Can you spot the reasons for our site dropping in rankings so significantly?
-
We've been racking our brains over this since the recent search engine changes (the notorious and non-cuddley Google Panda update) and have, within reason, corrected as many of the problems that we possibly can yet still our traffic drops further.
http://www.bedandbreakfastsguide.com used to rank fairly equally with it's competitors however since the update (and a number of suggestions from another SEO company), the traffic has dropped by about 90% and it's dropped almost completely from the search results (unlike the competitors who are breaking many faux-pars yet remain well ranked).
I don't think we're seeing the wood from the trees anymore so I'd be grateful if someone could take a look and see if we've missed anything glaringly obvious?
Any thoughts welcome.
Thanks
Tim
Big changes around the same time/since that might be worth noting:
- Setup a canonical domain name of www.bedandbreakfastsguide.com and (using IIS7) 301 redirect all other traffic over.
- Setup canonical URL meta tag for all results pages so they point to a single page
- Moved the redirect page (the one which sends users to the B&B's site) to another subdomain.
- Redesigned the URLs where possible to use "friendlier" and more keyword rich urls and 301 redirecting for the old urls
- Added XML sitemaps to the various tools (we found out they weren't there before)
- Added a robots.txt file
- Lowercased all urls
- Where possible removed duplicate results pages and pointed them at a single page
- Restructured the page titles to be more relevant
- Setup nofollow on the external urls
-
Sure, one thing I forgot to mention. Look at your XML sitemap. It doesn't seem to be correctly formatted at all, and it caused my window to freeze loading it. I'd look into that.
As far as the backlinks, yes I would start to build up some positive and natural backlinks. Start with all the social profiles, like linkedin, youtube, facebook, twitter - make sure they all have links pointing to your site. Put unique, useful content on them. Try knowem to find more relevant social media sites to register with.
Then I would read over this guide to linking building and try putting it into practice to build new links.
A full off-site review is obviously out f the scope of this Q&A, but you can run your site through open site explorer and take a look - see if there's any sites that stick out like a sore thumb with a lot of links that provide no value (low quality domain, spammy or tons of exact match anchor text). Pick the worst sites and contact them and see if you can get them removed.
Hope that helps!
-Dan
-
Thanks Dan, there's some interesting bits there. Nice to hear we don't necessarily need to redesign the site (though we still feel it would benefit the user).
We've not done any back link analysis no -and I can't explain those two spikes either but we have noticed a large increase in the number of robots storing invalid links (e.g. ones which have been truncated) which was one of the reasons we looked to move to friendlier URLs.
In regards the back links, is this mostly a matter of improving the quality of the sites linking to us to resolve this?
-
Ryan's on-site analysis is great. But I honestly don't think its the total reason for a 90% drop in traffic.
In taking a quick look at off-site, its looking like you have a very unnatural backlink portfolio.
And take a look at the screenshot of Majestic's historic backlink discovery. All the sporadic spiking as well as referring domains spiking without total links spiking or vice versa is the sign of links being acquired unnaturally.
Plus only half of your external links are followed, and there's even much less linking C-blocks, which means many of your links are coming from the same place.
The good news is, you can address this without redesigning the site, but the bad news is, it could take a bit of effort in its self. I'd suggest starting with a back link audit.
Have you done much by way of trying to clean up your links?
-Dan
-
Thanks Ryan, all valid points (we'd like to redesign the site but thanks to the massive drop in traffic and subsequently sales) are having to hold off. Interesting point about the homepage links, we'll look into that thanks.
-
A few items I noticed:
1. Your home page has over 300 links. Ideally you should have under 100 but at least keep it under 150.
2. In the center section you have a "B&Bs By Category" block. I am using FF7 and the top three columns are cut off so the last 3 links in each column cannot be seen. I am unsure if this issue exists in all browsers but this could be taken as hidden links and cause you to incur a penalty. Users cannot see all the links.
3. Your home page title is too long and will get cut off. I would suggest just using your site name and save the rest for your meta description.
4. Going back to the links on the page, it is not simply the number of links but how they are presented. The page is basically a big collection of links. It doesn't present a good user experience.
5. The page itself is actually difficult to read. As you look through the various blocks such as "B&B Articles", you offer teasers of 8 different articles and most do not even complete the first sentence before being cut off with ...
From a Panda perspective of a user looking at a quality webpage, the presentation is not good. There is far too much being crammed onto the page. Several of the link blocks should be removed entirely. The blocks which share content such as "Featured B&Bs" and "B&B Special Offers should either contain fewer entries and/or be widened to 1/2 a page rather then 1/3 of a page.
The above is my feedback and would require a significant redesign of the home page. My suggestion would be to try it with A/B testing.
-
One other (big) change that we made was that the old developers used to pass around a session id for the user on all pages so every time Google came back to the same page, it would get new content. This resulted in Webmaster Tools having over 35M pages for the site (there's about 100k at most). We fixed this issue but we're wondering whether it was actually helping (despite what's recommended)?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Baffled by this site's inability to rank
Hi guys, I've been working on a site for quite a while and it has a really good link profile, excellent content, no errors or penalties (as far as I can tell) but for some reason it consistently ranks below a lot of thin poor quality websites with spammy EMDs and a few obviously paid links from old-skool business directories etc. It has a significantly higher DA and linking root domains that almost all of them. Also it just bounces around from #40 to #28 to#35 to #40 to #28 on a weekly basis for many of our primary keywords. There just seems to be no logic to this and it goes against everything I know and everything we're taught. (I should probably point out that I've been doing this quite a while and have a number of other sites ranking extremely well in quite a few different verticals), Has anyone ever experienced anything like this and what did you do? Before I throw in the towel it would be good to hear from others and try and understand why this happens and if there is anything else I can try to help my client and fix it. Many thanks in advance.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Blaze-Communication0 -
Linking from a corporate site to a brand site.
Is there an SEO impact to a large corporation linking from a corporate and/or a divisional site to a specific brand site with it's own top level domain? We would like to keep the traffic coming, but not if it will be seen as a black hat tactic. My guess is that Google will be smart enough to see that the corporation owns the brand and at least not penalize us, but I am wondering if anyone else has this experience? Google Analytics is calling it self-referral.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mrbobland0 -
Can Google read content/see links on subscription sites?
If an article is published on The Times (for example), can Google by-pass the subscription sign-in to read the content and index the links in the article? Example: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/life/property/overseas/article4245346.ece In the above article there is a link to the resort's website but you can't see this unless you subscribe. I checked the source code of the page with the subscription prompt present and the link isn't there. Is there a way that these sites deal with search engines differently to other user agents to allow the content to be crawled and indexed?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CustardOnlineMarketing0 -
Why is my client's site not ranking anymore? Like big time!
Ok, I'm reaching out to all of you Moz'rs for some help with this one. My client's site has dropped off the face of google in a real short period of time. It went from page 1 (avg rank 3 to page 6 (avg rank 50) and below in the matter of 2 weeks. Here's some facts: 1. DA is a 22 and homepage PA is a 31. It outranks all other sites in its competitive set. 2. The homepage used to be the page that displays for keyword searches, now its the FAQ page, which has a lower PA of 23. Why has the home page seemingly vaporized? And, why is the FAQ showing as the first result? What should I start checking. I feel paralyzed, not sure where to start. More info: a. There are no alerts present in Webmaster Tools. b. For some reason the homepage (domain.com) was 301'd to domain.com/home.html. Domain.com is indexed by Google, however, domain.com/home.html is not. If this is the issue, what is the best way to handle it? Thanks in advance for your help!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | rhoadesjohn1 -
Site revamp for neglected site - modifying site structure, URLs and content - is there an optimal approach?
A site I'm involved with, www.organicguide.com, was at one stage (long ago) performing reasonably well in the search engines. It was ranking highly for several keywords. The site has been neglected for some considerable period of time. A new group of people are interested in revamping the site, updating content, removing some of the existing content, and generally refreshing the site entirely. In order to go forward with the site, significant changes need to be made. This will likely involve moving the entire site across to wordpress. The directory software (edirectory.com) currently being used has not been designed with SEO in mind and as a result numerous similar pages of directory listings (all with similar titles and descriptions) are in google's results, albeit with very weak PA. After reading many of the articles/blog posts here I realize that a significant revamp and some serious SEO work is needed. So, I've joined this community to learn from those more experienced. Apart from doing 301 redirects for pages that we need to retain, is there any optimal way of removing/repairing the current URL structure as the site gets updated? Also, is it better to make changes all at once or is an iterative approach preferred? Many thanks in advance for any responses/advice offered. Cheers MacRobbo
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | macrobbo0 -
Company name often shows in anchor text (important keyword phrase within), can this impact ranking?
Hi everyone, My company is called "Hawaii Job Engine" - www.hawaiijobengine.com - and many sites that link to my site use my company name as anchor text "Hawaii Job Engine". I have heard Google may devalue a certain keyword phrase if used too often in anchor text. Does this mean I may, over time, get a poor ranking for the term "Hawaii Job" since that phrase is part of my company's name. Or, will search engines easily notice it is my company name and therefore it will not have a negative impact on rankings? Example: if the anchor text leading to my company's homepage is company's name 95% of the time (on authoritative sites) could this be an issue? I don't know the %, but just to establish if there may be in % levels to keep in mind. thank you, Kristian
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | knielsen1 -
Is My site seeing a Google Dance ? - Rankings all over the place
My eCommerce website is seeing some rankings flucuate daily from say rank 20 to rank 130 whilst some other keywords ago up and down by as much as 40 places. I have been putting up alot of new unique content and can see in GWT that google has been crawling my site more but given that I was affected by the google panda updates which saw a 40% drop in traffic I'm only just to recover some of it., i have also been trying to get rid of any poor links and our linking building is only concentrating on high quality posts and links. I am wondering if this is the post panda update - "google dance" or is google having issues trying to work where to rank my site and possibly punish me? thanks Sarah.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SarahCollins0 -
Any reason not to redirect entire directory from old site structure to new?
I'm helping on a site that has tons of content and recently moved from a 10 year old .ASP structure to WordPress. There are ~800 404s, with 99% of them in the same directory that is no longer used at all. The old URL structures offer no indication of what the old page contents was. So, there is basically no way to manually redirect page by page to the new site at this point.....is there any reason not to redirect that entire old directory to the new homepage? Matt Cutts seems to think its OK to point an entire old directory to a new homepage, but its not as good as the 1:1 redirects: http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=93633 Any thoughts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | wattssw0