Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
You could pick an infrequently-visited page to monitor, maybe even create one just for the purpose, not accessable through normal nav but known to the test visitor, look for a direct visit to the page. Maybe name it so it's at the top of the alphabetical listing of pages in the Content section, something like that.
Real Time now obeys filters, did not previously.
If low enough volume just watch Real Time when you know someone is 'supposed' to be there.
Do searches like: pages with titles containing "links" or "resources" and niche terms.
In my experience there are two kinds of public company news: either real-time "material information" (i.e. potentially market moving, monitored by regulators) or basically PR stuff that can be planned in advance. I'd deal with the two types differently. Wouldn't worry about widely disseminating the former in just about any manner, standard operating procedure, but would treat the latter differently as described above: establish on company website first, then press release, don't syndicate.
I'd want to step back a bit and strategize, set some objectives before proceeding. Determine what outcomes are expected, and while you're at it keep in mind how changes could improve user experience.
Maybe end up consolidating if it makes sense as a way to improve rankings, possibly retire some of them by moving the content over to the main site and 301 redirecting everything.
All depends on what we're specifically talking about of course, how well do all the domains rank now (including main), what content is housed where, how does it all inter-relate logically, how much traffic does each currently get, quality of that traffic in conversion terms, consider any trends: are any of them moving up or down lately, what inter-site referral volumes are happening, all that.
To the dup content point: absolutely do not simply copy from one place to another. Hire a writer if necessary to add value by at least offering a different point of view on the material if there is any similar content in more than one place.
I believe generally the motivation in these click-along-lists is to maximize page view counts and ad impression rates, to make top-line numbers look good at the expense of user experience.
I'd suspect if anything bounce or abandonment rates are made worse with these if no other way out is offered. Some will mercifully provide a "show all" link or in this case we have a nice side menu showing the whole list.
Maybe do some re-architecting along with the cleanup.
I didn't walk thru the cart process but the site navigation at least has the look of something that's been patched and altered over time, for example: Main menu My Account and Login point to the same page so that kind of thing should be sorted, the navigation paths should be mapped and made simpler if possible.
The site could do with some copy editing. Might want to tighten up how everything is organized, and plan overall what pages are supposed to be ranking for what terms, the information seems spread around too much, it all seems a little scattered and in places a little verbose.
Here: https://www.ccisolutions.com/StoreFront/category/CLA.cat, we have a mis-used "About Us" page offering additional services descriptions instead of talking exclusively about the company.
Services overviews should be found only on their own focussed pages designed to rank for their terms.
About page should be about the company itself: who's in it, reason for being, history, function within the economy, corporate responsibility ideas, market(s) served. That kind of stuff.
My take just checking quickly.
Add a paragraph or two of fresh content, state what the item is in new terms, try differentiating more from Origenmusic.
From here: http://www.origenmusic.com/free-piano-music.html, origenmusic links to virtualsheetmusic; maybe Google is thinking the origenmusic page is the original and the virtualsheetmusic page just contains a subset of the same information without adding anything else for the user?
Thanks Marcus, the other one is nofollow as well. I'll leave 'em be but will ask the client if they're aware of any other SEO activity being done in the last couple years.
Cheers,
Peter
I have new a client with a couple dozen normal inbound links along with a 150 links between these two domains. What do you think, disavow time?
These links are not showing in OSE, but are listed by Webmaster Tools.
The cybo.com links are in sets, seems to language?, ten or so links each from
etc
For technical signals they'd have to remove any UK signals by replacing with US or neutral. Like hosting location (US) or Webmaster Tools' geographic target setting (Unlisted).
For content signals, agree: keep what already exists with possibly some revisions and/or build additional content that refers to the global nature of the business and the markets being served. Maybe home page copy that talks about "serving clients world-wide". Pages like "Top 5 Reasons Californians Visit Blackpool", and all that kind of thing indicating the page is relevant to Californians.
I see this happening in Canada. Even though in reality your business, like many in Canada, is serving a global market, Google suddenly decides your website is primarily relevant for one of the non-US English speaking markets, and so knocks it back on .com while leaving it alone on .ca (or .uk or ..au.).
My strategy would be to remove as many signals as possible that would make them think you're only serving the UK.
There can be a problem with this approach: hopefully not in your case but there may be a period where the non-.com ranking suffers as a result. I had a situation where I had a clear choice between ranking page 1 on .ca .uk .au while page 10 on .com - or on page 2 for all. Webmaster tools market setting could be flipped back and forth at will to cause either state. The only way out was to set it at page 2 for everywhere and do everything else to get back on 1 - took time and we had to accept the page 2 .ca etc ranking meanwhile.
A guess based on experience but I suspect it depends on the term, with domain working especially well for things like brands and personal names, and being less significant for generic terms.
Yes if it builds community and leads to backlinking.
Yes if it builds community and leads to backlinking.
I work mostly for companies in Canada, for those targeting only the Canadian market (vs also US or globally) I've found webmaster tools setting for 'target users' to have the biggest most immediate effect on improving Canadian company search results from within Canada.
In terms of design, I'd say the site looks pleasant but not immediately engaging/interesting/exciting, there's no strong call to do anything. The gray on gray logo text at upper left is weak. I'd think about adding a strong tagline, or something else that sells the product right away, maybe a funny/informative 'top ten reasons cheese is awesome' or 'five reasons you need to know more about cheese' or some such.
I've used this Redirection plugin a couple times on smaller sites, makes it about as easy as possible.