Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi,

Just a quick note. I hope someone is able to advise.

To cut a long story short I have a page/s that receive multiple syndicated feeds.
We are using the content for its value to visitors.

Am very happy to cross domain rel=canonical the source and not incur any of Panda's wrath but would like to know if one can add multiple rel-canonicals to one page to reference multiple sources.

Appreciate your help.

Many thanks

Dave Upton

Thanks for all the replies. Appreciated.

I guess the reverse question: Do you think that having a lot of 'duplicate link no follows' on a webpage where there is already a 'primary link' is penalised.

Again, your thoughts would be appreciated.

Hi,

Just a quick note. I hope you are able to assist.

To cut a long story short, on the page below http://www.bookbluemountains.com.au/ -> Features Specials & Packages (middle column) we have 3 links per special going to the same page.
1. Header is linked
2. Click on image link - currently with a no follow
3. 'More info' under the description paragraph is linked too - currently with a no follow

Two arguments are as follows:
1. The reason we do not follow all 3 links is to reduce too many links which may appear spammy to Google. 2. Counter argument:
The point above has some validity, However, using no follow is basically telling the search engines that the webmaster “does not trust or doesn’t take responsibility” for what is behind the link, something you don’t want to do within your own website.   There is no penalty as such for having too many links, the search engines will generally not worry after a certain number.. nothing that would concern this business though.  I would suggest changing the no follow links a.s.a.p.

Could you please advise thoughts.

Many thanks

Dave Upton

[long signature removed by staff]