Moz Crawl: Can't check page optimization error https
-
Help needed, when I try to do a page optimization check i get the following error :
The URL you entered does not appear to be returning a page successfully. Please make sure that you've entered the URL of valid, working page.
But i can do a site crawl, what should be the problem?
Checked with frog seo spider and add no problem, robots.txt its also clean.
Anyone knows what can be wrong?
Thanks
-
Thanks Kristina,
Working fine. Keep up the good work.
-
Hi again!
I just wanted to follow-up with you here, as well as in your support ticket, to let you know that this has been resolved. We were experiencing some issues with On-Page reports for https:// sites but this has since been resolved.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. If you're still experiencing issues, please don't hesitate to report them to our team by sending a note to help@moz.com and we'll be happy to assist further!
Have a great day.
-Kristina -
Hi Kristina,
Thank you for your feedback.
Hope you'll find what's happening, i'll wait for the ticket.
-
Hi there! I apologize for the delay.
I've had a chance to speak to our technical team on this and we're definitely seeing the same error on our end, and we're not able at first glance to be able to tell WHY it's happening.
I'm going to open a support ticket on your behalf and then send this one up to be triaged further to see why this is happening. I apologize we weren't able to get this quickly resolved for you, as I would've hoped to have.
You should get an email here shortly with the details on your support ticket and I'll be updating you through that ticket as we move through this one.
Sorry again for the inconvenience but hopefully we'll be able to sort this one out for you soon.
Thank you,
- Kristina
-
-
Hi there! Kristina from Moz's Help Team here. Sorry to hear about the trouble!
Can you provide the URL and the keyword you were plugging into the Page Optimization tool so I can take a closer look at the issue you're experiencing?
In the future, you can contact my team directly with any technical issues by emailing help@moz.com. Doing so typically renders a faster turn-around time than logging technical questions into the Q&A forum.
I look forward to helping you solve this mystery!
Thank you,
-Kristina
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to remove bad or spammy links from Moz?
My website has gotten some bad and spammy links. I know how to disavow bad links from Google. But I reviewed Moz and haven't got any disavow option.
API | | juanitajb9
Have any disavow option on Moz? How can I remove the bad links from Moz? Thanks0 -
Is Moz's rank checker driving referals (and bounces) in my analytics?
I see 200+ referral visits per month from "rank-checker.online" and they all bounce with one second session durations. Are these bounces hurting my SEO? They are definitely distorting my referral metrics. Can I block them somehow?
API | | 10516VT1163000 -
September's Mozscape Update Broke; We're Building a New Index
Hey gang, I hate to write to you all again with more bad news, but such is life. Our big data team produced an index this week but, upon analysis, found that our crawlers had encountered a massive number of non-200 URLs, which meant this index was not only smaller, but also weirdly biased. PA and DA scores were way off, coverage of the right URLs went haywire, and our metrics that we use to gauge quality told us this index simply was not good enough to launch. Thus, we're in the process of rebuilding an index as fast as possible, but this takes, at minimum 19-20 days, and may take as long as 30 days. This sucks. There's no excuse. We need to do better and we owe all of you and all of the folks who use Mozscape better, more reliable updates. I'm embarassed and so is the team. We all want to deliver the best product, but continue to find problems we didn't account for, and have to go back and build systems in our software to look for them. In the spirit of transparency (not as an excuse), the problem appears to be a large number of new subdomains that found their way into our crawlers and exposed us to issues fetching robots.txt files that timed out and stalled our crawlers. In addition, some new portions of the link graph we crawled exposed us to websites/pages that we need to find ways to exclude, as these abuse our metrics for prioritizing crawls (aka PageRank, much like Google, but they're obviously much more sophisticated and experienced with this) and bias us to junky stuff which keeps us from getting to the good stuff we need. We have dozens of ideas to fix this, and we've managed to fix problems like this in the past (prior issues like .cn domains overwhelming our index, link wheels and webspam holes, etc plagued us and have been addressed, but every couple indices it seems we face a new challenge like this). Our biggest issue is one of monitoring and processing times. We don't see what's in a web index until it's finished processing, which means we don't know if we're building a good index until it's done. It's a lot of work to re-build the processing system so there can be visibility at checkpoints, but that appears to be necessary right now. Unfortunately, it takes time away from building the new, realtime version of our index (which is what we really want to finish and launch!). Such is the frustration of trying to tweak an old system while simultaneously working on a new, better one. Tradeoffs have to be made. For now, we're prioritizing fixing the old Mozscape system, getting a new index out as soon as possible, and then working to improve visibility and our crawl rules. I'm happy to answer any and all questions, and you have my deep, regretful apologies for once again letting you down. We will continue to do everything in our power to improve and fix these ongoing problems.
API | | randfish11 -
Use of Moz with non-latin characters
Hey there, I am new member with Moz and i have to say that you are doing very good job. Three days ago, i have learnt that the On-page Grader and On-Page Optimization tools are useless for me because i am using no-latin keywords (greek characters) in order to optimize my SEO. From that moment i dont know how to properly use moz pro in order to optimize my SEO score (if this still can be done) so i would like to ask: Without these two powerfull tools how can i use the Moz Pro in order to optimize my (greek) website? Is this possible to do it with out these two tools? should i try to do it manually? if yes what i have to read/learn in order to do it manually? What other tools can i use in order to help me rank my website instead of On-Page grader and optimization? Thanks in advance
API | | tsalatzi0 -
Is Moz Pro down?
This morning, just before trying to meet with a client, I cannot access Moz Pro. Here is the page I get: This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below.
API | | jessential
<error>NoSuchBucket<message>The specified bucket does not exist</message><bucketname>analytics.moz.com</bucketname><requestid>DC68738B494D30A1</requestid><hostid>r13H1pVq04vKGcKkAD9AUCTRXNdZAhUOULNwv4/TB74e0utcat2mV3PT7dXOtnuG</hostid></error> What can I do to access my information?0 -
Duplicate description error: one for meta one for og:type
I am getting the duplicate description error from Moz. I use both the og:description and . I am not sure if that is going to get me penalized by the search engines or my pages somehow discounted if I have meta description and og:description on the same page. What does Moz recommend? NOTE: for years I have followed this in the best practices format put out from other sources. Found at: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/52600/should-i-have-ogdescription-and-meta-description-together-on-every-page Short Answer: Use both! Long Answer: The OG stands for Open Graph which is apart of the Open Graph protocol of which works on platforms such as Facebook. The meta description element is for search engines such as Google, Yahoo and Bing. Since these are two separate tags that kinda do the same thing but they are designed for different types of platforms, one for Facebook and the other for Search Engines. The reasoning behind this is that the Open Graph protocal is more rich in what content can be feed to Facebook without scrapping the full page, think rich snippets. So images, description and more information is feed to Facebook via the Open Graph. Using both is a good idea.
API | | jessential0 -
Is there a way to include Moz Analytics in my website backend.
Hi, Does any one know if using the moz APIs, I can created a "SEO" dashboard inside my backend? Thanks
API | | Felip30 -
Huge in crease in on page errors
Hi guys I’ve just checked my online campaign and I see errors in my crawl diagnostics have almost doubled from the 21<sup>st</sup> of October to the 25<sup>th</sup> of October going from 6708 errors to 11 599. Can anyone tell me what may have caused this? Also I notice we have a lot of issues with duplicate page titles which seems strange as no new pages have been added, can anyone explain why this might be? I look forward to hearing from you
API | | Hardley1110