Old Blogs
-
We have several blogs on our site for a range of products we no longer stock. Would you set up a redirect for these - and how long would you keep it in place?
-
@Caroline_Ardmoor Yes, setting up 301 redirects for these blogs is a good practice, as it helps preserve the SEO value that these pages might have accumulated over time. This is particularly important if the blogs have backlinks or still receive substantial traffic.
You should redirect these old blog posts to the most relevant new content or product pages. If no such relevant page exists, you could direct users to a related category page or to your homepage.
As for the duration, 301 signifies a 'permanent' redirect, so you should ideally keep them in place indefinitely. However, in practice, after around a year or so, most of the link equity (the SEO value of links) will have transferred to the new page. Still, if old links to the page exist on other sites or in bookmarks, you'll want to keep the redirect in place to ensure users don't hit a dead end.
-
@Caroline_Ardmoor Yes, it is generally recommended to set up redirects for blogs or any other pages that no longer exist or have been removed from your site. Redirects ensure that users and search engines are directed to relevant content instead of encountering broken links or errors.
To set up redirects, you can use the .htaccess file if you're using Apache server or utilize the redirection module if you're using Nginx. Here's an example of how to set up a redirect using the .htaccess file:
-
Open your .htaccess file located in the root directory of your website.
-
Add the following line to create a redirect:
Redirect 301 /old-blog-url.html http://www.example.com/new-blog-url.html
Replace "/old-blog-url.html" with the URL path of the old blog and "http://www.example.com/new-blog-url.html" with the URL of the corresponding new blog or an alternative relevant page.
- Save the .htaccess file.
Regarding how long you should keep the redirect in place, it depends on the specific circumstances. If you have permanently removed the product and its corresponding blog posts, a 301 redirect (as shown above) is appropriate, indicating that the content has permanently moved. In this case, it is generally recommended to keep the redirect in place indefinitely to maintain a good user experience and preserve any SEO value associated with the old URLs.
However, if there is a chance that the products or related content might return in the future, you may consider using a temporary redirect (302 or 307) instead. Temporary redirects indicate that the content has temporarily moved, and you can specify a shorter timeframe for keeping the redirect in place.
In any case, regularly monitoring your website's analytics and traffic patterns can help you assess whether the redirects are still necessary or if any updates are required based on user behavior.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unsolved WP YoastSEO Plugin
We just updated our sites WP YoastSEO plugin one day prior to the Moz weekly crawl. Not sure if our change interrupted our weekly Moz crawl or if it was an issue with Moz. The Moz weekly crawl, weekly email notifications were not received and all Moz campaign reports were not updated. I would like to run a crawl immediately. How can I do so before waiting for the next MOZ crawl?
Product Support | | dctomten0 -
Unsolved Why My site pages getting video index viewport issue?
Hello, I have been publishing a good number of blogs on my site Flooring Flow. Though, there's been an error of the video viewport on some of my articles. I have tried fixing it but the error is still showing in Google Search Console. Can anyone help me fix it out?
Technical SEO | | mitty270 -
Unsolved Duplicate LocalBusiness Schema Markup
Hello! I've been having a hard time finding an answer to this specific question so I figured I'd drop it here. I always add custom LocalBusiness markup to clients' homepages, but sometimes the client's website provider will include their own automated LocalBusiness markup. The codes I create often include more information. Assuming the website provider is unwilling to remove their markup, is it a bad idea to include my code as well? It seems like it could potentially be read as spammy by Google. Do the pros of having more detailed markup outweigh that potential negative impact?
Local Website Optimization | | GoogleAlgoServant0 -
How to create sitemap for example.com and blog.example.com ?
Hi I try to create sitemap for www.example.com, this website has link www.blog.example.com. after creating the sitemap using different tool. the sitemap not include www.blog.example.com and its relative files how can i get both example.com and blog.example.com in one sitemap
Technical SEO | | fogtheagency0 -
Find all old links from a site to 301
We worked on this site a while ago - http://www.electric-heatingsupplies.co.uk/ Whilst we did a big 301 redirect exercise, I wanted to check that we "got" all of them. Is there a historical way I can check all the old indexed links to make sure they correlate to the new links? Thanks!!
Technical SEO | | lauratagdigital0 -
Subdomain for a blog
My client has a site hosted with a company that allows very little customization including I am unable to add a blog to the site. As he has a fair amount of time & money invested in the site, he is reluctant to start over. So my question is this. His blog is currently hosted off site, would it benefit him if I had them add a cname or a record to show his blog at blog.mydomain.com? Or does Google recognize that it is still a separate site and treat it as such? Finally does it matter how they set it up cname, a record or redirect? This is definitely not my area of expertise (if that is not already obvious from the question!). Thanks for your help! Matthew
Technical SEO | | farlandlee0 -
E-Commerce site and blogs
We have e-Commerce site and an official blog to give advice about our products. This blog exists under our domain. Usually we build links directly to our site. Recently our ranking started going down. Also, we have been experiencing backlash for spam based on our link building (we are working on this, including a change of staff,but we cannot be sure that this will not happen again). This backlash has come through our social networking outlets (Facebook) in the form of very negative posts to our pages. One of our "SEOs" has devised a plan to use secondary blogs which we would start building links for. This blog would contain links back to our website. The idea is that the blog acts as a gate in a sense, in this way backlash is either posted on the blog or is directed at the blog. Also, we would be attempting to raise the page authority of these secondary blogs so in essence they act as high page authority links back to our website. The concern is that these secondary blogs may undermine the legitimacy of the official primary blog, which is still in its early stages as far as ranking and authority goes. Also, we are concerned that this technique would further undermine the legitimacy of the website itself by creating a larger "spam-like" presence, since visitors may see through the use of the secondary link through blogs.
Technical SEO | | ctam0 -
Can leaving up old web pages no longer accessible through my site navigation hurt my rankings?
My firm recently overhauled a client's website. As part of the project, we gave the content a new structure, eliminating certain pages and creating several new ones. However, I just found out that some of the "old" pages (the ones we supposedly eliminated) still appear in the Google SERPs. Somehow, the client - who handled the coding - let these pages remain live even though they can no longer be accessed through the site navigation. This seems like something that could hurt the client's SEO rankings, but I want to make sure before contacting the client and suggesting they take down the old pages. Can anyone confirm my suspicion?
Technical SEO | | matt-145670