Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi Brendan!

The post you linked is really interesting! Thanks! There are so much info out there that it’s quite easy to miss the good stuff

Yep, and for the on-page grader I already checked that one: A

Thank you very much for your kind help

HI guys, thank you very much for your kind help. Yes the anchor is perfectly natural, and it makes sense that a link from the footer is not seen as an over optimization, otherwise all big sites should have this issue However, I already did an analysis of the competitors considering A LOT of things and our site, at least on paper, should rank higher (and I took into consideration not just what was on the moz report but html errors, page speed, word count and so on…pretty through). There are things that can be done to improve the page optimization, but what is interesting, is that all the pages that are outranking us have some sort of keyword variation in the URL. I thought the keyword in the URL was not a big deal, but if that’s the case, well, it kind of gets confusing with everyone saying that keywords in the URL are not important. Do you have any experience on this? Not sure if I can share the URL but in case I can, I will Thank you so very much!

Hello everyone,

I would like to have your expert (hopefully) opinion on one thing: I am working on a specifi page of a pretty big site, and I noticed one thing in particular. This page is linked to from a lots of internal pages (which is ok) but the anchor text used is in most cases the exact keyword they would like to rank for. I know this is not generally a good thing, but I guess they have so many links with that particular anchor because of the breadcrumbs, and this actually makes sense. Now, if this is the case, how could we work this out (if this is an issue)? Or probably this is not an issue since those links don’t carry a lot of SEO weight…don’t know.

Thanks for your opinion on this