Write new articles or republish old ones?
-
Hi,
we run a tourism information website about a region in italy, and each year, during special occasions such as christmas, easter and so on we publish an article with a "what to do on Christmas / Easter / .... in the Langhe" (collecting events, activities, etc.).Is it better to "reuse" the old articles and change only the year in the title and of course the content (providing that we are gonna keep the URL without year), or to publish a new one?
thanks!
-
Thanks for information
-
@Nomansahil009 said in Write new articles or republish old ones?:
Always write new content or update old content but never republish your old already published and indexed content.
Google knows what you doing it can impacts you site SEO, so better you should write you new content if that not the case you should update you old content.
If we write new content and 301 redirect the old content, will the credit be transferred to the new article?
Are the backlinks received on the previous page directed to the new page? -
I suggest making new articles instead of just updating old ones. Even though it might be easier to reuse what you already have and just change the year, it's important to think about what your readers want. They're likely looking for fresh and exciting content, not just the same thing with a small tweak.
-
Always write new content or update old content but never republish your old already published and indexed content.
Google knows what you doing it can impacts you site SEO, so better you should write you new content if that not the case you should update you old content.
-
@Enrico_Cassinelli said in Write new articles or republish old ones?:
This is a great question, Enrico! Deciding whether to reuse or create a new article for seasonal occasions like Christmas and Easter depends on several factors:Reusing the old article with updates (pros):
SEO benefits: Keeping the same URL can maintain existing backlinks and search engine ranking for that specific keyword ("what to do on Christmas in the Langhe").
Saves time and effort: Updating an existing article is quicker than writing a new one, especially if the core content remains relevant.
Continuity for returning visitors: Familiar format and structure might be beneficial for users who have read previous articles.
Cons of reusing:Stale content: Readers might feel it's repetitive if changes are minimal.
Missing out on trends and updates: New events, activities, or recommendations might be overlooked.
Less engagement: A completely new article can generate more buzz and attract new readers.
Creating a new article (pros):Fresh and exciting content: Showcases your commitment to providing updated information and keeps readers engaged.
Opportunity to expand and improve: Include new recommendations, trends, and insights.
Potentially reach a wider audience: New article can attract new search engine traffic.
Cons of creating a new article:SEO impact: Starting from scratch might take longer to rank in search results for the same keyword.
More time and effort required: Writing a new article takes more time and resources.
Loss of previous backlinks: If you change the URL, existing backlinks might not carry over to the new article.
Recommendation:I suggest a hybrid approach:
Reuse the main structure and relevant evergreen content of the old article.
Update the content significantly: Include new events, activities, recommendations, and insights for the upcoming season.
Highlight the updates in the title and introduction.
Consider adding visuals and multimedia to refresh the presentation.
This balances the SEO benefits of keeping the URL with the freshness and engagement of new content. You can also create a short "What's new this year" section at the top of the article to further emphasize the updates. -
One more thought on this: it is a generally good idea to have MORE valuable pages on your website than LESS pages. If you look at big authority websites. they have millions of pages. On the other hand, small and poor quality websites have a small number of valuable pages. On our sites like RealtyCinema or Bizpages (https://bizpages.org) we are keen to develop a greater number of good quality unique pages. BUT! there is one important thing that I mentioned in my previous post: the pages should focus on different keywords, they should not be just copies. In this case you improve chances that this or that page gets a high ranking in search engines and brings traffic/clients.
-
It also depends on what your goals are. If your current article is on the same topic as the previous one, it is likely that the two articles will compete for the same keywords in search engines and Google will have to choose one of the two to show in its SERPS. On the other hand, it is possible to make variations to the Title/Description and article keywords to try cover more topics with 2 articles.
-
Deciding whether to write new articles or republish old ones depends on various factors. Creating fresh content is ideal for staying relevant, attracting new audiences, and addressing current trends. However, republishing can be beneficial for revisiting evergreen topics, reaching new audiences, and optimizing for search engines. A balanced approach, combining both strategies, allows for a mix of timely, original content and the revitalization of valuable existing articles. Consider audience engagement, SEO goals, and the ever-changing landscape of your niche when determining the most effective content strategy for your platform.
-
I think it completely depends on your situation.
Is the information in your old article still relevant and valuable?
Yes: Republish with updates and optimizations.
No: Write a new article on the same topic with fresh information.
Do you have time and resources to create new content?
Yes: Write new articles on trending topics or to explore new directions.
No: Republish some older articles that are still valuable and relevant. -
I think you have to delete your old pages. Create new ones. Redirect the old URL onto new post.
Waterproof socks for wudu.
-
@Enrico_Cassinelli Both approaches—updating existing articles or creating new ones—have their pros and cons,
Updating Existing Articles: Pros:
Preserving Authority: If your existing articles have gained authority and backlinks, updating them can help maintain that authority. Consistency: Keeping the same URL provides consistency for your audience, and they know where to find the updated information each year. Time-Saving: It can be quicker to update an existing article than to create an entirely new one from scratch.
Creating New Articles: Pros:
Fresh Content: Search engines often favor fresh and new content. Creating a new article signals to search engines that it's current and relevant. Audience Engagement: New content might attract more attention and engagement from your audience. Variety: Having a variety of content can cater to different preferences within your audience.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What Service Page Strategy Should We Use to Target City-Specific Local Intent Service Keywords?
Hey guys! We are targeting a number of cities in the Nassau and Suffolk County areas for foundation repair, insulation, and mold remediation keywords, and we were debating on creating city-specific pages for each location and service, or creating one service page for each type of service that contains all of the services and solutions within that service category for each city. Example: City-Specific Pages for Each Service: One page for say foundation repair, one page for foundation crack repair, one page for foundation problems, etc. (for each target city) Service Category Pages for Each City: One page for foundation contractors that lists all services on one page in sections. Which one do you think is better for local SEO and rankings? Both seem to have their advantages and disadvantages to me. Just to throw a couple out there, the category pages may not rank as high as the city pages for each individual service if our competitors have a whole page designed for that service and we only have a part of a page covering the topic. At the same time, they would save labor hours, technical issues would be less, and they would be condensed, and we would have WAY less mess on the backend. I appreciate your expert opinion on this one. The site is www. zavzaseal.com in case you want to check us out.
Local SEO | | everysecond0 -
What would be Best Content Starategy For My Dental Website?
Greetings to all Moz Fellows! Our organization specializes in digital dentistry, and we aim to establish a thriving blog focused on this subject to attract a wide range of clients from all across the United States. We would greatly appreciate any advice on the most effective strategies for achieving this goal.
Content Development | | SEOBrandBoca
@MOZ-LUCY1230 -
Is it a good idea to publish a list of players in my industry, including competitors?
I am working with an e-commerce site that does mostly B2B sales in a very commoditized industrial product segment in which very few manufacturers sell direct. It's all done through distributors and resellers, like our site. We don't often win on price, but we do win enough SERP battles to get the visitors and provide great customer service, so we have gained a following and we do compete well for some very large orders. We list several thousand products and in a given month, visitors regularly hit over 1,000 different landing pages. While we make most money from relatively few items, most items are sold only once a year, maybe twice. It's a very longtail business, and therefore tough to do a great job optimizing all pages down the tail. So, one thing I'm doing is building out a set of resource pages with common questions, terminology and other useful bits so the site gains more traffic and authority, in the hope of boosting product pages. e.g., an in-depth category definition in the glossary could link to all the items in a category. In addition to adding content that augments product pages, I'd like to create basically a map of the whole industry, including brand name manufacturers, white label manufacturers, distributors, etc. If it's going to be a truly comprehensive list, it should include my competitors. Given that I have never found such a list, it feels like this could be a good page and earn some links. Since it's unlikely much traffic will even find that page, compared to product pages, are there potential pitfalls I should be aware of? I get the feeling if I create a page that others bookmark and visit when hunting for products in our market, we win, even if most visitors to that page won't buy from us. I've been in this industry for four years now, and it's amazing how hard it is to find some companies. Only a handful even think about SEO, since they sell through other channels. Should I link to all my competitors (which is only about a dozen) among hundreds of other industry links?
Content Development | | Mike_Sobol0 -
Best practices for publishing sponsored content
Hello, Our website hosts sponsored content from different brands. Should we be listing the sponsor either on the frontend and/or through markup? - Would either way have any sort of an impact? The content itself is already clearly marked as 'sponsored content' but we were more interested in listing the specific sponsor. Also, we’re assuming the outbound links would need to be marked rel="sponsored" but are there any other best practices we should be implementing? Any insight would be appreciated.
On-Page Optimization | | Ben-R
Thank you in advance.
Best,0 -
How best to roll out updated website to new responsive layout
We are having an issue about when to upload newly converted pages to website. By going responsive we are basically going with a new layout, different look entirely. I think it's best to wait until every page in the site has been transferred over to the new layout. Partially because some urls are being updated too, and the look is different enough that it may look like half the site got hi-jacked. My partner thinks rolling out/uploading each page as it is complete is the way to go. Need input on pros and cons of either method.
Content Development | | Manifestation0 -
Images in articles - copying the authority in my industry
Hello, For my site, BobWeikel.com, I have an article about the type of coaching I do. It's called "What is NLP?" Here's the link. The two authorities in my industry which I respect the most have no (or sometimes one) images or anything in their best articles - it's all just text. Some examples of these authoritative articles are here and here. Note the second article has one image in it. That's common for that author, and he's the top person in the field. Note that that first link has no images at all. I'd like to refine my article until I can compete. Should I leave out all images since that's what the big guys are doing? Thanks!
Content Development | | BobGW0 -
Multiple Domains pointing to one site?
Due to takeovers, different strategies and a certain amount of historical lack of control, we have a dozen sites covering many different specialist areas of our business. To make things easier to manage, we are thinking of merging website content, then repointing some of the domains to the new section within the larger website. The content on each site is all different, but the subject matter is sometimes the same.This will make content, design and management much easier. We propose to choose the best content, then repoint the underperforming domains. Is there an seo risk of having many domains pointing to one site?
Content Development | | GardenGamer0 -
Archiving old blog posts - yea or nay?
I'm building up my personal website. When I moved from my old domain to my current one a few years ago, I had moved a folder with all my old blog posts (from an old blogger.com account) to an archives called /blog/. It's bad enough the entries just text and nearly all the images aren't there but because of the way I moved over the posts, I have 200+ duplicate page titles with no meta descriptions. Is it worth saving these posts ? (putting them into an archives.mysite.com sub-domain?) I already have the folder disallowed in my robotos.txt file and there's nothing really incredible content-wise in the archives, though they are some of the oldest pages on my current (3 years old) domain. There's no real SEO thought in them as this was just a fun personal blog at the time. Thoughts?
Content Development | | JamesDziezynski0