Process for moving existing articles to new structure (URLs, titles, etc)
-
I am in the midst of a major redesign of my site, including revamping existing articles . I have a couple of hundred articles and I am reviewing all aspects of these articles, including titles, URLs, content, etc. I am putting together a process as I move each article across to the new site and have SEO very much in mind. I'd appreciate any feedback on this.
First off, let me be clear that I consider the quality of the content paramount. Anything suggested below is considered "supporting" (that content) from an SEO perspective. But, since I am moving this content across, I may as well take the opportunity to clean things up.
The existing articles don't have particularly good SEO-related attributes, in terms of their titles, URLs, use of keywords and so on. So, I plan to do the following for each article. For illustrative purposes (our site serves the wedding industry), I will use an article about how to involve children at a wedding. Questionsunder each bullet.
- Use the "Keyword Difficulty" feature on Moz Pro to research a specific keyword for each article. In the example case I used "involving children in our wedding".
- Honestly, I am not really sure what to do with this feature I've read everything from "focus on the long tail" to "don't fear highly competitive keywords". So, my current thinking is merely to use it as interesting information for they keyword I choose but not actually make any specific decisions from that ie. make sure the keyword is relevant to the article as the first priority and use the tool to check out search volume.
- Not sure what I should read into a zero for recent Bing searches. Is that really an important factor? I'm assuming the Google information is not available from Google (it would be displayed here otherwise, I'm guessing)
- Use a title that uses these keywords. In this case, I simply went with "Involving children in our wedding".
- Same for URL - /wedding-guests/involving-children-in-our-wedding
- If I have a reasonable, short and human-friendly term like this (I can do this with virtually every article quite easily), is there any reason why the URL and the title should not be the same? In short, the title and URL are both a relatively concise "mini-sentence"
- Make sure the meta description of the article is easy-to-read (for humans) and uses the keyword (sentence)
- Make sure that the theme (we are moving to WordPress) uses H1 for the page header/title and H2 for sections within the document
- Implement 301 redirects from the old URL (old site) to the new URL
- This seems like a pretty obvious approach for articles where the URL has changed (which will be most of them). But what do I do with articles that I am going to remove. Should I redirect (301) to a related article (so at least the visitor ends up on a page that is generally relevant) or just let this "fall through" as a non-existent page (401)?
As I say, I have 200+ articles to go through I want to make sure I am taking this advantage to clean things up.
Anything leaping out as missing/problematic?
Thanks in advance
Mark
-
You're very welcome Mark!
-
Donna, thank you so much for the response and my apologies for the delayed response (I read as you replied but forgot to thank you). I believe I am on the right track and your responses give me confidence that the changes make sense.
Thank you again.
Mark
-
Hi Mark,
I see your questions have been sitting unaswered for a while now. Let me take a crack at it.
1. Keyword Difficulty - "...my current thinking is merely to ... make sure the keyword is relevant to the article as the first priority and use the tool to check out search volume." Good strategy. When it comes to blogging, one of the main objectives is to built relevance and trust. Picking the most relevant, most applicable phrases that match your intended content is what counts. Volume should only be a consideration if you have options that are equally relevant.
"Not sure what I should read into a zero for recent Bing searches. Is that really an important factor? **"**You are correct. Google doesn't give Moz access to it's keyword data. I would again use relevance as the deciding criteria and not worry about volume.
2. Titles - I think your question is "should I use the keyword phrase in my title and if so, does it have to be exact match". The answer is yes and no. Yes you should use your chosen keyword phrase in your title tag. It doesn't have be an exact match but understand that if you're in a highly competitive market (and certainly the wedding market is competitive), then the closer you are to an exact match the better. Again here though, your first priority should be in appealing to searchers. So if you think "Involving children in our wedding" will be compelling enough to attract clicks thru to your site then go for it. If you think something like "The pros and cons of involving children in our wedding" (or something else) would be more compelling, I'd go for that.
3. URL - No reason for them not to be the same other than length. Google ignores stop words like "and" and "the". You can shorten your URL by removing them and still achieve your objectives.
4. Meta description - yep. Make it human friendly and use your keyword phrase. Also make it compelling and between 150-160 characters. If you and 9 other articles all contain the same title and description tags, why should I click on yours?
5. "Make sure that the theme (we are moving to WordPress) uses H1 for the page header/title and H2 for sections within the document". Here you just want to make sure when you're publishing your content that you don't end up with multiple H1s. I see that a lot with different Wordpress themes. Some allow you to toggle off and on using the page or post title (at the top) as your H1. You'd have to try it and see.
6. 301 redirects - yes, redirect the old to the new. Any you want to retire, redirect them to their closest relative. If there is nothing similar to redirect retired pages to, consider setting up a custom page-not-found (404) page that explains the URL the visitor is searching for no longer exists and point them to your most popular pages, your blog, a human-readable sitemap, or whatever else makes sense. Don't just let it fall thru, unattended.
"Anything leaping out as missing/problematic?"
If you're new to wordpress, you need to be aware that it creates a lot of duplicate content as a result of how content is stored so as it be easily accessible to readers. The Wordpress for SEO by Yoast plugin is the one I use to manage SEO aspects of the site. I recommend it. It's not completely plug-and-play. You'll need to configure the back end to minimize duplication.
The Yoast plugin also allows you to enter "focus keywords", phrases you think might be good to optimize your page or post for. As I said earlier, I use Keyword Difficulty for main site pages, but just the Yoast plugin and its build-in integration with Google suggest for finding article keywords. You might consider just using it.
Lastly, Moz has best practice guidelines for crafting all these parts and pieces. It would be worth your while to review them if you have not done so already. Sounds like you might already have though.
Good luck!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
We 410'ed URLs to decrease URLs submitted and increase crawl rate, but dynamically generated sub URLs from pagination are showing as 404s. Should we 410 these sub URLs?
Hi everyone! We recently 410'ed some URLs to decrease the URLs submitted and hopefully increase our crawl rate. We had some dynamically generated sub-URLs for pagination that are shown as 404s in google. These sub-URLs were canonical to the main URLs and not included in our sitemap. Ex: We assumed that if we 410'ed example.com/url, then the dynamically generated example.com/url/page1 would also 410, but instead it 404’ed. Does it make sense to go through and 410 these dynamically generated sub-URLs or is it not worth it? Thanks in advice for your help! Jeff
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jeffchen0 -
New page not being picked up
Hello, We have created a new page for truck rentals but for some reason it does not seem to be picked up. See this report: http://screencast.com/t/npYqeoa5gq The page is: https://www.globecar.com/en/montreal-truck-rentals but our main site is being pickedup instead vs the competition that has their truck page showing up. Can anyone help me understand? Thanks, Karim
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | GlobeCar1 -
Parallax and Title Tags
I've noticed an issue with our site, which uses parallax on multiple pages. Here is an example: If you search for About SQL Sentry, you get the correct title tag and description If you search for SQL Sentry Careers (which is on the about us page) it appears that Google has made up a title tag and description for it. Is there any way to force a separate title tag for a part of a parallax page?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Sika220 -
Clean URL help!
Hi all, In short, i'm looking to redirect examplepage.html to examplepage .I've got rid of the .html, sitewide this morning. However I want to redirect Google & people who have bookmarked the old url structure. Currently if you have the extension on or not, it will show in your browser. I'm wanting /examplepage.html to 301 redirect to /examplepage I've gone the normal way I'd do it by adding in .htaccess: Redirect 301 /examplepage.html http://www.example.com/examplepage I'm assuming it isn't redirecting as the example.html page is no longer... what is the way around this? Thanks for any help! In firefox the error of the page is: The page isn't redirecting properly Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for this address in a way that will never complete.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Whittie0 -
301 forwarding old urls to new urls - when should you update sitemap?
Hello Mozzers, If you are amending your urls - 301ing to new URLs - when in the process should you update your sitemap to reflect the new urls? I have heard some suggest you should submit a new sitemap alongside old sitemap to support indexing of new URLs, but I've no idea whether that advice is valid or not. Thanks in advance, Luke
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | McTaggart0 -
Duplicate Titles caused by multiple variations of same URL
Hi. Can you please advise how I can overcome this issue. Moz.com crawle is indicating I have 100's of Duplicate Title tag errors. However this is caused because many URL's have been indexed multiple times in Google. For example. www.abc.com
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | adhunna
www.abc.com/?b=123 www.abc.com/ www.abc.com/?b=654 www.abc.com/?b=875 www.abc.com/index.html What can I do to stop this issue being reported as duplictae Titles, as well as content? I was thinking maybe I can use Robots.txt to block various query string parameters. I'm Open to ideas and examples.0 -
Should we move a strong category page, or the whole domain to new domain?
We are debating moving a strong category page (and subcategory, product pages) from our current older domain to a new domain vs just moving the whole domain. The older domain has DA 40+, and the category page has PA 40+. Anyone with experience on how much PR etc will get passed to a virgin domain if we just redirect olddomain/strongcategorypage/ to newdomain.com? If the answer is little to none, we might consider just moving the whole site since the other categories are not that strong anyway. We will use 301 approach either way. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Durand0 -
Canonical URLs and Sitemaps
We are using canonical link tags for product pages in a scenario where the URLs on the site contain category names, and the canonical URL points to a URL which does not contain the category names. So, the product page on the site is like www.example.com/clothes/skirts/skater-skirt-12345, and also like www.example.com/sale/clearance/skater-skirt-12345 in another category. And on both of these pages, the canonical link tag references a 3rd URL like www.example.com/skater-skirt-12345. This 3rd URL, used in the canonical link tag is a valid page, and displays the same content as the other two versions, but there are no actual links to this generic version anywhere on the site (nor external). Questions: 1. Does the generic URL referenced in the canonical link also need to be included as on-page links somewhere in the crawled navigation of the site, or is it okay to be just a valid URL not linked anywhere except for the canonical tags? 2. In our sitemap, is it okay to reference the non-canonical URLs, or does the sitemap have to reference only the canonical URL? In our case, the sitemap points to yet a 3rd variation of the URL, like www.example.com/product.jsp?productID=12345. This page retrieves the same content as the others, and includes a canonical link tag back to www.example.com/skater-skirt-12345. Is this a valid approach, or should we revise the sitemap to point to either the category-specific links or the canonical links?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 379seo0