Ecommerce Product Page Optimization & International SEO
-
Hello,
I'm working on our website SEO optimization. We have a thousands of products pages with different structures for the languages (arg) and very depth folder path .com/[folder]/[folder]/[folder]/product1.hmtl
So now I have the happiness of working on the optimization of the website with themajor risk of impacting all current ranking. But anyway, here are a few questions I have on the way.
Part 1 - International URL
Our websites target people per country and languages. We do not have shops per countries (not enough resources_) but we try to get at least website per languages. What could be the best option?_
-
Url Parameters +hreflang
-
So we save one folder less and the proper setup. But I'm just scared it's gonna be too messy for Google
- URL:.com/product1**?lang=fr**
- Product page:link rel="alternate" hreflang="en" href=".com/product1" /
-
Language folder + hreflang
-
one folder more but clearer structure
-
URL:.com**/fr/**product1
-
**Product **page:****link rel="alternate" hreflang="en" href=".com/product1" /
Part 2 - Product URL
Our website is structure per categories so the product comes after. However, I've seen a lot of websites recently removing the categories to save folders space. What should be the most efficient option?
-
Category folder
-
It's obviously a good practice but this + the language folder makes already 2 folders
-
URL:.com/categoryA/product1-{targetedKW}
-
{targetedKW} = cheap product, best price or else
-
All in url
-
I've never done it but it somehow makes sense
-
URL:.com/categoryA-product1-{targetedKW}
Part 3 - Keyword stuffing
As I'd like to get most of it automatically done, what could be the best places to add a few KW.
-
**Markups:**All the ones we can
-
**Meta Descriptions:**optimize one for Google + one for twitter + one for facebook
-
Longer to do but then from google shopping and other automatic links, we could have the perfect or, at least, best description possible
-
**All other option:**Reuse our product name + {targetter KW1 KW2 ...}
-
Product description_ex: content_
-
Buttons (click to buy)ex: button title="Buy product_name cheap" alt="Purchase product_name"Buy Product name/button
-
Images:same than above
-
Meta:Titles and meta description
-
Hn
-
-
First of all, a caveat: if your site is ranking even moderately well, I would not change the URL structure. Once search engines have indexed content, they really don't like it when you play around with the URLs later. The exception would be your language URLs - if you're not already consistent about those or you don't already have those set up, then by all means set up whatever works for you, thinking as much as possible about how you might need to expand in the future so you can solve for that now, and not be in the same boat of wanting to change URLs again later. At the very least, in your shoes, I would first dive deep into analytics and find out what the most-visited folder structure is. Then if you decide to standardize them all, at least go with that version of the structure, and make sure you're putting in one-to-one redirects so you can preserve as much link juice as possible.
As to your more specific questions - these are answers more to what I would do if I were setting up a new site, and not if I were thinking about optimizing by changing a ton of the hierarchy.
1. Language URL - I lean toward #2, language in a folder, for a couple of reasons. To me it intuitively feels like everything in that language would be in that folder - in your example, .com/fr/ - and thereby grouped structurally, a signal to both search engines and humans that they are in the (insert language name here) language version of your site. Another reason is that after a certain point, parameters can get truncated, so if you're using other parameters - some that come to mind are Google Analytics' utm_source, utm_campaign, utm_medium - you may end up exceeding the max characters if you go the alternate route of language in a query string.
2. I would stick with either option 1 or option 3. While search engines are getting smarter about parsing, just like with the language folder, I think there's a lot to be said for showing some sort of structure and hierarchy by using a folder structure rather than mixing category with product name. Option 3: I'd suggest .com/toplevelcategory/product-name/ - and not include any of the subcategories as in .com/toplevelcategory/childcategory/grandchildcategory/product-name/ because it makes the URLs so long. Some of the benefits of having long URLs are that your tech-savvy users will visually recognize the hierarchy more easily and can quickly jump up a couple of levels just by chopping off a couple of folders in their address bar, and of course you can include more keywords the more folders you have. Drawbacks, though, are that in SERPs the full URL gets chopped off and looks less appealing to end users. On a related note, using Schema breadcrumbs (which are also visible to the user) is a great way to give additional signals to both search engines and users about what all those various levels are.
3. Just the fact that you used the term "keyword stuffing" would make me quite cautious. It's not about stuffing, it's about optimizing for both humans and spiders. In your shoes, I would again go to analytics and figure out what is already bringing you the most success - a combination of pages with the most organic traffic along with pages that convert really well. From there, I'd see what traits they have in common. Do all of them have longer content? Do you have some sort of special tags or something that is clearly working well?
If you don't want to get into the weeds and start optimizing pages individually, look hard at your Product Detail Page template. Make sure it pulls a decent title and meta description from a template (but that you can override it later if you ever have time to do one-by-one page optimization). By far the biggest thing you can do on any of your pages, besides getting basic page structure clean and clear, is to add Schema markup. A few tweaks to your PDP template and you should be able to show price, reviews, etc. to both humans and spiders. If for some reason you can't edit the template, look for similar gains through Google Search Console. They have a content highlighting tool that will let you highlight a series of pages to show it where to find certain information, and they'll then understand (and presumably rank) your content much better.
It varies by site, but if you're using old markup (say an XHTML transitional 1999 doctype) or lots of tables or tons of nested divs, that type of optimization can give you pretty decent gains as well. Cleaning up the codebase is often a huge ranking signal because it affects a ton of pages and shows you care about modernizing and improving UX.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to best set up international XML site map?
Hi everyone, I've been searching about a problem, but haven't been able to find an answer. We would like to generate a XML site map for an international web shop. This shop has one domain for Dutch visitors (.nl) and another domain for visitors of other countries (Germany, France, Belgium etc.) (.com). The website on the 2 domains looks the same, has the same template and same pages, but as it is targeted to other countries, the pages are in different languages and the urls are also in different languages (see example below for a category bags). Example Netherlands:
International SEO | | DocdataCommerce
Dutch domain: www.client.nl
Example Dutch bags category page: www.client.nl/tassen Example France:
International domain: www.client.com
Example French bags category page: www.client.com/sacs When a visitor is on the Dutch domain (.nl) which shows the Dutch content, he can switch country to for example France in the country switch and then gets redirected to the other, international .com domain. Also the other way round. Now we want to generate a XML sitemap for these 2 domains. As it is the same site, but on 2 domains, development wants to make 1 sitemap, where we take the Dutch version with Dutch domain as basis and in the alternates we specify the other language versions on the other domain (see example below). <loc>http://www.client.nl/tassen</loc>
<xhtml:link<br>rel="alternate"
hreflang="fr"
href="http://www.client.com/sacs"
/></xhtml:link<br> Is this the best way to do this? Or would we need to make 2 site maps, as it are 2 domains?0 -
International advice.... can anyone help and check my site?
Hi ALL, I'm running 3 sites, internationally .com, com.au and co.nz Can anyone please look at my site and give me feedback about the hreflang tags, I ran a W3C and i have errors stating https://validator.nu/?doc=http%3A%2F%2Fzenory.co.nz for www.zenory.com and its relevant domains
International SEO | | edward-may0 -
Best process to 301 ecommerce store?
Hi, We have decided to segment our products and languages on to different country tlds. I know how to 301, but I am curious as to how I should actually do this, in what order to do it. Let's call the existing site with all products on OLDsite, and the new tld, where the products will also appear NEWsite. I am thinking of: Setting up NEWsite, but no sitemap. On launch of NEWsite, 301 all products on OLDsite to NEWsite (they will no longer appear on OLDsite) After some time, add sitemap, google verification in GWT, etc... on NEWsite. My thinking is that if I launch NEWsite and notify Google it will index the same products and content as OLDsite, and not necessarily check the 301 right? Which could lead to dupe content issues... Any ideas? We are only redirecting part of the site, so not all of it. Thanks!
International SEO | | bjs20100 -
Massive jump in pages indexed (and I do mean massive)
Hello mozzers, I have been working in SEO for a number of years but never seen anything like a jump in pages indexed of this proportion (image is from the Index Status report in Google Webmaster Tools: http://i.imgur.com/79mW6Jl.png Has anyone has ever seen anything like this?
International SEO | | Lina-iWeb
Anyone have an idea about what happened? One thing that sprung to mind might be that the same pages are now getting indexed in several more google country sites (e.g. google.ca, google.co.uk, google.es, google.com.mx) but I don't know if the Index Status report in WMT works like that. A few notes to explain the context: It's an eCommerce website with service pages and around 9 different pages listing products. The site is small - only around 100 pages across three languages 1.5 months ago we migrated from three language subdomains to a single sub-domain with language directories. Before and after the migration I used hreflang tags across the board. We saw about 50% uplift in traffic from unbranded organic terms after the migration (although on day one it was more like +300%), especially from more language diversity. I had an issue where the 'sort' links on the product tables were giving rise to thousands of pages of duplicate content, although I had used the URL parameter handling to communicate to Google that these were not significantly different and only to index the representative URL. About 2 weeks ago I blocked them using the robots.txt (Disallow: *?sort). I never felt these were doing us too much harm in reality although many of them are indexed and can be found with a site:xxx.com search. At the same time as adding *?sort to the robots.txt, I made an hreflang sitemap for each language, and linked to them from an index sitemap and added these to WMT. I added some country specific alternate URLs as well as language just to see if I started getting more traffic from those countries (e.g. xxx.com/es/ for Spanish, xxx.com/es/ for Spain, xxx.xom/es/ for Mexico etc). I dodn't seem to get any benefit from this. Webmaster tools profile is for a URL that is the root domain xxx.com. We have a lot of other subdomains, including a blog that is far bigger than our main site. But looking at the Search Queries report, all the pages listed are on the core website so I don't think it is the blog pages etc. I have seen a couple of good days in terms of unbranded organic search referrals - no spike or drop off but a couple of good days in keeping with recent improvements in these kinds of referrals. We have some software mirror sub domains that are duplicated across two website: xxx.mirror.xxx.com and xxx.mirror.xxx.ca. Many of these don't even have sections and Google seemed to be handling the duplication, always preferring to show the .com URL despite no cross-site canonicals in place. Very interesting, I'm sure you will agree! THANKS FOR READING! 79mW6Jl.png0 -
Same domain with different google effect seo ?
I have a domain www.abc.com for US market. Now i want to sell same services in Australia. I am thinking to buy www.abc.com.au . Because i think i will get rank more faster for .au in Australia because of .au . What do you guys suggest ?
International SEO | | afycon0 -
The best SEO practice for a .hk domain
We are currently working on a project which involves 3 separate .com domains in relation to a UK company selling/renting residential, commercial and investment properties within the UK. We are now working on producing a .hk site for the overseas customers. Can anyone advise what the best practice is for a .hk domain and where best to start? Should the domain be hosted in that geographical location for example? We are relatively new to this so any advise would be greatly appreciated.
International SEO | | SoundinTheory0 -
Internationally targetted subdomains and Duplicate content
A client has a site they'd like to translated into French, not for the french market but for french speaking countries. My research tells me the best way to implement this for this particular client is to create subfolders for each country. For ease of implementation I’ve decided against ccTLD’s and Sub Domains. So for example… I'll create www.website.com/mr/ for Mauritania and in GWT set this to target Mauritania. Excellent so far. But then I need to build another sub folder for Morocco. I'll then create www.website.com/ma/ for Morocco and in GWT set this to target Morocco. Now the content on these two sub folders will be exactly the same and I’m thinking about doing this for all French speaking African countries. It would be nice to use www.website.com/fr/ but in GWT you can only set one Target country. Duplicate content issues arise and my fear of perturbing the almighty Google becomes a possibility. My research indicates that I should simply canonical back to the page I want indexed. But I want them both to be indexed surely!? I therefore decided to share my situation with my fellow SEO’s to see if I’m being stupid or missing something simple both a distinct possibility!
International SEO | | eazytiger0 -
International SEO - auto geo-targetting
I read with interest the recent post on international SEO and the top level domain architecture approaches to local content: http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/folders-vs-subdomains-vs-cctld-in-international-seo-an-overview#jtc135670 The issue I have is a little more complex: The business sells a wide variety of products (37) but one is by far and away the biggest and most popular. This means that due to the link profile of the various country sites and HQ site, search engines categorise the site according to this product (this is easily seen with the Google Adplanner) and the other product lines suffer as a result. The current architecture is to have a .com site and then individual ccTLD country sites, again with all products on each site. This creates an issue as in most countries the brand is not strong (compared to the keyword names and search volumes of the products) and so it is not that effective in generating organic traffic. The .com hogs much of the inbound links and the country sites themselves are not that well optimised for a number of reasons. A proposed solution has been to leverage the strength of the .com and the search volume for the product names, and to produce thematic sites based on each product: productA.brand.com
International SEO | | StevieCC
productB.brand.com
productC.brand.com In this way, the sites, content and link profiles are aligned around the more desirable products and we can expect improved organic search performance as a result (or at least ensure relevant traffic finds the relevant content fast). In terms of providing localised content, the plan was to use content mirroring and to then assign each content mirror to a specific geo-location using the webmaster tools console (and other SE equivilents). This is shown I think in one of Rand's videos. ProductA.brand.com/de/de Germany site for product A with unique German content
ProductA.brand.com/fr/fr French site for product A with unique French content This makes economic sense to me as to utilise the ccTLDs would result in hundreds of separate sites with all the licence and server considerations that entails. For example, for product A alone we would have to produce: productA.brand.de
productA.brand.fr
productA.brand.cn
productA.brand.jp
ect ect ect This just would not be sustainable in license/server costs alone across 37 products and 24 countries. However, I saw in a recent presentation at SES London that (auto) geo-targeting is risky, often doesn't work well for SEO and can even be seen as cloaking. I think the above strategy could still work, but perhaps we should avoid the use of auto-geotargetting altogether and hope the search engines alone do their job in getting users to the right content as we optimise the unique content for each country (and if they don't, ensure our desgn, UX and country selectors do the job instead). SEO guru consensus is to use the ccTLD if you own it, but as described above, in the real world that just isn't possible or practical given the company's strategic position. Which leads to the final question- we do own the brand ccTLDs- if they are directed back to the content mirror for the country on the .com, is there any SEO benefit in doing so aside from directing back any link juice associated with the domain)?0