Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Hi Robert,
I answered to your reply twice now, let's hope they won't show three times, SEOmoz might be having a small glitch. Anyway, I thank you very much for a fast a clear answer to my question, so now I have another name for my "Tree".
To answer your question, i noticed that there were 4 photos added, i updated the attachments to include the only good one. Both searches were made on Google.ca and not Google.com. Search terms were PAF.CA and SEOmoz.
Thanks Again,
Cheers!
I never used Yoast before, so I am not sure as to how their Canonical strategy works.
One thing I know for sure is that Yoast is not working properly on your site....
Link one: http://www.prntscr.com (not working while it should be directing to link # 2)
Link two: http://prntscr.com
The following post could be helpful:
It is one year old, but still i'd appreciate it if you let me know if it answered your question
It could be that they receive Preferred API Pricing for Adwords, but I do not believe there is a Google Preferred Agency. They'd be breaking the rules that they made:
http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=35291
Google doesn't recommend anyone, neither publicly nor under the table.
Hi Folks,
I have a newbie question:
When I do a Google search for: SEOmoz i get a SERP for SEOmoz in a form of a Tree, on the other hand if I search another company, let's say PAF.ca I get individual page results on google.
Question is: What is the difference between the two, and how do we usually ask Google to display results of a Company name in the form of a tree or Main Category with Subpages in the SERP when looking for that company name.
For my Visual Friends, Please find attached a Print screens that could explain my question a bit more.
Hi Igor,
If you're getting HTML or CSS errors, correct those errors ESPECIALLY your HTML errors...
I don't want this post to point you in the wrong direction so it's important to note the following:
Don't customize your website for search engines, customize it to provide the best user experience on all used browsers
Search Engine spiders work mainly in this direction: Google spider -> Make pages primarily for users, not for search engines. Don't deceive your users which is commonly referred to as "cloaking."
Avoid tricks intended to improve search engine rankings. A good rule of thumb is whether you'd feel comfortable explaining what you've done to a website that competes with you. Another useful test is to ask, "Does this help my users? Would I do this if search engines didn't exist?"
If these errors are related to layout, you will not be affected since most crawlers look at your site as plain text without trying to render them.
Some SEO's would tell you that CSS doesn't really matter, I say we cannot be 100% sure so to be on the safe side try to fix any non-layout related errors.
Regards,
Jean
Hi Igor,
Trojan's case from the fast check that I did there are 68 css errors, Meta Description is pretty long 500 something and missing a lot of alt tags.
Durex: If you go to a page associated to a territory or country ( i tested: http://www.durex.com/en-CA/Pages/default.aspx), it has 19 css errors, 7 warnings. No Meta Description. They are still using Meta Keywords, and they have over 150 unique links on one page.
If you use google chrome, i suggest you use SEO Site Tools plugin, it is very useful for fast on page data. Here's the link:
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/diahigjngdnkdgajdbpjdeomopbpkjjc
Best Regards,
Jean Hanna
Hi Igor,
I checked out the images and I agree with Kevin, I do not believe you need a disclaimer. As for your second question, here's what could be done:
if the pictures require a disclaimer, I suggest not using those pictures. Top 2 Condom Brands ( Trojan.ca and durex.com) are using any disclaimer, and if they don't i believe they already did their job researching on the matter.
PS: try to make the site with the least errors possible ( both durex and trojan's sites are full of errors :S Weird)
I hope I helped.
Cheers!
Jean
Hi Igor,
I checked out the images and I agree with Kevin, I do not believe you need a disclaimer. As for your second question, here's what could be done:
if the pictures require a disclaimer, I suggest not using those pictures. Top 2 Condom Brands ( Trojan.ca and durex.com) are using any disclaimer, and if they don't i believe they already did their job researching on the matter.
PS: try to make the site with the least errors possible ( both durex and trojan's sites are full of errors :S Weird)
I hope I helped.
Cheers!
Jean
