Ecommerce Category Pages
-
First, let's define the terminology for the various types of ecommerce pages. The terminology differs from organization to organization:
- Product Description Pages (PDPs): These pages have a single product, pricing, an "add to cart" button, reviews, and a product description.
- Product Listing Pages (PLPs): These are product category/subcategory pages that have product image links and text links to Product Description Pages (PDPs).
- Category Pages: These pages have subcategory image and text links to subcategory pages. No product images are displayed
- Hybrid Category Pages: these pages combine sub-Category Images and text at the top of the page and product listings below. Our CMS currently does not allow us to create hybrids.
This conversation revolves primarily around mobile.
Our ecommerce team is having discussions around the appropriate use of PLPs vs Category pages. After doing a quick audit of the mobile sites of some top ecommerce players, there is definitely a trend to use Category Pages at the top of the category and sub-category hierarchy and use PLPs at the very bottom. The logic from a usability perspective is to allow visitors to navigate a site without ever using the hamburger navigation. ex:
Baby (Category Page) => Car Seats (Category Page) => Convertible Car Seats (PLP)
The sites I audited all had hamburger menus.
A visitor would navigate from a home page image for "Baby," an image on the "Baby" page to "Car Seats", and an image on the "Car Seats" page to the Convertible Car Seats page. At that point, they would be able to shop for "Convertible Car Seats" on a PLP.
This appears to be excellent UX and easy to use navigation. Theoretically, good for SEO as well. In short, category and subcategory pages are being used as navigation to allow visitors to easily navigate to the bottom of the hierarchy and shop on the most narrow page in the hierarchy. Much easier to use than a hamburger menu, but it does entail more clicks.
The discussion revolves around allowing users to shop for product at a higher level in the taxonomy. For example, what if a visitor wants to shop all Car Seats? In the above taxonomy, we are precluding users from shopping in this manner. There is no "Car Seats" PLP. Our CMS has the ability to create both a Category Page and a PLP for "Car Seats". We could theoretically place an image on the "Car Seats" category page for "View All Car Seats", and allow users to click to a "Car Seats" PLP.
None of the major ecommerce players I've audited are adding a PLP option higher up in the hierarchy. That doesn't mean that it's not good UX.
Problems:
- From an SEO perspective, having a Category Page and a PLP for "Car Seats" would cause cannibalization - they would be competing for the same keywords.
- I am skeptical that canonicals would work. The pages are not near duplicate content. One page has category images, the other has product images. We could place content blocks on the page to make them more similar.
- We could noindex the PLP, but that's a waste of internal link juice.
Need advice:
- Will canonicals work in this situation?
- Should we trash this idea entirely? Does adding a PLP add value or confusion?
- Is noindex a good idea?
- Is there an option to target keyword variations with the PLP?
- Is there another solution?
-
Yeh, I thought you'd like it.
I have been working with a lighting eCommerce store and we have been looking at them a lot - they nail it with SEO
Regards
Nigel
-
Nigel:
Thanks - you pretty much confirmed my thoughts. At the moment, we don't have the ability to create hybrid pages - pages with category and product images. It's on the wish list. If it was up to me alone, we would only have PLPs at the bottom of the taxonomy. Our merchants group is pushing hard for PLPs.
BTW, Wayfair's SEO/UX is outstanding. Those folks are squared away. Any time I have an issue to resolve, it's wayfair.com and "view source".
-
Hi Satans_apprentice
You have to keep it simple and the addition of your PLPs, whilst looking pretty are adding a layer of complication to the structure that you don't need. I hate hamburger menus as well - you must remember to add a search bar at the top that does not need opening as well so people can get stuck in immediately.
You need - say,
Department>Category>Sub-Category - this is the natural structure for most eCommerce sites.
Baby>Car Seats>Convertible Car Seats.
Department, I would go with a menu structure at the top and Category images in the centre with some text at the bottom.(300) - you can then either add products to this or keep those for the categories and sub-categories.
Category - I would have a menu structure at the top, a grid of sub-categories with products beneath and a description (300) at the bottom.
Sub-category - I would have a menu structure at the top, a grid of products with a small description at the top and a bigger one (300) at the bottom
Look at Wayfair - they do really well in search and I think their site is really well organised using as it does a mixture of text menu, images and products. They also have really chunky descriptions on appropriate pages like 'Bedroom Lighting' - have a look at the bottom.
This is their lighting category:
https://www.wayfair.co.uk/lighting/cat/lighting-c234985.html
You don't say whether you have brands as well - this can add a layer of complication and possible cannibalisation, but as long as you add Meta and content, this type of cannibalisation has become more acceptable. The pages are hybrids in themselves and sit lower down in search, making them less of a problem.
Sale pages can also add complication and I always canonicalise these back to the brand.
Some sites have 'New-In' sections also - I canonicalise these back to the brands - or categories if you a non-branded website.
I hope this has helped to clarify your thinking.
Regards
Nigel
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does adding new pages, new slugs, new URLS in a site affects rankings and visibility?
hi reader, i have decided to add new pages to my site. if i add new urls, i feel like i have to submit the sitemap again. my question is, does submitting sitemap again with new slugs or urls affects visibility is serps, if yes, how do i minimize the impact?
Web Design | | SIMON-CULL0 -
SEO Problem With My Pages ?
Hi everyone, I created a self-hosted custom PHP website the page is ( custom cosmetic boxes ), but it doesn't show up on Google. I tried to follow tutorials on the HubSpot, but even my site sucks. Please help me where I am wrong. Maybe the little thing is left unattended, which makes it void.
Web Design | | fbowable
Please help me.0 -
Why is Google displaying meta descriptions for pages that are nowhere contained in said page metas?
Certain search keywords are pulling up incorrect page titles and meta descriptions for our site. I've looked through our code, and the text used by Google in the search results is nowhere found inside our site. I've also looked at previous iterations of our site from over a decade ago and still haven't found it. I then searched specifically for the exact phrased incorrect meta descriptions and found a long list of spammy sites linking to our domain with the exact, incorrect meta description. Is this why Google is displaying the incorrect data, and how do I get Google to use the meta descriptions from my actual site?
Web Design | | Closetstogo0 -
Lots of Listing Pages with Thin Content on Real Estate Web Site-Best to Set them to No-Index?
Greetings Moz Community: As a commercial real estate broker in Manhattan I run a web site with over 600 pages. Basically the pages are organized in the following categories: 1. Neighborhoods (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/neighborhoods/midtown-manhattan) 25 PAGES Low bounce rate 2. Types of Space (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/commercial-space/loft-space)
Web Design | | Kingalan1
15 PAGES Low bounce rate. 3. Blog (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/how-long-does-leasing-process-take
30 PAGES Medium/high bounce rate 4. Services (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/brokerage-services/relocate-to-new-office-space) High bounce rate
3 PAGES 5. About Us (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/about-us/what-we-do
4 PAGES High bounce rate 6. Listings (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/listings/305-fifth-avenue-office-suite-1340sf)
300 PAGES High bounce rate (65%), thin content 7. Buildings (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/928-broadway
300 PAGES Very high bounce rate (exceeding 75%) Most of the listing pages do not have more than 100 words. My SEO firm is advising me to set them "No-Index, Follow". They believe the thin content could be hurting me. Is this an acceptable strategy? I am concerned that when Google detects 300 pages set to "No-Follow" they could interpret this as the site seeking to hide something and penalize us. Also, the building pages have a low click thru rate. Would it make sense to set them to "No-Follow" as well? Basically, would it increase authority in Google's eyes if we set pages that have thin content and/or low click thru rates to "No-Follow"? Any harm in doing this for about half the pages on the site? I might add that while I don't suffer from any manual penalty volume has gone down substantially in the last month. We upgraded the site in early June and somehow 175 pages were submitted to Google that should not have been indexed. A removal request has been made for those pages. Prior to that we were hit by Panda in April 2012 with search volume dropping from about 7,000 per month to 3,000 per month. Volume had increased back to 4,500 by April this year only to start tanking again. It was down to 3,600 in June. About 30 toxic links were removed in late April and a disavow file was submitted with Google in late April for removal of links from 80 toxic domains. Thanks in advance for your responses!! Alan0 -
Link colour on page?
I always thought that the link colour has to be different from text colour? I have come across a site http://www.printandpackaging.co.uk/ and it has made me question this belief, they seem to only have bolded the link which would be very nice if this is fine.
Web Design | | BobAnderson0 -
Any discussions on the actual web page design and how it might affect SEO?
Are there any links to previous discussions or tips, techniques for how creative design has any impact on seo??
Web Design | | theideapeople1