Anchor Text and over optimization
-
Hello everyone,
I would like to have your expert (hopefully) opinion on one thing: I am working on a specifi page of a pretty big site, and I noticed one thing in particular. This page is linked to from a lots of internal pages (which is ok) but the anchor text used is in most cases the exact keyword they would like to rank for. I know this is not generally a good thing, but I guess they have so many links with that particular anchor because of the breadcrumbs, and this actually makes sense. Now, if this is the case, how could we work this out (if this is an issue)? Or probably this is not an issue since those links don’t carry a lot of SEO weight…don’t know.
Thanks for your opinion on this
-
Hi Brendan!
The post you linked is really interesting! Thanks! There are so much info out there that it’s quite easy to miss the good stuff
Yep, and for the on-page grader I already checked that one: A
Thank you very much for your kind help
-
Hi Parodi,
Including your targeted keywords in your URL is definitely recommended. As a general rule, people should be able to read the URL and understand what the page is about before clicking. Pete Meyers wrote a great post on this a few years back but all of the information in it is still very much valid today.
One really important thing to note - if you do change your URLs to include your targeted keywords (and there's no real reason you shouldn't), remember to redirect the old versions properly using 301 redirects.
One final thing you might want to try if you haven't already is Moz's On-Page Grader Tool which will look at important on-page ranking factors for your targeted search term and give you a list of things you can do to improve the relevancy of the page.
-
HI guys, thank you very much for your kind help. Yes the anchor is perfectly natural, and it makes sense that a link from the footer is not seen as an over optimization, otherwise all big sites should have this issue However, I already did an analysis of the competitors considering A LOT of things and our site, at least on paper, should rank higher (and I took into consideration not just what was on the moz report but html errors, page speed, word count and so on…pretty through). There are things that can be done to improve the page optimization, but what is interesting, is that all the pages that are outranking us have some sort of keyword variation in the URL. I thought the keyword in the URL was not a big deal, but if that’s the case, well, it kind of gets confusing with everyone saying that keywords in the URL are not important. Do you have any experience on this? Not sure if I can share the URL but in case I can, I will Thank you so very much!
-
Howdy,
This all really depends on what the anchor text being used is and how natural it sounds. For example, if it's a service such as car insurance that your site offers, using 'car insurance' as the anchor text would make complete sense as this is how the service is referred to. However, if it's something more long tail than this - car insurance California, for example, it would look unnatural and would not be recommended.
Are you able to share the URL for the page you're working on so we can take a closer look? Feel free to send me a PM if you'd prefer.
Another thing you could do is to look at your competitors in the SERPs for your targeted term(s) and see what they're doing. Open Site Explorer's Anchor Text tool is a great way to look at internal links pointing to a particular page so you can get a really good idea of what others are doing.
-
Well, ideal case is variety of anchors, but you are speaking about internal links so i dont think it´s a big problem.
Problematic would be if those links with same achors would be external links
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Question about Image Optimization and File Size -- Does it really matter
I was using Moz's guidelines (https://moz.com/learn/seo/page-speed) to reduce the file size of my pages to improve load speed, but I'm not sure it really makes much of a difference. On this page https://www.mtecorp.com/cad/MAPP0006A002/, the file size is 710KB and it's Google Page Insight Score is 84 on desktop and 66 on mobile. On this page https://www.mtecorp.com/cad/SWNW0130E/, I got the image size to 227KB and its Google Page insight Score is virtually the same, 87 on desktop and 62 on mobile. Any ideas if it is really worth the time to get images down? (or maybe it doesn't matter if it is less than 1,000KB.
Technical SEO | | EricVallee1 -
Hidden text and mobile indexing
Hello, I believe mobile indexing 1 st is in place. Since then, does google give the same value to content that is hidden behind a tab (for example a question where you need to click on the + to see the answer) as content that would be directly visible ? Thank you,
Technical SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
Optimizing a Forum (phpbb3)
Hi all, Over the last 6 months our small forum has be getting a tiny bit of traffic. We would like to make the forum a larger part of what we are offering (content wise). Regardless, I am wondering if anyone had any recommendations for optimizing a phpbb3 forum as Moz seems to keep telling me that I have 70,000 pieces of duplicate content, duplicate pages, etc. While the site crawl by moz outputs varying results week to week, it appears to be tagging posts and responses to posts as duplicate content. I am concerned that Google may be doing the same. Additionally, are there any recommendations for best practices related to forum meta descriptions and page titling as well? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Jared P.
Technical SEO | | wallacep0 -
Optimizing internal links or over-optimizing?
For a while I hated the look of the internal links page of Google Web Master Tools account for a certain site. With a total of 120+K pages, the top internal link was the one pointing to "FAQ". With around 1M links. That was due to the fact, on every single page, both the header and the footer where presenting 5 links to the most popular questions. The traffic of those FAQ pages is non-existent, the anchor text is not SEO interesting, and theoretically 1M useless internal links is detrimental for page juice flow. So I removed them. Replacing the anchor with javascript to keep the functionality. I actually left only 1 “pure” link to the FAQ page in the footer (site wide). And overnight, the internal links page of that GWT account disappeared. Blank, no links. Now... Mhhh... I feel like... Ops! Yes I am getting paranoid at the idea the sudden disappearance of 1M internal links was not appreciated by google bot. Anyone had similar experience? Could this be seen by google bot as over-optimizing and be penalized? Did I possibly triggered a manual review of the website removing 1M internal links? I remember Matt Cutts saying adding or removing 1M pages (pages) would trigger a flag at google spam team and lead to a manual review, but 1M internal links? Any idea?
Technical SEO | | max.favilli0 -
Is it better to have text is separate hidden divs or text stored in Javascript?
would it be better if: 1. I have all the text in separate hidden divs or 2. or all the text is stored in javascript?
Technical SEO | | Personnel_Concept0 -
If I get a natural link for a great site and I have my keyword with anchor text in this link, how should I proceed?
If I get a natural link for a great site and I have my keyword with anchor text in this link, how should I proceed? I need to contact the site and ask to remove the link or request the removal of the anchor text and leave only the site URL? Or yet do not I need to worry about this issue?
Technical SEO | | soulmktpro0 -
How should I structure a site with multiple addresses to optimize for local search??
Here's the setup: We have a website, www.laptopmd.com, and we're ranking quite well in our geographic target area. The site is chock-full of local keywords, has the address properly marked up, html5 and schema.org compliant, near the top of the page, etc. It's all working quite well, but we're looking to expand to two more locations, and we're terrified that adding more addresses and playing with our current set-up will wreak havoc with our local search results, which we quite frankly currently rock. My question is 1)when it comes time to doing sub-pages for the new locations, should we strip the location information from the main site and put up local pages for each location in subfolders? 1a) should we use subdomains instead of subfolders to keep Google from becoming confused? Should we consider simply starting identically branded pages for the individual locations and hope that exact-match location-based urls will make up for the hit for duplicate content and will overcome the difficulty of building a brand from multiple pages? I've tried to look for examples of businesses that have tried to do what we're doing, but all the advice has been about organic search, which i already have the answer to. I haven't been able to really find a good example of a small business with multiple locations AND good rankings for each location. Should this serve as a warning to me?
Technical SEO | | LMDNYC0 -
Google / Bing Product Feeds - Optimization - Taxonomies
Can anyone provide insightful optimization tips for GOOGLE and BING product feeds? How important is it to use the respective SE' taxonomies? Any other effective tactics apart from data stufffing?
Technical SEO | | DavidS-2820610