Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Not sure what you mean "https site". I tend to use https pages for secure areas where users are logged in or are about to submit data.

Therefore http are generally better for ranking as they are public pages.

In the construction of the site make sure pages are allocated to https or http rather than have a duplicate version of the site on either. You will need to check with your hosting whether it is possible to do this.

If it was me I would have different blogs. Any chance of cross selling in SM? Corporate people get married and vice versa. Really depends on your content strategy, resources and what you believe you can achieve in either space via SM. Can't see any SEO issues - except on the blog side.

in essence it tells Google it is that page so removes it from the index

Chris is right. The issue is that you won't have control of which version gets in the results - which one people link to or share via social media. You won't get a penalty but you would be best to get rid of the duplicates using 301s and rel=canonical - this will get the issue sorted the quickest and the page will get the maximum benefit from shares and links.

be careful with rel=canonical

your homepage would be: <link rel="<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank">canonical</a>" href="http://www.colourbanners.co.uk">

then lower page 1: <link rel="<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank">canonical</a>" href="http://www.colourbanners.co.uk/lower-page-1.htm">

then lower page 2: <link rel="<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank">canonical</a>" href="http://www.colourbanners.co.uk/lower-page-2.htm">

do not put the same tag across all pages

With Google it depends on a range of factors. The URLs will be removed from the index once Google crawls them again.

If I was you I would still implement <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="full URL of page"> in the head section - note the URL should be the www version of the page and must change to the URL of the page you are on.

Have no idea how long Moz takes.

you'll need to 301 redirect http://www.colourbanners.co.uk/index.htm and http://www.colourbanners.co.uk/index.html to http://www.colourbanners.co.uk/ to avoid duplicate homepages

Hi Kelly,

Also consider making sitemaps if:

• you have alternate versions of the website - like a mobile version for example
• you are using video content on the website

With the video content a sitemap will help you get a thumbnail in the results which can attract more clicks - especially with your how to type articles. If you are using a service like Wistia.com it's very easy to create a Video Sitemap.

Hi Chris,

Take a look at some of Aleyda's posts: http://moz.com/community/users/14053

Working on an international project and am using a combination of country level domains: .co.uk. .de etc. and folders on a .org domain i.e. domain.org/italia. It kind of depends on the size of the operation and budget available.

Most advice I found was don't do it.domain.org.

Ok. I would set up these tags:

https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/189077?hl=en

can't see them on the site...

Hi,

Can you do me a favour?

Open an incognito window in chrome and repeat the search on www.google.ee

then add &pws=0 to the end of the url for the results and hit enter.

Do you still have the same problem?

You could update the older posts (making sure the new internal links are not overly SEO'd) and then ask your programmer to turn off date display on all posts more than 3 months old. Users then arriving on the posts will not be bouncing because they see it as an "old" post and will benefit from your updated content.

Hi,

I'd use Wistia.com (you can get a discount from Pro Perks) and it will generate a sitemap for you plus attribute your website as the original source of the content. And it looks way more professional than YouTube.

Hi Chris,

Take a look at some of Aleyda's posts: http://moz.com/community/users/14053

Working on an international project and am using a combination of country level domains: .co.uk. .de etc. and folders on a .org domain i.e. domain.org/italia. It kind of depends on the size of the operation and budget available.

Most advice I found was don't do it.domain.org.

In my opinion, duplicate content is one of those things people get unnecessarily hung up about. I think it is about control. Duplication means loss of control - Google will choose which version to display in the results.

For video, keep the full or extended versions on your domain. Syndicate the teasers or ads everywhere. That way you keep control and meet the aim of driving traffic to your site

I guess it really depends how old the "old posts" are.

If the posts are relatively recent, "sprucing" up the blog posts to make them more readable and more engaging is a possibility (and maybe a good idea if the original was not well written).

It might be better and more natural to write new posts on the topic which add value to the original butink back to the older posts as a point of reference. This should improve the positioning for the long tail on the old posts and is

I would not recommend transparent activity like going back to the old posts stuffing them full of keywords and a couple of keyword rich links to other parts of the site - Google will see you are trying to game the system and most likely discount any potential benefit.

I might have misunderstood the question but what really matters is how you get to the content not necessarily the URL structure (relevancy required - no spam please).

Given this "freshness" aspect i.e. recent links / social shares will enhance the opportunities for this particular page to appear in the results (given other SEO boxes are "ticked"), the "extra" folders will not matter.

301 them to the parent page in that category

Hi,

We have an issue with a particular channel on a lead generation site where we have  sales staff requiring different quality of leads in different parts of the country. In saturated markets they require a stricter lead qualification process than those in more challenging markets.

To combat the problem I am toying with the idea of severing very slightly different content based on IP address. The main change in content would be in terms of calls to action and lead qualification processes.

We would plan to have a "standard" version of the site for when IP location can not be detected. URLs on this version would be the rel="canonical" for the location specific pages.

Is there a way to do this without creating duplicate content, cloaking or other such issues on the site?

Any advice, theories or case studies would be greatly appreciated.

Hi, I think as you offer translation services, you have an especially strong need to have real people translate the relevant parts of the website (rather than software).

With regards to geo-targeting in webmaster tools. The suggestion is to geo-target the /es folder rather than just a page. So all the Spanish elements are targeted within that folder.

Resources permitting and having a good understanding of your / your client's markets I would suggest extending this to the other Spanish speaking countries you are targeting. The nuances of language are enough to warrant this and it is an opportunity to demonstrate expertise in translation.

Links from a holding page won't help. Drop the concept. Forget short-cuts. Invest in decent content. Push that content and reap the rewards