Should I redirect off topic blog posts?
-
We launched a store on top of a popular blog. The blog had nothing to do with the store. The blog has a lot of backlinks and traffic, but our store is now our primary business. I am concerned that the off topic blog content may be affecting or ability to rank better for the core store business. Should we delete or redirect the old blog content to another website to improve the SEO for our store?
-
Thanks for the addition thoughts Mike. I'll check out that article and continue with the plan to see if these initial "test" redirects affect the site overall. I'll share my findings down the road...
-
The question of relevance vs authority in what makes links valuable is an interesting one and has recently been covered on Search Engine Land here: http://searchengineland.com/relevance-vs-authority-link-value-part-two-274417 (part two)
I tend to agree with those who value authority over relevance, as I've not seen any real proof that "relevant" links drive more power, but I have seen that links from off-topic sites improve rankings and traffic many times.
Obviously there's a great deal of context I don't have about how related the two sites appear to be to users that could be adding to the mess, and it does sound like the authority you have isn't quite driving the business you want, so no big pushback on the 301s - I'd keep an eye on your rankings and organic traffic though, it could cut authority to the point where you see a drop.
Best of Luck,
Mike -
Thanks Mike. I agree that this might not improve our SEO. But my hope is that it will at least clean up the site and make it more clear what we are about. So as we continue to acquire more links to the on-topic content, it will build a better SEO foundation for our long term success.
The other benefit is to get better clarity with our Analytics.
Right now, 75% of our business comes from non-Google sources (e.g. Pinterest, word of mouth). So I think the risk-reward scenario makes it worth a try. And I agree that we should start with a test and monitor. If no impact, then we'll redirect more of the content until it's all gone. And if there is an impact, then we can remove the redirects and just live with it, like we have been doing.
-
Hi Doug,
I'd be dubious about associating the old posts with the lack of traffic/rankings for the new store pages.
If you were to redirect those old posts to another domain, at best I'd expect no impact, at worst the loss of PageRank will cause the store to lose some the traffic/rankings it has now.
You could potentially test this (redirect those old posts somewhere else, see what happens, then remove the redirects if you're unhappy with the result, or if there's no/positive impact, leave them in place).
Ultimately, the need to acquire new links (and traffic sources other than Google) will remain either way, which is probably where I'd be investing focus/capital.
Best,
Mike -
The blog is on the same domain as the store. The store has been running on this domain for a few years and is well-branded, so moving it to a new domain isn't an option. Over the past 1 1/2 years we have been writing on-topic blog posts. But we still get a ton of traffic into the older off-topic posts. Not only does this muck up our Google Analytics (because of all of the irrelevant traffic), I am also concerned that it is confusing Google as to what type of site were are. We don't get much value from the traffic to these off topic blog posts, so my thought is to move these pages to a new domain (with 301 redirects), or simply redirect them to another site that has similar content. Thoughts?
-
Is the blog on the same domain as the store? If it is and there is no match between the topics of the blog and the store, I'd consider to move the store to a separate domain as far as it is still new. Otherwise try to write some topical articles with internal linking to relevant products of the store. But definitely don't delete the blog because there's a lot of potential for spreading the link juice to the store. I'd be also very careful with 301 because its purpose is to navigate user to a page with similar content, which won't be the case.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Ugly Redirect Chain
Hey everyone, Hoping to get your take on this: We have some very high demand products, they usually sell out in minutes (lucky us, eh?!) We are implementing a queue function on a product page - basically if too many people try to check out at the same time, we dump them in a queue The queue could kick in before or after search engines have indexed the product page The product page has markup and on-page content relating to the product. The queue page exists on an external (yes, external) site The queue page will not have any of the product info, markup, or optimised page title Product page will 302 to queue page and starts a series of 302 redirects! Here's the sequence when queue is active: CANONICAL product page (with markup, on-page product info, optimised page title, etc.)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TSEOTEAM
>> 302 >> queue page on external domain (ZERO markup, product info or page title)
>>302>> same queue page, but throwing a hashed queue ID into the URL (basically giving you your place in the queue)
HELD IN QUEUE FOR A FEW MINUTES
**>> 302> ** NON-CANONICAL product page (with markup, on-page product info, optimised page title, etc.) I can foresee two scenarios search engine has indexed product page prior to queue kicking in. Then queue kicks in 302ing search engine to queue page. because it's a 302 the crappy queue page content is indexed back to the originating product page. This causes search engines to drop the product page cos all the product-specific markup/content has been overwritten with crappy queue page content search engines don't manage to index product page before queue kicks in. They crawl product page URL, get 302 to queue page, index crappy queue page content and think the product page is crappy, so don't traffic it. They will recrawl the product page once the queue's turned off, only to discover the product has sold out - boo. I very much doubt the search engines will 'wait for a few minutes' so may never end up reaching the product page again. I'm trying to get the markup/product info and optimised meta data injected into the queue page, so that remains present at all points on the journey in the hope that this enables search engines to continue to rank and traffic the product page. What's your take on this? Any suggestions on how we might overcome the issues? (before you ask; avoiding using the queue system is impossible, sorry!) Thanks!1 -
Related Topics what is this ?
Is this questions people have about something. For example : for the keyword Title tag would a related topic would be the length because people look for the length of a title tag ? Thank you,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
I've got duplicate pages. For example, blog/page/2 is the same as author/admin/page/2\. Is this something I should just ignore, or should I create the author/admin/page2 and then 301 redirect?
I'm going through the crawl report and it says I've got duplicate pages. For example, blog/page/2 is the same as author/admin/page/2/ Now, the author/admin/page/2 I can't even find in WordPress, but it is the same thing as blog/page/2 nonetheless. Is this something I should just ignore, or should I create the author/admin/page2 and then 301 redirect it to blog/page/2?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | shift-inc0 -
Should I Remove Dates From My Old Posts
I have a web site that has content about home improvement topics but the site has no new content since 2010. All the posts on the wordpress site have the date which are all 2010 and prior. Is there a downside in terms of search engine rankings to remove the dates or changing the dates? What are the risks to removing the dates? Could I lose rankings if I do this? Do you have any personal experience with this situation?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | alpha170 -
301 redirects.
Hi everyone, I am having some issues with an a few dynamic URLs that are not redirecting; Example: http://www.example.com/shop-online?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage_images.tpl&product_id=69164&category_id=303 I first tried to carry out a standard 301 which looked like this; Redirect 301 /longurlwith&category_id=303 http://www.example.com/new-url Which didn't work. After a little bit of research I added the following into the htaccess file; RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.example.com$ [NC]RewriteRule ^/shop-online$(.*)$ http://www.example.com/shop-online$ [NE,L,R=301] Which caused the website to error 500 (Not cool). So now I am stumped. Any help would be really appreciated as I'm sure it's an easy fix but I can't quite my finger on it. Thanks in advance :).
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AduroLabs0 -
Wordpress Blogs and SEO
So far we have been creating separate blogs on wordpress.com for our sites, and writing there. Today I was told that there was better SEO hosting the blog on the actual domain. i.e. www.widgets.com/blog instead of widget.wordpress.com Is this true? Oddly I have had my WP beat my own URL on one account. So I am not sure if this is valid. Can someone tell me pros and cons of both? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | greenhornet770 -
301 redirect or rel=canonical
On my site, which I created with Joomla, there seems to be a lot of duplicated pages. I was wondering which would be better, 301 redirect or rel=canonical. On SeoMoz Pro "help" they suggest only the rel=canonical and dont mention 301 redirect. However, ive read many other say that 301 redirect should be the number one option. Also, does 301 redirect help solve the crawling errors, in other words, does it get rid of the errors of "duplicate page content?" Ive read that re-=canonical does not right? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | waltergah0 -
Should I redirect secondary keyword page
I have a reasonably high authority home page and have decided to optimise the home page to target a competitive keyword that previously had a specific page that was optimised on an internal page of my site that I have spent time building links to. The internal page has over 200 links to it so should I 301 redirect this internal page to the home page. Will that increase the auhority of the home page further? Or should I keep the internal page as a 'secondary' page for that keyword?. If I do have two pages don't I risk confusing google?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SamCUK0