Are Facebook links really helpful?
-
If they are no follow, how can I benefit? If Google isn't using this data, than why would we bother to LIKE anyone or anybody?
-
Great! thanks for all the info! I guess my mentality needs a shift. I get so focused on what google wants rather than the user. I will start my day from that mind set today.
thanks
-
Facebook Likes play a significant role in Bing search due to Facebook's partnership with Bing. When you use Bing and are logged into Facebook you see when your friends have Liked something in the search results which can strongly influence click through rate.
-
The value of anchor text varies as does the value of any link. With respect to a link which is crawlable by search engines, the anchor text helps associate the keyword with your webpage. Whether a link is crawlable on facebook varies based on privacy settings. Try logging out of facebook and then visiting the facebook URL which contains the link to your site. If you can see the link, so can search engines. In that case, the value of the anchor text can be applied in any algorithms.
On the other hand, if a link is not crawlable, anchor text can still have value for readers. Consider reading these two recommendations:
I was recently in Las Vegas and it was a fantastic trip! I had many memorable experiences including a chance to dine at my favorite Italian restaurant!
Next consider,
I was recently in Las Vegas and it was a fantastic trip! I had many memorable experiences including a chance to dine at my favorite Italian restaurant: http://www.mirage.com/restaurants/onda-ristorante.aspx
Both methods work, but the first appropriately uses anchor text and may arouse curiosity. What is the name of his favorite Italian restaurant? Whereas the second link is presented without the anchor text and you know the name is "Onda Ristorante".
My suggestion is Google and other search engines reward anchor text because it offers real value. Many of the things we do "because Google says so" is actually backwards. Google encourages site owners to adopt behaviors which Google has learned offers the highest value to consumers. Often site owners disagree, but Google has invested millions and billions into learning what consumers want, and they design their systems accordingly.
With respect to Bounce Rate, no one knows exactly how that metric is used in Google's algorithms. When a visitors clicks on a Google search result and visits your site, Google has a perfect picture of the bounce rate and likely considers it as a factor in determining ranking. If a visitor enters your site from facebook, Google still has a considerable amount of data if you use GA on your site. Google can also gather data from your Google Chrome browser, your Google WiFi network, etc. That data could be used to measure bounce rate as well, but again it is unclear how the process works exactly and what amount of weight is applied to bounce rate in the overall rankings.
My best recommendation is stop trying to figure out what Google wants but instead focus on what your user's want. You will be a step ahead of the game with this approach.
-
thanks, with that said! It would be fair to say that "anchor text" in a FB link really doesn't matter. What matters is the quality of the traffic to "XYZ.com". Then if the bounce is 99%, I would not see an bump in rank...OR bounce rate wouldn't apply here?
-
Studies show information shared in social networks is valued by friends and others in the sharer's network. Whether you are sharing your experience about a cool new device, a restaurant or a great tax preparer, your friends and others in your network are likely to consider your personal share much higher then most other sources of information.
The REAL value is any link is not whether Google will see the link and give your site a 0.01 bump in rankings for the relevant search term. Instead the true value of a quality link is the direct, quality traffic your site would receive from the link.
Put the needs and wants of your site visitor's above all else. Then determine how you can benefit them and earn a profit from doing such. This business model is what makes Google so successful, and if you follow that model your company can climb to greatness as well. [If you are an anti-Google person, you probably don't love this analogy but you cannot argue Google is the most dominate player in their market].
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Please help - Duplicate Content
Hi, I am really struggling to understand why my site has a lot of duplicate content issues. It's flagging up as ridiculously high and I have no idea how to fix this, can anyone help me, please? Website is www.firstcapitol.co.uk
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Alix_SEO1 -
Breadcrumbs or contextual links ?
Hi, I have breadcrumbs on my site but wondering if in addition to those I should also add contextual links linking to the same pages ? Or is it necessary to duplicate ? The reason i would be doing this is because contextual links/ editorial is what google likes and I am not sure breadcrumbs counts as much. Thanks,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
Link conundrum - losing nav/footer links in mobile view
Hi Moz folks! I'm currently moving a site from being hosted on www. and m. separately to a responsive single URL. The problem is, the desktop version currently has links to important landing pages in the footer (about 60) and that's not something we want to replicate on mobile (mainly because it will look pretty awful.) There is no navigation menu because the key to the homepage is to convert users to subscription so any distraction reduces conversion rate. The footer links will continue to exist on the desktop view but, since Google's mobile-first index, presumably we lose these important homepage links to our most important pages. So, my questions: Do you think there is any SEO value in the desktop footer links? Do you have any suggestions about how best to include these 60-odd links in a way that works for mobile? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | d_foley0 -
2015 Disavow Links on Bing?
In years past I was told not to disavow links in Bing unless the site had an issue. This was driven home when a site we were working on disavowed the links in google and saw the site recover after a few months, then when they disavowed the same links in Bing and the rankings dropped 20% over the next few months. The reasoning was that Bing was looking more at the qty of links, and didn't analyze links the way Google does. So even though you might disavow links in Google you might not want to disavow those same links in Bing. Does this still hold true in 2015? I want to get the community's opinion on this topic, should the same links be disavowed in Bing that are disavowed in Google? Why or why not?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | K-WINTER1 -
Where to link to HTML Sitemap?
After searching this morning and finding unclear answers I decided to ask my SEOmoz friends a few questions. Should you have an HTML sitemap? If so, where should you link to the HTML sitemap from? Should you use a noindex, follow tag? Thank you
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | cprodigy290 -
Domain Links or SubDomain Links, which is better?
Hi, I only now found out that www.domain.com and www.domain.com/ are different. Most of my external links are directed to www.domain.com/
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeytzNet
Which I understand is considered the subdomain and not the domain. Should I redirect? (and if so how?)
Should I post new links only to my domain?0 -
Thanks for the help!
I just wanted to say thank you all for the advice you've given on this board. When I first joined we had been stomped by Panda three times and our traffic was down about 40% from last year. Since then, we've followed recommendations here and while we aren't quite back to where we were before, our traffic for the last three days from Google is higher than any time since May and trending higher. We are also up in Google rank for 70% of our tracked keywords and showing up for 15% that we weren't even on the radar for in August. We still have a lot of work to do but know that we are on the right track. We can now do the same on a site that survived the initial hit but got slapped in July. I just want to reiterate what others have said: Get rid of duplicate urls - 301 redirect all dups to a single page Flesh out or drop pages with low content value Find 404 pages that used to exist and instead of 404s, 301 redirect to current resources Fix speed issues This forum was well worth the subscription.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | IanTheScot1 -
Google, Links and Javascript
So today I was taking a look at http://www.seomoz.org/top500 page and saw that the AddThis page is currently at the position 19. I think the main reason for that is because their plugin create, through javascript, linkbacks to their page where their share buttons reside. So any page with AddThis installed would easily have 4/5 linbacks to their site, creating that huge amount of linkbacks they have. Ok, that pretty much shows that Google doesn´t care if the link is created in the HTML (on the backend) or through Javascript (frontend). But heres the catch. If someones create a free plugin for wordpress/drupal or any other huge cms platform out there with a feature that linkbacks to the page of the creator of the plugin (thats pretty common, I know) but instead of inserting the link in the plugin source code they put it somewhere else, wich then is loaded with a javascript code (exactly how AddThis works). This would allow the owner of the plugin to change the link showed at anytime he wants. The main reason for that would be, dont know, an URL address update for his blog or businness or something. However that could easily be used to link to whatever tha hell the owner of the plugin wants to. What your thoughts about this, I think this could be easily classified as White or Black hat depending on what the owners do. However, would google think the same way about it?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bemcapaz0