Process for moving existing articles to new structure (URLs, titles, etc)
-
I am in the midst of a major redesign of my site, including revamping existing articles . I have a couple of hundred articles and I am reviewing all aspects of these articles, including titles, URLs, content, etc. I am putting together a process as I move each article across to the new site and have SEO very much in mind. I'd appreciate any feedback on this.
First off, let me be clear that I consider the quality of the content paramount. Anything suggested below is considered "supporting" (that content) from an SEO perspective. But, since I am moving this content across, I may as well take the opportunity to clean things up.
The existing articles don't have particularly good SEO-related attributes, in terms of their titles, URLs, use of keywords and so on. So, I plan to do the following for each article. For illustrative purposes (our site serves the wedding industry), I will use an article about how to involve children at a wedding. Questionsunder each bullet.
- Use the "Keyword Difficulty" feature on Moz Pro to research a specific keyword for each article. In the example case I used "involving children in our wedding".
- Honestly, I am not really sure what to do with this feature
I've read everything from "focus on the long tail" to "don't fear highly competitive keywords". So, my current thinking is merely to use it as interesting information for they keyword I choose but not actually make any specific decisions from that ie. make sure the keyword is relevant to the article as the first priority and use the tool to check out search volume.
- Not sure what I should read into a zero for recent Bing searches. Is that really an important factor? I'm assuming the Google information is not available from Google (it would be displayed here otherwise, I'm guessing)
- Use a title that uses these keywords. In this case, I simply went with "Involving children in our wedding".
- Same for URL - /wedding-guests/involving-children-in-our-wedding
- If I have a reasonable, short and human-friendly term like this (I can do this with virtually every article quite easily), is there any reason why the URL and the title should not be the same? In short, the title and URL are both a relatively concise "mini-sentence"
- Make sure the meta description of the article is easy-to-read (for humans) and uses the keyword (sentence)
- Make sure that the theme (we are moving to WordPress) uses H1 for the page header/title and H2 for sections within the document
- Implement 301 redirects from the old URL (old site) to the new URL
- This seems like a pretty obvious approach for articles where the URL has changed (which will be most of them). But what do I do with articles that I am going to remove. Should I redirect (301) to a related article (so at least the visitor ends up on a page that is generally relevant) or just let this "fall through" as a non-existent page (401)?
As I say, I have 200+ articles to go through I want to make sure I am taking this advantage to clean things up.
Anything leaping out as missing/problematic?
Thanks in advance
Mark
-
You're very welcome Mark!
-
Donna, thank you so much for the response and my apologies for the delayed response (I read as you replied but forgot to thank you). I believe I am on the right track and your responses give me confidence that the changes make sense.
Thank you again.
Mark
-
Hi Mark,
I see your questions have been sitting unaswered for a while now. Let me take a crack at it.
1. Keyword Difficulty - "...my current thinking is merely to ... make sure the keyword is relevant to the article as the first priority and use the tool to check out search volume." Good strategy. When it comes to blogging, one of the main objectives is to built relevance and trust. Picking the most relevant, most applicable phrases that match your intended content is what counts. Volume should only be a consideration if you have options that are equally relevant.
"Not sure what I should read into a zero for recent Bing searches. Is that really an important factor? **"**You are correct. Google doesn't give Moz access to it's keyword data. I would again use relevance as the deciding criteria and not worry about volume.
2. Titles - I think your question is "should I use the keyword phrase in my title and if so, does it have to be exact match". The answer is yes and no. Yes you should use your chosen keyword phrase in your title tag. It doesn't have be an exact match but understand that if you're in a highly competitive market (and certainly the wedding market is competitive), then the closer you are to an exact match the better. Again here though, your first priority should be in appealing to searchers. So if you think "Involving children in our wedding" will be compelling enough to attract clicks thru to your site then go for it. If you think something like "The pros and cons of involving children in our wedding" (or something else) would be more compelling, I'd go for that.
3. URL - No reason for them not to be the same other than length. Google ignores stop words like "and" and "the". You can shorten your URL by removing them and still achieve your objectives.
4. Meta description - yep. Make it human friendly and use your keyword phrase. Also make it compelling and between 150-160 characters. If you and 9 other articles all contain the same title and description tags, why should I click on yours?
5. "Make sure that the theme (we are moving to WordPress) uses H1 for the page header/title and H2 for sections within the document". Here you just want to make sure when you're publishing your content that you don't end up with multiple H1s. I see that a lot with different Wordpress themes. Some allow you to toggle off and on using the page or post title (at the top) as your H1. You'd have to try it and see.
6. 301 redirects - yes, redirect the old to the new. Any you want to retire, redirect them to their closest relative. If there is nothing similar to redirect retired pages to, consider setting up a custom page-not-found (404) page that explains the URL the visitor is searching for no longer exists and point them to your most popular pages, your blog, a human-readable sitemap, or whatever else makes sense. Don't just let it fall thru, unattended.
"Anything leaping out as missing/problematic?"
If you're new to wordpress, you need to be aware that it creates a lot of duplicate content as a result of how content is stored so as it be easily accessible to readers. The Wordpress for SEO by Yoast plugin is the one I use to manage SEO aspects of the site. I recommend it. It's not completely plug-and-play. You'll need to configure the back end to minimize duplication.
The Yoast plugin also allows you to enter "focus keywords", phrases you think might be good to optimize your page or post for. As I said earlier, I use Keyword Difficulty for main site pages, but just the Yoast plugin and its build-in integration with Google suggest for finding article keywords. You might consider just using it.
Lastly, Moz has best practice guidelines for crafting all these parts and pieces. It would be worth your while to review them if you have not done so already. Sounds like you might already have though.
Good luck!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Will URLS With Existing 301 Redirects Be as Powerful As New URLS In Serps?
Most products on our site have redirects to them from years of switching platform and merely trying to get a great and optimised URL for SEO purposes. My question is this: If a product URL has alot of redirects (301's), would it be more beneficial to me to create a duplicated version of the product and start fresh with a new URL? I am not on here trying to gain backlinks but my site is tn nursery dot net (proof:)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | tammysons
I need some quality help figuring out what to do.
Tammy0 -
When I crawl my website I have urls with (#!162738372878) at the end of my urls
When I crawl my website I have urls with (#!162738372878) at the end of my urls. I used screaming frog to look check my website and I seen these. My normal urls are in there too, but each of them have a copy with this strange symbol and number at the end. I used a website builder called homestead to make the website and I seen a bunch of there urls in my crawl as well - http://editor.homestead.com/faq is an example I recently created a new website with their new website builder and transferred it to my old domain. However, I didnt know they didnt offer 301 redirects or canonical tags(learned about those afterwards) and I changed my page names. So they recommended I leave the old website published along with the new website. So if I search my website name on google, sometimes both will show in the results. I just want to sort this all out somehow. My website is www.coastlinetvinstalls.com Any feedback is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Matt
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Matt160 -
URL Migration: Better to have .301s processed or 200s?
I'm migrating sub-domains to sub-folders, but this question is likely applicable for most URL migrations. For example: subdomain1.example.com to example.com/subdomain1 and any child pages. Bear with me as it may just be me but I'm having trouble understanding whether internal links (menu, contextual etc and potentially the sitemaps) should be kept as the pre-migration URL (with .301 in place to the new URL) to give Google a chance to process the redirects or if they should be updated straight away to the new URL to provide a 200 response as so many guides suggest. The reason I ask is unless Google specifically visits the old URL from their index (and therefore processes the .301), it's likely to be found by following internal links on the website or similar which if they're updated to reflect the new URL will return a 200. I would imagine that this would be treated as a new page, which is concerning as it would have a canonical pointing toward itself and the same content as the pre-migrated URL. Is this a problem? Do we need to allow proper processing of redirects for migrations or is Google smarter than this and can work it out if they visit the old URL at a later date and put two and two together? What happens in-between? I haven't seen any migration guides suggest leaving .301s in place but to amend links to 200 as soon as possible in all instances. One thought is I guess there's also the Fetch as Google tool within Search Console which could be used with the old URLs - could this be relied on? Apologies if this topic has been covered before but it's quite difficult to search for without returning generic topics around .301 redirects. Hope it makes sense - appreciate any responses!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AmyCatlow0 -
URL Construction
Working on an old site that currently has category urls (that productively rank) like this example: LakeNameBoating.com/category/705687/rentals I want to enhance the existing mid page one rank for terms related to "Lake Name Boat Rentals," 301ing the old urls to the new, would you construct the new urls as: LakeNameBoating.com/lake-name-boat-rentals or... LakeNameBoating.com/boat-rentals And why? It's all for one particular lake with "name" being just an anonymous placeholder example. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
What's the best way to A/B test new version of your website having different URL structure?
Hi Mozzers, Hope you're doing good. Well, we have a website, up and running for a decent tenure with millions of pages indexed in search engines. We're planning to go live with a new version of it i.e a new experience for our users, some changes in site architecture which includes change in URL structure for existing URLs and introduction of some new URLs as well. Now, my question is, what's the best way to do a A/B test with the new version? We can't launch it for a part of users (say, we'll make it live for 50% of the users, an remaining 50% of the users will see old/existing site only) because the URL structure is changed now and bots will get confused if they start landing on different versions. Will this work if I reduce crawl rate to ZERO during this A/B tenure? How will this impact us from SEO perspective? How will those old to new 301 URL redirects will affect our users? Have you ever faced/handled this kind of scenario? If yes, please share how you handled this along with the impact. If this is something new to you, would love to know your recommendations before taking the final call on this. Note: We're taking care of all existing URLs, properly 301 redirecting them to their newer versions but there are some new URLs which are supported only on newer version (architectural changes I mentioned above), and these URLs aren't backward compatible, can't redirect them to a valid URL on old version.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | _nitman0 -
How important is it to canonicalize mobile URLs to desktop URLs?
I know many SEO's prefer a stylesheet and single URL, but if you use m.domain.com, do you canonicalize to your desktop URLS?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nicole.healthline0 -
Quick URL structure question
Say you've got 5,000 articles. Each of these are from 2-3 generations of taxonomy. For example: example.com/motherboard/pc/asus39450 example.com/soundcard/pc/hp39 example.com/ethernet/software/freeware/stuffit294 None of the articles were SUPER popular as is, but they still bring in a bit of residual traffic combined. Few thousand or so a day. You're switching to a brand new platform. Awesome new structure, taxonomy, etc. The real deal. But, historically, you don't have the old taxonomy functions. The articles above, if created today, file under example.com/hardware/ This is the way it is from here on out. But what to do with the historical files? keep the original URL structure, in the new system. Readers might be confused if they try to reach example.com/motherboard, but at least you retain all SEO weight and these articles are all older anyways. Who cares? Grab some lunch. change the urls to /hardware/, and redirect everything the right way. Lose some rank maybe, but its a smooth operation, nice and neat. Grab some dinner. change the urls to /hardware/ DONT redirect, surprise Google with 5k articles about old computer hardware. Magical traffic splurge, go skydiving. Panic, cry into your pillow. Get job signing receipts at CostCo Thoughts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EricPacifico0 -
New domain name for existing site
Hi all, Our business has aquired a new domain name because there are several organisations closely related to ours that use similar domain names to target a niche group of users. We would like to use this new domain name to link to an existing website with content targeted at this user group as we feel that they will be more comfortable getting to the content via this new URL. After a useful search in these forums the majority of SEOMOZ gurus suggest that the new URL should be redirected to our current site using a 301 and we are happy to do this. However do we have to link the URL to our homepage or is it acceptable to link to a subfolder within the domain and then targeting content on this page to the user niche? Thanks for any input. Kind regards. Edit 11:38 The old url is oldcommunity.charity.com (we know having a subdomain is bad) this is where we manage all community engagement. The new url is www.newparticularcommunity.com and we would redirect this to oldcommunity.charity.com. The reason we have bought www.oldparticularcommunity.com is because the url is used by other charities for community engagement and is recognised by the community we are targeting. We are redirecting to our old site because we do not want to engage with them on this new url as our old site oldcommunity.charity.com already does this and can cater for the new community and perhaps they haven't realised that we can.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | tgraham0