Website dropped out from Google index
-
Howdy, fellow mozzers.
I got approached by my friend - their website is https://www.hauteheadquarters.com
She is saying that they dropped from google index over night - and, as you can see if you google their name, website url or even site: , most of the pages are not indexed. Home page is nowhere to be found - that's for sure.
I know that they were indexed before. Google webmaster tools don't have any manual actions (at least yet). No sudden changes in content or backlink profile. robots.txt has some weird rule - disallow everything for EtaoSpider. I don't know if google would listen to that - robots checker in GWT says it's all good.
Any ideas why that happen? Any ideas what I should check?
P.S. Just noticed in GWT there was a huge drop in indexed pages within first week of August. Still no idea why though.
P.P.S. Just noticed that there is noindex x-robots-tag in headers... Anyone knows where this can be set?
-
"P.P.S. Just noticed that there is noindex x-robots-tag in headers"
That will do it. You are telling Google to take all of your pages out of Google. You set that at the web server level and so you will need to get into your apache or nginx setup
https://developers.google.com/webmasters/control-crawl-index/docs/robots_meta_tag
Get on this ASAP!
-
Hi Dmitri,
I also see the homepage in Google, but very few pages indexed beyond that, so there does appear to be a serious problem. I don't see anything immediately regarding problems with robots.txt or no index tags. Screaming Frog was able to crawl this site without any problems.
One thing I did see in the few pages that are indexed is the presence of a lot of internal search results pages being indexed.
For example:
https://www.hauteheadquarters.com/shop/rings/2?sort_price=ascandhttps://www.hauteheadquarters.com/shop/rings/2?sort_price=descThese two pages are exactly the same products, just in different order. This page also exists: https://www.hauteheadquarters.com/shop/rings/2 - the same products again. For all practical purposes all three of these pages are exactly the same content. Unfortunately, they price sort pages are not blocked from being crawled and indexed AND they are using self-referencing canonical tags.Based on pages like these and other duplicate/thin content issues across the site, I wouldn't rule out a Panda Penalty. It is highly likely that this site may have been penalized. Just because there is no manual action doesn't mean a penalty isn't in play.Recommendations:1. Audit sitewide content and determine which pages should be in Google2. Implement directives in the robots.txt file to prevent the URLs containing query parameters that don't provide unique content from being crawled.3. Implement canonical tags referencing the original URL without query parameters. Examplehttps://www.hauteheadquarters.com/shop/rings/2?sort_price=ascandhttps://www.hauteheadquarters.com/shop/rings/2?sort_price=descShould both be canonicalized to https://www.hauteheadquarters.com/shop/rings/24. Rebuild the XML sitemap and include only important URLs5. Resubmit the XML sitemap in GSC Wait a anywhere from a couple of days to a couple of weeks after resubmitting the sitemap, then evaluate if this has remedied the problem.Don't file a reconsideration request. This won't do any good because if it is a penalty, it was done via the algorithm and not manually.Hope that helps a little and good luck!Sincerely,Dana
-
Me too!
-
Absolutely, I'm glad you got things squared!
-
Thanks for response!
Well, basically, as I mentioned, the problem was due to http-header robots tag. So, after removing it, and requesting "fetch as google", it's all up and running now. The crawl time proves that as well.
Thanks for giving me idea for looking into cache times in the future though!
-
I see the homepage in my results - https://www.google.com/#q=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.hauteheadquarters.com
Homepage was also cached today: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://www.hauteheadquarters.com&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.&biw=1920&bih=955&dpr=1&ion=1&ech=1&psi=EYbEV6CLN8aweJDvktgD.1472497162096.3&ei=EYbEV6CLN8aweJDvktgD&emsg=NCSR&noj=1
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
MOZ is showing that I have non- indexed blog tag posts are they supposed to be nonindexed. My articles are indexed just not the blog tags that take you to other similar articles do I need to fix this or is it ok?
MOZ is showing that my blog post tags are not indexed my question is should they be indexed? my articles are indexed just not the tags that take you to posts that are similar. Do I need to fix this or not? Thank you
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Tyler58910 -
Best Practice Approaches to Canonicals vs. Indexing in Google Sitemap vs. No Follow Tags
Hi There, I am working on the following website: https://wave.com.au/ I have become aware that there are different pages that are competing for the same keywords. For example, I just started to update a core, category page - Anaesthetics (https://wave.com.au/job-specialties/anaesthetics/) to focus mainly around the keywords ‘Anaesthetist Jobs’. But I have recognized that there are ongoing landing pages that contain pretty similar content: https://wave.com.au/anaesthetists/ https://wave.com.au/asa/ We want to direct organic traffic to our core pages e.g. (https://wave.com.au/job-specialties/anaesthetics/). This then leads me to have to deal with the duplicate pages with either a canonical link (content manageable) or maybe alternatively adding a no-follow tag or updating the robots.txt. Our resident developer also suggested that it might be good to use Google Index in the sitemap to tell Google that these are of less value? What is the best approach? Should I add a canonical link to the landing pages pointing it to the category page? Or alternatively, should I use the Google Index? Or even another approach? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Wavelength_International0 -
Javascript content not being indexed by Google
I thought Google has gotten better at picking up unique content from javascript. I'm not seeing it with our site. We rate beauty and skincare products using our algorithms. Here is an example of a product -- https://www.skinsafeproducts.com/tide-free-gentle-he-liquid-laundry-detergent-100-fl-oz When you look at the cache page (text) from google none of the core ratings (badges like fragrance free, top free and so forth) are being picked up for ranking. Any idea what we could do to have the rating incorporated in the indexation.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | akih0 -
Does Google Index URLs that are always 302 redirected
Hello community Due to the architecture of our site, we have a bunch of URLs that are 302 redirected to the same URL plus a query string appended to it. For example: www.example.com/hello.html is 302 redirected to www.example.com/hello.html?___store=abc The www.example.com/hello.html?___store=abc page also has a link canonical tag to www.example.com/hello.html In the above example, can www.example.com/hello.html every be Indexed, by google as I assume the googlebot will always be redirected to www.example.com/hello.html?___store=abc and will never see www.example.com/hello.html ? Thanks in advance for the help!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EcommRulz0 -
Https & http urls in Google Index
Hi everyone, this question is a two parter: I am now working for a large website - over 500k monthly organic traffic. The site currently has both http and https urls in Google's index. The website has not formally converted to https. The https began with an error and has evolved unchecked over time. Both versions of the site (http & https) are registered in webmaster tools so I can clearly track and see that as time passes http indexation is decreasing and https has been increasing. The ratio is at about 3:1 in favor of https at this time. Traffic over the last year has slowly dipped, however, over the last two months there has been a steady decline in overall visits registered through analytics. No single page appears to be the culprit, this decline is occurring across most pages of the website, pages which traditionally draw heavy traffic - including the home page. Considering that Google is giving priority to https pages, could it be possible that the split is having a negative impact on traffic as rankings sway? Additionally, mobile activity for the site has steadily increased both from a traffic and a conversion standpoint. However that traffic has also dipped significantly over the last two months. Looking at Google's mobile usability error's page I see a significant number of errors (over 1k). I know Google has been testing and changing mobile ranking factors, is it safe to posit that this could be having an impact on mobile traffic? The traffic declines are 9-10% MOM. Thank you. ~Geo
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Geosem0 -
Why extreme drop in number of pages indexed via GWMT sitemaps?
Any tips on why our GWMT Sitemaps indexed pages dropped to 27% of total submitted entries (2290 pages submitted, 622 indexed)? Already checked the obvious Test Sitemap, valid URLs etc. We had typically been at 95% of submitted getting indexed.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jkinnisch0 -
Google Places Listing Active In Two Seperate Google Places Accounts?
Hi is there any issues with having a google places listing in two seperate google places accounts. For example we have a client who cannot access their old google places account (ex-employee had their login details which they can't get) and want us to take control over the listing. If we click the "is this your listing" manage this page button - and claim the listing, will this transfer the listing to our control? Or will it create a duplicate? Are there any problems having the listing in different separate accounts. Is it a situation in which the last person who manages the listing takes control? And the listing automatically deactivates from the old account? Do all the images remain aswell? Thanks,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MBASydney
Tom0 -
Has anyone seen a spammy competitors website hit by the Google changes?
I wonder, after all the talk of Penguins and Pandas if anyone has seen evidence of a competitor who you know has 1000's of spammy links removed from their page one position in Google. I have a trade competitor who appeared from nowhere about 12 months ago with 11,000+ back-links most of which were totally unrelated to our trade and appear to be link-farm links for the most part. After reading about Google's changes I thought the site might be hit but it remains up there in the first 2 or 3 results on page one. I wonder if anyone has seen similar sites penalised? Colin
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | NileCruises0