Google has not indexed my site in over 4 weeks, what's the problem?
-
We recently put in permanent redirects to our new url, but Google seems to not want to index the new url.
There was no problems with the old url and the new url is brand new so should have no 'black marks' against it. We have done everything we can think off in terms of submitting site maps, telling google our url has changed in webmaster tools, mentioning the new url on social sites etc...but still nothing.
It has been over 4 weeks now since we set up the redirects to the url, any ideas why Google seems to be choosing not to index it?
Thanks
-
Hi Keri,
We submitted a reconsideration request through Webmaster tools and got index within a week!
I am non the wiser why the site wasn't being indexed.
Thanks
James
-
Have you been indexed yet? Wondering the status on this, and if you need any more assistance.
-
Hi,
I've just given that a blast, fingers crossed it does the trick!
Thanks
-
Ok Andrew,
just Checked your site headers, robots, meta tags and every is Ok!
Try these and wait for few days:
- Submit your site to Pingoat.com
- try to tweet your website threw your account
- under Diagnostics in Google WT there is fetch as Google Bot, run it threw the website and check the page if google crawled.
I believe in the next few days, ur site will be crawled and indexed
-
Hi Tom,
-
The old domain 301 redirects to the correct URL on the new domain, correct? YES
-
Is there a robots.txt present on the new domain? If so - has it been carefully checked?
Here is the current robots text on the site:
| <meta <span>name</meta <span>="robots' content="index" /> |
| | name="robots" content="follow" /> |
| | name="revisit" content="2 days" /> |- Have you got Google Webmaster Tools setup for the domain? Have you checked all the settings carefully? What does it say about your Robots.txt and Sitemap? It should tell you about any crawl errors. (See Webmaster Screengrab attached)
Also attached screengrab from Webmaster tools of submitted sitemap.
-
Is the old domain still indexed? NO
-
Are there any meta tags for index or follow settings?
| <meta <span>name</meta <span>="robots"content="follow" /> |
| | <meta <span>name</meta <span>="revisit"content="2 days" /> |I have PM'd you the domains for you to take a closer look at if possible.
Thanks
-
-
I've PM'd you
-
I've PM'd you
-
I've PM'd you
-
A few questions you should consider:
-
The old domain 301 redirects to the correct URL on the new domain, correct?
-
Is there a robots.txt present on the new domain? If so - has it been carefully checked?
-
Have you got Google Webmaster Tools setup for the domain? Have you checked all the settings carefully? What does it say about your Robots.txt and Sitemap? It should tell you about any crawl errors.
-
Is the old domain still indexed?
-
Are there any meta tags for index or follow settings?
These are places to start looking. GWT should be able to give you some clues. Let us know how you get on.
-
-
How old is your site?
-
Yes it will more beneficiary to have the URL
-
Would have to take a closer look. Would you be willing to identify the domain here, or PM it to someone?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does anyone know the linking of hashtags on Wix sites does it negatively or postively impact SEO. It is coming up as an error in site crawls 'Pages with 404 errors' Anyone got any experience please?
Does anyone know the linking of hashtags on Wix sites does it negatively or positively impact SEO. It is coming up as an error in site crawls 'Pages with 404 errors' Anyone got any experience please? For example at the bottom of this blog post https://www.poppyandperle.com/post/face-painting-a-global-language the hashtags are linked, but they don't go to a page, they go to search results of all other blogs using that hashtag. Seems a bit of a strange approach to me.
Technical SEO | | Mediaholix0 -
Google's ability to crawl AJAX rendered content
I would like to make a change to the way our main navigation is currently rendered on our e-commerce site. Currently, all of the content that appears when you click a navigation category is rendering on page load. This is currently a large portion of every page visit’s bandwidth and even the images are downloaded even if a user doesn’t choose to use the navigation. I’d like to change it so the content appears and is downloaded only IF the user clicks on it, I'm planning on using AJAX. As that is the case it wouldn’t not be automatically on the site(which may or may not mean Google would crawl it). As we already provide a sitemap.xml for Google I want to make sure this change would not adversely affect our SEO. As of October this year the Webmaster AJAX crawling doc. suggestions has been depreciated. While the new version does say that its crawlers are smart enough to render AJAX content, something I've tested, I'm not sure if that only applies to content injected on page load as opposed to in click like I'm planning to do.
Technical SEO | | znotes0 -
Will a Robots.txt 'disallow' of a directory, keep Google from seeing 301 redirects for pages/files within the directory?
Hi- I have a client that had thousands of dynamic php pages indexed by Google that shouldn't have been. He has since blocked these php pages via robots.txt disallow. Unfortunately, many of those php pages were linked to by high quality sites mulitiple times (instead of the static urls) before he put up the php 'disallow'. If we create 301 redirects for some of these php URLs that area still showing high value backlinks and send them to the correct static URLs, will Google even see these 301 redirects and pass link value to the proper static URLs? Or will the robots.txt keep Google away and we lose all these high quality backlinks? I guess the same question applies if we use the canonical tag instead of the 301. Will the robots.txt keep Google from seeing the canonical tags on the php pages? Thanks very much, V
Technical SEO | | Voodak0 -
Index problems
“The website http://www.vaneyckshutters.com/nl/ does not show in the index of Google (site:vaneyckshutters.com/nl/). This must be the homepage in the Netherlands. Previously, the page www.vaneyckshutters.com was redirected to /nl/. This page is accessible now with a canonical tag to http://www.vaneyckshutters.com/nl/ in the hope to let /nl/ be indexed. When we look at the SERPS for keyword ‘shutters’, the page http://www.vaneyckshutters.com/ is shown in Google.nl on #32 and in Belgium #3. Problem & question: Why is it that /nl/ has not been indexed properly and why is it that we rank with http://www.vaneyckshutters.com on ‘shutters’ instead the/nl/ page?”
Technical SEO | | Happy-SEO1 -
When i type site:jamalon.com to discover number of pages indexed it gives me different result from google web master tools
when i type site:jamalon.com to discover number of pages indexed it gives me different result from google web master tools
Technical SEO | | Jamalon0 -
Should we use & or and in our url's?
Example: /Zambia/kasanka-&-bangweulu or /Zambia/kasanka-and-bangweulu which is the better url from the search engines point of view?
Technical SEO | | tribes0 -
Intuit's Homestead web developer
I used Intuit's homestead to develop my website and when I analyze my site on semoz, I get duplicate page content between the site and the "index". Is this something to worry about and can I fix it if it is? Thanks. Michael
Technical SEO | | thompsoncpa0