What am i not spotting?
-
A client i'm working with is desperate to rank top for the term 'wholesale jewellery' (it's a UK company and that's the UK spelling). He previously held the top spot but got hit with a penalty and is now bottom of page 1.
So far nothing I have done has had much of an impact despite this being a relatively low competition term. We've fluctuated around the first page for the last few months but the highest we got was 4th before dropping again. The site's domain authority is on par with the site ranking top (who have no content to speak of) and is superior to most other sites on the first page. The site also has similar social metrics to the top ranking site and superior to most others on the first page.
I've focused on building fewer good quality links and some of them have been excellent - DA 80+ and yet, still no movement. On-page optimisation is spot on as well.
A couple of things I have spotted that might be having an impact:
-my client's site has a .com domain where most others have .co.uk
-most sites on the first page have either jewellery, wholesale or both in their domain names
-relevance of linking istes could be playing a part here. My client has links from wholesale sites but few from jewellery-related sites
-within my client's link profile there are very few, if any exact anchor text links for the term 'wholesale jewellery'
-legacy of a penalty could be making ranking progress that much more difficult?
I'd appreciate your input because I've hit a brick wall. The site is http://www.parklaneonline.com
-
Hello there,
Answers to your questions below
- My client's site has a .com domain where most others have .co.uk
I suspect this isn't the issue. but provided your client is only targeting the UK you might considering setting up geotargeting in Google Webmaster Tools - see: http://moz.com/community/q/geographic-target-set-up-in-google-webmaster-tool
- Most sites on the first page have either jewellery, wholesale or both in their domain names
This is unlikely to be the issue.
- Relevance of linking sites could be playing a part here. My client has links from wholesale sites but few from jewellery-related sites.
Attracting relevant links is never a bad idea, plus even if you don't see ranking improvements you'd hope that relevant links sent good quality traffic. I'd definitely do this if I were you
- Within my client's link profile there are very few, if any exact anchor text links for the term 'wholesale jewellery'
I'd suggest it's unlikely that this is the issue - anchor text is not the ranking signal it once was.
- Legacy of a penalty could be making ranking progress that much more difficult?
I think this is the most likely answer, but I don't quite agree with your phrasing. You mentioned a past penalty - given that you're ranking on the first page I suspect you're not suffering from said penalty any more. However, if you do still have a lot of 'low quality' links, then further clean up might be the way forward.
However, you'll also need to continue to build the sorts of links that Google want to reward (i.e. links which are editorially given from quality sites) in order to improve your rankings.
Incidentally, you mentioned you've disavowed a bunch of links. 3rd party tools (ahrefs, majestic, moz) aren't able to filter these out because they've no access to your disavow files
I hope this helps,
Hannah
-
Thanks for your response Matt.
A lot of the bad links have been disavowed. Does Ahrefs filter these out?
Perhaps a second round of link cleanup is in order?
-
It's backlinks holding the site back.
Tons of link spam - check out Majestic historic info. 1926 referring domains, 12,000+ backlinks. Of the 1926 domains, only 800 different subnets. That's a pretty high spam ratio.
If Ahrefs is your tool of choice, check out the referring IPs. Link networks aplenty.
- 36 domains on one IP
- 34 domains on another IP
- 30 domains on another IP
- 29 domains on another IP
- Blogspot spam
As far as onsite, remove the meta keywords, ensure you've geo-targeted in WMT and the onsite should be ok. This is very, very likely backlink network related.
-
My Take on this:
-my client's site has a .com domain where most others have .co.uk
Google does rank regionally, .com is great, .co.uk would probably be better for UK specific listings. (301 from .com .co.uk would be your best bet)
-most sites on the first page have either jewellery, wholesale or both in their domain names
This is less of a thing than it used to be. Google seems to be starting to favour brand identity over direct keyword rich domains (EMD) - http://moz.com/blog/are-exact-match-domains-in-decline
-relevance of linking istes could be playing a part here. My client has links from wholesale sites but few from jewellery-related sites
Probably not going to be a penalty from this, but relevance might make a difference to just how much extra juice those links provide.
-within my client's link profile there are very few, if any exact anchor text links for the term 'wholesale jewellery'
Probably some effect from this, how much though im not sure (Exact anchor text isnt something i've had to look into before)
-legacy of a penalty could be making ranking progress that much more difficult?
Depends how long ago this was. So long as whatever caused the penalty is fixed, this is probably not an issue now.
-
I can confirm in Incognito mode you are ranked at the bottom of page 1, but only us SEOs use Incognito mode - not your average Google user.
We had a similar problem and no matter what I did I couldn't get the ranking to change constantly.
The strategy I took, was to look at keywords people we're searching for before the 'money' term and get content to meet the searches needs. Less competition usually so rank higher.
Google will rank sites higher where users have visited before and had a good experience, so if you can get people to your site before they know they are looking for wholesale jewellery, when they come to search the terms as well as you ranking higher, you will also have some brand loyalty so more likely to get clicked.
If we still had keyword data in GA we could prove this theory but I get more organic traffic to the page I was trying to improve.
Hope this helps. While you might not improve in Incognito mode - you will get more organic traffic and more sales.
Hope this is useful.
Thanks
Andy
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Webpage is not ranking
https://www.nextheadphone.com/oneodio-a10-hybrid-review/ I just published a new article. Keyword is : OneOdio A10 Hybrid Review Before writing the article, I researched that This is Easy keyword. I should rank as soon as I publish the article. After publishing the article my Current rank is #32 Why its not ranking? Any idea
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | NextHeadphone0 -
Optimization for "Search by Photos" feature
Howdy, fellow mozzers, Does anyone know what affects a given company photos show up in the "Search by Photos" section? I can't find any decent info.. Here is the link to SEL, describing the feature (not even google themselves seem to have an announcement about it). https://searchengineland.com/google-showing-mobile-search-by-photos-option-in-selected-local-verticals-323237 Thanks in advance!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DmitriiK0 -
Gradual traffic drop of personal finance website in the last three months
Dear All, I have personal finance website https://mymoneysouq.com and the traffic dropped by less than half of what is was before last three months. I am figuring out all the possible issues and doing everything that comes to our mind to improve the quality of our website. I tried the following before posting here:1. Tried contacting website owner which we think spam and add all such domains to our disavow list2. We found little duplicate content on sites like Quora, we made those answers down by reporting to Quora3. Reported to DMCA on 3 articles articles(partial) from our website.4. We are trying improving user experience5. Removed one of our page that shared by many people but our page was not indexed by Google.6. Checked and modified content if any our articles are having more keywords than what SEO experts recommend. 7. We are working on researching more and figuring our what else can might have gone wrong with our traffic.8. Working on improving EAT I attached our traffic drop graph. I believe this drop is not natural it happened because of some issue at our end and we are not able to figure out the exact reasons.Surprisingly another site with not so high quality content started ranking now in the top.I am here to get community members/experts help on this. I could provide you if you need any further details. Thanks a lot for your time. We really appreciate any tips that you can share with us.Q2S1tlK Q2S1tlK
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | swamyallamraju0 -
Any Tips for Reviving Old Websites?
Hi, I have a series of websites that have been offline for seven years. Do you guys have any tips that might help restore them to their former SERPs glory? Nothing about the sites themselves has changes since they went offline. Same domains, same content, and only a different server. What has changed is the SERPs landscape. I've noticed competitive terms that these sites used to rank on the first page for with far more results now. I have also noticed some terms result in what seems like a thesaurus similar language results from traditionally more authoritative websites instead of the exact phrase searched for. This concerns me because I could see a less relevant page outranking me just because it is on a .gov domain with similar vocabulary even though the result is not what people searching for the term are most likely searching for. The sites have also lost numerous backlinks but still have some really good ones.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CopBlaster.com1 -
Showing up in Bing and Yahoo, but not Google? - Spa Spot
Spa Spot Edmonton is a Client of ours and while it seems that they are performing very well in Bing and Yahoo search engines, the same can't be said about Google. 9 or 10 keywords are on the 1st page with another 9 or 10 on the second pages of Bing and Yahoo, whereas Google is only ranking 3 keywords and the rest do not show up even in the Top 50. Any ideas?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Web3Marketing870 -
Can you spot the differences?
Well, I have been scratching my head on this for days, I will try throwing the ball to you with hopes someone more experienced than me can help. The scenario is: e-commerce -> brand page -> SERP -> comparison between how two pages rank; one from my website, one from a competitor website. The brand is Michelin, the keyword is "pneumatici michelin" (equivalent in italian of “michelin tires”). I am not looking at SERP first page, where competition is surely much more fierce. I am looking at position 11: http://www.cambio-gomme.it/marchi/michelin/ And my page (not in the first 50): http://www.gomme-auto.it/pneumatici/michelin My page: MOZ Page Grade (for keyword “pneumatici michelin”): A External backlinks to the page: 1 Domain Authority: 29 Page Authority: 24 On-page SEO optimization: keyword density: 0.87% internal links: 145 external links: 3 page size: 108kb html size: 24kb words on page: 2077 link-words: 408 non-linked words: 1669 time to first byte: 0.419s Competitor page: MOZ Page Grade (for keyword “pneumatici michelin”): A External backlinks to the page: 0 Domain Authority: 26 Page Authority: 13 On-page SEO optimization: keyword density: 0.75% internal links: 70 external links: 1 page size: 31kb html size: 9kb words on page: 1521 link-words: 168 non-linked words: 1353 time to first byte: 0.373s Domain age is very similar, both websites launched close to each other in 2012. Ideas? Suggestion on other metrics to compare?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | max.favilli0 -
Duplicate content on ecommerce sites
I just want to confirm something about duplicate content. On an eCommerce site, if the meta-titles, meta-descriptions and product descriptions are all unique, yet a big chunk at the bottom (featuring "why buy with us" etc) is copied across all product pages, would each page be penalised, or not indexed, for duplicate content? Does the whole page need to be a duplicate to be worried about this, or would this large chunk of text, bigger than the product description, have an effect on the page. If this would be a problem, what are some ways around it? Because the content is quite powerful, and is relavent to all products... Cheers,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Creode0 -
Can you spot the reasons for our site dropping in rankings so significantly?
We've been racking our brains over this since the recent search engine changes (the notorious and non-cuddley Google Panda update) and have, within reason, corrected as many of the problems that we possibly can yet still our traffic drops further. http://www.bedandbreakfastsguide.com used to rank fairly equally with it's competitors however since the update (and a number of suggestions from another SEO company), the traffic has dropped by about 90% and it's dropped almost completely from the search results (unlike the competitors who are breaking many faux-pars yet remain well ranked). I don't think we're seeing the wood from the trees anymore so I'd be grateful if someone could take a look and see if we've missed anything glaringly obvious? Any thoughts welcome. Thanks Tim Big changes around the same time/since that might be worth noting: Setup a canonical domain name of www.bedandbreakfastsguide.com and (using IIS7) 301 redirect all other traffic over. Setup canonical URL meta tag for all results pages so they point to a single page Moved the redirect page (the one which sends users to the B&B's site) to another subdomain. Redesigned the URLs where possible to use "friendlier" and more keyword rich urls and 301 redirecting for the old urls Added XML sitemaps to the various tools (we found out they weren't there before) Added a robots.txt file Lowercased all urls Where possible removed duplicate results pages and pointed them at a single page Restructured the page titles to be more relevant Setup nofollow on the external urls
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TimGaunt0