Do we need rel="prev" and rel="next" if we have a rel="canonical" for the first page of a series
-
Despite having a canonical on page 1 of a series of paginated pages for different topics, Google is indexing several, sometimes many pages in each topic. This is showing up as duplicate page title issues in Moz and Screaming Frog.
Ideally Google would only index the first page in the series. Do we need to use rel="prev" etc rather than a canonical on page 1? How can we make sure Google crawls but doesn't index the rest of the series?
-
So for the pages, would it look like:
Blog page 1 "rel next"
Blog page 2 "rel prev" & "rel next"
and so on?
-
Having the markup only prevents them from dinging you for dupes, not necessarily from indexing.
-
Thanks, super helpful! The canonical is only on the first page of the series but clearly we still need rel prev/next. Although I've noticed, from other sites that are using rel prev/next correctly that Google sometimes ignore that too and index a random selection of paginated pages.
-
Hello Hjsand,
My experience is yes you should be using rel="next" and rel="prev" for paginated pages.
Here is a guide that can help you understand why and how to implement these guidelines
https://moz.com/blog/seo-guide-to-google-webmaster-recommendations-for-pagination
Thanks,
-
Hi,
Google says they'll index paginated series properly and that they can usually interpret what the structure you've set, but as you're seeing, this is not always the case. The preferred method for pagination markup is to use rel prev/next, not to canonicalize the pages to the first or root version URL. The only place a canonical tag should live in a paginated series is on page=1 that points to the root URL.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Do we get "Removal of "nofollow" from first custom URL on profile" when we cross 200 Moz Points? I have not received it yet, anything I can do?
Though I have only recently subscribed to Moz Pro, I have been using Moz Blog for quite some time. I recently crossed 200 Moz Points. As per Moz Points, it says "Removal of "nofollow" from first custom URL on profile" for crossing 200 points. I still dont see any links from Moz when I am using OSE. Can anyone suggest what i need to do?
Moz Pro | | vinodh-spintadigital2 -
Is the on page optimization tool not working?
i received a grade f for one of my keywords/page. i corrected some of the points but when i tried to submit the form again, it doesn't check off those corrected items. is there something wrong with the tool right now? also, how does the tool work if i'm targeting 2 different keywords for one page? e.g. digital marketing philippines and digital marketing agency philippines I'm pretty sure one of the keywords will have problems with at least 3 critical and high importance on page factors (broad keyword usage in page title, exact keyword usage in page title, etc.) is there an effect if there's a critical factor left unchecked because using both keywords in the title might look redundant?
Moz Pro | | optimind0 -
El "Crawl Diagnostics Summary" me indica que tengo contenido duplicado
Como El "Crawl Diagnostics Summary"pero la verdad es que son las mismas paginas con el wwww y sin el www. que puedo hacer para quitar esta situacionde error.
Moz Pro | | arteweb20 -
Pages Crawled: 250 | Limit: 250
One of my campaigns says: Pages Crawled: 250 | Limit: 250 Is this because it's new and the limit will go up to 10,000 after the crawl is complete? I have a pro account, 4 other campaigns running and should be allowed 50,000 pages in total
Moz Pro | | MirandaP0 -
How to get rid of the message "Search Engine blocked by robots.txt"
During the Crawl Diagnostics of my website,I got a message Search Engine blocked by robots.txt under Most common errors & warnings.Please let me know the procedure by which the SEOmoz PRO Crawler can completely crawl my website?Awaiting your reply at the earliest. Regards, Prashakth Kamath
Moz Pro | | 1prashakth0 -
How come when I export a error list I can only export the first page?
I am working on fixing the 4xx errors. I have found the easiest way to do this would be to export the list, print it out, and check off the ones i've fixed. The site only lets me export the first page. We'll appreciate any help. Thanks, Ryan D. Gran --Not sure what category this question belongs in so selected SEOmoz Tools--
Moz Pro | | dggusmc0 -
Confounding "Accessible to Engines" error?
Most of the pages on our site "Accessible to Engines" test in the SEOmoz reports. We cannot find any problem with the code and it's largely identical to the few pages that come up with an "A" score. One item that may be a reason is that we use meta http-equiv="refresh" content="600; For example in www.weatherzone.com.au/nsw/sydney/sydney We use this to fresh dynamic content on our site. Do search engines penalise pages that use this form of page refresh? Alternatively, is there a known bug in the SEOmoz "Accessible to Engines" report? Many thanks
Moz Pro | | weatherzone0