Can't figure out how my competitor has so many links
-
I suspect something possibly black-hat is going on with the amount of inbound links for www.pacificlifestylehomes.com ( http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links?site=www.pacificlifestylehomes.com ) mainly because they have such a large volume of links (for my industry) with their exact targeted keyword.
Can anyone help clear this up for me?
-
Spend your time and money focused on generated incredible CONTENT not buying links.
You or someone who works for the site can be reaching out to become a solid member of the housing community. Newspapers, government agencies, builders and others all write about housing. Find out what the current hot topics are and write about them.
Don't write the standard "I need a 500 word SEO article" type of internet junk. Forget about your company. Write the best, most sincerely helpful article you can think of regarding a housing topic. "The Importance of Researching Local Schools Before Buying a Home", "Building a Truly Green Home", "Home Improvements that Add Value", etc.
Write an article that talks about something people will WANT to link to. Talk about something YOU would link to if you even found it on a competitor's site. The value of your competitors links were not that strong. I don't recall any links from DA 7x sites. You can earn those kind of links with a high quality article.
-
Ryan,
Thanks so much for this breakdown - those settings in OSE make sense and are very helpful. I wish I didn't have to buy links like they apparently did, but in the housing industry the bulk of organic links companies get are either branded to the company's name or they just say 'website'. Why can't everyone understand SEO??
-
Hi Christopher.
When using OSE, I always set the top filters as follows:
Show followed + 301 - I only wish to see followed links which help DA/PA
links from only external - internal links are not helpful for my backlink analysis
pages to pages on this root domain - usually I wish to see all links to the domain and not just links to the given page
and group by domain - usually I am trying to learn which domains are providing the link and do not need to see each individual link
Before applying the filter I notice the site has 4646 total links from 51 domains. That's an average of close to 100 links per domain. With a high link average it's common to find some site-wide links. Site-wide links muddy the waters a bit and make it difficult to see the links which offer value. You can work hard, obtain 50 links from 50 domains and then obtain one site-wide footer link from a 10k page forum site which has little value, but then your backlink profile will show 10,050 links from 51 domains.
With the above in mind I apply the filter and see this site only has links from 44 domains. That is not a large number. When I scanned the link I noticed a michigan.gov link which stood out, but when I tried to follow the link it is to a file. The Linkscape index upon which OSE is dependent had an issue with the last crawl of the web and some files showed links which are not actually there. This issue should be resolved during the next crawl.
Many of the remaining links appear to be from a network of classified ad sites. When I check the first OSE link www.vancouverclassifieds.com/ it shows the "Custom New Homes Portland" anchor text at the top of the page. As you can see from the backlink profile, this link appears on many of the other network classified sites. The site presents itself as a free classified ad site and I could not find anywhere which mentioned how to pay or otherwise receive an anchor link in that location. Either I missed something, or this site owner has a friend or otherwise paid someone to receive a link in that location.
As I look at other sites, the links seem to be paid links that are not otherwise obvious. They are links from sidebars such as found at http://oregoncatalyst.com/. There is no apparent reason for the link.
You could try contacting the sites and ask what you can do to earn a link like your competitor. The answer you receive may offer further clarity.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
If I am getting links on competitor websites, is it safe to assume those competitors are doing this to hurt our SEO?
We have received a few notification from Google Webmaster Tools and Moz that our competitors have "mentioned" our page on their website. This is incredibly odd as you wouldn't think they'd want to do this. Further, when I go to the page that we are supposedly mentioned on, the link to our site is not on the page. What is going on? Thank you in advance for your insights!!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | brits0 -
Strange Pingback/Blog Comment Links
On one of my sites I've noticed some strange links from Google Webmaster Tools recent links feature. They are pingbacks/blog comments but they are using keyword anchor text and linking to my site. I know we are not doing this. Should I be concerned about this possibly being negative SEO? Here's a sample (be careful, shady site)
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | eyeflow0 -
How to Explain The Danger of Link Networks
A client of mine has been approached by a company that sets up one-off private link networks like this: Main site: http://www.klausparking.com/ Network sites: http://www.carparkingtechnology.com/
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | waynekolenchuk
http://www.carparkingsystem.com/
http://www.victoriaparking.net/
http://www.reginaparking.com/
http://www.torontoparking.net/
http://www.multicarparkingsystem.com/
http://www.carparkingsolutions.com/ The company doing this actually promotes this as a patent-pending feature they call "silos". How do I explain the real danger to my client?1 -
Hidden links in badges using javascript?
I have been looking at a strategy used by a division of Tripadvisor called Flipkey. They specialize in vacation home rentals and have been zooming up in the rankings over the past few months. One of the main off-page tactics that they have been using is providing a badge to property managers to display on their site which links back. The issue I have is that it seem to me that they are hiding a link which has keyword specific anchor text by using javascript. The site I'm looking at offers vacation rentals in Tamarindo (Costa Rica). http://www.mariasabatorentals.com/ Scroll down and you'll see a Reviews badge which shows reviews and a link back to the managers profile on Flipkey. **However, **when you look at the source code for the badge, this is what I see: Find Tamarindo Vacation Rentals on FlipKey Notice that there is a link for "tamarindo vacation rentals" in the code which only appears when JS is turned off in the browser. I am relatively new to SEO so to me this looks like a black hat tactic. But because this is Tripadvisor, I have to think that that I am wrong. Is this tactic allowed by Google since the anchor text is highly relevant to the content? And can they justify this on the basis that they are servicing users with JS turned off? I would love to hear from folks in the Moz community on this. Certainly I don't want to implement a similar strategy only to find out later that Google will view it as cloaking. Sure seems to be driving results for Flipkey! Thanks all. For the record, the Moz community is awesome. (Can't wait to start contributing once I actually know what I'm doing!)
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | mario330 -
competitor sites link to a considerable amount of irrelevant sites/nonsense sites that seem to score high with regard to domain authority
According to my recent SEOmoz links analysis, my competitor sites link to a considerable amount of irrelevant sites/nonsense sites that seem to score high with regard to domain authority... e.g. wedding site linking to a transportation attorney's website. Aother competitor site has an overall of 2 million links, most of which are seemingly questionable index sites or forums to which registration is unattainable. I recently created a 301 redirect, and my external links have yet to be updated to my new domain name in SEOmoz. Yet, by comparing my previous domain authority rank with those of the said competitor sites, the “delta” is relatively marginal. The SEOmoz rank is 21 whereas the SEOmoz ranks of two competitor sites 30 and 33 respectively. The problem is, however, is to secure a good SERP for the most relevant terms with Google… My Google pagerank was “3” prior to the 301 redirect. I worked quite intensively so as to receive a pagerank only to discover that it had no affect at all on the SERP. Therefore, I took a calculated risk in changing to a domain name that translates from non-latin characters, as the site age is marginal, and my educated guess is that the PR should rebound within 4 weeks, however, I would like to know as to whether there is a way to transfer the pagerank to the new domain… Does anyone have any insight as to how to go about and handling this issue?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | eranariel0 -
External links in a global footer
My company runs a real estate site (http://yochicago.com) that features editorial blog and video content. In our footer, we feature links to some of our client sites. That footer is global, i.e., on every page of the site, of which there are thousands. One of our clients has been hit by Google for unnatural links. While I am very aware of them using a network of junk sites (http://www.seomoz.org/q/can-our-white-hat-links-get-a-bad-rap-when-they-re-alongside-junk-links-busted-by-panda), could we be contributing to the problem? Our site has the most links into the troubled site.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | mikescotty0 -
Can someone explain how a site with no DA, links or MozTrust, MozRank can rank #1 in the SERPs?
I do SEO for a legal site in the UK and one of the keywords I'm targeting is 'Criminal Defence Solicitors'. If you search this term in Google.co.uk this site comes top www.cdsolicitors.co.uk, yet in my mozbar it has 0 links, 0 DA etc, I noticed it top a few weeks ago and thought something spammy was going on; I thought if I was patient, Google would remove it, however it still hasn't. Can someone explain how it is top in the SERPs? I've never seen this before. thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | TobiasM0 -
Why are these sites so high with poor relevant links...
Hello, Keyword: TV Stands. I have been researching competitors for a client and we seem to be unable to understand why certains pages are ranking on page 1 of Google UK for keyword TV Stands. eg: http://www.furnitureinfashion.net/plasma-TV-stand.html (Google UK 8 - TV Stands) http://direct.tesco.com/q/N.1999542/Nr.99.aspx (Google UK 9 - TV Stands) The furniture in fashion has links from sites like: http://www.ummah.com/forum/ and http://www.muslimco.com/ which is totaly irrelevant to the site. Any ideas on other things as the tesco.com site does not have direct links to it. Cheers
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | JohnW-UK0