Wikipedia is one of those sites that doesnt have much of SEO optimization.
Another example is the underscore in their URLs..

Hi there,

1. The only way to do that is saving every time the current time. There are some ways to do that automatically with programs, but arent officials.

2. No, it doesnt

If what you are trying to recover is information that you do not have and is older than 90 days, there is no way to recover that now.
My advise is to start saving the reports that you are interested in

Hope it helps.
GR.

We all agree that you should get rid of those 302's .

Then, Im kind of getting the idea... So, you're saying the possible solution: Turn the category pages into landing pages.

It's logical to me too. Of course making that move, will need well organization and a bit of preparation, so as nothing gets lost.

Hi lee,

Both pages show the exact same information?

If yes, then just add a canonical declaring the correct page to index and keep updated the sitemap.xml with the correct URLs.
Here some info about those:

Canonicalization  - Moz
XML Sitemaps: Guidelines on Their Use - Moz

If no, then I don't fully understand your problem.

Hope it helps.
GR.

Hi there,

On one hand, If the content on both landing pages, you **must **set up the 301. Because you are having duplicate content.

On the other hand, keeping all your landing pages in a very long landing page.. I don't see that's a good idea. 
even though you are differentiating with #keyword that is not taken as a different URL.

Let me explain a little more:
site.com/product/car1
site.com/product/car2
These two are different pages. Google takes them as different pages and are very suitable to rank for different keywords.

site.com/product#car1
site.com/product#car2
These two are the same page. The rankeable capacacity to rank on both keywords is diminished.

Is it clear?

Hi Andy,

In my experience, it took from a day to roughly 5-6 weeks. All of them just naturally re-indexed, I didn't use any gas indexer nor adding them with the search console add to index tool.

Hope it helps.

GR.

Hi there.

Why are you willing to add h2 tags? I its on seo purposes, add them as a REAL HEADING. Not has images.

My way of analyzing these kind of questions is asking how would Google interpret that action. I don't find any logical explanation to put an image in a heading tag.

Personally, I will not do that. But, someone might have it done and can offer a positive effect.

Best luck.

GR.

Im sorry to confirm you that google does not want to everyine know that they have in their index. We as SEOs complain about that.

Its hard to belive that you couldnt get all your pages with a scraper. (because it just searches and gets the SERPS)

Well, There are some scrapers that might do that job.

To do it the right way you will need proxies and a scraper.
My recommendation is Gscraper or Scrapebox and a list of (at list) 10 proxies.

Then, just make a scrape whit the "site:mydomain.com" and see what you get.
(before buying proxies or any scraper, check if you get something like you want with the free stuff)

Hi Sverre,

Have you tried Screaming Frog SEO Spider? Here a link to it: https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/

It's really helpfull to crawl all the pages you have as accesible for spiders. You might need the premium version to crawl over 500 pages.

Also, have you checked for the common duplicate pages issues? Here a Moz tutorial: https://moz.com/learn/seo/duplicate-content

Hope it helps.
GR.