com/things-to-do/index.cfm
Paid - I pay for MOZ Local! Isn't that paying??? AND, I paid for a whois listing on enom... is that bad too?
NOW FOR THE BAD.... these are bad right?
http://darman.niniyoo.com/Sea-Leveler-Sport-Fishing-Charters-Inc-FL.html (I have no idea how this got there)
http://teensnow.comwww.whoisbusinesslistings.com/Other/10/23490/Sea-Leveler-Sport-Fishing-Charters.html (what the heck is this??? how can they even append a website on a website?)
http://forums.gq.com.au/member.php?u=1813973 (I think this was created on my behalf by my part-time SEO)
If you have read all the way down to here, my sincerest thanks! Thank you for your time!
-
Thank you, all! Your answers are what I thought was okay to begin with. When I started reading Penguin articles, it was seeming that many things I thought were okay were not and it was really confusing. I did read that Point Blank article several months back and made a strategy to employ many of the concepts in there.
I have around 14% anchor text that isn't just my company name and is some kind of keyword phrase. Is that okay? The rest is some form of my website or company name.
-
The most important thing about a good link building strategy is making sure the links look natural and relevant. Keep your link building consistent and moderate. Find the best quality linking sources over the higher quantity link sources (like link farms). Build a strong social strategy and make sure you are sending valuable social signals. That means engaging your audience.
Link farms and other "paid for links" are the sources that do nothing but build quantities and quantities of link regardless of the root domains or the DA of the sources. This is bad because you don't know what or where these links will be. any kind of link building strategy that involves too much of one thing will look unnatural.
When you work on your strategy you have to make the decision of what kind of website you want Google to think of you as. Your link profile is the path that connects you to other sources and tells Google what kind of crowd you belong too. When you think of it like that, you can make the decision that points you to a better strategy. You don't want Google to think you are fast and loose, because then you aren't trustworthy. If you build high quality links, to related, reputable websites you will look like an authoritative member of your industry that can be trusted. Write good content that will make others want to link to you, send valuable social signals and strive for the best quality links, not the highest quantity of links.
-
I have to agree with Justian. You seem to have a few things so confused that it may not make sense for us to try to unravel all of them in a short Q&A but start with this:
Not all anchor text is bad, just way spammy & overdone anchor text. If you check a tool like Ahrefs and you're over say 20%, you're in a danger zone. Over 50% you may as well forget it. THAT is bad anchor text.
Not all paid for links are bad - if you can get traffic off a link, pay for it. If you want to be super-SEO friendly, no follow the link. But it's not bad to have the link if the traffic is good.
Unrelated directories - yes, I would stay away from non-niche pages. But "link directory" isn't bad if you're in the right ones. For instance, Trip Advisor at some level is a directory with links. I'd still put every single travel client ever on there.
Writing articles can be a great source of links - just don't overdo any one tactic. I had a client who wrote maybe 100 guest blogs in 4 months. THAT is bad. (Thanks for telling me, by the way! #disavow)
Anyways, just a few thoughts. Make sure you read http://pointblankseo.com/link-building-strategies and http://pointblankseo.com/prioritize-link-opportunities
And if you really want to learn more, Paddy Moogan's Link Building Book.
-
I don't know where you got all this information (where you read it or who told you) but IMO you have been mislead or only been told half of the story
Anchor text isn't bad.. its actually a good thing.. BUT if all the links pointing to you site have exact match anchor text, that might look pretty suspicious.
websites with unrelated subjects isn't a bad thing.. If the link is relevant in the context it has been written.
about submitted articles or guest blogging.. in general links that you influences/have control over in one way or another won't help you all that mush.. but the links that you have no control over will help you.. in other words; if someone refers to your site in some way that's a link that you have "no control" over - so to speak
Instead of thinking of building links, you should think of making outreach to people that might have an interest in your product or brand.
make content that people would want to link to or share.. that's a mush better approach.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is it a good idea to optimize for keywords that have no search volume if they're ranked?
Hello Moz Community, I have some questions I hope some of you can help with. We’re doing SEO work for a client that provides outsourced IT and managed IT services in Phoenix, AZ and cities in the Phoenix metro area (i.e. Glendale, Tempe, Scottsdale, etc.) They’re currently ranked for or targeting the following keywords: • consulting phoenix az (1)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | marnipatterson
• outsourced it phoenix (2)
• phoenix it support (3)
• it services Scottsdale (5)
• it consulting firm phoenix (targeting)
• it solutions phoenix (targeting) We have recommended the following keywords based on monthly search totals, competitive level and difficulty ratings in Moz. • IT consulting phoenix
• it consultant company
• outsourced it
• it support services
• it consulting services
• outsourcing it
• outsourced tech support Questions
1. While I know it’s a good idea to optimize for keywords that you're currently ranked for, there’s no search volume for any of these. So, I recommended non-geo versions since Google provides search results based on the user’s location. Will this preserve the company's current rankings?
2. If not optimizing for their current keywords will hurt their rankings, will using the current keywords as secondary keywords suffice? If so, do we need to include them in the content for keyword density?
3. Since search engine algorithms now focus so heavily on user intent, I assume we’re covered for all variations of a keyword (i.e. outsource it, outsourced it, outsourcing it, etc.) Is this correct?
4. They want to rank for “cloud services” and “cloud solutions.” Both are very competitive with high difficulty rankings. So, I recommended “cloud migration” and “cloud strategy” as alternatives since these are the main services they provide. Will including “cloud services” and “cloud solutions” as secondary keywords help them increase their rankings for both? If you’ve dealt with a similar situation, I'd appreciate your insight and advice. Thanks!0 -
Please Guide me - Is this good or bad backlink? Website have all same type of backlinks.
Website niche - Animation and 3D Rendering Studios Backlink from - http://www.adamfrisby.com/create-home-design-and-interior-decor-in-2d-3d.html the anchor tag is image URL from one of the many images in that post. Please let me know such types of links were good for bad?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | varunrupal0 -
Are "Powered By..." type footer backlinks good or bad for SEO?
Hi guys, We're running a software company which is also selling WP themes amongst other things. We've heard recently that footer backlinks like "Powered by BigBangThemes" might do more harm than good. Some clients usually forget to change them - so we want to make sure we stop including them in case this is true. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | andy.bigbangthemes0 -
Is there a good tool for finding co-occurance words/terms?
It would be great if there was a tool that helped find words/terms frequently used with other terms. For example, a search in this theoretical tool for "mobile app development" could bring up "iPhone app development" and "mobile app design" as examples of frequently co-occuring words. Any ideas or tools for this kinda thing?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jim_shook1 -
OSE - How to determine good links to build on...?
Hey Guys, Weather it be OSE, ahrefs, etc. How do you determine if the link is worth using to build a backlink on? I know to look for a higher DA/PA and overall established links. I want very quality sites for external links (as we all do) but I also want to know what to look for and what to bypass when determining if I should build a backlink on the domain. These are a Few examples / questions i have sorry if they are basic: (the below are all specific examples) 1. If a site has an article and that article page is a DA 65 / PA 1 with Zero (0) established links to that article my backlink is on; would it be link building worthy? Should I leave a backlink, why? ex. lots of different blogspot.com blogs pointing back at my site..^^ Same domian, different blog any benefit? 2. If a site is a PR2 DA 30/ PA 32 with 14 root domains, 250 total links.... Would a link like this give me any benefit or should I skip links like this? Why? 3. What main factors do you focus on/look for and know when & when not leave a backlink to your site when using a tool like OSE, Ahrefs? 4. Should I even worry about a sites PR when linkbuilding since PR doesnt play that big of a role anymore opposed to high quality backlinks? Ive seen PR 7 sites outranked by PR1 site with 200 high quality backlinks to it Thanks for any help and any help is GREATLY appreciated. 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Circa4440 -
Why my good links disappeared from gWMT?
Hi Last night some of my good links suddenly stopped from being display displayed at the WMT list of links Any thoghts? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeytzNet0 -
Creating 100,000's of pages, good or bad idea
Hi Folks, Over the last 10 months we have focused on quality pages but have been frustrated with competition websites out ranking us because they have bigger sites. Should we focus on the long tail again? One option for us is to take every town across the UK and create pages using our activities. e.g. Stirling
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PottyScotty
Stirling paintball
Stirling Go Karting
Stirling Clay shooting We are not going to link to these pages directly from our main menus but from the site map. These pages would then show activities that were in a 50 mile radius of the towns. At the moment we have have focused our efforts on Regions, e.g. Paintball Scotland, Paintball Yorkshire focusing all the internal link juice to these regional pages, but we don't rank high for towns that the activity sites are close to. With 45,000 towns and 250 activities we could create over a million pages which seems very excessive! Would creating 500,000 of these types of pages damage our site? This is my main worry, or would it make our site rank even higher for the tougher keywords and also get lots of traffic from the long tail like we used to get. Is there a limit to how big a site should be? edit0 -
Recommendation to fix Google backlink anchor text over optimisation filter penalty (auto)
Hi guys, Some of you may have seen a previous question I posted regarding a new client I started working with. Essentially the clients website steadily lost all non domain name keyword rankings over a period of 4-12 weeks, despite content changes and various other improvements. See following:: http://www.seomoz.org/q/shouldn-t-google-always-rank-a-website-for-its-own-unique-exact-10-word-content-such-as-a-whole-sentence After further hair pulling and digging around, I realised that the back link anchor text distribution was unnatural for its homepage/root. From OSE, only about 55/700 of links anchor text contain the clients domain or company name!....8%. The distribution of the non domain keywords isn’t too bad (most repeated keyword has 142 links out of the 700). This is a result of the client submitting to directories over the last 3 years and just throwing in targeted keywords. Is my assumption that it is this penalty/filter correct? If it is I guess the lesson is that domain name anchor texts should make up more of your links? MY QUESTION: What are some of the effective ways I can potentially remove this filter and get the client ranking on its homepage again? Ensure all new links contain the company name?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Qasim_IMG
Google said there was no manual penalty, so not sure if there’s any point submitting another reconsideration request? Any advice or effective experiences where a fix has worked would be greatly appreciated! Also, if we assume company is "www.Bluewidget.com", what would be the best way to link most naturally: Bluewidget
Blue widget
Blue widget .com
www.bluewidget.com
http://www.bluewidget.com....etc I'm guessing a mix of the above, but if anyone could suggest a hierarchy that would be great.0