- Home
- mad2k
Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
mad2k
@mad2k
Job Title: SEO & Search Advertising
Company: 360 Digital Care PTY LTD
Website Description
Professional WordPress maintenance and care services
Just marketing and startups :-)
Favorite Thing about SEO
Just fun...when you do something and it works ...and it can be fresh and juicy.
Latest posts made by mad2k
-
RE: CSS vs Javascript vs JQuery drop down navigation
Hi Joel,
In my opinion CSS is "The Best". Simple, easy usage, easy changes, very good speed of page load ... etc...
As I red on many forums on the internet JQuery and JS are are available for robots, so there are no contraindications to employ them.
But
CSS - better code/text ratio (no long scripts in page code)
CSS - simple usage and changes (CSS3, HTML5)
CSS - faster loading (only simple text and html)
In my opinion, now when we have HTML5 and CSS3 there is no better way - it's innovative and simple solution,
Marek
-
RE: /%category%/%postname%/ Permalink structure
Did you find any reason of site declining?
Send me an url, I will take a look
-
RE: /%category%/%postname%/ Permalink structure
Hi again
I think that depends on what is the position of your site now. If it's good there is no pressure to do changes in other case you can take a risk. In my opinion good structure of content help in SEO an if I were in your situation i would take a risk of change.
-
RE: Is there a way to use Google Analytics event tracking for YouTube embedded videos on my website?
Hi Brian,
I think - yes, just try - it is my video and some code:
<iframe width="560" height="315" <="" p=""><p class="p1">onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Video', 'Click', 'KenyanLakes2010']);" </p> <p class="p1"> src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/FpA0JzF8lco" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
more on:
and in further discussion Track PDF files downloaded from my site
-
RE: /%category%/%postname%/ Permalink structure
Hi Marisa,
I'm using /%postname% and in my opinion it is a best structure ... but ... in that kind of structure is important to care about slug and to prevent creation of duplicated titles.
/the-best-solution is a good slug
//the-best-solution-2 is not a good slug
I don't have duplicated pages cos WordPress has mechanism which check the slug in real time when you creating a post.
I think that /%postname% is the most friendly link structure.
-
RE: Google is indexing wordpress attachment pages
For more than 2 months I'd been tested another SEO plugin - SEO Ultimate. IMHO it is the best plugin for WP at the time. It is very flexible and it is possible to decide about almost every element of a page. It has follow/nofollow and index/noindex manager and tons of other features.
I don't have attachment pages indexed
-
RE: NOINDEX or NOINDEX,FOLLOW
Hello again,
They are the same.
And I assume that interpretation is the same because default state is:
**<META NAME="ROBOTS" CONTENT="ALL"> **that means index, follow
and you can decompose every tag to parts:
<META NAME="ROBOTS" CONTENT="NOINDEX">
<META NAME="ROBOTS" CONTENT="FOLLOW">
and that tells robot to noindex, but do follow is default so if you don't use this tag robot will follow anyway.
Marek:-)
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/03/using-robots-meta-tag.html
-
RE: NOINDEX or NOINDEX,FOLLOW
Hi Peter,
Read an Google article first: http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=93710
and then you can read http://www.robotstxt.org/meta.html
Take in the consideration that many robots especially malware simply can ignore that tag. So on the end your site can appear in SERP's despite you use "noindex". More information about indexing: http://www.robotstxt.org/faq/indexing.html
When you think about googlebot it respects "noindex" tag. The best place to tag is section. Make sure that your robots.txt doesn't block a robots
User-agent: *
Disallow: /
block all robots to enter the site, so you can use:
User-agent: *
Disallow:
more: http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html
Take Care
Marek
Best posts made by mad2k
-
RE: CSS vs Javascript vs JQuery drop down navigation
Hi Joel,
In my opinion CSS is "The Best". Simple, easy usage, easy changes, very good speed of page load ... etc...
As I red on many forums on the internet JQuery and JS are are available for robots, so there are no contraindications to employ them.
But
CSS - better code/text ratio (no long scripts in page code)
CSS - simple usage and changes (CSS3, HTML5)
CSS - faster loading (only simple text and html)
In my opinion, now when we have HTML5 and CSS3 there is no better way - it's innovative and simple solution,
Marek
-
RE: NOINDEX or NOINDEX,FOLLOW
Hello again,
They are the same.
And I assume that interpretation is the same because default state is:
**<META NAME="ROBOTS" CONTENT="ALL"> **that means index, follow
and you can decompose every tag to parts:
<META NAME="ROBOTS" CONTENT="NOINDEX">
<META NAME="ROBOTS" CONTENT="FOLLOW">
and that tells robot to noindex, but do follow is default so if you don't use this tag robot will follow anyway.
Marek:-)
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/03/using-robots-meta-tag.html
-
RE: /%category%/%postname%/ Permalink structure
Hi Marisa,
I'm using /%postname% and in my opinion it is a best structure ... but ... in that kind of structure is important to care about slug and to prevent creation of duplicated titles.
/the-best-solution is a good slug
//the-best-solution-2 is not a good slug
I don't have duplicated pages cos WordPress has mechanism which check the slug in real time when you creating a post.
I think that /%postname% is the most friendly link structure.
It is such a hard to say something about myself ... Had been working for big corporates mainly in product development and marketing on high positions. But after time I found it highly tiring. Now I run my own business and lead a projects for every kind of companies.
Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.