Flux in Bing/Yahoo search rankings?
-
Has anyone else noticed any flux in Bing/Yahoo desktop search rankings in the start of March?
Our weekly MSN search traffic was steady and then starting dropping off around March 3 or 4. Weekly desktop traffic now down about 20%
Anyone see anything similar or have any resources for learning more about this?
-
I have likewise noticed this on several sites - that do very well in Google. Some sites were near or at the top of Yahoo page one have fallen suddenly & drastically!
Specifically, two smaller (what I call) "magnet sites" or "satellite sites", tuned to narrow band topics, and linked to the main site which also contained those topics. They were both number one, page one - and beat the main, large site on their topic.
The net result is the two magnet sites fell back but Yahoo made the "mother-ship" number one in both categories. They "givith and taketh away".
I too noticed a large increase in ad-space real estate. Since there's so much less room for organic results, they are obviously quashing multiple SERPS from the same outfits. I have noticed a similar result in Google years back - a satellite site will virtually disappear, but the main site goes to number one.
-
Yes, just desktop. And the change happened across multiple browsers, not just Firefox.
I hadn't used Bing in a while but when I tested it out after the drop seems like there's way more ads that I remember there being before. (Of course, that's not the most scientific of observations.)
-
If all of the traffic is one keyword, then a minor interface change could cause a big traffic change. Any new ad units or stuff like that showing up that wasn't there before in the SERP?
There's been flux lately from the Firefox partnership, but seems unlikely for you to notice that trickle down.
I assume you saw no change on mobile or tablet, just desktop?
-
I looked in Bing Webmaster Tools and it definitely looked like something funky was going on.
We still use http on our site, but Bing was picking up a flawed https version of the home page. I had the tech team redirect https to http using a 301. When I fetched with Bingbot, it initially returned an error. After a couple of re-tries, though, it worked fine. Very strange. I submitted the URL for bing to re-crawl.
I imagine this has something to do with it, although I can't say exactly how.
Another funky thing: Almost all of our Bing/Yahoo traffic is from one keyword. According to Bing Webmaster tools, we rank the same for that keyword after the drop in traffic as we did before. Maybe there has been a change to Bing/Yahoo SERPs?
-
That's all interesting. Didn't mean to suggest you needed to look at BWT (sounds like you have quite a bit already), I meant to reiterate that Benjamin should look there. I rarely spend any time in BWT so I can't say much about its response times and error rate, but I wouldn't be surprised if it has delays or takes awhile to sort out big site changes.
Hope it trends well for you and please report back if you see any developments. I'm curious what Benjamin sees on the backend of BWT as well.
-
Hi, Kane. I went through every setting and data page on Bing Webmasters. The only thing odd is that the sitemap has been sitting there "pending" for a couple of weeks. Hopefully the URL submits with jostle something good loose. Bing may be very confused because my clients had a website they had tried to do themselves and there were http and https pages mixed together and orphan pages and template placeholder posts like "hello world". So some radical surgery was performed to resolve the SEO issues...along with content changes. So Bing could just be in a bit of a shock. I have seen lesser changes make rankings suffer for a while before. So I am not sure either if this is due to a systemic Bing change or due to our actions taken on the site. Thanks for responding!
-
I just scanned through 20-30 sites of various traffic/content models and I don't see anything major on any of them, but that doesn't mean you're not seeing something specific happening.
If I were you I would check into Bing Webmaster Tools data and see what they can tell you about recent changes to crawling or visibility to see if there's a signal there that you can look into further.
-
Yes, Ben, I have seen this and it was very pronounced on one of the websites I support. Rankings for Google remained, shifting a little bit due to some technical and content SEO changes. The shifting in Google was desired. However Bing/Yahoo dropped all keyword rankings that we are following. From many to zero in one week. And, the sitemap in Bing Webmaster Tools has been pending for 2 weeks now. Although concerned, I figured this was a response to the elimination of duplicate content from technical SEO changes, onpage optimization changes (from none or accidental to well-optimiized), and a change of address on a Bing listing that did not go through completely on Bing Local the first time. So, yes, the Bing/Yahoo drop in early March happened on a a few sites I monitor, and were very pronounced on one site that was undergoing many changes. After waiting 2-3 weeks for things to index/deindex naturally with all search engines, this week, I submitted URLs to Bing Webmasters Tools looking for some ranking relief. Next step is to do some deep page linking to try to influence having more pages crawled by Bing. I would be interested to hear others' experiences.
-
I haven't seen this Ben. And you're still doing fine in Google? Have you checked Google Trends in relation to your content? Did your robots.txt file change? Is your site in Bing Webmaster Sites? https://www.bing.com/webmaster/ Just a few of the things to check on. Cheers!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Page Rank on Moz compared to Ahrefs
So there seems to be a huge philosophical difference behind how Moz and Ahrefs calculates page rank (PA). On Moz, PA is very dependent on a site's DA. For instance, any new page or page with no backlinks for a 90DA site on Moz will have around 40PA. However, if a site has around 40 DA, any new page or page with no backlinks will have around 15PA PA. Now if one were to decide to get tons of backlinks to this 40 DA/15PA page, that will raise the PA of the page slightly, but it will likely never go beyond 40PA....which hints that one would rather acquire a backlink from a page on a high DA site even if that page has 0 links back to it as opposed to a backlink from a page on a low DA site with many, many backlinks to it. This is very different from how Ahrefs calculates PA. For Ahrefs, the PA of any new page or page with no backlinks to it will have a PA of around 8-10ish....no matter what the DA of the site is. When a page from a 40DA site begins acquiring a few links to it, it will quickly acquire a higher PA than a page from a 90DA site with no links to it. The big difference here is that for Ahrefs, PA for a given page is far more dependent on how many inbound links that page has. On the other hand, for Moz, PA for a given page is far more dependent on the DA of the site that page is on. If we were to trust Moz's PA calculations, SEOrs should emphasize getting links from high DA sites....whereas if we were to trust Ahref's PA calculations, SEOrs should focus less on that and more on building links to whatever page they want to rank up (even if that page is on a low DA site). So what do you guys think? Do you agree more with Moz or Ahref's valuation of PA. Is PA of a page more dependent on the DA or more dependent on it's total inbound links?
Algorithm Updates | | ButtaC1 -
Google loves me. Yahoo and Bing not so much...
My site is ranked very high for my keywords on Google and Google Maps. But we come in 4 or 6 places lower on the other two search engines. Does any one have any pointers on the different types of algorithms they use? Many thanks in advance:)
Algorithm Updates | | MissThumann0 -
"Update" in Search Console is NOT an Algo Update
We've had a few questions about the line labeled "Update" in Google Search Console on the Search Analytics timeline graph (see attached image). Asking around the industry, there seems to be a fair amount of confusion about whether this indicates a Google algorithm update. This is not an algorithm update - it indicates an internal update in how Google is measuring search traffic. Your numbers before and after the update may look different, but this is because Google has essentially changed how they calculate your search traffic for reporting purposes. Your actual ranking and traffic have not changed due to these updates. The latest updated happened on April 27th and is described by Google on this page: Data anomalies in Search Console Given the historical connotations of "update" in reference to Google search, this is a poor choice of words and I've contacted the Webmaster Team about it. 2CsyN7Q
Algorithm Updates | | Dr-Pete12 -
Its the 21st April, and my non responsive page is still ranking the same ?
Hi, As you know the new algorithm is due today, can anybody confirm why my site wouldn't appear to be affected as yet? Cheers
Algorithm Updates | | CFCU0 -
Content, for the sake of the search engines
So we all know the importance of quality content for SEO; providing content for the user as opposed to the search engines. It used to be that copyrighting for SEO was treading the line between readability and keyword density, which is obviously no longer the case. So, my question is this, for a website which doesn't require a great deal of content to be successful and to fullfil the needs of the user, should we still be creating relavent content for the sake of SEO? For example, should I be creating content which is crawlable but may not actually be needed / accessed by the user, to help improve rankings? Food for thought 🙂
Algorithm Updates | | underscorelive0 -
Can visitors duration time affect Google Rankings?
Does the time a person stays on a website affect Search Rankings? If so, could the lower time from Adwords Visitors be effecting organic rankings? And the same for bounce rate. If Non-Paid Search Traffic Avg. Visit Duration time is 3:55 and Paid Search Traffic Avg. Visit Duration is 1:59 Could the low duration time be affecting our website rankings?
Algorithm Updates | | hfranz0 -
SEO Link building / Article Distributation
Quick question in regards to link building and OFF PAGE SEO... Why isn't Articles distributation via wire services considered a "Duplicate Content" issue by Google? i.e. If take the one article and post it accross 50 (do follow) websites, Press release sites, and blogs. I would love to hear your thoughts and feedback on this. Regard, Sammy
Algorithm Updates | | revsystems.com0 -
Location and how it affects search results
I'm ranking in the top 3 for a keyword in Google but when I change my location to a state of city I'm at the bottom of the page. Can anyone help? I made sure that the state I want to rank for is both in my title and body. The page has been up for almost a year and is a PR3. It is not my home page but a sup page under "areas we serve." I'm looking for someone who can explain how I can optimize for a state or city. Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | donnye0