I am really surprised to see this page is ranking like crazy even the content is very thin
-
We are ranking for 121KW for this page. And 22KW are ranking in the 1-3 position. I am not able to understand why will it rank like anything. Considering that it has just 4 inbound links.
Will some help me to understand this mystery. When we try to write a good in-depth content then we are not ranking but for such content, we are doing fairly good.
-
Thanks, Buddy!
-
Sure, no problem I'll take a look now!
So **this is your post URL: **<a>https://www.hackerearth.com/recruit/resources/e-books/a-complete-guide-to-talent-assessment-software/</a>
This time Moz Link Explorer has only detected one backlink to the post.
The link is from: https://www.yasteq.com/US/Fremont/123161387835128/HackerEarth
The site describes itself thusly: "One of the largest resources on the Internet for finding computer & electronics services and related businesses, worldwide." - so basically it's a local-themed business directory with a tech focus and content curation elements. You can tell that more easily by looking at the homepage (https://www.yasteq.com/). It only has 18 domain authority so that's pretty weak to be honest. The listing is relevant with a reasonable write-up - but it's from a place no one really cares about.
Majestic SEO (another tool) found this link: https://www.eventshigh.com/detail/Bangalore/48e3b2743f568bd46a83bb182fe91ce8-djangothon?src=ecbox whilst **Ahrefs found a separate link from the same site here: **https://www.eventshigh.com/detail/bangalore/63c53417b3eadb328fa3d568d970624c-travel-tech-meetup-with-goibibo
At a glance these just seem to be simple events listings. In most instances, links from these listings are either image-based or have no-follow set to true. Contrary to popular opinion, 'no-following' links does not prevent or discourage users or search engines from following a link (probably one of the worst named attribute values ever). What it does is it prevents Google from transferring any link equity (or 'SEO juice') through the link. The linking page (which hosts the hyperlink) will still lose some SEO authority, but at the receiving end you won't be gaining any (it just gets vented into cyberspace).
Seeing as the page hosting a hyperlink loses SEO equity either way (a measure taken by Google to stop PageRank sculpting from actually 'being a thing') - the only reason to no-follow hyperlinks these days is to avoid outbound Penguin penalties. This is where you are selling hyperlinks but want to tell Google "this link is somehow commercial or advertorial in nature, so don't weight it into your SEO ranking algorithm(s) for Google's results". Google will take that on board and it will prevent the link-host from garnering a penalty (for selling links to others with the intention of manipulating rankings, kind of like being labelled a drug dealer)
The domain actually has very strong metrics in Ahrefs, earning an Ahrefs domain rating of 70. They are probably aware of their site's SEO-clout and either don't want to be giving you a free ride (they expect you to pay for the equity) or they're very cautious about how they link, not wanting to lose the established authority they have built up via penalty / manual action. In any case, though the site is strong and you have links from it - those links are not sending you much / any SEO equity - so there's no party here amigo. Image-based links tend to transfer less equity anyway (even forgetting about 'nofollow') and they have no (user-visible) anchor-text to explain their relevance. Search engines do use image links as signals, but they're not such strong signals (as they're more ambiguous in general)
Ahrefs also found two links from "Mail Pug":
Both have a Domain Rating and URL Rating of zero in Ahrefs. Content doesn't actually seem that bad but... it's from a site with no equity to give you.
In basic terms, your really decent contextual (content-based) links are from sites no one cares about. On the one site with high metrics, they're refusing to transfer SEO equity to you for one reason or another. As such, no rankings for this post.
The reason why it's not ranking well is that although it may be detailed and well written, unlike your other post it didn't attract links. As such it's not deemed very shareable and it has very little SEO authority. You might say it's a vehicle with no fuel.
The reasons why it attracted no 'significant' buzz or attention online could be variable. Was it promoted as well as the other post? Like you suggest - were there CRO or UX defects in the design or copy of the content? I'll leave that side to you.
-
Ah man I love stuff like this!
Ok so here's your post: https://www.hackerearth.com/blog/artificial-intelligence/artificial-intelligence-101-how-to-get-started/
Now I can see you think this post only has four inbound links and you have drawn that conclusion from Moz Link Explorer. By the way I think Moz's tool is great. My agency wouldn't have a subscription otherwise! BUT - MLE (Moz Link Explorer) doesn't have a complete picture of all links on the web. Even Google doesn't have this (yet - their MO is to 'index the web' though).
There are several platforms which aim to supply 'backlink' (external links) data. Moz is one platform but there are others. All of these platforms or link-explorer tools, are coded to crawl the web in different ways. They all have their own unique philosophy on how to index the the 'important' links on the web more quickly. I'm not going to get into whether certain tools are better or worse, really you need **a few of them **so that you can aggregate and de-dupe your own data!
From Moz we can see that these URLs are linking to your post:
- http://blog.crescenttechnologyconsultants.com/artificial-intelligence-101-how-to-get-started/
- https://blog.steppingblocks.com/the-tools-that-saved-me-thousands
- http://analyticstraining.com/the-best-way-to-learn-ai-and-ml/
- https://analyticstraining.com/the-best-way-to-learn-ai-and-ml/
Really that's only three pages as the last two entries there are the same page being served via different protocols (HTTP vs HTTPS).
What do other tools have to say about your post?
Well I can tell you that another tools (Ahrefs) claims to have found more live links for this particular URL. That's not to say that it always will find more links overall, but in this instance it has.
Ahrefs believes that you have 10 live links (more than 4) from 8 domains.
I'll list the domains for your reference:
- refind.com
- steppingblocks.com
- analyticstraining.com
- innovify.com
- snyxius.com
- techgenies.com
- grokbase.com
- malware.xyz
In particular "refind.com" and "grokbase.com" have pretty high SEO authority metrics! These two were not picked up by MLE but will invariably have been factored by Google.
This is the link from "refind.com": https://refind.com/TinaTran_au/collections/ai - it looks pretty weird! If you go to the base-level homepage (https://refind.com/) you can see that the site is an effective content curation network with social aspects. It's likely that when your post was added by users or editors; at some point it featured on the homepage. If so that would have driven a pretty hefty whack of SEO-juice to your post. It may be worth uncovering how this network operates and seeing if you can get in with them, leverage the platform further. Turn fluke into process...
Here's the link from GrokBase: https://grokbase.com/t/gg/django-users/13a438tgw5/inconsistency-in-model-field-with-file-storage-on-amazon-s3 - seems a bit more 'on-point'. But what the heck is GrockBase? Let's go back to the home URL (https://grokbase.com/). Here's what they have to say about themselves: "Grokbase is a growing mailing list archive that facilitates __discovery of discussions and users within and across groups." - it doesn't mean huge amounts to me, maybe it will mean more to you. What ever it is, even though it looks a bit rough and simplistic - it seems to be popular. It **looks **a bit like some kind of Reddit knock-off. Maybe I'm just being ignorant and it was well established on Web 1.0. Do some digging, see what you can find. I wanted to take this further for you by looking in SEMRush (another tool) to get an estimate of the domain's traffic. Sadly it seems to be down or having problems right now.
Another popular link-indexing tool (Majestic) has **no information **on your post, so clearly both Moz and Ahrefs index your site more efficiently in terms of backlinks and the particular sites which you network with.
This was another interesting link found by Ahrefs: https://www.snyxius.com/where-to-begin-with-ai-development/ - Ctrl + F for the anchor text of "different industries and processes" and you'll find the link to your own article. It seems like a contextual link from a well established app / software development company in Austin, Tx. Guess what you wrote resonated.
It's not about volume of links, it's about the **quality **of backlinks. Either your links are high in quality for this post, or you have beaten the system somehow. Either way - congratulations
-
As I see you have some really good links but most important you have really good anchor text
- artificial intelligence
- artificial intelligence 101: how to get started
One of those anchor text is your Headline / Title which according to Adam White is the most valuable backlink type
If you want to understand how important are the anchor texts on your backlinks please read this articles The Single Best Anchor Text for SEO That No One Is Talking About
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Revamping/Re-optimizing State Pages - What to do with old content?
Hello Moz Fam! I work in the insurance industry and we serve all 50 states. We have a state page for each state where the content is thin(ish). We're slowly revamping each page and hitting every talking point for that specific state. I've used multiple tools to come up with a content template and link building template for each page as well. I spent 5 months last year proof reading all these pages. So the content is good, just not SEO good. I didn't have the team or resources to really optimize them all yet, now I do. My question is... what should I do with the old content? I was thinking of publishing it to other platforms that we have a contributor account on and linking back to each state page with it. Of course, I would wait a few days for the search engines to index the new content so it wouldn't be duplicated on these platforms. Good or bad idea?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | LindsayE0 -
How to replace an already ranked page with a better, more optimised one?
Hello peeps! I need your collective wisdom to help me deal with something. We manage a website that is doing quite well in its niche, however we have the following problem: Our section landing pages are well established and they rank for a wide range of search terms, including some with a transactional focus. It is obvious that these pages do not cater for users with transactional intent. Our competitors are targeting those transactional keywords with a completely different type of pages, and are winning across the board (annoying but understandable). We have now created a number of pages, which are very similar to the ones that our competitors are using and with an even better on-page SEO score ... WIN! ...well, not so much! Our old section pages are still ranking for the transactional search terms and our new pages are getting very little traction and are having a really slow start. 1. I suspect there is some sort of page cannibalisation going on. How would you address that?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Yordan.Vasilev
2. Is there a tried and tested way of telling search engines to rank your new page because it meets the search intent in a better way? Please note that we cannot just redirect the old page to the new one - there are structural and commercial reasons for keeping the old page as it is.
3. Is there anything else that I am missing? Your help is much appreciated.
Thanks
Yordan0 -
Does >70 character title tag affect a pages ranking in search?
We are a publication that puts out hundreds of articles a month. We have +5000 medium priority errors showing that our title element tags are too long. The title tag is structured like this: [Headine] | [Publication Name that is 23 characters] . However, since we are a publication, it's not practical for us to try to limit the length of our title tags to 70 characters or less because doing so would make the titles of our content seem very unnatural. We also don't want to remove the branding because we want it to go with the article when it's shared (and to appear when some titles are short enough to allow room in SERPs). I understand the reasons for limiting characters to 70 or less with regard to SERP friendliness. We try to keep key phrases in the front. People are more likely to click on a page if they know what it's about etc etc. My question is, do the longer titles affect the ability for the page to rank in search? To put it a different way, if we altered all the +5000 of the title tags to fit within 70 characters, would the page authorities and our site's domain authority increase? I'd like to avoid needed to clean up 5000 pages if the medium priority errors aren't really hurting us. Any input is appreciated. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CatBrain1 -
Is site page structure hurting its chances to rank?
I have a client that sells geotextiles and related products. None of his keywords gets a lot of traffic google as it is a very B2B niche specific industry. For instance, and these numbers are off the top of my head The phrase geotextiles may get 80 searches a month and we have a domain.com/geotextiles.php page Then there are woven and nonwoven geotextiles which may get 30 searches a month We too have a domain.com/nonwoven-geotextiles.php and etc It then goes even further and has things like slit film series non woven /woven and we have subpages from there. To me, I feel as if we need to merge all of these pages to just a singular geotextile page with headers for woven and nonwoven and product info for the sub branches of those two. I feel as if we are basically competing for the same phrase again and again and again for very small amounts of traffic. Thoughts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Atomicx0 -
Which is more valuable in a landing page, content or functionality?
I have two possible landing pages to focus off page links and paid ad links to, one page has space for content but basically only serves as a springboard to a map view style listing page. The idea is to use this page full of good content to build search engine value. The map view page is the most functional and is what visitors would ultimately be seeking, but has no real room for content. Are these content landing pages useful? Would it be better to focus on user functionality even though there is no space for content, and would search engines naturally apply for value to these pages? Are these landing pages necessary? The url's in question are http://www.rentcollegepads.com/marquette/search and http://www.rentcollegepads.com/marquette Thanks guys!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Dom4410 -
Google Ranking Wrong Page
The company I work for started with a website targeting one city. Soon after I started SEO for them, they expanded to two cities. Optimization was challenging, but we managed to rank highly in both cities for our keywords. A year or so later, the company expanded to two new locations, so now 4 total. At the time, we realized it was going to be tough to rank any one page for four different cities, so our new SEO strategy was to break the website into 5 sections or minisites consisting of 4 city-targeted sites, and our original site which will now be branded as more of a national website. Our URL structures now look something like this:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | cpapciak
www.company.com
www.company.com/city-1
www.company.com/city-2
www.company.com/city-3
www.company.com.city-4 Now, in the present time, all is going well except for our original targeted city. The problem is that Google keeps ranking our original site (which is now national) instead of the new city-specific site we created. I realize that this is probably due to all of the past SEO we did optimizing for that city. My thoughts are that Google is confused as to which page to actually rank for this city's keyword terms and I was wondering if canonical tags would be a possible solution here, since the pages are about 95% identical. Anyone have any insight? I'd really appreciate it!0 -
404 Error on Blog Pages that Look Like Loading Fine
There was recently a huge increase in 404 errors on Yandex Webmasters corresponding with a drop in rankings. Most of the pages seem to be from my blog (which was updated around the same time). When I click on the links from Yandex the page looks like it is loading normal, expect that it has the following message from the Facebook plugin I am using for commenting Any ideas about what the problem is or how to fix it? Critical Errors That Must Be Fixed | Bad Response Code: | URL returned a bad HTTP response code. | Open Graph Warnings That Should Be Fixed | Inferred Property: | The 'og:url' property should be explicitly provided, even if a value can be inferred from other tags. |
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | theLotter
| Inferred Property: | The 'og:title' property should be explicitly provided, even if a value can be inferred from other tags. |
| Small og:image: | All the images referenced by og:image should be at least 200px in both dimensions. Please check all the images with tag og:image in the given url and ensure that it meets the recommended specification. |0 -
Best way to improve page rank
I notice many small business sites seems to have a page rank of 3,4, or 5 which don't appear to be doing a great deal of SEO on their websites. i.e these are very basic sites with a little static content that rarely changes, no blogs or particular links. Does having a high page rank still mean your will achieve better search engine positions? whats the best way to improve page rank for small business sites? thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bristolweb0