I would not worry about multiple H1 as a major issue .( as long you are not over doing it )
MattCutts :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIn5qJKU8VM&feature=player_embedded&noredirect=1
Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
I would not worry about multiple H1 as a major issue .( as long you are not over doing it )
MattCutts :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIn5qJKU8VM&feature=player_embedded&noredirect=1
If you can show the image on the page then do that . I think it would be better for users too instead of an unwanted click to open up another page which takes them away from your products page.
Perhaps you can add one as a subcategory . If you cater for shirts from many brands you could have
Shirts >> Gucci
If you offer various Gucci Products You could have
Gucci >> Shirts
Its also perfectly fine to have both of them as main categories as long as they don't both offer the exact same content .. eg: you only show 10 items on a page and you have 10 shirts all of them Gucci then it could be seen as a duplicate page
I am not really sure what you want to get done. If you want to display the "certificate of authenticity" as an image you can JPG.
No Worries .. I was referring to the avatar pic you use
Someone is a happy Panda ^_^
If you have structured you site well and don't go overboard with Categories / Tags then by all means leave them to be indexed BUT make sure to add a Title and Description for each of those Categories and Tags.
With Media I find it useful to index them .. made sure you add a alt tag for you images and add relevant titles for them.
Author Archives : If it's a single person blog then I would suggest to avoid using them and add a noindex to author archives BUT since your wife contributes to the blog my advice is to leave them as indexable ( make sure you add a Title and Description for this as well)
Adding a NOFOLLOW will tell the bot not to follow any links from that page. I usually don't add that.
Other than the obvious reply of your client editing the listing to show that . It could have something to do with Google's effort to craft titles depending on what they think is the best fit ( it could be expanding in to Local too ? MY Speculation )
I dont see why you need to rel canonical the page to itself .
I believe you can get in touch with the dev team here to get them to fix this issue .
Hi Kevin
so its not just me then .. I will update the post with any info I get
Thanks mate ... its been a couple of weeks now.
Is there a certain limit that you have to hit before the profile picture becomes visible ? I can see it on my blog profile but in Q&A its the default image
Some browsers might hide the www and htttp part from the url . Just to make sure pop your sites url in there ( http://www.webconfs.com/http-header-check.php ) and see if there is a redirect.
Rel canonical : does NOT redirect the pages .. its just there for search engine bots. Think of it this way
You would want to use rel canonical where you need to show the duplicate pages for users .. eg : on a shopping website sort by A-Z , by Price , Z-A, etc could all display the same things in different order BUT users benefits from having those so use a rel canonical there to tell the spider its all the same version of your " original page " . There is no redirects here users can see all the multiple versions of the page. If they are redirected what is the use of sorting those results ?
I would also like to know why OSE does that ( some one from the staff could possibly answer that )
In regards to your question : Should my non WWW be redirecting to my WWW ?
You should only allow one version it can either be non WWW or WWW. In your case stick with the one that has more authority and do a 301 redirect for the other one.
In regards to your question : Why am I getting two different domain authority and backlink counts ?
For Google www.yoursite.com and yoursite.com are 2 different sites on the same domain.
Hope that made things more clear for you
Glad you sorted it out.Thumbs up for posting your solution here
No worries .. If you happen to come across a better strategy .. do drop me a line . I would be interested to try it out ^_^
It depends on what you want out of it ? Do you have a new product / service and want to create buzz for it ? Then if you go with the right right press release package .. you might catch some journalists attention who might approach you for a story .
Pro Tips : Target Local Outlets , make sure the press release goes out at a time when people usually reads the news.
If you are after backlinks .. most outlets might no follow the links , have a text version of the press release out AND the press release is usually posted in its own section .. go through some of the older post and see what kind of Page Authority ( not Doamin Authority ) those pages have . Not much I would bet.
.. I follow a simple rule when it comes to link .. the harder to get the link the more valuable it usually is .
Pro Tip : The easiest quality backlink you can usually get is a well written blog post on blogs that accept guest posts. ( try to find something in your niche try searching for
You have recently changed it so give it some time .
301 with "follow" ? I don't think I have heard that one before. AFAIK 301 pass link juice .. there is no way to set follow.
You have recently changed it so give it some time . Also IMHO if you want to rank for diving 1 would have been a better option ( assuming everything else stays the same )
Ideally it would be individual pages for those cities with unique content. I would include the content to talk a bit about those suburbs + what you guys offer in those suburbs.
You have not provided enough data to give any specific advice ( what niche, links to competitors to see what they are doing ,etc ) but
When you have a new product and no likes .. having a couple of hundred likes on your page might encourage others to like it as well. BUT would I advice getting it ? NO
Like the other mentioned
Your page http://www.davidclick.com/ ranks better than the others ( I just had a quicklook, only looking at the page authority from moztoolbar ).
I would use canonical where you need the 3 duplicate pages for users ( In this case that is not the case ) .. eg : on a shopping website sort by A-Z , by Price , Z-A, etc could all display the same things in different order BUT users benefits from having those so use a rel canonical there.
In your case there is no real need for the 3 separate pages , so I would use .htaccess and do a permanent redirect to http://www.davidclick.com/
Hope that helps
My Theory is
So Google combines them in to one .
I know this is an old post but .. Just a heads up the video was from 2009
if you do make sure it is cross-domain rel="canonical"
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com.au/2009/12/handling-legitimate-cross-domain.html
If you have 301ed it I would not worry about the .net dupes
With pagination if you have correctly implemented rel="next" and rel="prev" , you should be fine . But one issue I have seen with my clients is that , eCommerce sites usually have multiple ways to sort pages
all these are duplicate content if you have not used rel="Canonical" . Hope this helps you out
To make navigations easier you could use breadcrumbs. So when the result show up in SERPS you can get
Home > Category > Post
and the breadcrumbs should also be prominently displayed on the site. I believe it heps spiders and users alike in figuring out the contents structure on your site.
In regards to the proposed structure .. is the category a keyword you would like to target on those pages ? For example if you have Home/Melbourne/CafeHome/Melbourne/MoviesIt would make sense to include Melbourne in there if you are targeting that location .But for something likeHome/News/Keyword-Post-Title Home/News/Keyword-Post-Title2Where your keywords are formed in the post title rather than the category , I would leave it out.One other thing to consider is when changing the structure , you should follow the best practices and make sure you redirect the old ones to the new ones . This is a good starting place : http://www.seomoz.org/blog/should-i-change-my-urls-for-seoAt the end of the day , it depends on what content you offer and you alone can make the decision .. if having the category in the url will help you rank better
I will not say it's of no value at all ... it probably has some value to it but if you are link building that is probably not the way to push forward in the future . Try looking in to Content Marketing and work towards pushing out quality -sharable content ( I know it's easier said than done , but there a re some nice beginners guide on the blog here to get you started on it.. ). Hope that helps
Saijo George
I would use rel="canonical" to example.com/inventory.php
on
This should cover you for pagination : http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com.au/2011/09/pagination-with-relnext-and-relprev.html
Main thing to do is consider if you want the video to rank ? or your page with the video to rank ?
having it on youtube means ( in most cases ) the video content on youtube will rank in serp over the content on your site . But if you have it on your server you can tag it properly to let the video snippet show up for your page in the serp.( which could increase the CTR )
Hope this helps you to make your decision.
Perhaps add a no follow to the imageand move the link above the image . Currently you might have
you need to make it something like
<a <strong="">rel="nofollow" href="product.php"></a>
It sounds like you have your work cut out either way you have to either
it boils down to which one would be the easier of the two. One other thing to note is if you have build you brand around the old site , you have to start from scratch on the new one.
Perhaps if you are offering those products as a special deal called " Deal of the Week " then have a page which says " example.com/deal-of-the-week " and get the content on that page and when you update the deal update the content on that page .. so over time that page will have a strong authority