Welcome to the Q&A Forum

I've just done a little more looking into it, and it turns out that the page with the tag on it is the one that you don't want the crawler to index (which makes more sense)

Google do note that pages can still appear in search results due to a lag time between crawls.

I still think though that is is what could be stopping Moz from crawling the site however, though Roger's just doing what he's told

Hi Richard

I inspected the markup of your site code and found that in your there is the meta tag

I'd suggest removing this, as this will tell crawlers to only index the first page of your site. Which I doubt is what you want.

As for the multi-line keywords, I think you should be okay. Once Moz can crawl your site you can use the On Page Grading tool to see whether it picks up the keywords in the H1 tags.

Hope this helps, Kraig.

UPDATE

I've discovered you can put schema.org meta data into meta tags, just like open graph using the content variable, for example:

thanks for pointing this out. I've actually decided for the sake of giving each service the best consistency to use a separate thumbnail for Google using schema, and keep the landscape image for Open Graph, as it looks better in Facebook. The thumbnail is a mere 7Kb in size, and I actually took out a 50Kb font variant after finding it wasn't being used.

Thanks for the advice though

Right now rel=publisher is being emphasised when it comes to Google+ Direct Connect - where a Google+ profile overview badge is displayed in the search results for a brand.

It's a pretty cool addition to your search results, but right now it's handed out algorithmically. You can't just declare ownership and see it there, so you'll need to build up a bit of authority before it appears.

I think it is. Crawlers might understand data-vocabulary, but if they're not committed to using it when creating search results, you might miss out on things like Google's new product search info panels.

Google's actually still using a number of different microdata formats right now, but kind of as a means of a fallback method, so it could be phased out in the future (for example, we all know Open Graph is Facebook's gig) Schema.org is the only one which the big three search companies have all pledged to support in the future, so any new features that improve search results are likely to happen first to schema.org

.ferrari, obviously...

Hi there, I'm in the middle of optimising my site to create decent sharing snippets to improve the overall experience and quality for visitors.

One thing I've come up against though is trying to balance site design with the requirements of schema.org and Google+

I've recently just altered the layout of my site to now visually display a brief post description to go into the Rich Snippet Google+ creates, but the images Look a little bit shorter than what they could be.

I'm curious to how I could perhaps serve a dedicated image for the Google+ snippet (a square cropped version of the large feature image that's given to each post) while avoiding forcing all users to load a second image I don't even really want to show.

I'm also in the middle of deciding what content to prefill the post text with, I'm thinking about tagging my own Google+ id and maybe using some post relevant hash tags too. Does that sound like a good idea?

Thanks for

95e0ec7c46e6e66c0a966089d7805813

.ferrari, obviously...

Hi Richard

I inspected the markup of your site code and found that in your there is the meta tag

I'd suggest removing this, as this will tell crawlers to only index the first page of your site. Which I doubt is what you want.

As for the multi-line keywords, I think you should be okay. Once Moz can crawl your site you can use the On Page Grading tool to see whether it picks up the keywords in the H1 tags.

Hope this helps, Kraig.