Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Thanks for your answerk, but I don't think this can be the solition.

The problem is that Google is indexing urls with parameters, so, I can see in SERPS those urls indexed despite the canonical

www.myweb.com/url123?type=3

www.myweb.com/url123

But in code you can see:

www.myweb.com/url123?type=3 has the rel="canonical" href="//myweb.com/url123" />

Hello Moz,

Google is indexing lots of urls despite the canonical in my site. Those urls are linked all over the site with parameters like ?, and looks like Google is indexing them despite de canonical. Is Google deciding to index those urls because they are linked all over the site? The canonical tag is well implemented.

Hi Erica

first of all, thks for answering!! I will read the link you sent to me in order to find a solution (at least to try it). I know It will be hard to save all shares though,

Kind regards

Francesca

Hi there,

I am going to change my current blog from subdomain to subfolder.

Obviously, I am going to apply a permanent redirection (301) since all URL will change...I have a doubt related to all share bottoms. Currently I use plugins in order to show the total number of shares (on Facebook...on Twitter etc.) of my posts. So, by changing all URLs, will I lose all my data? I mean, would It be possible to save them?

Thanks in advance for helping!!

Kind regards.

Francesca

I've understood where the problem was..

It was not a content problem, but something related with a "modal" we have put a couple of weeks ago...Thanks anyway!

Now I have everything under control

Greetings

Francesca

Hi there...

I have the same problem, since 24Th of August 2013 I have around 2000/5000 errors (it depends on subdomains...) of duplicate page content...for this reason, I am taking advantage of this question..

The MOZ Crawler says (I put just one example)

http://es.tiching.com/clasificacion-de-los-seres-inertes/recurso-educativo/35632

has similar/identical content to

http://es.tiching.com/primaria/tercero/medio-natural-y-social/sc/195

But, have jut put both on "Similar page Checker" and the result is: ** 9% percentage similar**

http://www.webconfs.com/similar-page-checker.php

I guess this percentage is normal since the second one is a results page, instead the first one is just 1 content....

I have many like that but I really did not understand why, moreover I put canonical tag, both to the same page.

A >>> canonical >> A

B >>> canonical >>> B

Tks for helping and have a great day!!!

Francesca

Hi Wissam an CleverPhD!

I am totally agreed with you, actually I'm going to implement this solution.

Metarobots "noindex, nofollow" isn't at all effective, If you already have a lot of HTTPS URLS version indexed....

Thanks!!!

Francesca

Hi All!

I have a doubt about how to fix the duplication problem https @ http. What is the better way to fix it in your opionion/experience? Me, for instance, I have chosen to put "noindex, nofollow" into https version. Each page of my site has a https version so I put this metarobots into it....But I am not sure about what happens with all backlinks with "https" URLs I have, I've just checked I have some...What do you think about it?

Thanks in advance for helping!

Thank you very much!

Francesca

I've found the solution. The problem was that did not put any closing tag into the HTML code....

Hi Kristin,

Each sitemap.xml can support maximum 50.000 URLs. So, If you have a site with more than 100K, It'd be better to create 2 or 3 o 4 etc sitemaps.xml in order to contain all URLs. Hope it is useful.

Kind regards!

Francesca

Hi Jørgen.

At the moment, I will apply rel ="prev" | rel="next" in order to set up pagination...currently pagination has "noindex, follow". I agree with you about "view all", I think it's the best option, in the future I'd like to set it up...

Thx for replying!!

Francesca

Hi there:

I have a doubt about how using the pagination and rel prev | rel next, I will try to sum up this example of pagination:

the page number 1 is SEO friendly in order to index it, It also gets metarobots: index, follow.

The other ones (pagination), instead, have noindex, follow. In fact, these URLs are not SEO friendly because of they have the parameter "?"  to set up pagination, so for this reason, in the past, It has been decided not to index them.

Would you suggest also to use rel="prev" rel="next" in this situation? Or would it be better to set up the others ones (pagination) in "SEO friendly" and then, to set up the rel prev | rel next?

Thanks a lot in advance for helping

Greetings

Francesca