Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Exclude price in rich snippet markup
-
Our site has their prices hidden for non logged in users.
Its a woocommerce built site and the rich snippet markups are added by woocommerce.
I would like to remove the markup for the price becouse : 1, we would like our customers to register for prices. 2 i dont want to get penalties for not showing the same thing to visitors as to "google" ..
Any help or thoughts on this one?
Thanks
/ Jonas
-
That lead me to the right direction!
Got it all working with price excluded in the rich snippet, still validating as a product with reviews, sku and description.
My solution..
Create following directories:
wp-content/themes/[your_theme]/woocommerce
wp-content/themes/[your_theme]/woocommerce/single-product
Create price.php and ad it to /single-product
Ad this code to the custom price.php
if ( ! defined( 'ABSPATH' ) ) {
exit; // Exit if accessed directly
}global $product;
?>
get_price_html(); ?>
// Jonas
-
I don't know what kind of Woo + WordPress + theme you use. But you can download everything into separate folder and use tool to find text in all files. You just need to look who is responsible for "schema.org/Offer" adding into HTML.
Here is shoot in the dark:
https://webdesires.co.uk/blog/add-schema-to-woocommerce-products/
you just need to reverse this change.As i said - it's just guessing. Can be also in plugin somewhere.
-
Hi Peter and thanks for your respons!
Any tips on how to do this patch in an easy way?
-
Here is example of Rich Snippet w/o offer (with price):
ACME
Executive Anvil
Sleeker than ACME's Classic Anvil, the
Executive Anvil is perfect for the business traveler
looking for something to drop from a height.Product #: 925872
4.4 stars, based on 89 reviewsAs you can see this code can be validated and works OK. Now you need to go back in Woo and make "patch" to remove http://schema.org/Offer where is price located. OR temporary disable them.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Inconsistency between content and structured data markup
Hi~ everyone What does Google think about the inconsistency between content and structured data markup? Is this kind of a cheating way ? Is hurt my SEO?
Technical SEO | | intern2020120 -
Max-snippet max length
Regarding Google's new max-snippet:[number], this is specifically for the length of the meta description? Also, does anyone know what the max character length is?
Technical SEO | | SoulSurfer81 -
Adding Reviews to JSON Product Schema Markup
Hi everyone, Below is an example of some JSON product schema markup I'd like to integrate into my site. My question is, what do I need to do to incorporate the individual reviews on a product page as well? I've tried a few different things but I can't get it to validate.
Technical SEO | | VDigitalServices0 -
Event Schema markup for multiple events (same location/address)?
I was wondering if its possible to markup multiple events on the same page for one location/address using the event schema.org markup? I tried doing it on a sample page below: http://www.rama.id.au/event-schema-test/ Google's schema testing tool shows that its all good (except for warning for offers). Just wanted to know if I am doing it correctly or is there a better solution. Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you 🙂
Technical SEO | | Vsood0 -
Meta Description VS Rich Snippets
Hello everyone, I have one question: there is a way to tell Google to take the meta description for the search results instead of the rich snippets? I already read some posts here in moz, but no answer was found. In the post was said that if you have keywords in the meta google may take this information instead, but it's not like this as i have keywords in the meta tags. The fact is that, in this way, the descriptions are not compelling at all, as they were intended to be. If it's not worth for ranking, so why google does not allow at least to have it's own website descriptions in their search results? I undestand that spam issues may be an answer, but in this way it penalizes also not spammy websites that may convert more if with a much more compelling description than the snippets. What do you think? and there is any way to fix this problem? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | socialengaged
Eugenio0 -
Is it worth adding schema markup to articles?
I know things like location, pagination, breadcrumbs, video, products etc have value in using schema markup. What about things like articles though? Is it worth all the work involved in having the pages mark up automatically? How does this effect SEO, and is it worthwhile? Thanks, Spencer
Technical SEO | | MarloSchneider0 -
Are recipes excluded from duplicate content?
Does anyone know how recipes are treated by search engines? For example, I know press releases are expected to have lots of duplicates out there so they aren't penalized. Does anyone know if recipes are treated the same way. For example, if you Google "three cheese beef pasta shells" you get the first two results with identical content.
Technical SEO | | RiseSEO0 -
Schema for Price Comparison Services - Good or Bad?
Hey guys, I was just wondering what the whole schema.org markup means for people that run search engines (i.e. for a niche, certain products) or price comparison engines in general. The intend behind schema.org was to help the engines better understand the pages content. Well, I guess such services don't necessarily want Google to understand that they're just another search engine (and thus might get thrown out of the index for polluting it with search result pages). I see two possible scenarios: either not implement them or implement them in a way that makes the site not look like an aggregator, i.e. by only marking up certain products with unique text. Any thoughts? Does the SEOmoz team has any advice on that? Best,
Technical SEO | | derderko
schuon0