How do I avoid this issue of duplicate content with Google?
-
I have an ecommerce website which sells a product that has many different variations based on a vehicle’s make, model, and year. Currently, we sell this product on one page “www.cargoliner.com/products.php?did=10001” and we show a modal to sort through each make, model, and year. This is important because based on the make, model, and year, we have different prices/configurations for each. For example, for the Jeep Wrangler and Jeep Cherokee, we might have different products:
Ultimate Pet Liner - Jeep Wrangler 2011-2013 - $350
Ultimate Pet Liner - Jeep Wrangler 2014 - 2015 - $350
Utlimate Pet Liner - Jeep Cherokee 2011-2015 - $400
Although the typical consumer might think we have 1 product (the Ultimate Pet Liner), we look at these as many different types of products, each with a different configuration and different variants.
We do NOT have unique content for each make, model, and year. We have the same content and images for each. When the customer selects their make, model, and year, we just search and replace the text to make it look like the make, model, and year. For example, when a custom selects 2015 Jeep Wrangler from the modal, we do a search and replace so the page will have the same url (www.cargoliner.com/products.php?did=10001) but the product title will say “2015 Jeep Wrangler”.
Here’s my problem:
We want all of these individual products to have their own unique urls (cargoliner.com/products/2015-jeep-wrangler) so we can reference them in emails to customers and ideally we start creating unique content for them. Our only problem is that there will be hundreds of them and they don’t have unique content other than us switching in the product title and change of variants. Also, we don’t want our url www.cargoliner.com/products.php?did=10001 to lose its link juice.
Here’s my question(s):
My assumption is that I should just keep my url: www.cargoliner.com/products.php?did=10001 and be able to sort through the products on that page. Then I should go ahead and make individual urls for each of these products (i.e. cargoliner.com/products/2015-jeep-wrangler) but just add a “nofollow noindex” to the page.
Is this what I should do?
How secure is a “no-follow noindex” on a webpage? Does Google still index?
Am I at risk for duplicate content penalties?
Thanks!
-
Hi Don,
Using these generic blocks for multiple products is an awesome idea, but don't you think it'll end up creating almost duplicate content section on all these product pages?
Does bots consider duplicate content across the page, or section wise?
-
The only thing I'd add to this is to that nofollow isn't secure enough. I would recommend blocking the individual product pages that you don't want search engines to find. Thanks Donford for the detailed response.
Craig
-
Thanks for your response Don. I have a followup question for you.
I did understand your your t-shirt example but I think it's even more refined in our case. Since there are so many different variants, we do have to count them as different products, and we would like to avoid creating custom content right away (there's just so much we would have to create). I'm still thinking our perfect solution would be custom links but with a canonical tag pointing back to "www.cargoliner.com/products.php?did=10001".
Here's my solution based on your advise:
I'm going to keep my main page where people can sort to find there make, model, and year (www.cargoliner.com/products.php?did=10001).
Then I plan to have specific product pages per make, model, and year which will have duplicate content except for the make, model, and year searched and replaced. ie Jeep Wrangler 2015-2016 will be "www.cargoliner/products/jeep-wrangler-2015-2016" and in that page I will have a canonical tag point back to "www.cargoliner.com/products.php?did=10001" so I don't get hit with duplicate content.
After this and over the next 6-9 months, I plan to fill in all of the custom content for each product. Then I plan to remove the canonical tag once I have custom content on that page.
Does this sound like the correct approach?
-
Hi Kirby,
What you have here is a common hurdle to many online businesses. Just like a company selling T-shirts, they may have a smiley face t-shirt in s, m, l, xl, xxl and in 5 different colors. So how does one optimize their content to be found when somebody searches for XL red smiley face t-shirt?
You can take one of two approaches.
Option 1: You can optimize a page for the "main item" in my example it would be "smiley face t-shirt". Then try to get the long tailed keywords on the page by listing colors, sizes, on the page a couple times. The goal of this page would be to rank #1 for the broad keyword Smiley Face T-Shirt, and high on longer keywords like XL Smiley Face T-Shirts, and Red Smiley Face T-shirt. With this approach you would use parameters for items, so you could generate a unique url, but you would canonical it back to the main page.
So the main page would look like this:
url: thetshirtShop.us/mens-tees/smilely-face-tshirt
Title: Smiley Face T-Shirt, Men's Small Through XL
H1: Men's Smiley Face T-Shirt, S,M,L,XL, 2XL, Select A Color & SizeThen for each option you would have your parameters (example red, XL)
url: thetshirtShop.us/mens-tees/smilely-face-tshirt?size=XL&color=red
Canonical: thetshirtShop.us/mens-tees/smiely-face-tshirtThat is the basic structure, but be sure in your content you include the color's and sizes at least twice so when the page is crawled the crawlers see the sizes and colors.
Option 2: which in my opinion is the better of the two would be to create unique content for each item. I know this may seem like it would be difficult or time consuming, and to a degree it is. Again how much different is a red t-shirt from a green one? Aside from the color not much, but there is opportunity here.
Example option 2 color red / xl
url: thetshirtShop.us/mens-tees/smilely-face-tshirt?size=XL&color=red
Title: Red Smiley Face T-Shirt Men's Size XL
H1: Men's Red Smilely Face T-Shirt Size XLContent Block (Smiley Face T)
By artist Harvest Ross Ball the smiley face t-shirt puts a smile on your chest and a positive attitude by on-lookers. Staying true to the original creator the smiley face tee has been digital optimized and transferred to the tee using our proprietary screen process that insures the image will last. This is one of best selling iconic tees and available in colors, yellow, red, black, white and green. Men's U.S standard sizes, small, medium, large, extra large, and extra extra large.Content Block (Color-Red):
The T-Shirt Shop using the finest natural dyes in creating our vibrant red color for {Smiley Face T-Shirt}. Using red hibiscus, sumac berries and beets. Our red color is formulated to last for thousands of washes with no fading or wash bleeding. The end result we get true red {Smiley Face T-Shirt} which is quality tested to be HEX #FF0000 RGB 255,0,0 +- within 2 shades.Content Block (Size XL):
Our Men's Size XL for our {Red} {Smiley Face T-Shirt} follows U.S sizing standards; width 24" (61 cm), length 31.25" (80cm). Sleeve length for the {Red} {Smiley Face T-Shirt} is 9" (22cm), and can accommodate up to a 16" (40cm) bicep comfortably. All our T's are pre-washed and pre-shrunk to ensure our high sizing standards are meet.Okay, so let me break down what I did here. I created 2 different "specific" code blocks with dynamic elements inside them noted by the { } brackets. Along with the original description block. You can reuse these blocks for other t-shirts, and still achieve a unique page. For example:
Smiley Face T (red/xl) Content Blocks = Smiley Face T, Red, XL
Smiley Face T (green/large) Content Blocks = Smiley Face T, Green, LargeUsing these code blocks with dynamic insertion of product details you can achieve a unique page. However you need to get creative in writing these blocks, and do some back end coding or extra work in getting them uploaded to the thousands of different products properly. Just to note I have no knowledge of t-shirts or how best to market them, I just used this for an example to help you identify possible areas of creativity in your product.
In summary I have laid out 2 options for this problem. You can use parameters with canonical and a single page, or get creative and make some unique content pages. Each option will achieve unique urls for your email campaign, and follow SEO best practices.
Hope this helps,
Don
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate content, although page has "noindex"
Hello, I had an issue with some pages being listed as duplicate content in my weekly Moz report. I've since discussed it with my web dev team and we decided to stop the pages from being crawled. The web dev team added this coding to the pages <meta name='robots' content='max-image-preview:large, noindex dofollow' />, but the Moz report is still reporting the pages as duplicate content. Note from the developer "So as far as I can see we've added robots to prevent the issue but maybe there is some subtle change that's needed here. You could check in Google Search Console to see how its seeing this content or you could ask Moz why they are still reporting this and see if we've missed something?" Any help much appreciated!
Technical SEO | | rj_dale0 -
How to avoid Duplicate Content Creation While Assigning One Post in 2 Categories
Hello Everyone, I need advice with blog post in wordpress. I have one blog which i wish to assign to 2 different categories as the blog is related to both of the categories, for eg infographics & How to. I have noticed that if i have one post related 2 categories it flags as Duplicate content how to over come this issue. Your advice is highly appreciated. Warmest
Technical SEO | | wolfeyes0 -
Do you think my client is being hit for duplicate content?
Wordpress website. The client's website is http://www.denenapoints.com/ The URL that we purchase so that we could setup the hosting account is http://houston-injury-lawyers.com, which shows 1 page indexed in Google when I search for site:http://houston-injury-lawyers.com On http://www.denenapoints.com/ there is <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="http://houston-injury-lawyers.com/"> But on http://houston-injury-lawyers.com it says the same thing, <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="http://houston-injury-lawyers.com/" /> Is this how it should be setup, assuming that we want everything to point to http://denenapoints.com/? Maybe we should do a 301 redirect to be 100% Sure? Hopefully I explained this well enough. Please let me know if anyone has any thoughts, thanks!
Technical SEO | | georgetsn0 -
URL Mixed Cases and Duplicate Content
Hi There, I have a question for you. I am working on a website where by typing any letter of the URL in lower or upper case, it will give a 200 code. Examples www.examples.com/page1/product www.examples.com/paGe1/Product www.examples.com/PagE1/prOdUcT www.examples.com/pAge1/proODUCt and so on… Although I cannot find evidence of backlinks pointing to my page with mixed cases, shall I redirect or rel=canonical all the possible combination of the cases to a lower version of them in order to prevent duplicate content? And if so, do you have any advice on how to complete such a massive job? Thanks a lot
Technical SEO | | Midleton0 -
Partially duplicated content on separate pages
TL;DR: I am writing copy for some web pages. I am duplicating some bits of copy exactly on separate web pages. And in other cases I am using the same bits of copy with slight alterations. Is this bad for SEO? Details: We sell about 10 different courses. Each has a separate page. I'm currently writing copy for those pages. Some of the details identical for each course. So I can duplicate the content and it will be 100% applicable. For example, when we talk about where we can run courses (we go to a company and run it on their premises) – that's applicable to every course. Other bits are applicable with minor alterations. So where we talk about how we'll tailor the course, I will say for example: "We will the tailor the course to the {technical documents|customer letters|reports} your company writes." Or where we have testimonials, the headline reads "Improving {customer writing|reports|technical documents} in every sector and industry". There is original content on each page. The duplicate stuff may seem spammy, but the alternative is me finding alternative re-wordings for exactly the same information. This is tedious and time-consuming and bizarre given that the user won't notice any difference. Do I need to go ahead and re-write these bits ten slightly different ways anyway?
Technical SEO | | JacobFunnell0 -
Duplicate content vs. less content
Hi, I run a site that is currently doing very well in google for the terms that we want. We are 1,2 or 3 for our 4 targeted terms, but havent been able to jump to number one in two categories that I would really like to. In looking at our site, I didn't realize we have a TON of duplicate content as seen by SEO moz and I guess google. It appears to be coming from our forum, we use drupal. RIght now we have over 4500 pages of duplicate content. Here is my question: How much is this hurting us as we are ranking high. Is it better to kill the forum (which is more community service than business) and have a very tight site SEO-wise, or leave the forum even with the duplicate content. Thanks for your help. Erik
Technical SEO | | SurfingNosara0 -
Ways of Helping Reducing Duplicate Content.
Hi I am looking to no of anyway there is at helping to reduce duplicate content on a website with out breaking link and affecting Google rankings.
Technical SEO | | Feily0 -
Complex duplicate content question
We run a network of three local web sites covering three places in close proximity. Each sitehas a lot of unique content (mainly news) but there is a business directory that is shared across all three sites. My plan is that the search engines only index the business in the directory that are actually located in the place the each site is focused on. i.e. Listing pages for business in Alderley Edge are only indexed on alderleyedge.com and businesses in Prestbury only get indexed on prestbury.com - but all business have a listing page on each site. What would be the most effective way to do this? I have been using rel canonical but Google does not always seem to honour this. Will using meta noindex tags where appropriate be the way to go? or would be changing the urls structure to have the place name in and using robots.txt be a better option. As an aside my current url structure is along the lines of: http://dev.alderleyedge.com/directory/listing/138/the-grill-on-the-edge Would changing this have any SEO benefit? Thanks Martin
Technical SEO | | mreeves0