How have your SEO Audits evolved over time?
-
Hi guys,
SEO Audits used to be so focused on the basics like title tags, meta descriptions etc. but now more than ever, SEO is a discipline which encompasses everything from content marketing to UX design.
Would be great to hear from everyone how their audit templates have evolved over time to keep up with the latest updates in SEO and algorithm changes! Which new sections have you added and which have you removed?!
Cheers,
Daniel
-
Moosa thank you for linking to me about this stuff!
-
Personally, my audits have not changed dramatically in all the years I've been performing them as far as the overwhelming majority of signals / factors to look at, because sustainable SEO has always been consistent.
User experience has always been the core of what real, sustainable SEO is all about. That has not ever changed. Real, quality and relevant links have always been part of true sustainable SEO as well because that's an off-site consideration to the comprehensive understanding of UX across the web.
Where they have changed is in regard to other realities:
1. As Google has gotten more and more honest about the unrealistic "let us figure it all out" message, they've consistently come out with new ranking signal points including, but in no way limited to Canonical tags, Breadcrumbs, Schema, URL Parameters, and a host of other similar "aids" they either invented, or got on board with to help their algorithms understand what's really going on.
2. That can be extended to the attempt search engines have made to better integrate real user experience signals including page processing speed, crawl efficiency (search bots are users, so user experience for bots matters more now), and also where they've worked to better integrate social signals over the years, all of these have needed to be integrated into the audit process. Now we have mobile and what real UX means to that platform, so of course, we need to look at what the full range of signals are for mobile UX.
2. As everything has gotten more complex across multiple algorithms run by two different teams at Google, their own decisions have caused new problems. Robots.txt files used to be a hard directive. Now, they're only a hint. Canonical tags are supposed to be a directive (hence the word "canonical") yet now they often ignore those. Things like that have thus become an integral part of my audit work in that cross-signal relationships are now more critical than ever.
3. I have always done my best to reevaluate how I present my findings and recommendations in my audits, and routinely have refined that as well - a stronger, clearer and more education-centric audit doc results each time.
Another crucial concept I try to help clients become educated in is that Google is, for the forseeable future, going to work more and more at refining and building on all of these concepts, and because of that, we as auditors need to realize that the writing on the wall type issues are almost certainly going to become ranking factors in the future, and if we can anticipate those well enough, our audits today need to address those so our clients get ahead of the Google roller coaster.
At the moment, one example of this are page speed specific to mobile - I've been advocating that to audit clients for years, and then not long ago Google Page Speed Insights came out and included speed data for mobile. Then, this year, Google's people have stated that they will be upgrading their new Mobile testing tool in the not distant future, to show exactly how page speed is in fact, now a direct ranking factor.
Another one that's about to pop is interstitial pop-ups. The buzz is heavily growing around user complaints about them. Google even just this week came out with a post about the harm interstitial popups did in their own testing on their own properties. And it's been hinted by their people that this will be an upcoming ranking factor.
For someone who has been laser focused on UX, this was an obvious issue to have been advocating against for at least the past year as site owners have gotten more and more aggressive in their use, harming UX.
So audits always have, and always will need to also integrate forward-thinking recommendations.
disclaimer: I do around 80 audits a year - its my primary business.
-
An interesting question
Mine have taken a huge turn towards usability and content, but I still cover off all best practices such as the titles etc. I also focus more heavily on brand strength and user metrics (data from Crazy Egg for eggsample).
Backlinks also feature more prominently now than they used to.
SEO is about so much more than just where you appear in the SERPs now.
-Andy
-
Daniel, I guess there is no straight answer to it and I totally agree with you when it comes to SEO audits, now it’s not limited to titles and meta tags only. One has to focus on UX and UI of the website, their bounce rate on the website, content creation, blog and much more.
If you personally ask me I love Alan Bleiweiss when it comes to SEO audits of the website and I highly recommend you checking this post out http://alanbleiweiss.com/professional-seo-audits/seo-audit-checklist/
It covers all the important points that one should cover when auditing the website.
Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Video Accessibility and SEO
How do you implement video meta data, closed captioning and transcripts to ensure both search engines and screen readers can crawl/read? For example, in a mostly text-based video with a simple audio track hosted one brightcove and embedded into our site, we want to make sure 1) google can crawl the text on the video and 2) a vision-impaired viewer would be able to use a screen reader to hear the text on the video.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | elmorse1 -
What is the best SEO way for a shop
Hi there ! A client want to sell some products on its future website but just a small range (the most part of this website will not be an online shop). The idea is to add a "shop" button in the menu to redirect clients in this shop. I would like your opinion about how should I construct this shop, what do you think is the best for SEO : "www.website.com/shop" or "shop.website.com" thank you in advance for your answers !
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EnjinFrance0 -
SEO: Subdomain vs folders
Hello, here's our situation:We have an ecommerce website, say www.example.com. For support, we use zendesk which offers a great platform that makes publishing FAQ and various resource articles very easy. We're torn between publishing these articles on our actual website, or publishing them via Zendesk. If we publish them on our website, the url would be something like:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | yacpro13
www.example.com/articles/title_article.html On the other hand, if we publish them via zendesk, the url would look like:
support.example.com/articles/title_of_article We would like to publish them via Zendesk, however, we do no want to miss out on any SEO benefit, however marginal it may be. Doing it this way, the domain would have all of the ecommerce pages (product and category pages), and the subdomain would have ALL other types of pages (help articles and also policies, such as return policies, shipping info, etc etc). I know a long time ago, folders were preferred over subdomains for SEO, but things change all the time.Do you think setting up all the ecommerce pages on the domain, and all content pages on the subdomain, would be a lesser solution? Thanks.0 -
SEO issues with Magento
Hi Everyone, We use Magento CMS for our site and we are having a frustrating time resolving our SEO issues. The site was very poorly managed in years past and in the past year I have redesigned and cleaned up many things. However we are recently having trouble with indexing and keyword ranking. Issue #1: Our main keyword ranking has dropped quite a bit while our other less important keywords have steadily risen. I suspect a very strict robots.txt implemented back in early January may have been the culprit. We have since been modifying it with out much luck. Many of our pages are still blocked. 12/05/12 : ranked 12th 1/09/13: ranked 19th 1/16/13: ranked 35th Now: out of top 50 (52nd) Issue #2: Not a single image is being indexed. We are 0 for 582 according to Webmaster tools. Not sure why... Any help and advice would be greatly appreciated as I have great determination and interest in learning the correct way to fix/do this. Site: www.scojo.com Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | t_parrish0 -
Local SEO and PO Boxes
What is the best way to do local SEO when the business has a physical address, but the mailing address is through a PO Box. Can you still list your business on Google Maps, Google places, yahoo, bing etc... with the physical address?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | melen0 -
Video SEO
Hello All! I'm wondering about the best way to link build and carry on my video trend. I love to create video's with all of my articles as I feel it adds an extra element to just boring old text! The problem is that my current 25 links from Youtube are all NoFollow. This didn't originally bother me, but it's starting too. Is there a couple of websites that I could upload my article/ video to and gain a link from in a similar manner? Come to think of it, is this a good SEO tactic to use?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Paul_Tovey0 -
Does a Slider widget harm my SEO?
Does using a slider widget (such as the one Skype uses) harm my SEO? Meaning, is the text still totally readable to search engines or will it be in JAVAscript. Are there any SEO-friendly sliders you would recommend?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | theLotter0 -
Expiring URL seo
a buddy of mine is running a niche job board and is having issues with expiring URLs. we ruled it out cuz a 301 is meant to be used when the content has moved to another page, or the page was replaced. We were thinking that we'd be just stacking duplicate content on old urls that would never be 'replaced'. Rather they have been removed and will never come back. So 410 is appropriate but maybe we overlooked something. any ideas?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | malachiii0