Addendum - I think I found the connection.  I searched a combo of brand and keyword  "utilis usa homeless shelter" and found these lovely results on page 1 in Google

https://www.chamberofcommerce.com/fort-walton-beach-fl/1158721-utilis-usa

http://www.hellodestin.com/local-businesses/utilis_usa/601399199/

http://www.citysearch.com/profile/601399199/fort_walton_bch_fl/utilis_usa.html

Page 2 has

http://oddpath.com/odd/?profile=601399199&name=

http://www.hotfrog.com/Products/Military-Shelters

Interestingly, the Hot Frog page is the category of "Military Shelters" but in the description of your various competitors in that arena - some list "Homeless Shelters".

Somewhere your company was listed under the local business of "homeless shelters" so this information is being propagated across various local listing sites such as above.  Google scrapes this data and so is therefore associating you with that category. Looks like an effect of Hummingbird possibly making some of these connections as well.

I still stand by my "so what" statement above, but if you wanted to take action, you need to clean up your local citations.  The Moz Local tool would be a place to start, but you can contact the above websites directly as well.  I concur with Cyrus though, not sure if it is worth the effort.

Cheers!

There's a joke in there, but I'm going to let someone else tell it.

Cheers!

Are you sure this is not a personalization effect?  I searched "homeless shelter" but did not see your website anywhere.  I also ran it through the Moz rank checker and  http://www.utilisusa.com/ is not ranked in the top 50 for "homeless shelter".

My bigger question is "so what?"  If you sell a bunch of military grade soft-wall shelters to organizations that use them as homeless shelters, sounds like you have a new revenue stream.  If anything, you could use it as a marketing angle.  Donate some shelters to the Red Cross, show how your shelters made a difference in a recent disaster recovery.   Sounds like some pretty awesome, durable structures if they can help people out of difficult situations.

Not according to this doc:

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753812(v=ws.10).aspx

"Levels

The procedures for configuring HTTP headers can be performed at the following levels in IIS:

• Web Server

• Site

• Application

• Physical and virtual directories

• File (URL)"

Question - why move to the .com?  If you are a non-profit, you want to stay .org and just redirect the .com to your .org.

If you are moving to the .com, it would be like any other domain name move.  The key, you need to really plan your move and make sure you have your 301 redirects in place that is specific as possible for all of your old pages pointing to new pages.  In other words, don't redirect everything to your new home page.  Ideally, your redirects should be 1 to 1.  Old page A on .org redirects to New page A on .com.  Old page B on .org redirects to New page B on .com.  Rinse repeat for as many pages as you have.  Yes, it is tedious, but yes worth it if you do want to retain your traffic and rankings.  The more work you do prior to the switch the better.

I would advise you to read everything about the Moz migration from SEOMoz

http://moz.com/blog/domain-migration-lessons

http://moz.com/webinars/domain-migrations-lessons-from-the-moz-transition

http://moz.com/rand/10-traffic-graphs-seomoz-moz-domain-migration/

Also, lots of Domain Name Transfer - Site Transfer Type Checklists

http://moz.com/blog/achieving-an-seo-friendly-domain-migration-the-infographic

http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2013/04/29/big-content-site-migration-tips/

Good luck!

I think this just has to do with the way you have your front end code designed.  I went to the link you provided and yes the information that is displayed is blank except for a semi colon.  If you view source for that page, you can see all the content in the HTML of the text only cache version.

There is some interaction with the header that google uses on that page and the code on your site so that it looks blank even though all the information is there. Google can obviously read it, it is just not displaying correctly in that mode.

I ran your home page through the WC3 validator

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.suprafootwear.com%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0

You have 125 errors and 32 warnings.  That may point to what is going on here.  Worth fixing all that and doing some cross browser testing to make sure the code displays across browsers etc.

Cheers!

Yes bad for both.  You now have the name of a file acting as the name of a folder.

As mentioned above - kill the use of index.php as your index "file" - just end in a slash.

I know php treats these as routes/queries that then produce a page, but it can get things all messed up real quick.

I agree - screaming frog is an awesome tool for finding the internal 301s.  You can export a spreadsheet of all the pages that contain the 301s etc and so it makes creating a task list to work through (or pass on) pretty straight forward.

Correct - the duplicate issue is what will hurt you.  Whatever you go with, make sure the other variants 301 redirect to the "true" page.

It is not "bad", although typical style would be that you can drop it as the extra characters are not needed and nobody likes extra typing - just ask Mr. Twitter.  He used brevity to become a billionaire!  Hmm .. I wish we could get Moz points for alliteration.

What is key is that you are consistent in your use of it.  If you want to use /index.php then go for it.  Just make sure every time you link to that URL in your menus or in articles when you Twiddle it of Farcebook it, you include the /index.php at the end as you do not want to have duplicate URLs for the same page.  I would also setup 301 redirects so that the / only version redirects to the index.php version.

All of that said, you are going to find that after the 104th time of Twiddling that URL, you will say, "Gee, it sure is a pain to type all those extra characters."  You will also find that when people are going to share your URLs they may have a tendency to drop the index.php as again, it is extra work.  If you have the redirect in place, you will be ok, but I say, why have you and everyone else do all that extra work to start with.  Just start with the URL ending in the slash and stay with that.  Have all other versions of the index page (index.php, index.htm or even a non slashed version, etc)  301 redirect to the URL that ends in a /.

The keyword meta tag is alive and well, they just call it the meta title nowadays

Then a 302 would be more appropriate as it is a temporary redirect.   It sounds like you need to work on some of your publishing operations/procedures.   Ideally, once you publish a post, it stays up etc.  You need to figure out how you can improve the process so that you minimize getting into the situation to start with.

If you need to, I would delay the posting to start with if that would ensure that once it posts, it stays up on the site etc.

Good luck.

You need the 301 redirects.  302 redirects give me ulcers.  Is there any reason you are keeping things in the trash?  If you really need to save something for later, putting it in the trash is probably not your best option.  If you need to permanently delete them - then go ahead.  If you need the trash option for storage, then you probably need another plugin.

Follow-up question on your links that were no followed.

1. Were they links within the body of the release that were optimized with anchor text. e.g. Widget Industries Inc (Wii) is proud to announce the latest in wigitized technology, pink widgets!  Joe Smith, president of Wii said that, "Our red widgets are a technology leader, we thought pink widgets would be a win win win!"    and in your text "pink widgets" was linked to an optimized page for pink widgets on your site.

or

2. Was it that you simply had a link under your contact info e.g.

Widget Industries Inc 124 Anyroad, Anytown, State, Zip, www.domain.ext, phone

Just curious the types of links you put into that release.

I have seen talk from various persons saying links in press releases are ok as long as you are not keyword embedding them.  Seems silly that you would be penalized for linking to your company in the contact info, but I wanted to see.

Thx,