Duplicate page error from SEOmoz
-
SEOmoz's Crawl Diagnostics is complaining about a duplicate page error. I'm trying to use a rel=canonical but maybe I'm not doing it right.
This page is the original, definitive version of the content:
https://www.borntosell.com/covered-call-newsletter/sent-2011-10-01
This page is an alias that points to it (each month the alias is changed to point to the then current issue):
https://www.borntosell.com/covered-call-newsletter/latest-issue
The alias page above contains this tag (which is also updated each month when a new issue comes out) in the section:
Is that not correct? Is the https (vs http) messing something up?
Thanks!
-
Thanks, Ryan.
My entire site is https. I 301 any http request to the https version. That works fine.
I also 301 any non-www to the www version. That works.
I'm not currently doing anything special with the trailing slash (or lack of). I guess I should 301 anything with a trailing slash to the non-slash version, rather than serve up slash and non-slash each as status 200.
Appreciate the guidance...
-
What would you expect to happen?
Well, when look at the current Q&A URL:
http://www.seomoz.org/q/duplicate-page-error-from-seomoz
now try adding a trailing slash to it
http://www.seomoz.org/q/duplicate-page-error-from-seomoz/
in this case the URL with the trailing slash is rejected, which is expected. What I don't expect is for the page to be redirected to the root Q&A page. Not sure why that was implemented here and it seems unusual to me.
An example of a site with the (close to) expected behavior is the Distilled site:
http://www.distilled.net/blog/seo/7-technical-seo-wins-for-web-developers/
If you try to remove the trailing slash, you will notice the URL is changed back to a URL with the trailing slash.
What I am a bit surprised about in the Distilled example is the redirected page shows a 200 header code. I believe it should display a 301 redirect from the page without the trailing slash to the page with it.
Overall I would say this is very nit-picky SEO but since the topic came up, it is relevant. Actually I am curious enough about this I will use my staff question this month on this topic
Should I 301 redirect the url with the slash to the url without the slash, or something else?
Yes. This issue is very similar to www vs non-www. Each page should have one version of a URL available and not more. It is not so important which you choose in as much as you make a decision and remain consistent.
The Distilled site chooses to end all URLs with a slash. That is a fine choice. SEOmoz chooses (as do I) to end category pages with a slash and actual web pages without a slash. Using this system if you look at a URL and it ends with a slash, you know you can go deeper. If the URL does not have a slash, you have reached the bottom.
Wow. This is the most time I have spent thinking about this little detail of SEO
-
Thanks for the response. A followup question.... when you say:
"when I enter the same URL with a trailing slash, the same page appears"
What would you expect to happen?
Should I 301 redirect the url with the slash to the url without the slash, or something else?
Thanks.
-
Your example of how the canonical tag is presented is perfect. You can verify your canonical tag is recognized using the MozBar Analyze Page > Page Attributes.
The https should not cause any issue.
Is it possible something else is causing the duplicate content warning? For example, I noticed when I enter the same URL with a trailing slash, the same page appears:
https://www.borntosell.com/covered-call-newsletter/latest-issue
https://www.borntosell.com/covered-call-newsletter/latest-issue/
Of course, both pages are canonicalized properly but it does show there is an issue on your site which should be addressed. Technically adding a slash to the end of a URL is a different page in much the same way that adding or removing the "www" subdomain offers a different page.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Site Crawl Error
In moz crawling error this message is appears: MOST COMMON ISSUES 1Search Engine Blocked by robots.txt Error Code 612: Error response for robots.txt i asked help staff but they crawled again and nothing changed. there's only robots.XML (not TXT) in root of my webpage it contains: User-agent: *
Moz Pro | | nopsts
Allow: /
Allow: /sitemap.htm anyone please help me? thank you0 -
Duplicate Page Title - although there are differences
Hello, I get duplicate page titles errors on pages in which there are little differences. For example: C++ Online Test for Seniors C# Online Test for Seniors I assume that from some reason the ++ and the # are removed when SEOMoz crawler checks for duplicate page titles. As you may know C# and C++ means two different programming languages. Should I do something about it or is it a bug in the crawler?
Moz Pro | | ulukach0 -
404 Error
When I get a 404 error report like below, I can't find a reference to the specific link on the page that is in error? Can you help me. 404 : Error http://www.boxtheorygold.com/blog/www.boxtheorygold.com/blog/bid/23385/Measuring-Your-Business-Processes-Pays-Big-Dividends Thanks, Ron Carroll
Moz Pro | | Rong0 -
Duplicate Content in Blog
Hi, SEOMoz on-page analysis is reporting that our blog has duplicate content when technically it doesn't. Is this something that we need to address as it will actually be hurting our ranking or is this just a SEOMoz software quirk? There is 100+ example like this but here is one example. SEOMoz is reporting http://www.invoicestudio.com/Blog/author/InvoiceStudio?page=1 and http://www.invoicestudio.com/Blog/author/InvoiceStudio?page=2 as a duplicate content and Title Tag. Thanks Andrew
Moz Pro | | Studio330 -
Can I prevent some pages from being crawled from SEOMoz spider and still not affect Google Spider?
Well, basically that's the question 😄 Can I prevent some pages from being crawled from SEOMoz spider and still not affect Google Spider? This is, I have more than 10.000 pages on the website, and I am not interested in having reports for many of them, but I still wanna get SEO visits on them, so I want Google to crawl it easily... Thanks!
Moz Pro | | MattDG0 -
SEOmoz Campaign Setup: What would you do?
I've been using moz for nearly a year now. Initially when I set up our site (rac.com.au) it was as a single campaign for the rac.com.au domain. However, our business has a number of different product offerings and marketing teams (Insurance, finance, travel/tourism, automotive, security etc) - would I be better off setting each of these 'sub' brands as a campaign on their own using the 'folder' campaign setup? For example, have a campaign setup for the Insurance business (rac.com.au/insurance) folder, Finance business (rac.com.au/finance) and so forth? The advantage I see to the folder campaign setup is more specific reporting for each of the business units. Are there disadvantages to this? Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated. Cheers Ryan
Moz Pro | | Hutch_e0 -
SEOMoz Software
I want to start off with stating that i am truly an advocate of SEOMoz and the great stuff they have done for the inbound community that we all know and love. I've been an active member since July 2010 and a paying pro member since December 2010. The software has always been monumental in helping my clients achieve their goals. However, in the past few months i have received nothing short of buggy unreliable software. The keyword difficulty tool never returns difficulty results. The Adwords data has been gone since i can remember. The rank tracker tool is successfull close to 1 out of 5 times. OSE is updated terribly slow compared to competitors. Plus, I have had to write emails to get my campaigns to be manually refreshed to see new ranking data. I have simply missed deadlines because my data is always delayed or missing from the software. Am i an anomaly here? does anyone have these problems? I have been researching some new tools as a replacement but i have yet to find anything as robust as the old SEOMoz. I'd love some feedback. Cheers - Kyle
Moz Pro | | kchandler0 -
90% of our sites that are designed are in wordpress and the report brings up "duplicate" content errors. I presume this is down to a conical error?
We are looking at getting the Agency version of SEOMoz and are based in the UK Could you please tell me what would be the best way to correct this issue as this appears to be a problem with all our clients websites. an example would be www.fsgenergy.co.uk Would you also be able to suggest the best SEO plugin to use with SEOMOz ? Many thanks Paul
Moz Pro | | KloodLtd1