Javascript content not being indexed by Google
-
I thought Google has gotten better at picking up unique content from javascript. I'm not seeing it with our site. We rate beauty and skincare products using our algorithms. Here is an example of a product -- https://www.skinsafeproducts.com/tide-free-gentle-he-liquid-laundry-detergent-100-fl-oz
When you look at the cache page (text) from google none of the core ratings (badges like fragrance free, top free and so forth) are being picked up for ranking. Any idea what we could do to have the rating incorporated in the indexation.
-
Hello!
Pretty sure the issue is that this content requires a user action before being seen. Google will not crawl/index content which is not loaded until the user interacts. This post is a great resource %20Summary:%20How%20to%20Make%20Your%20Company%20Diverse%20Without%20Focusing%20on%20Diversity%20%20%20Name:%20Heather%20Huhman%20Spark%20Hire%20%20Category:%20Business%20and%20Finance%20%20%20Email:%20query-7wru@helpareporter.net%20%20%20Media%20Outlet:%20Spark%20Hire%20%20Deadline:%205:00%20PM%20EST%20-%2023%20April%20%20%20Query:%20%20%20LinkedIn's%20most%20recent%20Global%20Recruiting%20Trends%20report,%20recruiters%20say%20their%20top%20focus%20is%20on%20diversity%20and%20inclusion.%20But%20when%20it%20comes%20to%20hiring%20for%20diversity,%20there's%20a%20misunderstanding%20that%20the%20focus%20must%20be%20on%20the%20ethnicity,%20race,%20and%20sex%20of%20candidates.%20We're%20looking%20for%20insight%20into%20how%20hiring%20pros%20can%20break%20out%20of%20that%20rigid%20diversity%20box%20and%20find%20creative%20ways%20to%20hire%20diverse%20candidates%20who%20will%20positively%20impact%20various%20aspects%20of%20their%20company.%20Responses%20that%20are%20selected%20will%20be%20featured%20on%20the%20Spark%20Hire%20blog%20and%20promoted%20to%20over%2010K%20blog%20subscribers.%20%20Please%20respond%20to%20the%20following%20questions:%20%20How%20can%20focusing%20only%20on%20the%20ethnicity,%20race,%20and%20sex%20of%20candidates%20hurt%20hiring%20pros'%20efforts%20of%20hiring%20the%20best%20diverse%20candidates?%20What%20other%20candidate%20factors%20can%20hiring%20pros%20look%20into%20to%20find%20diverse%20candidates?%20Please%20share%20a%20story%20of%20a%20time%20when%20you%20or%20a%20fellow%20hiring%20pro%20narrowed%20your%20diversity%20focus%20too%20much,%20resulting%20in%20hires%20that%20weren%27t%20the%20best%20fit%20for%20the%20company.%20How%20can%20hiring%20professionals%20create%20a%20unique%20hiring%20strategy%20to%20attract%20diverse%20candidates%20who%20are%20the%20best%20fit%20for%20their%20open%20roles%20and%20company?%20%20Requirements:%20%20%20Please%20send%20your%20input%20in%20your%20initial%20response%20(don%27t%20send%20requests%20for%20interviews%20or%20article%20links).%20Include%20%22How%20to%20Make%20Your%20Company%20Diverse%20Without%20Focusing%20on%20Diversity%22%20in%20the%20subject%20line.%20Answer%20each%20question%20separately.%20Keep%20answers%20brief%20but%20informative.%20%20Include:%20%20Your%20title%20and%20qualifications%20Contact%20information,%20including%20an%20email%20Headshot%20(must%20be%20a%20link%20and%20at%20least%20200x200)%20Twitter%20handle%20%20Thank%20You.)on JS auditing/crawling%20Summary:%20How%20to%20Make%20Your%20Company%20Diverse%20Without%20Focusing%20on%20Diversity%20%20%20Name:%20Heather%20Huhman%20Spark%20Hire%20%20Category:%20Business%20and%20Finance%20%20%20Email:%20query-7wru@helpareporter.net%20%20%20Media%20Outlet:%20Spark%20Hire%20%20Deadline:%205:00%20PM%20EST%20-%2023%20April%20%20%20Query:%20%20%20LinkedIn's%20most%20recent%20Global%20Recruiting%20Trends%20report,%20recruiters%20say%20their%20top%20focus%20is%20on%20diversity%20and%20inclusion.%20But%20when%20it%20comes%20to%20hiring%20for%20diversity,%20there's%20a%20misunderstanding%20that%20the%20focus%20must%20be%20on%20the%20ethnicity,%20race,%20and%20sex%20of%20candidates.%20We're%20looking%20for%20insight%20into%20how%20hiring%20pros%20can%20break%20out%20of%20that%20rigid%20diversity%20box%20and%20find%20creative%20ways%20to%20hire%20diverse%20candidates%20who%20will%20positively%20impact%20various%20aspects%20of%20their%20company.%20Responses%20that%20are%20selected%20will%20be%20featured%20on%20the%20Spark%20Hire%20blog%20and%20promoted%20to%20over%2010K%20blog%20subscribers.%20%20Please%20respond%20to%20the%20following%20questions:%20%20How%20can%20focusing%20only%20on%20the%20ethnicity,%20race,%20and%20sex%20of%20candidates%20hurt%20hiring%20pros'%20efforts%20of%20hiring%20the%20best%20diverse%20candidates?%20What%20other%20candidate%20factors%20can%20hiring%20pros%20look%20into%20to%20find%20diverse%20candidates?%20Please%20share%20a%20story%20of%20a%20time%20when%20you%20or%20a%20fellow%20hiring%20pro%20narrowed%20your%20diversity%20focus%20too%20much,%20resulting%20in%20hires%20that%20weren%27t%20the%20best%20fit%20for%20the%20company.%20How%20can%20hiring%20professionals%20create%20a%20unique%20hiring%20strategy%20to%20attract%20diverse%20candidates%20who%20are%20the%20best%20fit%20for%20their%20open%20roles%20and%20company?%20%20Requirements:%20%20%20Please%20send%20your%20input%20in%20your%20initial%20response%20(don%27t%20send%20requests%20for%20interviews%20or%20article%20links).%20Include%20%22How%20to%20Make%20Your%20Company%20Diverse%20Without%20Focusing%20on%20Diversity%22%20in%20the%20subject%20line.%20Answer%20each%20question%20separately.%20Keep%20answers%20brief%20but%20informative.%20%20Include:%20%20Your%20title%20and%20qualifications%20Contact%20information,%20including%20an%20email%20Headshot%20(must%20be%20a%20link%20and%20at%20least%20200x200)%20Twitter%20handle%20%20Thank%20You.) and will show you how to use Chrome's 'inspect element' as a better way to see what's going on.
But in general, the content needs to load before a user action takes place (even if in JS) and yes Google is getting better, but won't look at anything behind a click. Google just confirmed this at their recent I/O conference, stating that they do render JavaScript but it could be a week after they first render the normal HTML.
-Dan
PS - Huge apologies for the delay in answering, Moz was having technical issues with the backend of the forum, affecting the ability to reply to some questions.
-
Hi akih,
I don't believe the "text-only" cache is representative of Google's index. They process JavaScript via their rendering service before they index content - so the full cached version is a more accurate representation of the content Google has seen/indexed.
Also, I ran a search for your site using a snippet of copy from the "Common Preservative Free" badge, and Google is returning pages with this text in the displayed page description. Here's a link to the SERP for the query I used.
I'd say Google's able to see and index this content just fine - it's just the "text-only" cached content does not include any JavaScript-rendered content.
Best,
Mike
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Indexing
Hi We have roughly 8500 pages in our website. Google had indexed almost 6000 of them, but now suddenly I see that the pages indexed has gone to 45. Any possible explanations why this might be happening and what can be done for it. Thanks, Priyam
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | kh-priyam0 -
Google does not index image sitemap
Hi, we put an image sitemap in the searchconsole/webmastertools http://www.sillasdepaseo.es/sillasdepaseo/sitemap-images.xml it contains only the indexed products and all images on the pages. We also claimed the CDN in the searchconsole http://media.sillasdepaseo.es/ It has been 2 weeks now, Google indexes the pages, but not the images. What can we do? Thanks in advance. Dieter Lang
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Storesco0 -
How can Google index a page that it can't crawl completely?
I recently posted a question regarding a product page that appeared to have no content. [http://www.seomoz.org/q/why-is-ose-showing-now-data-for-this-url] What puzzles me is that this page got indexed anyway. Was it indexed based on Google knowing that there was once content on the page? Was it indexed based on the trust level of our root domain? What are your thoughts? I'm asking not only because I don't know the answer, but because I know the argument is going to be made that if Google indexed the page then it must have been crawlable...therefore we didn't really have a crawlability problem. Why Google index a page it can't crawl?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | danatanseo0 -
Switching from Google Plus Local to Google Plus Business
Greetings, We have a website design firm located in India. We wanted to target customers in our city who are looking for website design locally. And with google plus local and a few content marketing would get us into first page very soon because none in the competition is using social signals or even content marketing. BUT unfortunately from last month even though our Google Places is verified we cant verify our Google Local Plus page https://plus.google.com/b/116513400635428782065/ It just shows error 500. Its a bug and its been a year for people without it being addressed. So we are skeptical if our strategy would work without Google+. At the least we decided we would just make company local page and connect it with website. But it might not have effect as local. So we are still unsure which step to take either to wait for google to fix it.(feedbacks emails calls nothing worked) OR We start the process with Google Business Category.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | hard0 -
Merging your google places page with google plus page.
I have a map listing showing for the keyword junk cars for cash nj. I recently created a new g+ page and requested a merge between the places and the + page. now when you do a search you see the following. Junk Cars For Cash NJ LLC
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | junkcars
junkcarforcashnj.com/
Google+ page - Google+ page the first hyperlink takes me to the about page of the G+ and the second link takes me to the posts section within g+. Is this normal? should i delete the places account where the listing was originally created? Or do i leave it as is? Thanks0 -
Previously ranking #1 in google, web page has 301 / url rewrite, indexed but now showing for keyword search?
Two web pages on my website, previously ranked well in google, consistent top 3 places for 6months+, but when the site was modified, these two pages previously ending .php had the page names changed to the keyword to further improve (or so I thought). Since then the page doesn't rank at all for that search term in google. I used google webmaster tools to remove the previous page from Cache and search results, re submitted a sitemap, and where possible fixed links to the new page from other sites. On previous advice to fix I purchased links, web directories, social and articles etc to the new page but so far nothing... Its been almost 5 months and its very frustrating as these two pages previously ranked well and as a landing page ended in conversions. This problem is only appearing in google. The pages still rank well in Bing and Yahoo. Google has got the page indexed if I do a search by the url, but the page never shows under any search term it should, despite being heavily optimised for certain terms. I've spoke to my developers and they are stumped also, they've now added this text to the effected page(s) to see if this helps. Header("HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently");
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seanclc
$newurl=SITE_URL.$seo;
Header("Location:$newurl"); Can Google still index a web page but refuse to show it in search results? All other pages on my site rank well, just these two that were once called something different has caused issues? Any advice? Any ideas, Have I missed something? Im at a loss...0 -
What is the best way to allow content to be used on other sites for syndication without taking the chance of duplicate content filters
Cookstr appears to be syndicating content to shape.com and mensfitness.com a) They integrate their data into partner sites with an attribution back to their site and skinned it with the partners look. b) they link the image back to their image hosted on cookstr c) The page does not have microformats or as much data as their own page does so their own page is better SEO. Is this the best strategy or is there something better they could be doing to safely allow others to use our content, we don't want to share the content if we're going to get hit for a duplicate content filter or have another site out rank us with our own data. Thanks for your help in advance! their original content page: http://www.cookstr.com/recipes/sauteacuteed-escarole-with-pancetta their syndicated content pages: http://www.shape.com/healthy-eating/healthy-recipes/recipe/sauteacuteed-escarole-with-pancetta
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | irvingw
http://www.mensfitness.com/nutrition/healthy-recipes/recipe/sauteacuteed-escarole-with-pancetta0 -
Mobile Site - Same Content, Same subdomain, Different URL - Duplicate Content?
I'm trying to determine the best way to handle my mobile commerce site. I have a desktop version and a mobile version using a 3rd party product called CS-Cart. Let's say I have a product page. The URLs are... mobile:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | grayloon
store.domain.com/index.php?dispatch=categories.catalog#products.view&product_id=857 desktop:
store.domain.com/two-toned-tee.html I've been trying to get information regarding how to handle mobile sites with different URLs in regards to duplicate content. However, most of these results have the assumption that the different URL means m.domain.com rather than the same subdomain with a different address. I am leaning towards using a canonical URL, if possible, on the mobile store pages. I see quite a few suggesting to not do this, but again, I believe it's because they assume we are just talking about m.domain.com vs www.domain.com. Any additional thoughts on this would be great!0