Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi Dunamis,

I was wondering about the same. If Google sees historical search queries using "Term A" + "Term B" would it associate both the words so strongly.. that even when only one of the search term is being used the others relevance still gets quantifies? Hard to believe Google could be going something like this.

Still an open question for now. Let's see if we get any more explanations.

Thanks Ryan for the historical wiki dig. But I doubt Google would have something so old still influence todays results (especially when the page was edited a long time ago removing all traces of the word "Beruk")

However this could be one of the possible explanations.

The term "Beruk" which means "Ape or Monkey" in english brings up this page of wikipedia amongst the first page result: URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khairy_Jamaluddin

The page does not contain the word "Beruk".

External links to the page do not contact the anchor-text "Beruk"

Given the above scenario, how is the page still ranking on first page for this keyword?