Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Take a good look at some of the pages you have indexed here
https://www.google.com/search?q=site:http://superbetting.com/forum/&num=100
Decide what should not be there and remove them with a noindex. This will help with quality Score.
Then do a fetch in Webmaster Tools to speed the indexing up. That should help you on your way.
Disavow all the crap links ASAP
Here is a great tool to get you started
http://barracuda.digital/panguin-tool/
Lets find out what happened and where then we can help you move forward! 
Very simple,
Your old site http://www.instantissuance.com uses a 301 redirect which can be seen here
http://www.internetofficer.com/seo-tool/redirect-check/
It then redirects to http://www.datacard.com/instant-issuance-solutions which is the exact page you mentioned above.
In tools like Majestic and MOZ you can see that the most common term used in backlinks to the site apart from the domain name is "dynamic card solution".
When you perform a 301 redirect all the positive signals that a site has are passed to its new home. This is a clear indication of that happening.
I hope that makes sense!
This has been a very common practice for years, link out to authority websites in the same post to give the page more credibility. If their websites is mentioned in the same breath then it may encourage higher click through.
Will it increase the power of that link specifically, No, but if click through rates are higher then that is a signal.
Content marketers got caught out a long time back only linking to one website in an article (THEIRS), in order to make it look more natural they decided to add sites like wikipedia and other news sources etc... To make it look like a well researched article. However the flaw is that in many cases its still a biased article. A better signal of quality is content that links out to yourself AND your competitors. That is something that would be considered to be less spammy, but people never do it because they obviously don't want to help their competitors.
There are a lot of factors that could be contributing to their rankings, not just the links they have. Links are becoming less and less of a factor in the last year.
200+ factors
http://backlinko.com/google-ranking-factors
Question is do your customers pay to be listed with you? If so are they using you for the dofollow links? If this is the case then you may lose some of your business by changing it to nofollow.
If they are paying there is also a risk of a Google penalty for paid do follow links.
If you are unable to maintain quality and there is no good reason to have a dofollow, then switch to nofollow.
Are the pages hardcoded? Or is all the data in a database? If it is in a database it would take no time at all to run each domain through a loop and check what response status code you get.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes
This would be a very quick way to find broken links. You may even be able to purchase an api on something like majestic or Moz and run the sites through that as well for a better indication of site quality. If the site has very low DA or Trust Flow, you could also make it nofollow or remove etc...
If it is all hardcoded then that would be very hard work all around.
I had a conversation about this in a Google hangout with John Mueller, internal duplicate content is not an issue he said. Google will send a customer to the page it thinks is best.
Its only a problem if most of your content is poor quality and duplicated to create landing pages just to capture keywords.
Even external duplicate content is not that much of an issue as many sites have api's and affiliate schemes that have shared content, John Mueller says that if you are offering something different and unique additionally then that should be fine. Also we are seeing lots of content curating lately and Google seems to favor this too.
I see no reason at all for you to be worried, I would go ahead and add it to your FAQ.
This is correct, Googlebot crawls from the US and will see your site in dollars if your code is serving up currency based on the users location.
In an ideal world you would want to use hreflang for this, you could setup a co.uk for the UK and the .com for the USA. Point the domains to the same directory with some clever code by detecting the TLD and swap out a few basics like currency. (you could also use sub directories or sub domains)
I run a company with the headquarters in the UK with large sales in the US and across the world. I would also consider a US phone number to boost sales and really give the customer more confidence in your company.
A $ currency symbol is a good indication to Google what your target audience is but at the same time your site does have a UK address at the bottom and your contact us page has a UK map etc... So I would not be surprised if Google can figure this out as its been a common issue for a long time and an unknown issue for may website owners.
If you feel that your UK rankings are being affected by this then you do have those options above.
FYI, DO NOT change your code to show £'s just for Googlebot, this can be a sure way to get a penalty.
Have a good read of the MOZ hreflang guide below, they mention Currency and other useful aspects of a site like yours.
no need, all hreflang sites are linked in the eyes of Google. Also you still want people going to your original url which is where all your brand building and everything else was done.
At some point Penguin will refresh and your original site will regain the ability to rank. At that point you can decide what you want to do.
I had set mine up so that my co.uk was set to "EN" this capturred all english enquiries. Then in OCT 2014 my site regained its ability to rank and So I switched it so that my co.uk was set to "en-gb". The co.uk extension is an additional signal in google.co.uk for ranking and we are a truly global company with plans to expand into dedicated sites for certain countries. So it was a welcomed find.
However there is no harm in setting up the second site to target your main audience.
Lets say you are a company in the United States with a .com that is waiting for a penguin refresh.
Get a second domain, point it to the same directory on your server. Do some clever coding to manage it so that you only have one set of code. (also think of a plan for the future to deliver separate content to both sites, maybe two database tables serving up content based on TLD).
Lets say you get a .net
Then apply the following
Do this for each page making sure to keep the same url structure. (John mueller just started the importance of maintaining the same URL structure)
Once your original site regains the ability to rank again from an algo refresh go into webmaster tools and set the region of the new site to your desired specific location such as United States.
Then change the hreflang to:
This way you are now telling Google to send only english searches from the US to your site and it will be a localized domain with a higher chance of ranking than the original site.
OR you could at that point remove hreflang and drop the newsite.net
This is the only way I was able to KEEP my original site up maintain my brand and all the people that go direct to my main brand website and also have a way of ranking again.
Its complicated to explain WHY it works but at some point I will write a big article for MOZ on this subject.
Hope that makes things more clear.
How about doing it the same way online help/chat boxes come up.
So in the bottom right hand corner it opens up after say x page views or x seconds. Says "catchy message" just pop a few details in here and I will be right back with you.
This kind of interaction and prompt is very effective.
If they choose not to respond, then they can minimize it and are now aware of where and how easy it is to contact you.
May I ask why you chose to create images for your address and contact info? This is a major signal of legitimacy for Google and they are unable to read it.
What I find interesting is that "bannershop" is #1, they have a poor majestic score LOTS of links and a terrible looking website. Looks like links win in this case. their social media buttons don't even work at the bottom of their site.
There is a lot to analyze here. In most cases however, the majestic score reflects the rankings except for keyword rich domain names.
Really make use of internal linking, many pages like this could take advantage of it.
http://www.discountbannerprinting.co.uk/help-centre/the-advantages-of-pvc-banners.html
Might be a good time to create a banner as some sort of marketing campaign. Something that could get you media attention? This would blow you out the water with one good idea
Yes the domain does not matter.
You can even test it out with just one single page. I spoke to John Mueller about this a while ago, he said when using hreflang you can use it in the same way you use a canonical tag. So maybe you could test it on an internal page that you know should be ranking better than it currently does.
Setup the new domain, create a blank index.php page and just replicate the internal page and URL structure.
FYI, John actually talked about URL structure for hreflang just 2 days ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1sewHcbKTJw#t=2171
In an ideal world you want to create a clever bit of PHP so that your code is being pulled from one directory otherwise you will have 2 versions of your site that you will need to maintain and that would just be a royal pain in the a$$.
Before you do anything I suggest you read the page below and watch the video by Maile Ohye on there too.
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/189077?hl=en
Fell free to ask me any questions I have had to do this on a few sites and have been doing it for a long time now.
Setup your current site as the x-default and the new one as "EN" so that all english inquiries are served up by Google to your new site.
I look forward to hearing how it goes. FYI its possible you may see your results drop for a day or two and then popup with the old URL again and then the new one, It can take a few days for it to recalibrate. It can also happen right away and then random adjustments happen over the next few weeks.
Also make sure to use fetch as Google in WMT on both site pages to get Googlebot looking at your pages ASAP. I have seen results in 30 seconds before.
Fetch is the best and fastest way. Chances are Googlebot came to your site right away and is prioritizing those changes in the SERPS update.
Give it 24hrs, sometimes I see changes like that happen in under a minute other times it can take many hours.
I asked John Mueller at Google a while ago about a news article my company wrote, should my links be dofollow or nofollow, he replied if they have been requested or in exchange for something then it should be nofollow. WHAT! Its a news article that was 100% researched by our team and nobody we link to would even know about it until the article came out and EVEN if they did how the hell would they even know unless there was some sort of visual exchange in someway! I didn't UNDERSTAND the response then and I still DON'T now. If this is a their response and I know 100% that we did our own research how can I trust that anyone looking at the news article from Google will see it the same way and if not then say its seems like someone would have paid for that so we are going to punish you for it. SO despite the article not having any influence or paid links or anything of that sort I still decided to nofollow the links. Google screwed me before on false pretenses and I am sure they will do it again. Mathematically it all leads back to Adwords in some way or another.
Google's flaw has always been the same, don't reveal anything and wait for the spammers who are actively looking for ranking factors to find them way before legit businesses understand them, by this time its exploited by everyone and the cycle starts again!
If ranking factors are a sign of what Google thinks a Good company should demonstrate then why the hell don't they tell people. This way legit business owners will rank up top for their services and be competing with others in their industry instead of competing with spammers and affiliate sites that only exists because of the reasons mentioned in the paragraph above.
Sick of this crap from Google. Same cycle for 15+ years. When will they learn.
They WILL NOT be able to build an algo/system that simply responds to genuine sites. So they might as well train business how to market themselves better. The better the real companies do the harder it will be for blackhat SEO's to enter the market.
They also need to respond immediately to spam issues not wait 6 months to factor them into a new algo. Nip the churn and burns in the bud and they will die a quick death forever!
How can so many bright minds at Google produce such poor decisions. They never think of the consequences of their actions.
Their thoughtless actions and poor response times have led to an astonishing amount of damage.
Forums have been trashed because of link profile building, Google should have discounted that immediately. It would have saved hundreds of thousands of site owners agony and in some cases irreversible damage. The success of this led to people in Asia being hired to decipher captcha codes every few seconds leading people to KILL themselves because of their jobs.
Google has a strong part to play in their DEATHS! This is just the tip of the iceberg.
YES you can't blame a gun maker for a gun owners actions but you can blame them for irresponsible distribution of those guns or poor reactions to issues with those guns. Same thing applies to links and the also to content for Google. The amount of spun garbage out there because Google desires content amounts to unfathomable amounts of garbage content flooding the web. Think of the webservers holding all this garbage and everything surrounding it. The global impact alone of all the energy needed for every aspect of that content, from being crawled and indexed, space required, loading of the content X billions of pages its shocking and probably has a notable impact on climate change.
A company this size needs to take better care before they make ANY decisions.
Yes that's fine, Pagerank/juice will still flow and Google will act as normal on all those child pages.
In an ideal situation you want to have good content on the pages that link to the weaker ones
Home->Landing Page->Weaker page->Child Page
Try to naturally include the most important words on the Landing Page as it will have the most power and you will be able to direct your customers through to the weaker pages.
Q1: Google is very bad at dealing with stuff like this, they really don't care to much in my experience. I have seen otehrs try and flood the front page with things like twitter facebook and linkedin to push down negative content. Try to use these strong networks to boost his name. Also might as well give it a shot and report it to Google.
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/93713?hl=en
Q2: Every day Googlebot gets smarter and more nosy! It crawls javascript it does al;l sorts of things. Crappy sites go up and down and have index issues eventually Google will get to them and index them. This is likely what you are seeing.
If they are pretty bad then get them in the disavow file ASAP. A Penguin update is not that far away and you need to be ready a month in advance.
The real question is...
Has Google already gathered a snapshot of all the data for the next Panda update already, if so its too late anyway.
With Penguin that has always been the case. If you are not ready a month before the update then you miss the boat.
John Mueller at Google has always said duplication is not the biggest factor it is more how you represent that content. If there is other content around it that makes your site unique and maybe a better option than others then you can be justified in having that duplicate content.
A suppression because of Panda can be an overall look at your site so it may be wise to noindex the weak pages.
Also if they are all under a specific directory structure such as /products/ you could do a fetch as Google in Webmaster Tools on it or even create a sitemap with just the pages that have changed and do a fetch on that page using the option to crawl all linked pages. This can be a very fast way to get Google to react to your changes.
Hope that helps.
WAIT!
Just so that you don't run into trouble. Its clear to me you already have a 301 redirect in place.
Also you can check with tools like this
http://www.internetofficer.com/seo-tool/redirect-check/
If you make changes you may put your homepage in an infinite loop! "home.asp" will redirect to "/" and then back again.
Make sure you look at your index.asp or other index files and also your htaccess, for the code that redirects to your "home.asp". You will need to remove it.
Also just a helpful hint, when I look through your code you have a TON of embedded javascript. Try to put it in a JS file if your technically able to.
My suggestion only do what is natural, the signals for h3 are so small that it would not be worth doing.
If however you feel that breaking the content up further with h3 tags will make the content more appealing, you may get a higher retention rate and this will lead to better rankings.
Quality is the key question here, the Panda algo is getting very smart.
I would go through Amit singhaL's 23 questions first and determine if you are putting content there for SEO or for the user.
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.ca/2011/05/more-guidance-on-building-high-quality.html
I also read about a test recently done where H4 tags were out performing H1 tags but for the life of me I cant find it!
It makes sense to have correlation between the H1 and the Title and if it is natural for you to repeat the word "hire" as much as you do then there is no harm in it.
There is of course one exception to that rule, Google builds its algo to work for the majority and you always stand a very small percentage chance that you do things correctly and Google takes a dislike, this is unfortunately luck of the draw. (something I hate the most about Google as you will get very little indication).
Also there is no harm in testing different things out on different pages, or even doing and A/B test
https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/2404033?hl=en-GB
Remember that your title tags should also be worded in a way that will get the highest click through rates or Google will rename them.
More info here: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.ca/2012/01/better-page-titles-in-search-results.html
Hope that helps somewhat.
@ruth
I urge you to try the hreflang solution sometime as a test.
"but it's not something I would test unless you actually do have different English-speaking audiences."
You can Always set the old domain to "x-default" and the new one to "EN" so that all English search results switch to the new site, this is great for sites not willing to wait up to a year for a Penguin refresh or affected by other SERPS suppression. Both sites can be identical and will not cause duplication issues. hreflang is amazing tool for testing.
My site got a revoke in May 2013 and took until the refresh in Oct 2014 for it to show recovery in SERPS
One way around this is to use hreflang and set your main site to x-default and create a new site that targets your main language.
Basically set your new domain to hreflang "EN" and you should see an instant recovery!
"Plus, your H1 should be the first thing on your page, not after your
."
Not sure I agree 100% with that, there are top and left nav elements and various other structual and design things that logically appear before an H1.
However it does make sense for it to be on its own line and above the content it is a header for as close to the top as possible.
Otherwise I agree with everything else you mentioned.
Your H1 should stand out as a solo tag and not be put into a line of code only used for SEO purposes.
Remember that H1 tags are used by Screen Readers and other such technology, read more here about the effects of screen readers and H1 tags here:
http://www.maxability.co.in/2013/06/html-5-headings-behavior-with-screen-readers/
As Google has suggested in the past, if you are doing it just for SEO and not for the user then its probably not a good idea.
Hi Jay,
I do everything online for my company YourCityOffice.com a Virtual office and office space provider with guides for business startups.
I would be interested to see how this new tool could help with the promotion of our content.
Thanks
Gary
Did you look up the site in https://archive.org/ ? you should be able to recover lots of the content that was deleted!
Its even possible that some was curated across the web as well, if you need some help looking let me know.
For me the one thing that will send it crashing and burning into flames is the spam issue.
No matter what common software you use spammers have written robots to crawl signup pages and create accounts. Some have written them so that they bypass those pages and directly post to the signup success pages avoiding many checks etc..
Do you very best to create a custom sign up process that cannot be easily filled in by a robot. Something totally unique to your site. Remove all signals of any software you may be using, logos specific html code that is easy to identify etc.. all these are things robots look for and they they NEVER stop hammering your site.
Its almost worth creating a custom build. As these xrumor link building schemes still work in Google. Others use them to build negative seo links. So basically your site will be used as a host for bad links. Go above and beyond to protect yourself.
Hope that helps.
I have the ultimate answer for you and you will not find this elsewhere online.
I have been through this process and it was a huge pain the a$$
I spoke with John Mueller at Google for years trying to resolve our issues until one day we spoke about hreflang. At which point John said to me that it would be OK to use it. So we played with it and it turned out that we recovered IMMEDIATELY from penguin for a new domain that was hrefland linked from our original site.
So basically this allowed us to keep our original brand name site up while traffic was going to our new co.uk site (in your case .net)
Let say for instance your client is US based. Take the .com site and set it as x-default, then set the new .net site as "en" or if you want to be more specific "en-US".
All Google traffic in english or english from google.com in the US will now start flowing in your non penalised site. the hreflang simply does a swap in those search engines but it happens before the penalty is enforced. So your rankings will return right away depending on where you would now rank after the penalty is lifted and your new content will also be back to their rightful ranking positions. Basically all the suppression is gone.
Dont worry about duplicate content as hreflang handles all that. Its very common for sites to have just a few small changes such as $ to £ or a few spelling changes like color and colour. There is no downside.
If you are clever with the way you code your site you can make it a seamless transition without having to maintain code on two domains. Only took me a few hours to code something up.
The best thing is it opens the door to targeting multiple regions of the world with other languages. (When you are ready).
Hope that answers your question.
Also FYI, when did your manual penalty get revoked? It can take up to a year for your site to be ready for the refresh to consider it OK to lift the suppression. Based on that you may have not been ready for the OCT 2014 refresh and may be waiting for the next one which could be a long way away.
See if the changes correspond to the Feb 4th update
http://moz.com/google-algorithm-change
Its possible that the algorithm update was the reason for your drop and will give you a starting place to investigate.
Also it would be worth disavowing any undesirable links such as porn just to be on the safe side.
Also I expect this to be rolled out country by country, a previous algo update was rolled out in the UK first. So its not always google.com
Until it rolls out we wont know how hash Google will be, they have to find a fine line between demoting sites and still producing a quality list of sites.
However they were very harsh with Penguin and as a result many SERPS results are still bad to this day.
So sorry for the delay getting back to you, its been a crazy week and didnt notice the response.
"Note that this is a manual penalty though, so fortunately no waiting for Penguin refreshes."
OK, just to let you know, once they lift the manual penalty, you still need to wait for a Penguin refresh. my penalty was lifted in May 2013 the vast majority of crap links had not been crawled and took a very long time for Google to do so. For the disavow file to take effect it needs to crawl each of those pages with your disavow file in mind and change them to a nofollow. Once a healthy amount is crawled you will then be in good standing when the Penguin algo is run. If Penguin runs before you have an acceptable level of healthiness you will not be released form Penguin and will have to wait for the next. So it took us until Oct 17th 2014 for us to finally get released. This was WITH John Muellers help!
My advice is don't be too picky with what you keep. Go through everything, mine was 20,000 Referring domains with 250k links! We had a 10 year history of business online and at one point also attacked with negative seo. So was a big job
"Providing I've given all possible evidence I can about the links being live or not to Google, do you think that disavowing all poor quality links that APPEAR to be no longer live is good enough in Google's eyes? Obviously for all links that are still live (as far as i can see) I have outreached to at least 3 times and disavowed if I can't get in touch."
Yes, create a report to show the work you have done, whats removed, who you have contacted, who did not respond. I did an Excel spreadsheet, one domain per line, with a few fields like, last contacted, date, removed etc..
There are lots of programmes out there that help with this now. Not so easy when your the first and there are no tools for it!
Also its best to do domain instead of links, how many links do you have pointing to your site?
you say "We would like to link my client's site to these articles"
How do you mean? Please explain a little more
Sorry I have to disagree,
There are many sites, specifically directory sites that list websites and as more sites get listed they push your link to page 3, 4, 5. It looks like the link does not exist but it does on another page.
Some sites are that are crappy also have poor connections/bandwidth etc... So they go up and down and overload all the time. Just because its down now does not mean its down later when Google crawls it.
When I did my now famous! link clean up these were both issues that came up when I got help from John Mueller at Google.
It sucks because its just a hell of a lot of work, but based on how long it takes for a penguin update to come about, I would make sure you get it right FIRST TIME or you could wait more than a year to see returns.
Feel free to ask me anything.
Best of luck
Gary
I took a look at your site and I see some issues with what your doing.
John Mueller at Google has confirmed on many occasions there is no duplicate penalty issues and I myself have a business that has a similar issue where geo locations overlap for services/content.
However what you do not want to do is create pages to try and rank them before you have content for them. I noticed all your state page are indexed but with the same message at the top with no content. This is a bad signal to the Panda Algorithm and will show thin non quality content that will affect the entire site. Noindex the pages you have no content for or its going to hurt you. Trust me I have been there on multiple sites.
Once you have done that Google will try to work out what page is best to show out of your duplicate content pages, so the best thing you can do is try to make each page unique with some additional information, maybe about the area or something, this will aid in those pages being ranked for the terms intended.
Have you been doing lots of link building recently one it?
I see www.claydip.com/airbnb_features.html ranking for those keywords in about 300th position. This can indicate a dislike for the actual page in question, maybe link related or in your case possibly content related.
I recently talked with John Mueller at Google and he said that Googlebot can have issues with lazy loading content when it comes to indexing. All your content is lazy load content and when the hummingbird algorithm checks to see what "IT CAN SEE" on a page its possible it will not see that content and consider it to be unimportant compared to what it can see. This can cause lots of ranking problems with the quality algorithms.
Googlebot does seem to be able to index your content, I tested some snippets of text but I think lazy load is a bad idea personally.
The fact that another page is indexed but also is a lazy load also leads me back to the possibility that you have done some link building that Google does not like?
There are a few options, you can also implement the noindex no follow on those pages. John Muller at Google has repeatedly said there is no internal duplicate content penalties. However it will need to determine the best page to show, so clear signals like the canonical are good.
You can also look at the "URL Parameters" section in webmaster tools if you are confident you know what you are doing. This can be used to inform Google about query strings you want it to ignore.
There is nothing wrong with query strings, in fact Google has recently said it likes them instead of very long keyword stuffed url's.
John Mueller at Google has confirmed there are no internal duplicate content penalties of any kind, Google will determine the best page to show based on its algorithm. Let Googlebot do its job or you could go into webmaster tools and use the "Fetch as Google" tool to submit any pages you are concerned about or want to speed up. There is a limit of 10 pages per month so its best to submit the top level page and tell it to crawl all linked pages.
hreflang is 100% the way to go, however you must consider the x-default as well.
If you have clients using google.ae (UAE) to find you and they use arabic to search they will not find you. As google will not show your results in that search engine. Many people in UAE search in arabic but are happy to read english or many other languages, this is the same for china, russia and many others. So if you have customers from other countries not searching in the languages you have set then you should have one site set as x-default, this will tell Google to send all other traffic to this location and show your website in all search engines.
I have used hreflang multiple times and frequently speak with John Mueller at Google about it. Its a great tool and once implemented you will start to see results in just a few days.
Here is a great guide https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/189077?hl=en
Another option is to host the same content on the main site and use the canonical tag on them. But the I would do as Devanur Rafi suggests, replicate the content on the new site and 301 redirect to the old pages. All the links gained will follow the 301 so the power will transfer over. I would leave the old site up permanently otherwise any links pointing to the old domain will be lost when the 301 redirect no longer exists. Another option is to go to webmaster or some other tool get a list of those links and contact the webmaster to let them know of the site move and to change the links to the new domain.
Your 301's if setup correctly will work fairly quickly in Google and should see results for your main pages within days sometimes hours depending on the sites popularity/crawl rate.
pagerank has not been updated since last november according to John Muller at Google and will not ever be updated again. It is still an internal metic used by Google but the latest data is no longer available to the public. So your pages will likely never have visible page rank again.
I took one look at the code and was amazed by how much is inline. Most of it should be in js and css files. I noticed the solutions pages many of them don't even have title tags! What's going on there? That needs seo attention and is a big no no for coding. This leads me to believe the code needs very close inspection. It surly cant take that long to strip a whole bunch of that code out of each page or template.
If a page is slow to load or pulls in external js files as well you can have scripts try to execute before the required code has loaded. This is probably what is happening some of the time and would explain the inconsistent nature of it.
Run the site through a bunch of validators. I am sure you will find a bunch of stuff.
I would use the hreflang tag, I implemented this on a few sites that have multiple local based versions and it works wonders and you do not have to worry about cross domain duplicate content in any way. I have a site in US dollars and one in UK pounds all the content is identical and both have been checked by John Mueller at Google and he has confirmed this is a perfect use for that scenario.
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/189077?hl=en
If however they are all in the same country, then I would use the rel canonical https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/139066?hl=en
OK I think I found out some of your issues!
There are a few major ones. I hope you don't mind but I did some detective work and found out what your site was by the code screen grabs you posted on another reply below.
OK so the first MAJOR ISSUE is that you have TWO BODY tags in your HTML! You need to check your code on all pages / templates and get it fixed ASAP. Archive.com shows that this has been a problem on your site since you did a redesign in OCT 2013. Google is looking at signals like this a lot more now and is not being favourable to them
My concern when you do a site: query in google is that your homepage does not show, it should be the first result. I see that you have 15,100 pages indexed.
When I search for your website "sitename.com.ar" I see in Google there is no title, description even the quick links are broken, just showing just one and saying untitled.
NEXT, All your pages have the same description and keyword tags! Whats going on there? I you cant make them unique then get rid of them, they are doing more damage and Google hates that stuff, I have had pages not show in SERPS because they have duplicate description tags. This happen to five of my pages recently that I somehow missed. But this is on every product Page of yours if not every page on the site.
Also I would remove the keywords meta tag, its pointless and will do you more harm than good.
The paths to your javascript and css files have two slashes (//) should only be one.
I would start with those changes and do a fetch in Google WMT and give it a few days, the homepage should reindex in a very short time frame maybe minutes.
After that we can take another look at the site. These are very basic issues that a large brand site like this should never be doing wrong, as you can see the damage it has caused. Lucky for you that you have only just started there and can be the knight in shining armour to sort it all out
First off if you want to keep the sitemap file, consider breaking it down to multiple files, one for each language/country etc...
Also FYI there are THREE methods, you can also add hreflang to the http header. This might be a good options as well to consider.
if all pages are 100#5 not indexed then I would block it in robots.txt, Google's John Muller confirmed to me that Googlebot will continue to crawl every link to check to see if a nofollow or noindex has changed status.
So as a result we blocked our pages with robots.txt and saw a great increases in index/crawl rates on pages we want Google to pay attention to. It also reduces waste in server resources.
However if there are any pages that are index, if you block them in robots.txt then Googlebot will never be able to crawl the link to determine that it should be noindex. This means it could stay in a permanent stage of indexed.
I hope that answers all your questions?
You are making the right move for the future. You can always remove something from the disavow later and it will simply be treated as a dofollow link again once the disavow file has been re-crawled and the page re-indexed. So no big deal, that process is fast if its not a crappy deep link.
There will be a Penguin update in the next few weeks according to John Mueller at Google. So any disavow effort now will be fruitless for the next update but still worth doing for the futire as the latest data sample for it has already been taken as reported by Gary Illyes here http://www.thesempost.com/penguin-possibly-next-week-late-disavow-links-next-update/
Panda has run recently, does the the drop coincide with that date? Normally there is a shake up in the week leading up to it.
I suspect that someone may have made changes before you go there and they have not given you the full picture.
Was there any issue with the server during that time and the pages speeds were slow or not loading. WMT should give you some indication of the decline, even how dramatic the drops were and what kind of pages were dropped.
FYI you are better to remove the meta descriptions from the pages that have duplication than keep them there, but the best course of action is of course to re-write them.
If you care to share the URL we can all take a look and see if we can spot anything.
Ok so John Mueller at Google has said not to worry about sites like this, Google bot is clever enough to figure these types of sites out. To add to that this site links to all external sites with a nofollow link, so disavowing would do nothing anyway.
However there instances where it might be worthwhile adding it to a disavow list and that would be if you believe this site might changes those links to dofollow at a later stage for some reason (highly unlikely).
Also if it were a similar site but links were dofollow, it would not hurt to add it considering you have found it and deem it to be of no value.
However as John has said in the past, if you did not create it don't worry about it unless you really need to disassociate yourself from it.