Creating two websites from one and building up traffic to the new domain quickly
-
A client has an existing successful website that sells niche products - they are well known in their marketplace. They have two sets of key customers, let's call them (a) and (b), that need addressing in different ways to maximise sales. (a) is the more specialist end of the market, where people have complex needs - there are fewer of them but repeat business is likely, and we can talk to them in more technical language. (b) is the layman's end of the market - there is a vast pool of potential customers but they'll be more casual buyers and need to be addressed more in layman's terms.
So what they want to do is to take their existing website, and essentially split it into two different websites, one for each market. The one that will use the existing domain, with all the links that have built up over the years pointing to it, will be the site for the more specialist end of the market (a). The domain name suits it better, which is why he wants to use the existing domain with that site and not the other.
(b) will be a brand new domain. The client will write new product descriptions across the board so that the two sets of product information are not duplicate.
I'd rather he didn't do this at all, because of the risk involved, and the difficulty of building up the traffic to the new site, which is after all the one with the best chance of mass market sales. But given that the client has decided that this is definitely what he wants, does anyone have any thoughts on what the action plan should be?
-
Again, the thing is that the client has made the decision and he definitely wants to do this. I'm not planning to fight it any further as I've already explained to him the difficulties and he appreciates them and has made the decision to do it anyway.
The new site won't be exactly the same, but it will have broadly the same set of products, albeit described in a very different way.
The situation is undoubtedly difficult and undesirable, that's for sure. But the client has made a business decision and now we have to find the best way through it.
-
Sorry where you said 'splitting' the site in two, I assumed part of the site would move out to the new domain and therefore would no longer reside on the old domain
If it's going to be exactly the same site on both domains, then it truly is un-wise as there's no value-add for the web or end users (why go to the new site, when users can get all the same stuff on the old site?)
If it's going to be basically the same then it probably won't perform very well (also as the goal-posts for a good, linkable site have probably shifted since the old one was made!)
Different wording will help a bit but I wouldn't expect to see much performance on the new site, if it's not bringing a value proposition to the table (wording will only take you so far)
This is a good video from Google: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AmRg3p79pM
You only really need to listen to point #1. If you start working on the SEO before you work on the unique value proposition of the new brand (or at least, new site - if it will be branded the same) then it's pretty much pointless to continue
-
I appreciate the time you've put in to such a detailed reply, however I'm not questioning the client's business decision and I don't plan to. My question was not whether it is a good idea or not - that really doesn't matter as the decision is already made - but more to start a discussion around the best action plan from this point forward.
There won't actually be any redirecting involved, because what the plan is essentially is to make a new website with all the same products on as the original site, but worded completely differently for the wider market. The existing website will stay in place as-is, with the original domain and all the original content.
-
Yes there is risk involved. But the greater risk is when you never diversify and build out, you get left behind. What's worse, a high probability of a small to medium dip in results (short term, 2-3 months) or the certainty of site death via refusing to evolve over time (probably in 5 years)?
What he is doing, is making a business decision. You can't make or unmake, or take responsibility for his business decision (that burden is his and his alone). What you can do is help to inform his decision
Even when redirect mapping is done perfectly, you can experience dips in traffic. This is especially true when new domains come into play!
Things that can affect the 301 redirects ability to transfer maximum (100%) SEO authority:
-
- If the redirects end up looping (super unlikely, between two different domains. Happens more when architecture changes on the same domain and someone super smart isn't doing the redirects!)
-
- Wrong redirect type used (e.g: JS redirects, Meta refreshes, 302 redirects etc)
-
- If the redirects begin to chain (301 to a 301, 301 to a 302, 302 to a 301 etc.)
-
- If the content Google saw on its last 'active' cache of the old URL (which is now redirecting), is vastly different from the content of the redirect destination URL. Do not think in human terms, think in machine terms. Think about stuff like Boolean string similarity. If you take all the content from the old URL and put it in a single string, and do the same for the new page - if the Boolean string similarity is only (example) 25% (rather than 75%, or 90%) - then don't expect most of the SEO authority to go across (it won't). If the new page is significantly different, it's Google's view that the backlinks which webmasters created previously (to the old URL) shouldn't necessarily be applied (in terms of PageRank) to the new URL. They might not have decided to link to the new URL, if it's very different (fair play I guess)
So as you can see, even if you do everything perfectly, there's still a risk that some performance could be lost and could have to be re-built. So why do anything or ever split / build sites out?
Well, the human population grows every day right? So does the population of the internet. That means that keywords which are long-tail today, could be heavy-hitters in 2-5 years time. That will draw the attention of larger SEO agencies and companies with more resources (people, money, expertise) than you can hope to match. Those keywords will get sucked up into the sky
So what will you replace them with? Happily, keywords with 0 search volume today (or which aren't even recorded) will exist and become fruitful as the human (and web) population grows and the diversity of applied language (for searches and queries) increases in complexity over time
So if you never build out and split out, never divide and offer a more long-tail experience - you will die and be forgotten. All your keywords now, will be taken from you - with nothing to replace them with, your site will die out
So you **HAVE **to grow and divide and scale. It's not optional, it's a survival requirement on a Darwinistic web
But you are right there is risk, especially in the short to medium term. There will be some pain and a loss of results. But if that stops the site from completely dying out, it's something you have to do
Judging when that moment has come can only be the business owners decision
Think of a lion on the African savanna. Is it risky to go out there, take down an antelope or a bison? You bet your ass it is, as a predator the lion could lose an eye. But does the lion just say "fudge it then I'll just stay in"? No, because if he takes that line of thought he's sure to starve. I mean, in reality the lionesses do all the hunting anyway >_> but you get what I mean right?
This split out will probably negatively impact results, and these kinds of maneuvers need to be kept in check. Once move like this every 2-3 years should not be exceeded. But if you never do these things, you lose everything in the long run!
Hope that makes sense
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate Content Question With New Domain
Hey Everyone, I hope your day is going well. I have a question regarding duplicate content. Let's say that we have Website A and Website B. Website A is a directory for multiple stores & brands. Website B is a new domain that will satisfy the delivery niche for these multiple stores & brands (where they can click on a "Delivery" anchor on Website A and it'll redirect them to Website B). We want Website B to rank organically when someone types in " <brand>delivery" in Google. Website B has NOT been created yet. The Issue Website B has to be a separate domain than Website A (no getting around this). Website B will also pull all of the content from Website A (menus, reviews, about, etc). Will we face any duplicate content issues on either Website A or Website B in the future? Should we rel=canonical to the main website even though we want Website B to rank organically?</brand>
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | imjonny0 -
Should I revive the old domain or just redirect all the juicy links to my new site?
I'm about to acquire a domain with a lot of great/highly authoritative backlinks. The links pointing to the domain are quite powerful and the domain is an exact match TLD. I have two options (that I know of 😞 1. I could redirect all the links to their new home(s) on my new site which offers the same resources the old site used to offer. or 2. I could rebuild the tools/content on this site. Ideally, I'd transfer to my new site as all those powerful links could help all my rankings. However, I'm worried that some of the powerful links will de-link once they see the site redirects elsewhere, even though it's offering the same content. Also, option one isn't an exact match domain. Which, I know, shouldn't make a difference now-a-days but regardless of what people say, it still seems to help out some sites in less competitive niches. One more thing to note: The domain that I'm purchasing is about 25 years old. I'm leaning toward option one. I want to make sure I put my best foot forward on this investment and thought it wise to consult the SEO gods.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ninel_P0 -
Does my website have an Exact Match Domain or a "brand"?
I'd like to get some input from the Moz community about the domain name I use on a travel website I run as a hobby. I got heavily whacked by an update in September 2012 which some have said was because my site is an EMD. Others said it was because I had poor quality backlinks (but in fact I hardly had any). With the benefit of hindsight, I'd love to know what really happened. The website is www.traveltipsthailand.com (now www.asiantraveltips.com) and the "brand" I use is "Travel Tips Thailand.The traffic penalty I incurred was around 80% and despite a LOT of work overhauling the site and trying to build some better quality links, I don't believe it has really recovered much. It ranks for non-competitive, low-traffic key phrases (which means it's not penalised as such), but struggles to rank anywhere meaningful on any phrase likely to drive traffic to the site. At this stage I really just want to know whether to persist with the site (it's heartbreaking, to be honest) or drop it an build something new from scratch. I monitor the site's progress using Moz Pro, so I can see all the search ranking, authority and backlink data. 5254ab15dcaa91-52423790
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Gavin.Atkinson0 -
Emergency duplicate of website due to DNS failure - how to minimise loss of search engine traffic?
Hi, Our client has had a disaster with their domain name registrar, where the DNS settings have been reset and it looks like the registrar won't be able to re-instate the DNS settings for four days time. This is a nightmare for lost business whilst the site and emails are offline. As a fallback, we've setup a copy of the client's website at an alternative domain name so that people can be directed there in the meantime via Facebook posts, etc. Is there anything you would recommend we do in the meantime to minimise the loss of traffic from search engines, and loss of reputation with Google? eg. using Google webmasters to tell Google about the change of address? Thank you.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | smaavie0 -
Why do some domains out rank stronger authority domains
Hi, If we take the Moz stats into account here, how comes sometimes weak Moz stat domains out ranking strong Moz stat domains? For example: A inner page with DA56 / PA40 is outranking a Wikipedia inner page with DA100 / PA82. That's a massive difference basically twice as strong on the Wikipedia page but being out ranking. In this case I assume the onpage SEO is playing a big part, but can onpage optimisation be that powerful? And I see this all the time, what SEO factors cause this? Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bondara0 -
Two websites in different niches. Should I create separate G+ authorship profiles?
I have two different websites. One of them is one of the most authoritative e-commerce websites in its niche. I own forums, installation resource websites and various other sites that provide excellent user information and customer interactions. There is another e-commerce website that I own which is very young and not as authoritative. I am about to start building it out like I did for my other site. My question is about whether I should link my G+ profile and become a "contributor/author" to the new e-commerce site(s) or if I should have someone else in the company be the "face" of this website. Since they're in two completely different niche's, I didn't know if it will give mixed signals to Google if my G+ profile is all about niche A, and then I start throwing in rel=author and being a contributor to other sites that have nothing to do with the original niche. Should I create another G+ profile to contribute to all of the guest posting & 2nd tier site creation for the new niche site or just use the one I have now for the time being?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SWWebTeam2 -
Best way to handle traffic from links brought in from old domain.
I've seen many versions of answers to this question both in the forum, and throughout the internet... However, none of them seem to specifically address this particular situation. Here goes: I work for a company that has a website (www.example.com) but has also operated under a few different names in the past. I discovered that a friend of the company was still holding onto one of the domains that belonged to one of the older versions of the company (www.asample.com) and he was kind enough to transfer it into our account. My first reaction was to simply 301 redirect the older to the newer. After I did this, I discovered that there were still quite a few active and very relevant links to that domain, upon reporting this to the company owners they were suddenly concerned that a customer may feel misdirected by clicking www.asample.com and having www.example.com pop up. So I constructed a single page on the old domain that explained that www.asample.com was now called www.example.com and provided a link. We recently did a little house cleaning and moved all of our online holdings "under one roof" so to speak, and when the rep was going over things with the owners began to exclaim that this was a horrible idea, and that domain should instead be linked to it's own hosting account, and wordpress (or some other CMS) should be installed, and a few pages of content about the companies/subject should be posted. So the question: Which one of these is the most beneficial to the site and the business that are currently operating (www.example.com?) I don't see a real problem with any of these answers, but I do see a potentially un-needed expense in the third solution if a simple 301 will bring about the most value. Anyone else dealt with a situation like this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | modulusman0 -
Hit by Penguin, Can I move the content from the old site to a new domain and start again with the same content which is high quality
I need some advice please. My website got the unnatural links detected message and was hit by penguin.. hard. Can I move the content from the current domain to a new domain and start again or does the content need to be redone also. I will obviously turn of the old domain once its moved. The other option is to try and identify the bad links and change my anchor profile which is a hit and miss task in my opinion. Would it not be easier just to identify the good links pointing to the old domain and get those changed to point to the new domain with better anchors. thanks Warren
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | warren0071