You wan't to get all of the links from stumbleupon to your site? You could search this in Google
inurl:stumbleupon.com "yoururl.com"
You change the stumbleupon.com to any domain you'd like to search for links to your site
Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Job Title: Alpha
Company: LORENZ INC
Website Description
My baby. Working on revamping the content and dramatically improving the link structure. Kind of a pain since I work with an extension of OSCommerce and I am not fluent in PHP... any help :) ?
Favorite Thing about SEO
Seeing my sites go into the sandbox
You wan't to get all of the links from stumbleupon to your site? You could search this in Google
inurl:stumbleupon.com "yoururl.com"
You change the stumbleupon.com to any domain you'd like to search for links to your site
The theory is that the "link juice" would flow like this:
Private Blogs -> Article -> website
It can be very effective to do this if the links are valuable - some people choose to do it for safety purposes, they believe that their website will not get put into Google's "sandbox" this way, in case too many links were made and various other reasons. For example, rather than create 1,000 links to the URL, make an article and then point 1,000 links to that article which would flow some of the power to the site.
Not all of the power will be passed through to the main website, but depending on the linking methodologies some people have very good success doing this. There are really many variables here, but if done correctly I would say yes indirect links can be very beneficial.
Those blogs do not sound very worthwhile - if the person is adding content and building links to the blogs, they would be much more beneficial. Google has updated their algorithm's and they are beginning to really weed out these low quality sites. At the end of the day, all you can come to is well educated speculation on the matter. If the website is very valuable it may be valuable to build the links indirectly while focusing on very high quality links only to the main website. If the site already has many links and is a decent age, the person may consider building a greater number of links to the actual URL.
Rewrite has been up for a few hours now by the way, I'm going to look through the file because I use a branch of Oscommerce and there are a lot of URL appending things and such so there may be something negating the 301 code I was given to do the redirects
Thank you. That brought forth another problem which is the index.php page being a seemingly separate entity than just the standard URL. Going to have to redirect that too, although I have an E-commerce store and it ends up generating session ID's and such in the URL so I have to figure out how to redirect anything with index.php and that's true for the main URL too I believe.
The biggest issue though still is the WWW versions being accessible.
Hi guys,
This is part 2 of a question I asked before which got partially answered; I clicked question answered before I realized it only fixed part of the problem so I think I have to post a new question now.
I have an apache server I believe on Host Gator. What I want to do is redirect every URL to it's corresponding alternative (www redirects to http). So for example if someone typed in www.mysite.com/page1 it would take them to http://mysite.com/page1
Here is a code that has made all of my site's links go from WWW to HTTP which is great, but the problem is still if you try to access the WWW version by typing it, it still works and I need it to redirect. It's important because Google has been indexing SOME of the URL's as http and some as WWW and my site was just HTTP for a long time until I made the mistake of switching it now I'm having a problem with duplicate content and such. Updated it in Webmaster Tools but I need to do this regardless for other SE's. Thanks a ton!
RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.yourdomain.com [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://yourdomain.com/$1 [L,R=301]
Hey Andy,
Thanks a ton - now all my URL's are appearing as the http version - one problem remains, however, and that is that I can still access the WWW version. Trying to 301 all URL's to the http version but now part of the problem is fixed. Thanks a ton!
Hey guys
I have hosting on Host Gator with I believe an apache web server. I need a code to put in the HT ACCESS to redirect all WWW URL's to their corresponding http URL. I haven't been able to get a code to work.
For example, http://www.mysite.org/page1.html -> http://mysite.org/page1.html , without having to redirect hundreds of pages individually
Here is the format my server uses in the HT ACCESS file for 301 redirects.
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^mysite.org$ [OR] RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.mysite.org
$RewriteRule ^Electric-Pressure-Cookers.html$ "http://mysite.org/Pressure-Cookers.html" [R=301,L]
Thanks
You wan't to get all of the links from stumbleupon to your site? You could search this in Google
inurl:stumbleupon.com "yoururl.com"
You change the stumbleupon.com to any domain you'd like to search for links to your site
The theory is that the "link juice" would flow like this:
Private Blogs -> Article -> website
It can be very effective to do this if the links are valuable - some people choose to do it for safety purposes, they believe that their website will not get put into Google's "sandbox" this way, in case too many links were made and various other reasons. For example, rather than create 1,000 links to the URL, make an article and then point 1,000 links to that article which would flow some of the power to the site.
Not all of the power will be passed through to the main website, but depending on the linking methodologies some people have very good success doing this. There are really many variables here, but if done correctly I would say yes indirect links can be very beneficial.
Those blogs do not sound very worthwhile - if the person is adding content and building links to the blogs, they would be much more beneficial. Google has updated their algorithm's and they are beginning to really weed out these low quality sites. At the end of the day, all you can come to is well educated speculation on the matter. If the website is very valuable it may be valuable to build the links indirectly while focusing on very high quality links only to the main website. If the site already has many links and is a decent age, the person may consider building a greater number of links to the actual URL.
I'm 21 years old; started internet marketing over three years ago - have been consumed in it ever since. Began building an actual business around a year ago. Currently building up an E-Commerce site, has been quite the job as it was an entirely new 'industry' when I began a year ago, so there have been many bumps and roadblocks along the way
Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.