Apple has recently disabled all third parties cookies in all safari browser either ipad, iphone or desktop
-
Hi All,
As you all know Apple has recently disabled all third parties cookies in all safari browser either ipad, iphone or desktop and due to this entire UK ecommerce transactions which are being executed by credit card are going failure and a big loss are being faced by entire ecommerece industry. Even safari browser don't indicate that please enable cookies to have credit card transaction so that visitor or buy can know why my ecommerce transaction by credit card is getting failure in each and every site. So please suggest solution what to do so that ecommerce site can successful have transactiona and aware visitors to active cookies from his browser to initiate credit card transaction, please give me 5 to 10 ecommerce website examples who has successful ecommerce transaction using otp.Because without otp only amazon.com and aliexpress.com are processing transaction but none other uk sites inshort otp is not even asked by this sites while having credit card transaction so skip such sites.
Regards,
Mitesh
-
Hi
I still only have version 8 so I can't test it, but my GA is showing data for version 9 with sales.
I have also checked that these aren't Paypal orders.
Once I get version 9 I will test, but our visitors are currently able to checkout.
Thanks
Andy
-
Hi Andy,
I am talking about Ecommerce transactions carried out only and only with credit card and that also in safari browser ie. either in ipad or in iphone or in desktop device. so now reply me what is the output for your site ? have u tried yourself to make any live transaction to test?
Regards,
Mitesh
-
Hi
Sorry can you explain a bit more, I from a UK based ecommerce site, and I am still seeing data in GA from Safari for yesterday and previous days.
Customers are able to checkout as well.
Thanks
Andy
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Recently rankings for "Tree Service" dropped
Hi, we've had a page which was ranking top 1 on the Google rankings but has complete dropped out to 5. We don't have any duplicate errors from that page on here. Do you have any suggestions?
Technical SEO | | FIT0 -
PWA for Desktop Site (Ecommerce)
Hi Folks, Need guidance about using PWA on desktop site. As I know PWA is basically used for mobile site to engage visitor more and let them surf your site like an app. Would it be good SEO practice to use PWA on desktop site(E-commerce site) by calling everything through Javascript and let google Crawler cache only site logo and Hide everything else?
Technical SEO | | Rajesh.Prajapati1 -
For responsive site what should be lowest Screen Resolution for Desktop?
Hello Guys, Can you please share in details screen resolution I have to define for my responsive site for desktop, tablet & mobile. Your inputs are very valuable to me. Thanks! Micey
Technical SEO | | micey1230 -
GWT Fetch & Render displays desktop version of site as mobile
Hi team, I noticed that when I request a desktop rendering in GWT using fetch and render, pages render as the mobile version. Screenshot attached. It's related to the VHS units in our CSS (as far as I'm aware). Does anyone know what the implications of this may be? Does it mean googlebot can only see the mobile version of our website? Any help is appreciated. Jake jgScJ
Technical SEO | | Jacobsheehan0 -
Mobile & desktop pages
I have a mobile site (m.example.com) and a desktop site (example.com). I want search engines to know that for every desktop page there is a mobile equivalent. To do this I insert a rel=alternate on the desktop pages to the mobile equivalent. On the mobile pages I insert a rel=canonical to it's equivalent desktop page. So far so good BUT: Almost every desktop page has 4 or 5 copies (duplicate content). I get rid of this issue by using the rel=canonical to the source page. Still no problem here. But what happens if I insert a rel=alternate to the mobile equivalent on every copy of the source page? I know it sounds stupid but the system doesn't allow me to insert a rel=alternate on just one page. It's all or nothing! My question: Does Google ignore the rel=alternate on the duplicate pages but keeps understanding the link between the desktop source page & mobile page ? Or should I avoid this scenario? Many Thanks Pieter
Technical SEO | | Humix0 -
Pages appear fine in browser but 404 error when crawled?
I am working on an eCommerce website that has been written in WordPress with the shop pages in E commerce Plus PHP v6.2.7. All the shop product pages appear to work fine in a browser but 404 errors are returned when the pages are crawled. WMT also returns a 404 error when ‘fetch as Google’ is used. Here is a typical page: http://www.flyingjacket.com/proddetail.php?prod=Hepburn-Jacket Why is this page returning a 404 error when crawled? Please help?
Technical SEO | | Web-Incite0 -
Can iFrames count as duplicate content on either page?
Hi All Basically what we are wanting to do is insert an iframe with some text on onto a lot of different pages on one website. Does google crawl the content that is in an iFrame? Thanks
Technical SEO | | cttgroup0 -
Does Google distinguish between core content and accessory, 3rd party widgets when considering how slow or fast a site is?
Our site's Facebook Plugin is really slowing page speed down. As far as users are concerned, the page loads fast enough and they can already start interacting with the page before the last sidebar widget has loaded. But the FB widget is really slow to load and is dragging the performance down in Google Analytics Page Speed for example. Any thoughts on whether this should be an SEO concern, and whether Google differentiates between different elements of the page when deciding whether a page is a bad user experience? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | etruvian0